Re: [videoblogging] NBC/Universal changed its name
Sony does not own Universal; Vivendi used to before they sold it to NBC. Sony owns Columbia. -m On 6/15/07, Jonathan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I didn't realize Sony owned Universal. Yikes! On 6/15/07, Paul Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought Universal was quite BIG too, as it belongs to the Sony Corp, but what do I know, I am from outside the US. LOL I am going on Holiday to Crete now, that's near Greece for those unfamiliar with world geography, and guess what guys, I am not even taking my Video camera, lol. See you after the hols. Paul Knight On 15 Jun 2007, at 17:25, joshpaul wrote: For those who might have missed it, NBC Universal Television Studio changed its name to Universal Media Studios. Not only did they drop NBC, but also Television. Take from it what you will. (International readers who don't know, NBC is one of the major three television networks in the states. Read: BIG.) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- -Jonathan Bloom http://thenameiwantedwastaken.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links -- -m http://www.secretelite.com/michael
Re: [videoblogging] I've got 2 Joost invites... anybody want one?
Got the invite...thanks so much! Yeah I am late to the game in looking at Joost but I played with it for a few minutes - blogged my initial thoughts http://www.secretelite.com/michael/2007/03/22/joined-joost-public-beta/ -m On 3/21/07, Ryan Ozawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sent you one, Michael, unless someone else got one to you first. I'm glad there's still some interest. For a while these Joost tokens were starting to feel like Gmail invites! I played with it, but it's not quite the game changer I was thinking it might be. Then again, it's still early in the first quarter. Who knows what the next few plays will bring. Ryan -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003) - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com wj8DBQFGAa9Ez+jy50P8pxcRAo1JAKCQDTF2VqNaJHL0R2oCN1dYD3ERhACeJ0Tw FgTLEjD28pTfZvpfVlnKebw= =Dk5k -END PGP SIGNATURE- [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links -- -m http://www.secretelite.com/michael
Re: [videoblogging] I've got 2 Joost invites... anybody want one?
Replying to the group as I'm not sure who still has invites, but I'd love one. Thanks! -m On 3/21/07, Chuck Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: An email from Joost today informed me that I have 2 invites to use before tomorrow. If anyone is interested in one of them, please email me with your name and email address. email to request joost invite: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chuck's Vlog http://runchuckrun.blogspot.com Yahoo! Groups Links -- -m http://www.secretelite.com/michael
Re: [videoblogging] Washington DC Area Bloggers
I don't produce a videoblog of my own, but I'm on the list and in the DC area (Northern VA). -m On 3/13/07, Zulma Aguiar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was wondering if anyone from the DC metro area is on this list. I'm hoping to meet with some of you just for fun. Or if events are already happening, I'd love to join the fun. Best, Zulma * Zulma Aguiar Electronic Artist Arlington, VA (Washington DC) 703-416-2262 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Www.zulmaaguiar.com Yahoo! Groups Links -- -m http://www.secretelite.com/michael
Re: [videoblogging] Video editing
A lot of people like Sony Vegas and they have a lite version that's well spoken of. Not sure if it's under $100 but it's in that range. I don't have expereince with Vegas personally, but again, it's highly regarded by a lot of people who are a lot more knowledgable and competant than I. -m On 1/22/06, jaguarfan888 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm looking into purchasing some new editing software because I'm quite fed up with windows movie maker, does anyone know of any really good editing programs that export in the quicktime format and cost less than $100? Thanks. Yahoo! Groups Links -- -m http://www.secretelite.com/michael Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: the clerks videoblog
On 1/18/06, Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 18, 2006, at 6:02 PM, wtrainbow wrote: Even though you might not be making money now if you do in the future they could so for back royalties with interest and that could feasibly be a handsome chunk of change. Interesting you should say that... if someone starts to make money you could legaly structure yourselves and incoporate to avoid liabilities from the original practices... it's quite simple actually. Yes and no. If it's obvious that was your intent, a judge can pierce the corporate veil. It would be better to plan not to create illegal content in the first place. -- -m http://www.secretelite.com/michael Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: AVID parties
