Vlogger Defense Fund * Re: [videoblogging] Re: Hey PodTech - What's up with Lan's image?

2007-07-03 Thread Josh Wolf
Hi, although not really set up to act as a slush fund to broker  
disputes between two parties within the community, I actually have  
established a fund for legal support for those independent media  
makers who find themselves in hot water, and I believe there is a tad  
over $3,000 in the account which will be overseen by the Free The  
Media Foundation which still needs to be established. But, yes, a  
legal fund for the collective good all of us is of crucial  
importance. When I was carted off to jail, I had no idea how I'd  
raise the funds for an appeal. Fortunately, my little pay-pal banner  
was rather productive and there was about $3,000 left-over to  
establish this fund for the next time such a situation strike.

Josh


On Jun 30, 2007, at 8:30 AM, bordercollieaustralianshepherd wrote:

 Make a mistake and own it? Priceless!

 My opinion and thoughts (for what that's worth)

 I missed a lot in this thread. Not likely I will be able to catch up
 either. So if I am repeating someone else's input it is truly a case
 of like minds thinking.

 Robert, you are a stand up guy. No doubt and big props to you.

 Lan, understand how you feel and do not find fault with your position.

 To quote Rodney King ... oh never mind.

 $300 is too low (considering this is after the fact) and $3000 is too
 high considering the limited use of the image and it's purpose.
 (Podtech may be a business, but we should lead by example too, we are
 suppose to be in this boat together).

 Solution (and certainly not the only): vlogger legal defense fund!

 How to do this? Podtech ponies up $1000.00 total which pays Lan
 $600.00 (double the lowest possible PRE use negotiated license fee)
 and opens a legal defense fund for video bloggers using the remaining
 $400 for the creation of this funds cost and a initial deposit. Lan
 can (if he chooses) donate any amount he sees fit to this fund.

 Seems like a nice way to make nice.

 I know that this means that guidelines, rules and a bunch of other
 stuff might need to be put into effect. Then again, this group seems
 to me at least, to be capable of expressing opinion that can be used
 to gauge under what circumstances funds would be disbursed.

 If a fund is set up, I would like to be the third person to  
 contribute.

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Robert Scoble
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  You told me on the phone that you did not want to negotiate. At
 least that's
  how I remember hearing it. Sorry if I heard wrong. You told me
 specifically
  that PodTech was not in position to negotiate.
 
 
 
  The problem is I'm getting in between you and John Furrier. John's
 mom died
  this week which is causing problems figuring out where things are.
 
 
 
  I'll get him to answer you.
 
 
 
  Regarding photo prices, I talked with photographers who work for
 Associated
  Press, Business Week and other magazines.
 
 
 
  I agree that we dropped the ball. No excuses there, but I wasn't
 involved
  back then and am trying to clean up a mess and having trouble  
 getting it
  cleaned up because of John's mom's death.
 
 
 
  Robert Scoble
 
 
 
  ###
 
 
 
  From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  On Behalf Of Lan Bui
  Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 10:51 PM
  To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Hey PodTech - What's up with Lan's  
 image?
 
 
 
  Robert, thank you for finally coming out and saying something for
  PodTech to the community.
 
  First, I must say that your statement:
 
  He believes his work is worth that and believes that there isn't  
 room
  for negotiation on this issue.
 
  Is a lie.
 
  One of the points in my blog post was that I wanted, at minimum,  
 to be
  contacted to negotiate. In the last couple days I did negotiate  
 down a
  lot less than $3000 and even sent an updated invoice for it. So  
 how is
  this not negotiating on the issue? Remember we talked about this on
  the phone, so I'm not sure why you left that out.
 
  PodTech had the chance to ask to purchase a license to use the
  photograph before it was used, at which time they would be able  
 to set
  the terms. That didn't happen. Now that they have used the  
 photograph
  already, who should set the terms?
 
  I gave PodTech over a month to respond to my terms and they didn't.
  When it was just me that was involved PodTech didn't care. When  
 others
  started to blog about it and it was giving them a bad name, then
  PodTech started to care. Remember, that blog post was up for about a
  month before others started take notice to it. So PodTech showed  
 to me
  they don't care about me, they only care about their image in the
  public eye.
 
  Next, I am not Thomas Hawk. Wait... Thomas Hawk? I will be the
  professional and not discuss the prices that PodTech pays him.
  Remember Robert, you told me how much PodTech pays him and that
  reinforced my price even more!
 
  You also said:
 
  It was easy to see how a mistake was made 

[videoblogging] Re: Videoblog Feedback Flash Meeting

2007-07-03 Thread Heath
I think that is a great idea Michael, I wish I didn't have something 
going on at that time cause I would love to participate.  I think a 
process like this if taken and handeled well can provide some really 
good dialogue and help push us as artists.

Heath
http://batmangeek.com
http://aroundcincinnati.net

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 A couple of weeks ago we started talking about critiquing videoblogs
 in a flash meeting. I've used this great feedback process with my
 theater and I think it'll work well for talking about videoblogs 
too.
 
 So, I set up another flash meeting for Tuesday, July 3 at 23:00 GMT
 
 This is a moderated process where the responsibility of the audience
 is to not bring their own agenda and to have a desire for the artist
 to do her/his best work.
 
