Re: [vchkpw] realrcppto

2004-01-22 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
There should be no problem, except some flags (I don't remember exactly 
which) that may be missing in the 5.2 vpopmail headers.

I suggest to try, and eventually modify the code where necessary.

Write me if you have any problems.

Ciao,

Tonino

At 21/01/2004 21/01/2004 -0500, Rick Macdougall wrote:


Martin wrote:

http://www.interazioni.it/qmail/#qmail-smtpd

Works great here.

Regards,

Rick
Hello Rick.
I'd like to hear more about this from other people, ie. who has tried it, 
opinions etc.
I note that on the web page, the patch version is given for vpopmail 
5.3.6 
5.3.25.  These are development versions and the last stable is vpopmail 
v5.2.2.
Has anyone tried it on 5.2.2 stable (on a production system) and what 
version patch did they use ?
Hi,

Never tried it against 5.2.2 but there should be no reason it wouldn't 
work since it is a qmail-smtpd patch, not a vpopmail patch.

I personally have it running on about 30 or 40 servers running 5.3.20 and 
I believe 2 servers running 5.4.0-rc2 (or what ever the latest release 
is).  Everything just works.

As for version of the patch, I normally use Bill Shupp's qmail-toaster 
patch and his modified version of the chkusr patch available from 
www.shupp.org (Thanks Bill!).

Regards,

Rick

[EMAIL PROTECTED]Interazioni di Antonio Nati
   http://www.interazioni.it [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [vchkpw] realrcppto

2004-01-21 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 14:14, Martin wrote:
 Hello.
 
 URL:http://multivac.cwru.edu./qmail/#realrcptto
 
 I have tried this on a basic qmail installation, and it works fine.  
 Basically, it holds the SMTP open whilst it checks if the user or .qmail 
 control files exists.  If not, it gives a:
 550 sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1)
 and closes the SMTP connection.
 
 Looking at the vpopmail directories, I had a .qmail-default with the bounce no 
 mailbox so I renamed this and created Two control files   .qmail-marrandy and 
 .qmail-martin with delivery instructions for the Two users.  I get deliveries 
 to these accounts but qmail/vpopmail still takes delivery of bogus usernames 
 and then bounces them later.
 
 I am obviously missing something, but despite checking around, can't see why 
 it isn't working.

that patch just checks to see if there's a .qmail file to handle the
delivery.  It doesn't actually attempt delivery at that time. 
Therefore, vpopmail can't say hey, that mailbox doesn't exist.

If you're running a vpopmail only machine, that patch is useless.

-Jeremy

-- 
Jeremy Kitchen [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [vchkpw] realrcppto

2004-01-21 Thread Martin
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 04:13 pm, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:

 that patch just checks to see if there's a .qmail file to handle the
 delivery.  It doesn't actually attempt delivery at that time. 
 Therefore, vpopmail can't say hey, that mailbox doesn't exist.
 
 If you're running a vpopmail only machine, that patch is useless.
 
 -Jeremy
 
 -- 
 Jeremy Kitchen [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hello Jeremy.

Thanks for the swift reply.

Is there an alternative solution ?

What do you suggest ?

This is mainly to protect against Joe-Jobs.

Regards...Martin
-- 
Can't open /usr/fortunes.  Lid stuck on cookie jar.



Re: [vchkpw] realrcppto

2004-01-21 Thread Rick Macdougall
Martin wrote:

On Wednesday 21 January 2004 04:13 pm, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:

Thanks for the swift reply.

Is there an alternative solution ?

What do you suggest ?

This is mainly to protect against Joe-Jobs.
Hi,

http://www.interazioni.it/qmail/#qmail-smtpd

Works great here.

Regards,

Rick



Re: [vchkpw] realrcppto

2004-01-21 Thread Martin
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 05:17 pm, you wrote:

 Hi,
 
 http://www.interazioni.it/qmail/#qmail-smtpd
 
 Works great here.
 
 Regards,
 
 Rick


Hello Rick.

I'd like to hear more about this from other people, ie. who has tried it, 
opinions etc.

I note that on the web page, the patch version is given for vpopmail 5.3.6   
5.3.25.  These are development versions and the last stable is vpopmail 
v5.2.2.

Has anyone tried it on 5.2.2 stable (on a production system) and what version 
patch did they use ?

Regards...Martin
-- 
Confidence is simply that quiet, assured feeling you have before you
fall flat on your face.
-- Dr. L. Binder



Re: [vchkpw] realrcppto

2004-01-21 Thread Rick Macdougall


Martin wrote:

http://www.interazioni.it/qmail/#qmail-smtpd

Works great here.

Regards,

Rick


Hello Rick.

I'd like to hear more about this from other people, ie. who has tried it, 
opinions etc.

I note that on the web page, the patch version is given for vpopmail 5.3.6   
5.3.25.  These are development versions and the last stable is vpopmail 
v5.2.2.

Has anyone tried it on 5.2.2 stable (on a production system) and what version 
patch did they use ?
Hi,

Never tried it against 5.2.2 but there should be no reason it wouldn't 
work since it is a qmail-smtpd patch, not a vpopmail patch.

I personally have it running on about 30 or 40 servers running 5.3.20 
and I believe 2 servers running 5.4.0-rc2 (or what ever the latest 
release is).  Everything just works.

As for version of the patch, I normally use Bill Shupp's qmail-toaster 
patch and his modified version of the chkusr patch available from 
www.shupp.org (Thanks Bill!).

Regards,

Rick