I'm not sure what that means..the only AVID tools I have experinece with are the Xpress line which, while more expensive than FInal Cut Pro or Premiere, are not the systems you were looking at. But on the low end you can get an AVID setup that competes with Final Cut Pro and is the same version as the PC based edition. I'm not personally familiar with the Symophony/Media Composer/Unity level of products, but as has been pointed out here they were originally developed exclusively for Mac and only much later came to Windows. While I suspect that FCP has stolen some of their thunder at the low end on Macs, as far as I know you can still buy all of their products for either platform. Of course- another point to make is that AVID has various products and product lines for various markets. While some film stuff has been moving to FCP, I'm not at all sure that FCP is popular in the realtime/news arena. As far as I know, Apple has no products that compete with the AVID workflow and clip archiving products for news production. -mOn 12/7/05, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My friend said that he finally had to switch to PC because money had poured into AVID(I gather from Microsoft)to have them produce programs for three years before updating their Mac programs. He said that he had been forced out of using Mac because of this. He says that because of this money-lobbying, AVID for Macs will always be three years behind, that Mac users will always be playing catch-up. At the meeting three months ago, they took a survey of those present and about 40% were still using Macs. Randolfe (Randy) Wicker Videographer, Writer, ActivistAdvisor: The Immortality InstituteHoboken, NJhttp://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/201-656-3280 - Original Message - From: Enric To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 3:12 PM Subject: [videoblogging] Re: AVID parties --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]... wrote: On Dec 7, 2005, at 1:52 PM, Randolfe Wicker wrote: AVID systems are quite expensive and are used by real professionals. I eavesdropped on guys from major news networks talking about their rendering time problems, etc. They announced they would have AVIDfor Macs available by the end of 2005.LOL, Avid started on the Mac. I went to a Avid training class around1991.Final Cut Pro has been competing and taking away customers from Avidrecently. The film editor Walter Murch (Apocalypse Now, TheGodfather II, The Conversation, The Engligh Patient, etc.) hasbeen using Final Cut Pro for editing motion pictures since 2003 onCold Mountain. -- Enric http://www.cirne.com Determine the Media They have a free version for Mac and PC: http://www.avid.com/freedv/index.asp I doubt anyone there would even know what vlogging was about. Avid knows what blogging is about. --Steve -- Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com Video Blog - http://stevegarfield.blogs.com Text Blog - http://offonatangent.blogspot.com Like Paul Revere, leading the citizen's media revolution. SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service . -- -mhttp://www.secretelite.com/michael YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Rec. Host Provider??
Yeah I'm a happy Dreamhost customer but I've never completely understood the referal bonus thing. I know I can make coupon codes that theoretically give you a discount, and I know that I then get a kickback as well from Dreamhost, but the way that actually works has always eluded me so I have no idea if it's a good deal. Although, frankly, even without any discounts, Dreamhost is cheap and the service is good. I mean, shared hosting will never be the same as a dedicated redundant infrastructure, but for $10/month...you get what you pay for (and with Dreamhost you get more than you pay for, in my opinion). If you do signup with Dreamhost, feel free to use my promo code MRIDLEYPROMO - I think that's supposed to give you a discount, but if it doesn't then I guess don't use it :-) I set it up a while ago for someone I knew who was going to sign up but then they ended up donig something else for their hosting (I forget what) so I'm pretty sure I've never actually used it to see if it works. But I highly doubt it will raise your bills :) so I figure it's safe to mention. -mOn 12/5/05, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DreamHost is favored by many. You can sometimes get discount coupons on the Internet. Beware of referrals because if you list someone as a referrer, you can't use the discount coupon and the person referring you gets something like 25% of all your future purchases on DreamHost. I suspect this referral fee stuff is widespread. Randolfe (Randy) Wicker Videographer, Writer, ActivistAdvisor: The Immortality InstituteHoboken, NJhttp://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/201-656-3280 - Original Message - From: havilahland33 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 6:54 PM Subject: [videoblogging] Rec. Host Provider?? I am thinking about finding my own host besides blogspot. Anysuggestions from the videobloggers on which host would be a goodquality and affordable choice? Thank you. SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service . -- -mhttp://www.secretelite.com/michael YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: mena trott