 For this first meeting well be looking at two videos:
 Stop, Look And Listen by David Howell
 http://www.davidhowellstudios.com/2007/05/30/stop-look-and-listen/
 and
 Little Iraq by Cheryl Colan
 http://www.hummingcrow.com/2007/04/03/little-iraq/
 
 There is limited space in the flash meeting so email
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] for an invitation.
 
 You can read more about how the process works over at freevlog:
 http://www.freevlog.org/index.php/2007/07/02/critical-response-
flash-meeting/
 
 Thanks,
 Verdi
 
 -- 
 http://michaelverdi.com
 http://spinxpress.com
 http://freevlog.org
 Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs





[videoblogging] Re: The History of What My Dog Can't Hear

2007-07-03 Thread missbhavens1969
Well, I was under the impression that musicians/bands covering a tune
for a recording would certainly need permission on the assumption that
money would be made from the sale of the album.

But every band in every live concert I've ever seen has done at least
one cover (always my favorite part of a show...you can't judge a book by
it's cover but you CAN judge a band by it's covers) and I can't imagine
they sought permission first.

Oh well. There must be some sort of if you're already famous you can do
a cover of my famous song clause.

In the meanwhile, I'm going to brush up on my piano skills. I've always
wanted to use Song for a Future Generation by the B-52s. Perhaps I'll
cover that.

bekah

ps: David, my fiancee informs me that we no longer say bastard
red-headed step children. The more accepted term is Gingers.

; )
--
http://www.missbhavens.com


--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Interesting.

 So, all musicians or bands covering a tune must get permission first
 or pay fees? Does that include if they cover a song in an encore or
 something too?

 Adam's music might have to become my bastard red-haired step children
 then.

 David
 http://www.davidhowellstudios.com

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
 solitude@ wrote:
 
  Beware though that the US court system do not agree with the dog
 essay.
  Adam did not write most of those songs and thus you will also need
to
  secure permission from the composer (or pay ASCAP fees or whatever
the
  procedure is for the kind of work you want to make).
 
  Longer reply coming in a day or two when I've had time  energy to
 wade
  through the rhetoric analogies in that essay.
 
  - Andreas
 
  Den 02.07.2007 kl. 20:49 skrev David Howell taoofdavid@:
 
   Excellent. Much appreciated.
  
   I'll care for them and treat them as though they were made of the
   finest crystal. Maybe, on a hot summer evening, I might just call
one
   of them Fred.
  
   David
   http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
  
   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Adam Quirk, Wreck 
Salvage
   quirk@ wrote:
  
   Free as in liberty and the natural state of man, not price.  They
   actually
   cost $4.30 each.
  
   Them's just jokes. Use em as you see fit. I'd be honored to hear
 them in
   your video, and those songs aren't mine to sell.
  
   On 7/2/07, David Howell taoofdavid@ wrote:
   
When you say free lo-fi music by me, is that free as in I can
use
your music without remuneration to you?
   
Not trying to sound like a prick. I like your tunes and could
 find use
for them in a few videos I have planned.
   
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
   
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Adam Quirk, Wreck 
Salvage
quirk@ wrote:

 Back in town, re-reading the Podtech v. Bui thread.  I just
 want to
talk a
 little more about copyright and the ownership of art, as I
felt
compelled
 to scratch Mr. Rice's mosquito bite about being trollish ;)
I
don't mean
 to start an argument here, I just need to understand how
 people feel
about
 the things they are making, and I want you all to understand
how
   I feel.

 A friend of mine wrote an essay on music a couple years ago
   called The
 History of What My Dog Can't Hear:

 http://www.geartekcorporation.com/texts/essay2.html

 The essay is about changing the way we perceive music, and
 accepting
it as
 something that is not ownable:

 The ownership or authorship of anything is a deception,
 surely. But
I take
  no issue with the ownership of objects in the world, like a
 broom
or a drum
  for example. Music however, is a thing not in the world,
 and the
present
  deception of its ownability places limits on our
 consciousness. My
  motivation here is not to sell iPods. If this near biblical
manifesto-mill
  can be accused of having any agenda at all, it is merely to
   assist an
  already rising consciousness. Neither are these paragraphs
commandments or a
  bugle call to what we need to realize or do. We didn't need
 to be
able to
  hear tone in music or need to be aware of its color - it's
just
the way
  music is happening to us, rising on a path like the moon.
Some
astronomers
  can predict the path of the moon, and surely artists are
those
astronomers.
  I understand those who are skeptical or scoff at this as
   pompous and
  irrelevant. After all, when you look at the moon, the moon
 looks
still.


 He feels the same way about music as I do about my videos,
and at
the end he
 says, EXTRA CREDIT: Re-read this entire essay but replace the
 word
music
 with the word images.

 Re-reading it I realized that I unconsciously lifted metaphor
directly from
 him.  Blatant plagiarism!  I've already informed him and a
 check is
in the

[videoblogging] FeedBurner Pro and MyBrand NOW FREE!q

2007-07-03 Thread Jonathan Bloom
I logged on this morning to hear that FeedBurner Pro and MyBrand are now
free! I then activated PRO on all of my accounts. MyBrand requires a quick
email to FeedBurner then they'll enable it.
-- 
-Jonathan Bloom
http://thenameiwantedwastaken.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: The History of What My Dog Can't Hear

2007-07-03 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
There are standard licensing agreements for this kind of stuff and no  
permission is needed as long as you pay. In the case of music being  
covered by a live band it is to the best of my knowledge the venue who is  
paying the licensing fees (in Denmark, don't know about the US) to the  
appropriate organization.

