Re: [Veritas-bu] Barcode label oddity.
Greetings, It looks like when the tapes were first loaded in, the proper barcode rule for that library was not in place. The LT tapes did what I wanted but the ARF ones did not. Bob reminded me that I could delete the tapes now that I had the rule in place. I deleted the tapes and ran it again. The ARF tapes read in using the first 6. Fortunately I hadn't written anything to the physical tape yet so I didn't have to deal with the bplabel or tape headers. Thanks for all the replies. Jeff On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Jeff Cleverley jeff.clever...@avagotech.com wrote: Judy, The library is sending all 8. When I look at the media manager I can see the barcode showing all 8 characters. The media ID it is assigning for the LT is taking the first 6 while the ARF tapes is taking the last 6. I checked barcode rules in vmadm and don't have anything of use. There are only 3 rules. One for cleaning tapes, one for tapes with no labels, and one for the default. I may just have to live with the behavior. For what I plan to do with it, I can work around things. Thanks for the reply. Jeff On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:37 AM, judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com wrote: Most libraries give you the option to control how it send the barcodes out. First 6, last 6, all 8 ……. Look at your library config and see how it is sending out the barcodes. *From:* veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] *On Behalf Of *Jeff Cleverley *Sent:* Tuesday, December 01, 2009 10:32 AM *To:* Len Boyle *Cc:* VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu *Subject:* Re: [Veritas-bu] Barcode label oddity. Len, The library is a HP/Compaq MSL6000. There is no virtual environment of any sort involved. I'm not aware that there was the option on this library to set up different barcode rules. The fact that NBU sees the full barcode label properly seems to point me to NBU having something funny in it. Thanks, Jeff On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Len Boyle len.bo...@sas.com wrote: Jeff, What is the library make and model. Are you using different virtual libraries in the LTO3 library. If so any chance that the library number to nbu does not match those in the vm.conf Or that the LTO3 library has different rules on how to present the barcodes for the library? len *From:* veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] *On Behalf Of *Jeff Cleverley *Sent:* Monday, November 30, 2009 7:44 PM *To:* VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu *Subject:* [Veritas-bu] Barcode label oddity. Greetings, I just zoned a LTO3 library into an old master server (5.1, I told you it was old). It sees everything but when I do the barcode scan of the tapes it is not doing the same thing for each type of label. I took a line in the vm.conf file and copied it from one of my other libraries and changed the robot number. When I scan the new library, the tapes that have a label like LT3001L3 get a media ID of LT3001 while the tapes with labels of ARF301L3 end up with a media ID of F301L3. I've stopped and restarted the media management database and I get the expected behavior from the LT tapes but not the AR tapes. Here is a copy of the vm.conf file. DEVICE_HOST = coda SCRATCH_POOL = scratch VERBOSE MEDIA_ID_BARCODE_CHARS 21 8 1:2:3:4:5:6 MEDIA_ID_BARCODE_CHARS 20 8 1:2:3:4:5:6 MEDIA_ID_BARCODE_CHARS 30 8 1:2:3:4:5:6 KNOWN = coda KNOWN = hesston The server coda is the master. Robots 20 and 21 both use the ARF labels when I use gen 2 tapes. I haven't set up a new robot and pool in so long I'm guessing I've forgotten a file somewhere. I just can't remember what else I need to change. Thanks, Jeff -- Jeff Cleverley Unix Systems Administrator 4380 Ziegler Road Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 970-288-4611 -- Jeff Cleverley Unix Systems Administrator 4380 Ziegler Road Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 970-288-4611 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu -- Jeff Cleverley Unix Systems Administrator 4380 Ziegler Road Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 970-288-4611 -- Jeff Cleverley Unix Systems Administrator 4380 Ziegler Road Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 970-288-4611 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Barcode label oddity.