In the vein of shameless self promotion, I just thought I'd mention that the shownotes.info site is available for any and all pod and vidcasters who'd like to use it for their show. Obviously you can setup your own wiki for shownotes, but if you'd like to use shownotes.info then come on down.If you have any problems getting setup, drop me a line.-mOn 12/6/05, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But I don't think Adam Curry is proposing a decoupling of audio from rich-media web hyperlink environment. In fact, it's just the opposite. Curry is exploring new ways to add even greater textual information and links to podcasts, including having listeners provide added details on podcast topics. For his recent show, you have the blog entry: #292 Daily Source Code for Tuesday December 6th 2005 http://www.curry.com/2005/12/06#a54657 Which allows comments AND you have a link to Shownotes: http://www.shownotes.info/wiki/Category:Daily_Source_Code_Shownotes This show's notes are here: http://www.shownotes.info/wiki/DSC_292 A wiki based page for listeners to annotate the show notes... Very cool. The show isn't just finished when it is sent out on the RSS feed, it continues to grow with contributions from listeners. On Dec 6, 2005, at 6:04 PM, Enric wrote: Perhaps the mistake is by proponents like Adam Curry who come from a flat, centralized media radio and TV background for decoupling the audio from rich-media web hyperlink environment. --Steve -- Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com Video Blog - http://stevegarfield.blogs.com Text Blog - http://offonatangent.blogspot.com Like Paul Revere, leading the citizen's media revolution. SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service . -- -mhttp://www.secretelite.com/michael YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Cisco CEO sees traffic up 300-500% per year for 10 years due to VIDEO
Should be good news for the telcos who laid all that dirk fibre in the late 90's and very early 2000's era. -m On 12/6/05, Digital [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a meeting with analysts today the WSJ Online reports that, John Chambers, CEO of Cisco Systems, said he expected network loads to increase 300% to 500% a year over the next decade. YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- -m http://www.secretelite.com/michael Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] making directories
It would be cool if there were some metadata format to have timecoded shownotes associated with vidcasts so that you could keep track of their content on a post by post basis and just get the clips you want. I know Doug Kaye basically already does this with some of the content on IT Conversations. And apple has their chapter-ized AAC podcast format... -m On 12/4/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 02:32:51 +0100, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this is interesting. its a list of known blogs circa 2000: http://www.jjg.net/retired/portal/tpoowl.html I'm not on it! I got my first Blogger blog in October 2000, and if I had one a ton of other people had them. That list looks like the A-list. :o) there's no really directory for text blogs that i know of...did they not think to do it? how will we be more successful? You're assuming that the lact of a directory is a problem. The total number of weblogs is an issue (22.3 million and counting according to Technorati). Weblogs.com have been unsuable for anyone except robots for years because of this (it is however extremely valuable for robots). The deal is that video-only blogs are seen as something that should be categorized on a blog-by-blog basis. Weblogs (and mixed-media blogs) are categorized on a post-by-post basis. A directory doesn't make sense, but something that helps me find what I'm looking for is (ie. blog post(s) about what I'm looking for). Video-only blogs haven't really adopted blogging in this respect. It's always dangerous to predict the future, but I can try anyway. I think video-only blogs will take directories to heart because people can't decide if they're blogging or making tv for iPod and PSP. Text blogs and mixed-media will continue like they always have because it's a better way to categorize blogs. - Andreas -- URL:http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links -- -m http://www.secretelite.com/michael Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/.QUssC/izNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] making directories