- Andreas

Den 03.07.2007 kl. 15:59 skrev missbhavens1969 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Well, I was under the impression that musicians/bands covering a tune
 for a recording would certainly need permission on the assumption that
 money would be made from the sale of the album.

 But every band in every live concert I've ever seen has done at least
 one cover (always my favorite part of a show...you can't judge a book by
 it's cover but you CAN judge a band by it's covers) and I can't imagine
 they sought permission first.

 Oh well. There must be some sort of if you're already famous you can do
 a cover of my famous song clause.

 In the meanwhile, I'm going to brush up on my piano skills. I've always
 wanted to use Song for a Future Generation by the B-52s. Perhaps I'll
 cover that.

 bekah

 ps: David, my fiancee informs me that we no longer say bastard
 red-headed step children. The more accepted term is Gingers.

 ; )
 --
 http://www.missbhavens.com


 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

 Interesting.

 So, all musicians or bands covering a tune must get permission first
 or pay fees? Does that include if they cover a song in an encore or
 something too?

 Adam's music might have to become my bastard red-haired step children
 then.

 David
 http://www.davidhowellstudios.com

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
 solitude@ wrote:
 
  Beware though that the US court system do not agree with the dog
 essay.
  Adam did not write most of those songs and thus you will also need
 to
  secure permission from the composer (or pay ASCAP fees or whatever
 the
  procedure is for the kind of work you want to make).
 
  Longer reply coming in a day or two when I've had time  energy to
 wade
  through the rhetoric analogies in that essay.
 
  - Andreas
 
  Den 02.07.2007 kl. 20:49 skrev David Howell taoofdavid@:
 
   Excellent. Much appreciated.
  
   I'll care for them and treat them as though they were made of the
   finest crystal. Maybe, on a hot summer evening, I might just call
 one
   of them Fred.
  
   David
   http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
  
   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Adam Quirk, Wreck 
 Salvage
   quirk@ wrote:
  
   Free as in liberty and the natural state of man, not price.  They
   actually
   cost $4.30 each.
  
   Them's just jokes. Use em as you see fit. I'd be honored to hear
 them in
   your video, and those songs aren't mine to sell.
  
   On 7/2/07, David Howell taoofdavid@ wrote:
   
When you say free lo-fi music by me, is that free as in I can
 use
your music without remuneration to you?
   
Not trying to sound like a prick. I like your tunes and could
 find use
for them in a few videos I have planned.
   
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
   
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Adam Quirk, Wreck 
 Salvage
quirk@ wrote:

 Back in town, re-reading the Podtech v. Bui thread.  I just
 want to
talk a
 little more about copyright and the ownership of art, as I
 felt
compelled
 to scratch Mr. Rice's mosquito bite about being trollish ;)
 I
don't mean
 to start an argument here, I just need to understand how
 people feel
about
 the things they are making, and I want you all to understand
 how
   I feel.

 A friend of mine wrote an essay on music a couple years ago
   called The
 History of What My Dog Can't Hear:

 http://www.geartekcorporation.com/texts/essay2.html

 The essay is about changing the way we perceive music, and
 accepting
it as
 something that is not ownable:

 The ownership or authorship of anything is a deception,
 surely. But
I take
  no issue with the ownership of objects in the world, like a
 broom
or a drum
  for example. Music however, is a thing not in the world,
 and the
present
  deception of its ownability places limits on our
 consciousness. My
  motivation here is not to sell iPods. If this near biblical
manifesto-mill
  can be accused of having any agenda at all, it is merely to
   assist an
  already rising consciousness. Neither are these paragraphs
commandments or a
  bugle call to what we need to realize or do. We didn't need
 to be
able to
  hear tone in music or need to be aware of its color - it's
 just
the way
  music is happening to us, rising on a path like the moon.
 Some
astronomers
  can predict the path of the moon, and surely artists are
 those
astronomers.
  I understand those who are skeptical or scoff at this as
   pompous and
  irrelevant. After all, when 

[videoblogging] HD output specs

2007-07-03 Thread eric gunnar rochow
Hi All, i posted this on the blip group as well,

I've started a new show Real World Green in HD, and am having trouble  
exporting it from FCP in a format  for blip.tv

My lower thirds and type are messed up, and the format seems off. If  
anyone could post their export specs, I'd appreciate it.

Thanks, eric.   http://realworldgreen.comhttp://gardenfork.tv


Re: [videoblogging] Re: The History of What My Dog Can't Hear

2007-07-03 Thread Brook Hinton
In the US it is assumed the venue has paid their annual licensing fee. My
understanding is even bars and cafes aren't supposed to have a radio on
unless they have paid a licensing fee.  It is: insane.


___
Brook Hinton
film/video/audio art
www.brookhinton.com vlog links are here
__


On 7/3/07, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   There are standard licensing agreements for this kind of stuff and no
 permission is needed as long as you pay. In the case of music being
 covered by a live band it is to the best of my knowledge the venue who is
 paying the licensing fees (in Denmark, don't know about the US) to the
 appropriate organization.

 - Andreas



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: The History of What My Dog Can't Hear

2007-07-03 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
That is true in Denmark as well. The prices are very reasonable (I just  
looked them up) and won't hold any establishment back.