Boy if I had a nickel... -Jonathan From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jeff Cleverley Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 4:21 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Barcode label oddity. Greetings, It looks like when the tapes were first loaded in, the proper barcode rule for that library was not in place. The LT tapes did what I wanted but the ARF ones did not. Bob reminded me that I could delete the tapes now that I had the rule in place. I deleted the tapes and ran it again. The ARF tapes read in using the first 6. Fortunately I hadn't written anything to the physical tape yet so I didn't have to deal with the bplabel or tape headers. Thanks for all the replies. Jeff On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Jeff Cleverley jeff.clever...@avagotech.com wrote: Judy, The library is sending all 8. When I look at the media manager I can see the barcode showing all 8 characters. The media ID it is assigning for the LT is taking the first 6 while the ARF tapes is taking the last 6. I checked barcode rules in vmadm and don't have anything of use. There are only 3 rules. One for cleaning tapes, one for tapes with no labels, and one for the default. I may just have to live with the behavior. For what I plan to do with it, I can work around things. Thanks for the reply. Jeff On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:37 AM, judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com wrote: Most libraries give you the option to control how it send the barcodes out. First 6, last 6, all 8 ... Look at your library config and see how it is sending out the barcodes. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jeff Cleverley Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 10:32 AM To: Len Boyle Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Barcode label oddity. Len, The library is a HP/Compaq MSL6000. There is no virtual environment of any sort involved. I'm not aware that there was the option on this library to set up different barcode rules. The fact that NBU sees the full barcode label properly seems to point me to NBU having something funny in it. Thanks, Jeff On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Len Boyle len.bo...@sas.com wrote: Jeff, What is the library make and model. Are you using different virtual libraries in the LTO3 library. If so any chance that the library number to nbu does not match those in the vm.conf Or that the LTO3 library has different rules on how to present the barcodes for the library? len From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jeff Cleverley Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 7:44 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Barcode label oddity. Greetings, I just zoned a LTO3 library into an old master server (5.1, I told you it was old). It sees everything but when I do the barcode scan of the tapes it is not doing the same thing for each type of label. I took a line in the vm.conf file and copied it from one of my other libraries and changed the robot number. When I scan the new library, the tapes that have a label like LT3001L3 get a media ID of LT3001 while the tapes with labels of ARF301L3 end up with a media ID of F301L3. I've stopped and restarted the media management database and I get the expected behavior from the LT tapes but not the AR tapes. Here is a copy of the vm.conf file. DEVICE_HOST = coda SCRATCH_POOL = scratch VERBOSE MEDIA_ID_BARCODE_CHARS 21 8 1:2:3:4:5:6 MEDIA_ID_BARCODE_CHARS 20 8 1:2:3:4:5:6 MEDIA_ID_BARCODE_CHARS 30 8 1:2:3:4:5:6 KNOWN = coda KNOWN = hesston The server coda is the master. Robots 20 and 21 both use the ARF labels when I use gen 2 tapes. I haven't set up a new robot and pool in so long I'm guessing I've forgotten a file somewhere. I just can't remember what else I need to change. Thanks, Jeff -- Jeff Cleverley Unix Systems Administrator 4380 Ziegler Road Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 970-288-4611 -- Jeff Cleverley Unix Systems Administrator 4380 Ziegler Road Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 970-288-4611 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas
Re: [Veritas-bu] Barcode label oddity.
Len, The library is a HP/Compaq MSL6000. There is no virtual environment of any sort involved. I'm not aware that there was the option on this library to set up different barcode rules. The fact that NBU sees the full barcode label properly seems to point me to NBU having something funny in it. Thanks, Jeff On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Len Boyle len.bo...@sas.com wrote: Jeff, What is the library make and model. Are you using different virtual libraries in the LTO3 library. If so any chance that the library number to nbu does not match those in the vm.conf Or that the LTO3 library has different rules on how to present the barcodes for the library? len *From:* veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] *On Behalf Of *Jeff Cleverley *Sent:* Monday, November 30, 2009 7:44 PM *To:* VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu *Subject:* [Veritas-bu] Barcode label oddity. Greetings, I just zoned a LTO3 library into an old master server (5.1, I told you it was old). It sees everything but when I do the barcode scan of the tapes it is not doing the same thing for each type of label. I took a line in the vm.conf file and copied it from one of my other libraries and changed the robot number. When I scan the new library, the tapes that have a label like LT3001L3 get a media ID of LT3001 while the tapes with labels of ARF301L3 end up with a media ID of F301L3. I've stopped and restarted the media management database and I get the expected behavior from the LT tapes but not the AR tapes. Here is a copy of the vm.conf file. DEVICE_HOST = coda SCRATCH_POOL = scratch VERBOSE MEDIA_ID_BARCODE_CHARS 21 8 1:2:3:4:5:6 MEDIA_ID_BARCODE_CHARS 20 8 1:2:3:4:5:6 MEDIA_ID_BARCODE_CHARS 30 8 1:2:3:4:5:6 KNOWN = coda KNOWN = hesston The server coda is the master. Robots 20 and 21 both use the ARF labels when I use gen 2 tapes. I haven't set up a new robot and pool in so long I'm guessing I've forgotten a file somewhere. I just can't remember what else I need to change. Thanks, Jeff -- Jeff Cleverley Unix Systems Administrator 4380 Ziegler Road Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 970-288-4611 -- Jeff Cleverley Unix Systems Administrator 4380 Ziegler Road Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 970-288-4611 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Barcode label oddity.