Sure but how do I link to the segmet 15 minutes in? -m On 12/4/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Write a text description in your blog software when you post your video. No need to overcomplicate things. - Andreas On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:45:29 +0100, Michael Ridley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It would be cool if there were some metadata format to have timecoded shownotes associated with vidcasts so that you could keep track of their content on a post by post basis and just get the clips you want. I know Doug Kaye basically already does this with some of the content on IT Conversations. And apple has their chapter-ized AAC podcast format... -m On 12/4/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 02:32:51 +0100, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this is interesting. its a list of known blogs circa 2000: http://www.jjg.net/retired/portal/tpoowl.html I'm not on it! I got my first Blogger blog in October 2000, and if I had one a ton of other people had them. That list looks like the A-list. :o) there's no really directory for text blogs that i know of...did they not think to do it? how will we be more successful? You're assuming that the lact of a directory is a problem. The total number of weblogs is an issue (22.3 million and counting according to Technorati). Weblogs.com have been unsuable for anyone except robots for years because of this (it is however extremely valuable for robots). The deal is that video-only blogs are seen as something that should be categorized on a blog-by-blog basis. Weblogs (and mixed-media blogs) are categorized on a post-by-post basis. A directory doesn't make sense, but something that helps me find what I'm looking for is (ie. blog post(s) about what I'm looking for). Video-only blogs haven't really adopted blogging in this respect. It's always dangerous to predict the future, but I can try anyway. I think video-only blogs will take directories to heart because people can't decide if they're blogging or making tv for iPod and PSP. Text blogs and mixed-media will continue like they always have because it's a better way to categorize blogs. - Andreas -- URL:http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links -- -m http://www.secretelite.com/michael Yahoo! Groups Links -- URL:http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links -- -m http://www.secretelite.com/michael Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Porn Shmorn. Grow up! There's real life going on.
Well I certainly agree that people should be allowed to put whatever content they so choose on their web site, filtered or not. My issue is with this spreading conventional wisdom that seems to state that we all have some inherent, deep, and fundamental responsiblity to sanitize what we can and firewall what we can't in abject terror of the remote possibility that some small child might stumble upon it. Certainly if some private directory or archive chooses not to include pornographic material (or any other kind) that is their perogative. But this sense that if one chooses not to do so they are in some way morally inferior is itself repugnant to me. And again the question of whether or not it's wise to conduct said parental filtering of the world for children is a whole other topic of discussion. And a can of worms probably best unopened. While I would agree that showing a 4-year-old Full Metal Jacket is on the gratuitous side, I think you equally do a disservice to one's (older) children by trying to shield them too much. After all, this world is a horrible, mean, petty, shallow, and opportunistic place that will chew you up, shred you, and spit you back out again for round two if you let down your guard. It's all well and good that we try to create a haven in our home that's as sheltered from that cruel reality as we can. But raising a kid in a cocoon and then thrusting them out, helpless and unprepared, to be bled dry by the world once they graduate from school doesn't seem like such a wise choice. -mOn 12/2/05, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree with you on that. I have never tried to protect my daughter, beyond giving her what words of wisdom I could from a very early age. We had a discussion about this in this group back in March, and I wrote about my attitude/solutions back then: http://beginningwithi.com/tech/kidsonline.html However, there are those who do feel responsible for what is seen on their site (not least because they could face legal liabilities), that's their choice as much as it's yours to do nothing to filter. On 12/2/05, Michael Ridley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The point is - it is not my responsibility to filter my site (or my life in general) in the event that some child might happen upon it. There's this concept called parental responsibility. It's a doctrine which puts forth the concept that if you are going to have children, then that's an active exercise which requires full participation for approximately 16 to 18 years. -- best regards,Deirdré Straughan www.beginningwithi.com (personal)www.tvblob.com (work) SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service . -- -mhttp://www.secretelite.com/michael SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: my video got taken off archive