- Andreas

Den 03.07.2007 kl. 17:16 skrev Brook Hinton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 In the US it is assumed the venue has paid their annual licensing fee. My
 understanding is even bars and cafes aren't supposed to have a radio on
 unless they have paid a licensing fee.  It is: insane.


 ___
 Brook Hinton
 film/video/audio art
 www.brookhinton.com vlog links are here
 __


 On 7/3/07, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   There are standard licensing agreements for this kind of stuff and no
 permission is needed as long as you pay. In the case of music being
 covered by a live band it is to the best of my knowledge the venue who  
 is
 paying the licensing fees (in Denmark, don't know about the US) to the
 appropriate organization.

 - Andreas



 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




-- 
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ 


[videoblogging] Re: HD output specs

2007-07-03 Thread Lan Bui
Eric, here is what we use on NoodleScar Daily.

http://flickr.com/photos/lanbui/706773970/

-Lan
www.LanBui.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, eric gunnar rochow [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Hi All, i posted this on the blip group as well,
 
 I've started a new show Real World Green in HD, and am having trouble  
 exporting it from FCP in a format  for blip.tv
 
 My lower thirds and type are messed up, and the format seems off. If  
 anyone could post their export specs, I'd appreciate it.
 
 Thanks, eric.   http://realworldgreen.comhttp://gardenfork.tv






[videoblogging] low tech wind screen tip for compact cameras

2007-07-03 Thread Andrew Darlow
Hi folks:

I just found a link to this cool wind-reduction tip on this site:  
www.photojojo.com
Here's a direct link to the tip: http://flash.popphoto.com/blog/ 
2007/05/tip_of_the_day__17.html

I haven't tried it, but I have a Canon that is very similar and I  
plan to do so when I film outside next time. If you try it and have  
any follow-up tips, feel free to share your experiences.

All the best,

Andrew

---
Andrew Darlow
Editor, The Imaging Buffet
http://www.imagingbuffet.com
Chief Cook: http://www.bigdiner.com




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] .mov for ipod?

2007-07-03 Thread Josh Leo
I have created two feeds for my vlog
an ipod compatible feed of .mov and m4v files
and an HD feed of mp4 files

I would like to have the ipod compatible files to just be mov's and not
m4v's
does anyone know how to make a large (like the size i have now of 640x360
.mov file that works on the ipod
right now i am just using compressor to make my mv4
i also have visualhub but it doesnt make .mov's

-- 
Josh Leo

www.JoshLeo.com
www.WanderingWestMichigan.com
www.SlowLorisMedia.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] .mov for ipod?

2007-07-03 Thread Adam Quirk, Wreck Salvage
You can just open the .m4v and Save As Quicktime Movie in QT Pro.

On 7/3/07, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have created two feeds for my vlog
 an ipod compatible feed of .mov and m4v files
 and an HD feed of mp4 files

 I would like to have the ipod compatible files to just be mov's and not
 m4v's
 does anyone know how to make a large (like the size i have now of 640x360
 .mov file that works on the ipod
 right now i am just using compressor to make my mv4
 i also have visualhub but it doesnt make .mov's

 --
 Josh Leo

 www.JoshLeo.com
 www.WanderingWestMichigan.com
 www.SlowLorisMedia.com


 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




 Yahoo! Groups Links






-- 
Adam Quirk
Wreck  Salvage
551.208.4644
Brooklyn, NY
http://wreckandsalvage.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] Re: .mov for ipod?

2007-07-03 Thread Steve Watkins
If you have quicktime pro, you should be able to open the m4v/mp4 in
quicktime, then do a 'save as' 'self contained movie'. This should
give you a mov without actually needing to recompress the video or
audio again, it just wraps it up in a mov file format. So as long as
your m4v/mp4 was ipod compatible, the mov will be too.

Doing it that way keeps things simple if you already have an encoding
method that is ipod compatible. Avoiding issues like Apple sometimes
changing the ipod spec, and for example the issue where theres no
option to manually select baseline low complexity (s opposed to
standard baseline) in qt, making it hard to manually create m4vs/mp4s
of 640x that are compatible, making the 'uses apple ipod presets' the
safer choice if compatibility is a must.

Cheers

Steve Elbows
 
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have created two feeds for my vlog
 an ipod compatible feed of .mov and m4v files
 and an HD feed of mp4 files
 
 I would like to have the ipod compatible files to just be mov's and not
 m4v's
 does anyone know how to make a large (like the size i have now of
640x360
 .mov file that works on the ipod
 right now i am just using compressor to make my mv4
 i also have visualhub but it doesnt make .mov's
 
 -- 
 Josh Leo
 
 www.JoshLeo.com
 www.WanderingWestMichigan.com
 www.SlowLorisMedia.com
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Re: [videoblogging] Re: .mov for ipod?

2007-07-03 Thread Josh Leo
cool ill give it a try tonight!

On 7/3/07, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   If you have quicktime pro, you should be able to open the m4v/mp4 in
 quicktime, then do a 'save as' 'self contained movie'. This should
 give you a mov without actually needing to recompress the video or
 audio again, it just wraps it up in a mov file format. So as long as
 your m4v/mp4 was ipod compatible, the mov will be too.