Most libraries give you the option to control how it send the barcodes out. First 6, last 6, all 8 ... Look at your library config and see how it is sending out the barcodes. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jeff Cleverley Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 10:32 AM To: Len Boyle Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Barcode label oddity. Len, The library is a HP/Compaq MSL6000. There is no virtual environment of any sort involved. I'm not aware that there was the option on this library to set up different barcode rules. The fact that NBU sees the full barcode label properly seems to point me to NBU having something funny in it. Thanks, Jeff On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Len Boyle len.bo...@sas.com wrote: Jeff, What is the library make and model. Are you using different virtual libraries in the LTO3 library. If so any chance that the library number to nbu does not match those in the vm.conf Or that the LTO3 library has different rules on how to present the barcodes for the library? len From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jeff Cleverley Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 7:44 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Barcode label oddity. Greetings, I just zoned a LTO3 library into an old master server (5.1, I told you it was old). It sees everything but when I do the barcode scan of the tapes it is not doing the same thing for each type of label. I took a line in the vm.conf file and copied it from one of my other libraries and changed the robot number. When I scan the new library, the tapes that have a label like LT3001L3 get a media ID of LT3001 while the tapes with labels of ARF301L3 end up with a media ID of F301L3. I've stopped and restarted the media management database and I get the expected behavior from the LT tapes but not the AR tapes. Here is a copy of the vm.conf file. DEVICE_HOST = coda SCRATCH_POOL = scratch VERBOSE MEDIA_ID_BARCODE_CHARS 21 8 1:2:3:4:5:6 MEDIA_ID_BARCODE_CHARS 20 8 1:2:3:4:5:6 MEDIA_ID_BARCODE_CHARS 30 8 1:2:3:4:5:6 KNOWN = coda KNOWN = hesston The server coda is the master. Robots 20 and 21 both use the ARF labels when I use gen 2 tapes. I haven't set up a new robot and pool in so long I'm guessing I've forgotten a file somewhere. I just can't remember what else I need to change. Thanks, Jeff -- Jeff Cleverley Unix Systems Administrator 4380 Ziegler Road Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 970-288-4611 -- Jeff Cleverley Unix Systems Administrator 4380 Ziegler Road Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 970-288-4611 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Barcode label oddity.
Judy, The library is sending all 8. When I look at the media manager I can see the barcode showing all 8 characters. The media ID it is assigning for the LT is taking the first 6 while the ARF tapes is taking the last 6. I checked barcode rules in vmadm and don't have anything of use. There are only 3 rules. One for cleaning tapes, one for tapes with no labels, and one for the default. I may just have to live with the behavior. For what I plan to do with it, I can work around things. Thanks for the reply. Jeff On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:37 AM, judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com wrote: Most libraries give you the option to control how it send the barcodes out. First 6, last 6, all 8 ……. Look at your library config and see how it is sending out the barcodes. *From:* veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] *On Behalf Of *Jeff Cleverley *Sent:* Tuesday, December 01, 2009 10:32 AM *To:* Len Boyle *Cc:* VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu *Subject:* Re: [Veritas-bu] Barcode label oddity. Len, The library is a HP/Compaq MSL6000. There is no virtual environment of any sort involved. I'm not aware that there was the option on this library to set up different barcode rules. The fact that NBU sees the full barcode label properly seems to point me to NBU having something funny in it. Thanks, Jeff On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Len Boyle len.bo...