Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] perl5.10.1 segfault when trying to send an email

2012-06-24 Thread Rick Macdougall

On 23/06/2012 6:23 PM, Stéphane Dupont wrote:

Thank you, it worked!

... it was 4000, I put 4. Isn't it too much ? What's the
implication of this ?



Yah, that's a little high unless you have 16 gigs of ram in the machine. 
 The implication is a DDOS using up all your ram.


I use 1200 on my machines without a problem.

Having you add an extra zero was just a quick way of checking to see if 
qmail-queue had enough ram to launch simscan and clamd.


Regards,

Rick


!DSPAM:4fe70dcd34181476212059!



Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] perl5.10.1 segfault when trying to send an email

2012-06-24 Thread Stéphane Dupont
Thank you.

I tried to change 40 000 000 to 60 000 000, seems to be enough. It
seems that my new installation needs a higher soft limit because I
went from a 32bits architecture to a 64bits one...

Again, thank you!


On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Rick Macdougall ri...@ummm-beer.com wrote:
 On 23/06/2012 6:23 PM, Stéphane Dupont wrote:

 Thank you, it worked!

 ... it was 4000, I put 4. Isn't it too much ? What's the
 implication of this ?


 Yah, that's a little high unless you have 16 gigs of ram in the machine.
  The implication is a DDOS using up all your ram.

 I use 1200 on my machines without a problem.

 Having you add an extra zero was just a quick way of checking to see if
 qmail-queue had enough ram to launch simscan and clamd.

 Regards,

 Rick


 


!DSPAM:4fe70ed734183329779156!