 Doing it that way keeps things simple if you already have an encoding
 method that is ipod compatible. Avoiding issues like Apple sometimes
 changing the ipod spec, and for example the issue where theres no
 option to manually select baseline low complexity (s opposed to
 standard baseline) in qt, making it hard to manually create m4vs/mp4s
 of 640x that are compatible, making the 'uses apple ipod presets' the
 safer choice if compatibility is a must.

 Cheers

 Steve Elbows


 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I have created two feeds for my vlog
  an ipod compatible feed of .mov and m4v files
  and an HD feed of mp4 files
 
  I would like to have the ipod compatible files to just be mov's and not
  m4v's
  does anyone know how to make a large (like the size i have now of
 640x360
  .mov file that works on the ipod
  right now i am just using compressor to make my mv4
  i also have visualhub but it doesnt make .mov's
 
  --
  Josh Leo
 
  www.JoshLeo.com
  www.WanderingWestMichigan.com
  www.SlowLorisMedia.com
 
 
  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 

  




-- 
Josh Leo

www.JoshLeo.com
www.WanderingWestMichigan.com
www.SlowLorisMedia.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] ADDING WIDGETS

2007-07-03 Thread waltwst
I am using, or trying to use Wordpress. In Dashboard, under 
Presentation, I have a submenu call sidebar widgets. Could someone 
be so kind as to tell me how I can add new widgets to the Available 
Widgets portion?? Thanks so much for any help. walt



Re: [videoblogging] ADDING WIDGETS

2007-07-03 Thread Michael Verdi
You upload widgets to a folder called 'widgets' in the plugins folder (you
may have to create the folder).
http://website.com/directory-wherewordpress-is/wp-content/plugins/widgets

- Verdi

On 7/3/07, waltwst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   I am using, or trying to use Wordpress. In Dashboard, under
 Presentation, I have a submenu call sidebar widgets. Could someone
 be so kind as to tell me how I can add new widgets to the Available
 Widgets portion?? Thanks so much for any help. walt

  




-- 
http://michaelverdi.com
http://spinxpress.com
http://freevlog.org
Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: .mov for ipod?

2007-07-03 Thread David Meade
On 7/3/07, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 If you have quicktime pro, you should be able to open the m4v/mp4 in
 quicktime, then do a 'save as' 'self contained movie'. This should
 give you a mov without actually needing to recompress the video or
 audio again, it just wraps it up in a mov file format. So as long as
 your m4v/mp4 was ipod compatible, the mov will be too.

 Doing it that way keeps things simple if you already have an encoding
 method that is ipod compatible.


Yup that's what I've been doing.

The cool thing is you can then also have interactive sprite tracks on the
.MOV too.  The sprite tracks wont sync up to the ipod, but the video/audio
will.  That way you have an online/interactive MOV that still syncs up for
offline viewing to the ipod just fine.

 - Dave

-- 
http://www.DavidMeade.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] Re: ADDING WIDGETS

2007-07-03 Thread waltwst
Thanks so much for your kind response. I will try immediately and let
you know of my success or lack thereof!!!
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 You upload widgets to a folder called 'widgets' in the plugins folder
(you
 may have to create the folder).

http://website.com/directory-wherewordpress-is/wp-content/plugins/widget\
s

 - Verdi

 On 7/3/07, waltwst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I am using, or trying to use Wordpress. In Dashboard, under
  Presentation, I have a submenu call sidebar widgets. Could someone
  be so kind as to tell me how I can add new widgets to the Available
  Widgets portion?? Thanks so much for any help. walt
 
 
 



 --
 http://michaelverdi.com
 http://spinxpress.com
 http://freevlog.org
 Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs


 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[videoblogging] Re: .mov for ipod?

2007-07-03 Thread Bill Streeter
My question is why not make them MP4's too, and skip MOV? It's easy 
to convert MV4's to MP4's just change the file extension. I set 
compressor up to output ipod comtatible files with the MP4 extension 
rather than the M4V so they will play back within a browser window 
without any problems and I don't have to change the file extension 
manually. 

Bill Streeter
LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
www.lofistl.com
www.billstreeter.net


--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have created two feeds for my vlog
 an ipod compatible feed of .mov and m4v files
 and an HD feed of mp4 files
 
 I would like to have the ipod compatible files to just be mov's 
and not
 m4v's
 does anyone know how to make a large (like the size i have now of 
640x360
 .mov file that works on the ipod
 right now i am just using compressor to make my mv4
 i also have visualhub but it doesnt make .mov's
 
 -- 
 Josh Leo
 
 www.JoshLeo.com
 www.WanderingWestMichigan.com
 www.SlowLorisMedia.com
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[videoblogging] Re: ADDING WIDGETS

2007-07-03 Thread waltwst
I have now uploaded a widget to my widgets folder under plugins.
However, when I go to Available Widgets the uploaded widget does not
appear in my list of available widgets Any idea as to what I have done
wrong???
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 You upload widgets to a folder called 'widgets' in the plugins folder
(you
 may have to create the folder).

http://website.com/directory-wherewordpress-is/wp-content/plugins/widget\
s

 - Verdi

 On 7/3/07, waltwst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I am using, or trying to use Wordpress. In Dashboard, under
  Presentation, I have a submenu call sidebar widgets. Could someone
  be so kind as to tell me how I can add new widgets to the Available
  Widgets portion?? Thanks so much for any help. walt
 
 
 



 --
 http://michaelverdi.com
 http://spinxpress.com
 http://freevlog.org
 Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs


 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Re: [videoblogging] Re: .mov for ipod?