@sas.com wrote: Jeff, What is the library make and model. Are you using different virtual libraries in the LTO3 library. If so any chance that the library number to nbu does not match those in the vm.conf Or that the LTO3 library has different rules on how to present the barcodes for the library? len *From:* veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] *On Behalf Of *Jeff Cleverley *Sent:* Monday, November 30, 2009 7:44 PM *To:* VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu *Subject:* [Veritas-bu] Barcode label oddity. Greetings, I just zoned a LTO3 library into an old master server (5.1, I told you it was old). It sees everything but when I do the barcode scan of the tapes it is not doing the same thing for each type of label. I took a line in the vm.conf file and copied it from one of my other libraries and changed the robot number. When I scan the new library, the tapes that have a label like LT3001L3 get a media ID of LT3001 while the tapes with labels of ARF301L3 end up with a media ID of F301L3. I've stopped and restarted the media management database and I get the expected behavior from the LT tapes but not the AR tapes. Here is a copy of the vm.conf file. DEVICE_HOST = coda SCRATCH_POOL = scratch VERBOSE MEDIA_ID_BARCODE_CHARS 21 8 1:2:3:4:5:6 MEDIA_ID_BARCODE_CHARS 20 8 1:2:3:4:5:6 MEDIA_ID_BARCODE_CHARS 30 8 1:2:3:4:5:6 KNOWN = coda KNOWN = hesston The server coda is the master. Robots 20 and 21 both use the ARF labels when I use gen 2 tapes. I haven't set up a new robot and pool in so long I'm guessing I've forgotten a file somewhere. I just can't remember what else I need to change. Thanks, Jeff -- Jeff Cleverley Unix Systems Administrator 4380 Ziegler Road Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 970-288-4611 -- Jeff Cleverley Unix Systems Administrator 4380 Ziegler Road Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 970-288-4611 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu -- Jeff Cleverley Unix Systems Administrator 4380 Ziegler Road Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 970-288-4611 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
[Veritas-bu] Barcode label oddity.
Greetings, I just zoned a LTO3 library into an old master server (5.1, I told you it was old). It sees everything but when I do the barcode scan of the tapes it is not doing the same thing for each type of label. I took a line in the vm.conf file and copied it from one of my other libraries and changed the robot number. When I scan the new library, the tapes that have a label like LT3001L3 get a media ID of LT3001 while the tapes with labels of ARF301L3 end up with a media ID of F301L3. I've stopped and restarted the media management database and I get the expected behavior from the LT tapes but not the AR tapes. Here is a copy of the vm.conf file. DEVICE_HOST = coda SCRATCH_POOL = scratch VERBOSE MEDIA_ID_BARCODE_CHARS 21 8 1:2:3:4:5:6 MEDIA_ID_BARCODE_CHARS 20 8 1:2:3:4:5:6 MEDIA_ID_BARCODE_CHARS 30 8 1:2:3:4:5:6 KNOWN = coda KNOWN = hesston The server coda is the master. Robots 20 and 21 both use the ARF labels when I use gen 2 tapes. I haven't set up a new robot and pool in so long I'm guessing I've forgotten a file somewhere. I just can't remember what else I need to change. Thanks, Jeff -- Jeff Cleverley Unix Systems Administrator 4380 Ziegler Road Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 970-288-4611 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Barcode label oddity.
Jeff, What is the library make and model. Are you using different virtual libraries in the LTO3 library. If so any chance that the library number to nbu does not match those in the vm.conf Or that the LTO3 library has different rules on how to present the barcodes for the library? len From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jeff Cleverley Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 7:44 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Barcode label oddity. Greetings, I just zoned a LTO3 library into an old master server (5.1, I told you it was old). It sees everything but when I do the barcode scan of the tapes it is not doing the same thing for each type of label. I took a line in the vm.conf file and copied it from one of my other libraries and changed the robot number. When I scan the new library, the tapes that have a label like LT3001L3 get a media ID of LT3001 while the tapes with labels of ARF301L3 end up with a media ID of F301L3. I've stopped and restarted the media management database and I get the expected behavior from the LT tapes but not the AR tapes. Here is a copy of the vm.conf file. DEVICE_HOST = coda SCRATCH_POOL = scratch VERBOSE MEDIA_ID_BARCODE_CHARS 21 8 1:2:3:4:5:6 MEDIA_ID_BARCODE_CHARS 20 8 1:2:3:4:5:6 MEDIA_ID_BARCODE_CHARS 30 8 1:2:3:4:5:6 KNOWN = coda KNOWN = hesston The server coda is the master. Robots 20 and 21 both use the ARF labels when I use gen 2 tapes. I haven't set up a new robot and pool in so long I'm guessing I've forgotten a file somewhere. I just can't remember what else I need to change. Thanks, Jeff -- Jeff Cleverley Unix Systems Administrator 4380 Ziegler Road Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 970-288-4611 ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu