Limiting amount of email addresses a user can send an email to

2001-03-09 Thread Leonardo Magallon

Hey guys,
   how can I set limits so my users can only send to as many as X number of
people per email they compose?

Regards,

Leo.




Re: qmail

2001-02-13 Thread Leonardo Magallon



That address DOES work.
Serkan wrote:

Hi
all,I want to install
qmail. The address of http://cr.yp.to/software/qmail-1.03.tar.gz
doesn't work. Do you know another link for qmail?





Next 5.0 features

2001-02-05 Thread Leonardo Magallon

Not related to vpopmail but since you guys do qmailadmin as well here it goes.

It would be nice for qmailadmin to report when was the last time the user
visited his account so that on large systems one could delete non-active
accounts.

My 2 cents.

Leo.





Re: Don't sweat the small stuff.

2000-12-08 Thread Leonardo Magallon

Very well said Matt.

I think that of all the open source Mail Code out , the combination of 
qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin+sqwebmail is the best of all.  REALLY.

Don't let kids or grown ups that like to behave like kids spoil your 
efforts or the things you believe in.  Besides who are they to 
critizice when they haven't taken the time to publish code that is open 
to be critizicism and be able to correct their mistakes.  They don't 
know or don't realize how wrong they are.

Regards,

Leo.

- Original Message -
From: "Matt Simerson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, December 7, 2000 11:48 am
Subject: Don't sweat the small stuff.

 Ken (et al),
 
 First, and foremost, why do you care what the script kiddies on 
 #openbsd say
 about your code? Seriously. Most of the people that loiter around 
 on irc
 channels are either extremely competent people who have gravy jobs 
 and can
 sit around and talk about all the cool stuff they've done. These 
 are the 1
 to 2 people on the channel that really know their stuff and then 
 you have
 the their throng of wanna be's soaking up the gospel from their 
 cult hero or
 two. You can try all you want but you aren't going to change them. 
 In time
 they'll begin to mature and begin the process of learning just how 
 much they
 don't know. 
 
 If that's not enough, you pick the openbsd channel where (not 
 unlike that of
 most openbsd users) opinions of "code quality" is about as anal 
 rententiveas you'll find on the planet. I'm not in favor of 
 Microsoft style code
 quality but there is a point of dimishing returns. I ofter throw 
 thingstogether "quick and dirty" because it doesn't matter if it's 
 not done the
 best way. When I write a script that I run one time, I spend 5 minutes
 writing it (instead of 15) because it doesn't matter if it takes a 
 minute to
 execute versus 10 seconds. 
 
 You also need to remember that the overwhelming majority of people 
 on IRC
 are kids. Literally, a bunch of little computer weenies running 
 around with
 soggy ears and diapers. Not unlike most teenagers, they know 
 everything and
 are more than willing to tell you all about it. Let them ramble 
 on. What
 they say is almost assuredly out of ignorance and in time, they 
 too will see
 the folly in their ways.
 
 If you want to measure the success of your project, ask people 
 that use the
 software. Talk to guys like me, I'll tell you all about it. I've 
 build more
 mail servers than there are script kiddies on that channel. I've 
 used nearly
 everything MTA, MDA, and MUA that exists. I'm sure that within 
 your ranks,
 I'm not the only very good, very smart, and highly clued systems
 architect/engineesome productive feedback. 
 
 Vpopmail users have a vested interest in the code. Some of us 
 appreciatethat it's open source. I've gone through quite a bit of 
 effort to help
 document it. Have you seen my FreeBSD + Qmail + Vpopmail HOWTO?  
 Take a look
 at it: http://matt.simerson.net/computing/qmail.toaster.shtml. Put 
 a link to
 it on the vpopmail page. It's an excellent HOWTO and I know 
 several guys
 have already built mail servers based on those instructions. 
 That's a
 testimony to code quality. 
 
 Even if it doesn't meet the yardstick of a bunch of script 
 kiddies, the
 software does the job it's intended it to do. When bugs creep out 
 we post
 them to the list. So far every issue I've had has been addressed. 
 Grantedsometimes I have to wait a week or two but that's nothing 
 compared to the
 length of time I've waited for some other software companies to 
 fix their
 bugs. That testifies that at some levels, the open source project is
 working.
 
 Last, pulling the source code is the last thing you should ever 
 do. Either
 you release it or you don't. If you don't then you're pissing on 
 us, your
 users, and those that have contributed time to making the software 
 betterwithout collecting a paycheck for doing so. You are 
 punishing the wrong
 people. We're on your team and deserve better treatment than that. 
 
 Matt
 
 On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Ken Jones wrote:
 
  I'm sorry. 
  
  The source code will be put back on the site within the next
  24 hours. I apologize for the temporary lack of availablilty.
  
  Unfortunatly, i was conversing with people on #efnet on the
  openbsd channel, and they insulted me deeply. I can not 
  begin to describe how deeply I was offeneded. It was not
  one thing or another thing, just the small attitudes of
  a small group of people.
  
  I would suggested you joing irc.east.gblx.net and go to
  the #openbsd channel and say at least something.
  
  The code will be put back up on the site soon. Better
  than ever. We are dedicated to providing open source 
  software to the internet. 
  
  It's just, some times, I get really ticked off when 
  stupid kids tell me how bad my code is. And I know 
  they don't understand. Sorry.
  
  If you really want to make a difference, do something
  to change something. I'm put the 

Re: Don't sweat the small stuff.

2000-12-08 Thread Leonardo Magallon

How about fixing the Makefile and submitting yours to the developers?

Leo.

Dan Phoenix wrote:

 dude i have it setup but not without problems
 having to add -lmysqlclient etc should have been done in Makefile

 On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, hari_bhr wrote:

  Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 19:51:21 +0530
  From: hari_bhr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Dan Phoenix [EMAIL PROTECTED],
   Leonardo Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: Matt Simerson [EMAIL PROTECTED],
   "Vpopmail (E-mail)" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: Don't sweat the small stuff.
 
  hi
 
  why do use all these lang's
  please go through the news group and faq and install
 
  this is not fare, the programs are working with several people
  iam not understading why not with u
 
  there may be small issues regarding config
  please check and fix
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Dan Phoenix [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Leonardo Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: Matt Simerson [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Vpopmail (E-mail)
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 7:36 PM
  Subject: Re: Don't sweat the small stuff.
 
 
  
   I have no bitches other than with sqlwebmail can;t even compile
   half the time. I think sqwebmail should be only one made more compile
   friendly with vpopmail and mysqlthat would be greatly appreciated
   from many people.
  
  
  
   On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Leonardo Magallon wrote:
  
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 08:04:45 -0600
From: Leonardo Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Matt Simerson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Vpopmail (E-mail)" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Don't sweat the small stuff.
   
Very well said Matt.
   
I think that of all the open source Mail Code out , the combination of
qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin+sqwebmail is the best of all.  REALLY.
   
Don't let kids or grown ups that like to behave like kids spoil your
efforts or the things you believe in.  Besides who are they to
critizice when they haven't taken the time to publish code that is open
to be critizicism and be able to correct their mistakes.  They don't
know or don't realize how wrong they are.
   
Regards,
   
Leo.
   
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Simerson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, December 7, 2000 11:48 am
Subject: Don't sweat the small stuff.
   
 Ken (et al),

 First, and foremost, why do you care what the script kiddies on
 #openbsd say
 about your code? Seriously. Most of the people that loiter around
 on irc
 channels are either extremely competent people who have gravy jobs
 and can
 sit around and talk about all the cool stuff they've done. These
 are the 1
 to 2 people on the channel that really know their stuff and then
 you have
 the their throng of wanna be's soaking up the gospel from their
 cult hero or
 two. You can try all you want but you aren't going to change them.
 In time
 they'll begin to mature and begin the process of learning just how
 much they
 don't know.

 If that's not enough, you pick the openbsd channel where (not
 unlike that of
 most openbsd users) opinions of "code quality" is about as anal
 rententiveas you'll find on the planet. I'm not in favor of
 Microsoft style code
 quality but there is a point of dimishing returns. I ofter throw
 thingstogether "quick and dirty" because it doesn't matter if it's
 not done the
 best way. When I write a script that I run one time, I spend 5 minutes
 writing it (instead of 15) because it doesn't matter if it takes a
 minute to
 execute versus 10 seconds.

 You also need to remember that the overwhelming majority of people
 on IRC
 are kids. Literally, a bunch of little computer weenies running
 around with
 soggy ears and diapers. Not unlike most teenagers, they know
 everything and
 are more than willing to tell you all about it. Let them ramble
 on. What
 they say is almost assuredly out of ignorance and in time, they
 too will see
 the folly in their ways.

 If you want to measure the success of your project, ask people
 that use the
 software. Talk to guys like me, I'll tell you all about it. I've
 build more
 mail servers than there are script kiddies on that channel. I've
 used nearly
 everything MTA, MDA, and MUA that exists. I'm sure that within
 your ranks,
 I'm not the only very good, very smart, and highly clued systems
 architect/engineesome productive feedback.

 Vpopmail users have a vested interest in the code. Some of us
 appreciatethat it's open source. I've gone through quite a bit of
 effort to help
 document it. Have you seen my FreeBSD + Qmail + Vpopmail HOWTO?
 Take a look
 at it: http://matt.simerson.net/computing/qmail.toaster.shtml. Put
 a link to
 it on the vpopmail page. It

Re: small bug in vpopmail-4.9.5/vmoduser.c

2000-10-26 Thread Leonardo Magallon

My ~vpopmail/bin/vuserinfo does not display any of the stuff yours has
Daniel.
I have qmail/vpopmail-latest/nomysql.

Daniel Augusto Fernandes wrote:

 Hello,

 I think I've corrected a small bug in vmoduser. Look here:

 [daftm@catope vpopmail-4.9.5]$ ~vpopmail/bin/vuserinfo
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 name:   daftm
 passwd: #
 uid:1
 gid:0
 all services available
 gecos:  Daniel Augusto Fernandes
 dir:/home/vpopmail/domains/epostal.com.br/G/daftm
 quota:  5242880
 [daftm@catope vpopmail-4.9.5]$ ~vpopmail/bin/vmoduser -p
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [daftm@catope vpopmail-4.9.5]$ ~vpopmail/bin/vuserinfo
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 name:   daftm
 passwd: #
 uid:1
 gid:2
 pop access closed
 gecos:  Daniel Augusto Fernandes
 dir:/home/vpopmail/domains/epostal.com.br/G/daftm
 quota:  5242880
 [daftm@catope vpopmail-4.9.5]$ ~vpopmail/bin/vmoduser -x
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [daftm@catope vpopmail-4.9.5]$ ~vpopmail/bin/vuserinfo
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 name:   daftm
 passwd: #
 uid:1
 gid:2
 pop access closed
 gecos:  Daniel Augusto Fernandes
 dir:/home/vpopmail/domains/epostal.com.br/G/daftm
 quota:  5242880

 So, this is what I did:

 [daftm@catope vpopmail-4.9.5]$ diff vmoduser.c vmoduser.c.old
 130c130
NoMakeIndex = 1;
 ---
NoMakeIndex = 0;
 133c133
ClearFlags = 1;
 ---
ClearFlags = 0;

 The 'NoMakeIndex' is another thing I thought I should correct... :o)

 [daftm@catope vpopmail-4.9.5]$ ~vpopmail/bin/vuserinfo
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 name:   daftm
 passwd: #
 uid:1
 gid:2
 pop access closed
 gecos:  Daniel Augusto Fernandes
 dir:/home/vpopmail/domains/epostal.com.br/G/daftm
 quota:  5242880
 [daftm@catope vpopmail-4.9.5]$ ~vpopmail/bin/vmoduser -x
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [daftm@catope vpopmail-4.9.5]$ ~vpopmail/bin/vuserinfo
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 name:   daftm
 passwd: #
 uid:1
 gid:0
 all services available
 gecos:  Daniel Augusto Fernandes
 dir:/home/vpopmail/domains/epostal.com.br/G/daftm
 quota:  5242880

 I am trying to add some of these features (vuserinfo/vmoduser) in
 qmailadmin!

 
 Daniel Augusto Fernandes (DAF tm)   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 GCSNethttp://www.gcsnet.com.br/
 
  Se você não encontra
  o sentido das coisas
  é porque este não
  se encontra, se cria.
Antoine Saint-Exupéry




Vpopmail+mysql + Sqwebmail won't authenticate pop3

2000-09-30 Thread Leonardo Magallon

Well, I thought I'd be able to migrate my vpopmail+sqwebmail to
vpopmail+mysql+sqwebmail but it didn't work.

I did vpopmail as follows,

./configure [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--enable-tcprules-prog=/usr/local/bin/tcprules --enable-log-name=vpopmail
--enable-vpopuser=vpopmail --enable-vpopgroup=vchkpw
--enable-default-domain=mydomain.com --enable-mysql=y --enable-passwd=n
--enable-harquota=700 --enable-tcpserver-file=/home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp

I did edit the vmysql.h file and changed the password for the user .

To make a long story short mysql is obvously not working.

When a client is trying to pop3-in he gets a "could not connect to mysql" and
the log says
 vpopmail[17932]: vchkpw: No virt found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:ip.or.the.person

I believe I have entered everything right.

And also if an email is sent to anyone in the system , the system rejects the
email with the following error.

qmail: 970290648.481591 delivery 6: failure: could_not_connect_to_mysql_server/v

sql_getpw:_failed_select/vsql_getpw:_failed_select/Reason_for_failure:_/Unknown_local_POP_user_/home

/vpopmail/domains/domain.com/user

I'm running sqwebmail 1.0 and vpopmail.4.9.3a.

Thanks for the help in advance,

Leo.