2007-07-03 Thread Josh Leo
the reason I want mov's is because my feeds are based off filetype ipod is
separated by mov and mv4 HD is separated by MP4. If i wasnt hosting on blip,
I could specify the videos for each feed by simply using a different
filename prefix but blip changes both the beginning and end of the file
name, thus making this impossible. So for now I will have one filetype for
ipods and another for HD

On 7/3/07, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   My question is why not make them MP4's too, and skip MOV? It's easy
 to convert MV4's to MP4's just change the file extension. I set
 compressor up to output ipod comtatible files with the MP4 extension
 rather than the M4V so they will play back within a browser window
 without any problems and I don't have to change the file extension
 manually.

 Bill Streeter
 LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
 www.lofistl.com
 www.billstreeter.net

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I have created two feeds for my vlog
  an ipod compatible feed of .mov and m4v files
  and an HD feed of mp4 files
 
  I would like to have the ipod compatible files to just be mov's
 and not
  m4v's
  does anyone know how to make a large (like the size i have now of
 640x360
  .mov file that works on the ipod
  right now i am just using compressor to make my mv4
  i also have visualhub but it doesnt make .mov's
 
  --
  Josh Leo
 
  www.JoshLeo.com
  www.WanderingWestMichigan.com
  www.SlowLorisMedia.com
 
 
  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 

  




-- 
Josh Leo

www.JoshLeo.com
www.WanderingWestMichigan.com
www.SlowLorisMedia.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: The History of What My Dog Can't Hear

2007-07-03 Thread Adrian Miles
around the 3/7/07 Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen mentioned about Re: 
[videoblogging] Re: The History of What My Dog Can't He that:
That is true in Denmark as well. The prices are very reasonable (I just
looked them up) and won't hold any establishment back.

ditto in Australia. the agency responsible also redistributes this 
money to artists on the basis of sales of music and radio station 
playlists.
-- 
cheers
Adrian Miles
this email is bloggable [ ] ask first [ ] private [x]
vogmae.net.au
[official compliance stuff:] CRICOS provider code: 00122A


Re: [videoblogging] Re: .mov for ipod?

2007-07-03 Thread Kary Rogers
I think there might be a way for you to use whatever file type you'd  
like for each of the feeds if you base it on role.  When you upload  
the different files for an episode you specify Source or HDTV or  
Portable (iPod).  I think if you based the feeds off the role, it  
would give you a file-type independent feed.

So if you want an HD feed use:

http://www.blip.tv/posts/?user=joshleoskin=rssrole=HDTV

or for ipod:

http://www.blip.tv/posts/?user=joshleoskin=rssrole=Portable%20(iPod)

Score one for blip!

Hope that helps,

--
Kary Rogers
http://karyhead.com


On Jul 3, 2007, at 3:53 PM, Josh Leo wrote:

 the reason I want mov's is because my feeds are based off filetype  
 ipod is
 separated by mov and mv4 HD is separated by MP4. If i wasnt hosting  
 on blip,
 I could specify the videos for each feed by simply using a different
 filename prefix but blip changes both the beginning and end of the  
 file
 name, thus making this impossible. So for now I will have one  
 filetype for
 ipods and another for HD

 On 7/3/07, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  My question is why not make them MP4's too, and skip MOV? It's easy
  to convert MV4's to MP4's just change the file extension. I set
  compressor up to output ipod comtatible files with the MP4 extension
  rather than the M4V so they will play back within a browser window
  without any problems and I don't have to change the file extension
  manually.
 
  Bill Streeter
  LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
  www.lofistl.com
  www.billstreeter.net
 
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging% 
 40yahoogroups.com,
  Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   I have created two feeds for my vlog
   an ipod compatible feed of .mov and m4v files
   and an HD feed of mp4 files
  
   I would like to have the ipod compatible files to just be mov's
  and not
   m4v's
   does anyone know how to make a large (like the size i have now of
  640x360
   .mov file that works on the ipod
   right now i am just using compressor to make my mv4
   i also have visualhub but it doesnt make .mov's
  
   --
   Josh Leo
  
   www.JoshLeo.com
   www.WanderingWestMichigan.com
   www.SlowLorisMedia.com
  
  
   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  
 
 
 






[videoblogging] Re: ADDING WIDGETS

2007-07-03 Thread waltwst

On another forum I was told just to save my widget under plugin and not
plugin/widgets. I tried that and it seemed to work for me and it now
appears in my available widgets. I am not sure of the difference but
thanks for all of your help.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, waltwst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have now uploaded a widget to my widgets folder under plugins.
 However, when I go to Available Widgets the uploaded widget does not
 appear in my list of available widgets Any idea as to what I have
done
 wrong???
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi michaelverdi@
 wrote:
 
  You upload widgets to a folder called 'widgets' in the plugins
folder
 (you
  may have to create the folder).
 

http://website.com/directory-wherewordpress-is/wp-content/plugins/widget\
\
 s
 
  - Verdi
 
  On 7/3/07, waltwst waltwst@ wrote:
  
   I am using, or trying to use Wordpress. In Dashboard, under
   Presentation, I have a submenu call sidebar widgets. Could
someone
   be so kind as to tell me how I can add new widgets to the
Available
   Widgets portion?? Thanks so much for any help. walt
  
