Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.23 vadduser segfaults
I am still working with our web designer for the inter7 development page. There is more than just pointing at source forge. So for the time being I will keep it up to date manually. Ken On Thursday 21 August 2003 4:12 pm, Tom Collins wrote: On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 01:48 PM, Paul L. Allen wrote: Any ideas (better still, fixes) would be appreciated. Please use 5.3.24 from SourceForge http://sourceforge.net/projects/vpopmail/. Ken, please update http://inter7.com/develop.html to point to SourceForge for qmailadmin and vpopmail downloads. -- Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sniffter.com/ - info on the Sniffter hand-held Network Tester
Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.23 vadduser segfaults
- Original Message - From: Paul L. Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 6:48 AM Subject: [vchkpw] 5.3.23 vadduser segfaults I upgraded from 5.2.1 to 5.3.23 recently to get a fix for the bug in vchkpw that stopped the authdaemond authentication working. I found that vadduser has a segmentation fault when I try to add a user (no switchs used). Paul, That bug was fixed in vpopmail-5.3.24 (available from http://sourceforge.net/projects/vpopmail ) Michael.
Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.23 vadduser segfaults
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 01:48 PM, Paul L. Allen wrote: Any ideas (better still, fixes) would be appreciated. Please use 5.3.24 from SourceForge http://sourceforge.net/projects/vpopmail/. Ken, please update http://inter7.com/develop.html to point to SourceForge for qmailadmin and vpopmail downloads. -- Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sniffter.com/ - info on the Sniffter hand-held Network Tester
RE: [vchkpw] 5.3.23 vadduser segfaults
Tom, Wouldn't 5.2.2 be better to use rather then 5.3.24? Thanks! Tom -Original Message- From: Tom Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 5:13 PM To: vpopmail list Cc: Ken Jones Subject: Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.23 vadduser segfaults On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 01:48 PM, Paul L. Allen wrote: Any ideas (better still, fixes) would be appreciated. Please use 5.3.24 from SourceForge http://sourceforge.net/projects/vpopmail/. Ken, please update http://inter7.com/develop.html to point to SourceForge for qmailadmin and vpopmail downloads. -- Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sniffter.com/ - info on the Sniffter hand-held Network Tester
Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.23 vadduser segfaults
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 04:01 PM, Tom Predmore wrote: Wouldn't 5.2.2 be better to use rather then 5.3.24? I'm personally still using 5.3.20 on my production machine (I haven't gotten around to upgrading it to 5.3.24 and recompiling courier, qmailadmin and qmail-smtp-chkuser). Has anyone out there upgraded to 5.2.2 from 5.2.1? I classified it as beta on the SourceForge site because we haven't tested it very thoroughly. It is primarily made up of bugfixes ported from the 5.3 series, but we could have introduced some new problems. -- Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sniffter.com/ - info on the Sniffter hand-held Network Tester
Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.23 vadduser segfaults
I think even though you introduced new problems, they are most probably in newest features. I also use 5.3.20 but I didnt enable the features which has just been invented in newest releases. This approach works great for me. I didnt have a single bug related problem in 5.3.20. :) Great work! Evren On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Tom Collins wrote: On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 04:01 PM, Tom Predmore wrote: Wouldn't 5.2.2 be better to use rather then 5.3.24? I'm personally still using 5.3.20 on my production machine (I haven't gotten around to upgrading it to 5.3.24 and recompiling courier, qmailadmin and qmail-smtp-chkuser). Has anyone out there upgraded to 5.2.2 from 5.2.1? I classified it as beta on the SourceForge site because we haven't tested it very thoroughly. It is primarily made up of bugfixes ported from the 5.3 series, but we could have introduced some new problems. -- Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sniffter.com/ - info on the Sniffter hand-held Network Tester