  
  
 
 
 
  --
  http://michaelverdi.com
  http://spinxpress.com
  http://freevlog.org
  Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs
 
 
  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 






[videoblogging] Re: ADDING WIDGETS

2007-07-03 Thread waltwst
I was told in another forum not to use caps...sorry about that.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, waltwst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 On another forum I was told just to save my widget under plugin and
not
 plugin/widgets. I tried that and it seemed to work for me and it now
 appears in my available widgets. I am not sure of the difference but
 thanks for all of your help.
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, waltwst waltwst@ wrote:
 
  I have now uploaded a widget to my widgets folder under plugins.
  However, when I go to Available Widgets the uploaded widget does
not
  appear in my list of available widgets Any idea as to what I have
 done
  wrong???
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi michaelverdi@
  wrote:
  
   You upload widgets to a folder called 'widgets' in the plugins
 folder
  (you
   may have to create the folder).
  
 

http://website.com/directory-wherewordpress-is/wp-content/plugins/widget\
\
 \
  s
  
   - Verdi
  
   On 7/3/07, waltwst waltwst@ wrote:
   
I am using, or trying to use Wordpress. In Dashboard, under
Presentation, I have a submenu call sidebar widgets. Could
 someone
be so kind as to tell me how I can add new widgets to the
 Available
Widgets portion?? Thanks so much for any help. walt
   
   
   
  
  
  
   --
   http://michaelverdi.com
   http://spinxpress.com
   http://freevlog.org
   Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs
  
  
   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  
 





[videoblogging] Re: The History of What My Dog Can't Hear

2007-07-03 Thread bordercollieaustralianshepherd
As always I have stories, but this time I'll just provide links and
search terms..


http://www.ascap.com/licensing/

http://www.bmi.com/licensing/?link=navbar

http://www.bmi.com/licensing/entry/C1176


You should be able to find plenty of info using these search terms:
ASCAP and BMI, ASCAP and BMI and VIOLATIONS, ASCAP and BMI and BAR and
CLUB.



 [videoblogging] Re: The History of What My Dog Can't He that:
 That is true in Denmark as well. The prices are very reasonable (I just
 looked them up) and won't hold any establishment back.
 
 ditto in Australia. the agency responsible also redistributes this 
 money to artists on the basis of sales of music and radio station 
 playlists.
 -- 
 cheers
 Adrian Miles





Re: [videoblogging] Re: .mov for ipod?

2007-07-03 Thread Rupert
Somebody will probably tell me why this is bad, but you can just  
rename the file from .m4v to .mov and it works fine.  Plays in  
Quicktime, plays on Ipod, and will be picked up as a .mov by your  
Feedburner feed generator.  For your purposes, you don't need to mess  
about with converting or resaving as or anything like that.
Rupert

On 3 Jul 2007, at 21:53, Josh Leo wrote:

the reason I want mov's is because my feeds are based off filetype  
ipod is
separated by mov and mv4 HD is separated by MP4. If i wasnt hosting  
on blip,
I could specify the videos for each feed by simply using a different
filename prefix but blip changes both the beginning and end of the file
name, thus making this impossible. So for now I will have one  
filetype for
ipods and another for HD

On 7/3/07, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  My question is why not make them MP4's too, and skip MOV? It's easy
  to convert MV4's to MP4's just change the file extension. I set
  compressor up to output ipod comtatible files with the MP4 extension
  rather than the M4V so they will play back within a browser window
  without any problems and I don't have to change the file extension
  manually.
 
  Bill Streeter
  LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
  www.lofistl.com
  www.billstreeter.net
 
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging% 
40yahoogroups.com,
  Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   I have created two feeds for my vlog
   an ipod compatible feed of .mov and m4v files
   and an HD feed of mp4 files
  
   I would like to have the ipod compatible files to just be mov's
  and not
   m4v's
   does anyone know how to make a large (like the size i have now of
  640x360
   .mov file that works on the ipod
   right now i am just using compressor to make my mv4
   i also have visualhub but it doesnt make .mov's
  
   --
   Josh Leo
  
   www.JoshLeo.com
   www.WanderingWestMichigan.com
   www.SlowLorisMedia.com
  
  
   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  
 
 
 

-- 
Josh Leo

www.JoshLeo.com
www.WanderingWestMichigan.com
www.SlowLorisMedia.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] Re: How much money to videoblog full-time?

2007-07-03 Thread Bill Cammack
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  I did read that Bill
   and it still sounds like speculation to me
   cold hard facts are what im after buddy
 
 correct, anytime we talk about ad sales, there's quite a bit of
speculation.
 if you get paid by a company to make videos, then youre just an
employee again.
 
 so here's an idea ive been floating around here lately...
 Do you think a videoblogger could raise money from his
community/viewers?
 This is media supported more like the American NPR model.  All content
 is free to everyone, but there's an understanding that if money isnt
 raised from the public, then the programming will stop. The perception
 is that because its not corporate sponsored, it can be much more
 critical and take longer times to tell stories. (NPR is not perfect,
 just an analogy)
 
 So my point is.
 let's say I want $4000 a month to live and make a regular videoblog
on a theme.
 is it crazy to think he could raise $5 a month from 800 people?
 Its almost the great humbler because then you got to make a real
 connection with people.
 you have to really connect with a community, and they would really
 have to feel like youre a voice for them.
 
 Jay
 
 
 -- 
 Here I am
 http://jaydedman.com
 
 Check out the latest project: http://politicalvideo.org
 500 hours of George Bush speeches!!
 Search, download, remix!!


I've revised my opinion on this topic.  I don't think $5 from 800
viewers is feasible, but I also don't think you have to go all the way
 corporate with it.

I think it's possible to split the difference IF you can get a topic
that's important enough to a lot of people to get those that have
money to sponsor you in order to enable the rest of the people to get
the message either for free or for whatever they wish to or can afford
to donate to the program(s).

The benefit to the donors would be some kind of recognition or
advertisement.  This show has been brought to you by _.  I'm
thinking somewhere along the lines of what Rudy  Casey did with
http://Galacticast.com with credit given to donors  supporters. 
Assuming one could come up with a show that was seen to be of great
use to a population, I would think donors would like to be affiliated
with the effort and potentially fund a videoblog to the degree that
they're not really losing out.  With a broad enough group that's
benefiting, I can see several philanthropists picking up the slack for
many of the 800 people who can't afford to donate or just aren't
interested enough in your project to give you money for it.

Of course, this is a chicken and egg situation where the more money
that's donated to your show, the better you can make the show because
you don't have to spend your time making money other ways.  You can
devote all your work-time to filming content and making the show more
interesting, longer and more polished.  This attention to product is
likely what's going to get the sponsors interested in donating, so it
requires a leap of faith on your part to start out making a quality
program and HOPING that the supporting donations start to roll in.

Otherwise... It's back to the old school.  Pitch it and if someone
offers you funding, go ahead and make the show.  If not... Regroup and
pitch something else.

--
billcammack



Re: [videoblogging] Re: ADDING WIDGETS

2007-07-03 Thread Michael Verdi
Sorry about the wrong info. I'll double-check my answers next time. :(

- Verdi

On 7/3/07, waltwst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   I was told in another forum not to use caps...sorry about that.

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 waltwst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  On another forum I was told just to save my widget under plugin and
 not
  plugin/widgets. I tried that and it seemed to work for me and it now
  appears in my available widgets. I am not sure of the difference but
  thanks for all of your help.
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 waltwst waltwst@ wrote:
  
   I have now uploaded a widget to my widgets folder under plugins.
   However, when I go to Available Widgets the uploaded widget does
 not
   appear in my list of available widgets Any idea as to what I have
  done
   wrong???
   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 Michael Verdi michaelverdi@
   wrote:
   
You upload widgets to a folder called 'widgets' in the plugins
  folder
   (you
may have to create the folder).
   
  
 
 http://website.com/directory-wherewordpress-is/wp-content/plugins/widget\
 \
 http://website.com/directory-wherewordpress-is/wp-content/plugins/widget
 \
   s
   
- Verdi
   
On 7/3/07, waltwst waltwst@ wrote:

 I am using, or trying to use Wordpress. In Dashboard, under
 Presentation, I have a submenu call sidebar widgets. Could
  someone
 be so kind as to tell me how I can add new widgets to the
  Available
 Widgets portion?? Thanks so much for any help. walt



   
   
   
--
http://michaelverdi.com
http://spinxpress.com
http://freevlog.org
Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs
   
   
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
   
  
 

  




-- 
http://michaelverdi.com
http://spinxpress.com
http://freevlog.org
Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] Re: ADDING WIDGETS

2007-07-03 Thread waltwst
Well, obviously, I just appreciate your interest and efforts to assist
me. Thanks again.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Sorry about the wrong info. I'll double-check my answers next time. :(

 - Verdi

 On 7/3/07, waltwst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I was told in another forum not to use caps...sorry about that.
 
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
  waltwst waltwst@ wrote:
  
  
   On another forum I was told just to save my widget under plugin
and
  not
   plugin/widgets. I tried that and it seemed to work for me and it
now
   appears in my available widgets. I am not sure of the difference
but
   thanks for all of your help.
   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
  waltwst waltwst@ wrote:
   
I have now uploaded a widget to my widgets folder under plugins.
However, when I go to Available Widgets the uploaded widget
does
  not
appear in my list of available widgets Any idea as to what I
have
   done
wrong???
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
  Michael Verdi michaelverdi@
wrote:

 You upload widgets to a folder called 'widgets' in the plugins
   folder
(you
 may have to create the folder).

   
  
 
http://website.com/directory-wherewordpress-is/wp-content/plugins/widget\
\
  \
 
http://website.com/directory-wherewordpress-is/wp-content/plugins/widge\
t
  \
s

 - Verdi

 On 7/3/07, waltwst waltwst@ wrote:
 
  I am using, or trying to use Wordpress. In Dashboard, under
  Presentation, I have a submenu call sidebar widgets. Could
   someone
  be so kind as to tell me how I can add new widgets to the
   Available
  Widgets portion?? Thanks so much for any help. walt
 
 
 



 --
 http://michaelverdi.com
 http://spinxpress.com
 http://freevlog.org
 Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs


 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

   
  
 
 
 



 --
 http://michaelverdi.com
 http://spinxpress.com
 http://freevlog.org
 Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs


 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[videoblogging] HBO site and a blog

2007-07-03 Thread bordercollieaustralianshepherd


http://www.thestorygetsdeeper.com/

http://www.HBOVoyeur.com