On 12/2/05, Randy Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if that is the case, then what happens when sony gets mad at me for smashing one of there tvs and calling it crap. would that be a trade mark issue?? No, although depending on your characterization if it as crap it may be slander or defamation if your comments are factually untrue. if im wearing a nike shirt does that make my video a tm issue?Depends on if a viewer of your video would construe that video to have been made or approved of by Nike as some sort of official communication. if i do a video blog in my car and the radio has a song on is that a copy rite isue??Yes it is.| i think it should be like this she bought the doll. its hers.Yeah unfortunately the law doesn't necessarily take common sense into account. -m i liked the video randy averrycoollifeblog.blogspot.com From: Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] Re: my video got taken off archive Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 13:38:34 - I don't think the issue with Barbie is copyright. I think it's a trade mark issue. And trademarks a quite a bit different than copyright under the law. Under copyright (which is registered with the Library of Congress, in the US--although it needn't be to be legal) you own it no matter what unless you overtly give it up. Trademarks are different. Trademarks need to be protected to remain your property. So if someone starts to use your Trademark and you don't do due diligence to stop it, then the Trademark can cease to be your trademark and become a generic mark that anyone can use. Thus explains why companies so jealously guard against infringement of their trademark. Because under law if they don't they can loose them. So no doubt this was an issue of not just copyright but also of trademark. Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I concede the point. I didn't know that infringement of Barbie's copyright would be the real issue. But, even on that level, I wonder if an argument couldn't be made for setting up some site in China or somewhere that was really free of copyright constraints. I understand people deserve to be paid for their work and what they own, etc. However, in this case, there was no financial gain being made. Barbie was being used to make a political statement (against men in my opinion) and therefore should be a legitimate target for parody like any celebrity. Randolfe (Randy) Wicker Videographer, Writer, Activist Advisor: The Immortality Institute Hoboken, NJ http://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/ 201-656-3280 - Original Message - From: Steve Watkins To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 5:58 PM Subject: [videoblogging] Re: my video got taken off archive Archive.org's aims to capture history do not mean they can afford to pretend their are no laws that may affect the content they can legally host. The internet would be very different today if all the laws in all countries were always followed to the letter. Clearly that doesnt happen, but responsible sites that dont want to lose all their money in court have to do some sort of risk assessment. In a case where theres already been legal action against a very similar type of video, I think its easy to see why they may of decided it wasnt worth it. A possible justification could go along the lines of 'would you rather us ditch a small part of history or have us lose the entire archive due to the cost of fighting lawsuits'? Of course all this is just speculation, I have no idea why that video actually was removed or the though processes behind the decision. Steve of Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this the Internet Archive that claims to be capturing the history of our day? Aren't sexual issues part of that history? It is really outrageous that they took your vlog off. And, I say that, as someone who doesn't fully agree with your viewpoint. Actually, I watched this vlog and I felt it treated men unfairly. It made me mad. That is good. Something that provokes you and challenges you to think is good whether you like it or not. Randolfe (Randy) Wicker Videographer, Writer, Activist Advisor: The Immortality Institute Hoboken, NJ http://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/ 201-656-3280 - Original Message - From: Aimee Buyea To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 5:09 PM Subject: [videoblogging] my video got taken off archive well i guess my work on gender issues is a little too provocative. Dear Patron: You recently uploaded an item to one of our collections. Curators had to remove it, possibly
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Porn Shmorn. Grow up! There's real life going on.
Of course it will. In the same way that the kids section of Blockbuster interests parents. There seems to be this view in our culture lately that kids are like little grownups and they just go and do whatever they want and so society has to protect them. That perspective is...not even wrong..it's just non-sensical. Parents make the rules. Parents enforce the limits. If there is a kids section of a web site, then presumably that's what the parents would sit down and look at with their children. Just like parents will steer their children to the kids section of the video store. It's not like parents just let their young children loose out in the world and let them wander around XXX movie theatres all day long. Perhaps some parents DO do that, but that's not my problem - that's their problem for being bad parents. And I'm pretty sure that if you have a 4 year old wandering around the red light district trying to get into peep shows, having a law requiring the establishment to card them and not let them in is probably not going to put that kid back on the right path and keep them from car jacking me in 10 years. They're probably well on that path already due to very poor parenting. -mOn 12/2/05, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jay dedman wrote: Maybe the opposite approach would be logical? Instead of filtering the not for kids stuff, filter the kid friendly stuff. And include a warning on site stating that there may be adult content within, but check out our kid-friendly zone here You can then have categories/tags/sections of kid safe video content which could be many things and is up to the directory curators to decide how best to approach that. My point is, IF the concern for children resides in the sites owner and IF they care to put effort towards designating a section on the site geared for children education and entertainment etc, then this could take care of most of the aforementioned issues maybe ;-) great idea. very proactive. eric rice and ryanne made a kidsafe feed a while back for eric's kids. http://video.ericrice.com/videoblogs/ANTresearch.mov but i think the feed died out. see this is a great idea: a kidsafe directory. itll come as content grows. im not interested in censoring, but in organizing and educating. everything will exist. we can simply chose where. Well, we already have yahooligans.yahoo.com, what about kids.mefeedia.com? :) It would be cool to be able to point kids to a videoblogging directory and let them explore what's there. Sometimes the most creative stuff comes from kids and the way they look at the world. You know, before the reality of it all crushes their spirit and makes them just another cog in the corporate machine that is today's society. Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for the future... I remember when I was a kid I didn't want to read books for children but those adults thought were important. I think I kids section will interest parents mostly. -- Enric SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service . -- -mhttp://www.secretelite.com/michael YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Putting pictures in the Title Bar?
To what title bar are you refering? If you're talking about the address line in the browser, google for favicon.ico -m On 12/1/05, Devin Grey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've seen some vlogs that use their own graphics for the Title bar of the blog. How do you do that? does anyone know? Specifically, I want a little picture next to the words Tap Down the State Do I have to do some kind of html thing? I hope not...haha Thanks a bunch! Devin Grey http://tapdownthestate.blogspot.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- -m http://www.secretelite.com/michael Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] voxmedia.org hacked?
Yeah I noticed it was down earlier when I was going to put a link to it on www.podcasterswiki.com ... I hadn't been to voxmedia.org in a while and I thought maybe it went away and I didn't get the memo. But apparently I just happened to go there the day it's broken..go figure..hope it comes back soon :) -m On 12/1/05, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hmmm, it 404 (for the moment) but i'm not sure it's hacked it's pointing to one of ryan ozawa's pages i think he owns the vox media site do not worry i can set up a new site/wiki if necessary i even have a backup of all links to the archives let's wait and see what ryan says hopefully he'll let us know markus ecomputerd wrote: It looks like voxmedia.org has been hacked. Just wanted to notify you if you are responsible for voxmedia.org. If you are not involved with voxmedia.org do NOT go there and give the hackers any additional hits. If you are involved with voxmedia.org, please let us know when it is fixed via this group. Thanks! Yahoo! Groups Links -- My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us http://apperceptions.org http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com http://spinflow.org http://wearethemedia.com http://www.corante.com/events/feedfest/ aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: msandy spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- -m http://www.secretelite.com/michael Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] my video got taken off archive
OK, since you brought it up - it must be saidthe best US Appelate Court opinion ever - Mattel, Inc vs. MCA Records, Inc. for trademark infringement on their Barbie mark and the counterclaim by MCA for defmation...in the US 9th Circuit...in the opinion of the court, Judge Kozinski writes... If this were a sci-fi melodrama, it might be called Speech-Zilla meets Trademark Kong. then insert about 30 pages of legal opinion and..in conclusion... MCA filed a counterclaim for defamation based on the Mattel representative's use of the words bank robber, heist, crime and theft. But all of these are variants of the invective most often hurled at accused infringers, namely piracy. No one hearing this accusation understands intellec- tual property owners to be saying that infringers are nautical cutthroats with eyepatches and peg legs who board galleons to plunder cargo. In context, all these terms are nonactionable rhetorical hyperbole, Gilbrook v. City of Westminster, 177 F.3d 839, 863 (9th Cir. 1999). The parties are advised to chill. AFFIRMED. Best...opinion...ev-ar! http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/2507FB5DDCB94D7088256C51F3B8/$file/9856453.pdf?openelement -m On 11/29/05, T.Whid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It probably doesn't have anything to do with it being sexually provocative, it's just provoking a lawsuit... Mattel has a long history of suing like crazy over Barbie. just google barbie lawsuit... Still, it's a drag that it was removed. On 11/29/05, Aimee Buyea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well i guess my work on gender issues is a little too provocative. Dear Patron: You recently uploaded an item to one of our collections. Curators had to remove it, possibly due to one of the following reasons: -Rights status unclear -Rights status appears inappropriate for our collections -Inappropriate content (eg, pornography) -Uploader requested the removal -Item content was empty or broken Although we appreciate your willingness to contribute, we would like to host only content that rightsholders will permit us to host. Please do not attempt to reupload this item. Thanks for your understanding! -an Internet Archive curator check it out! aimee http://onegirloneworld.blogspot.com/2005/11/warning-sites-linked-contain-adult.html Yahoo! Groups Links -- twhidwww.mteww.com/twhid SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- -m http://www.secretelite.com/michael Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: What editing software?
Personally I like Avid. A lot of people on DV-L swear by Vegas, and it's certainly a lot cheaper. I don't have experience with Vegas myself, but a lot of people who do a lot more professional video production than I do speak very highly of it. And I think there's even some cheap-o under $100 beginner version as well... -mOn 11/28/05, Joan Khoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm already using Windows Movie Maker and want to do a lot more with my videos. Just hoping for some input on other editing software. I'm assuming from your reaction Pinnacle is a no no? :) Joan http://rantingsofjoan.blogspot.com On 11/29/05, blackhelicoptersvideo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh my god...please dont lead someone towards Pinnacle. I cant think ofa worse NLE to have someone attempt to use.My opinion would be, if you are a beginner, to use Windows Movie Makerif you dont want to spend any money. Adobe Premiere Elements if you want to stay under $100.More advanced...Adobe Premiere.--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com , Kunga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For what platform? Mac OS X or Windoze XP? Mac iMovie. PC Pinnacle Studio Plus 10 -- Taylor Barcroft http://www.blogger.com/profile/11159903 New Media Publisher, Editor, Video Journalist, Podcaster, Futurecaster Santa Cruz CA, Beach of the Silicon Valley URL http://FutureMedia.org RSS http://feeds.feedburner.com/FutureMedia iTunes http://tinyurl.com/8ql87 On Nov 28, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Joan Khoo wrote: Hi guys! I was just wondering what video editing software do you use and what do you think of it. Cheers Joan http://rantingsofjoan.blogspot.com Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM~- Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- -mhttp://www.secretelite.com/michael YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: What editing software?
DV-L is here http://groups.google.com/group/DV-L - it's a Google Group (although I subscribe to the mailing list) for DV (digital video/camcorder) stuff. But a lot of the people on the mailing list are professionals, so it's a pretty good source of info. Of course most of these people are making documentaries and industrial/corporate videos and music videos and films and whatever else - not vidcasts - but the technology is the same. -mOn 11/28/05, Ronen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what's DV-L ? Also, the main fault in Vegas it you can't really tag source footage and have multiple options / sub-sequences. That's why for smaller/straight video, it comes in handy. And strikes me as more precise than the 'big boys'.On 11/28/05, Michael Ridley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Personally I like Avid. A lot of people on DV-L swear by Vegas, and it's certainly a lot cheaper. I don't have experience with Vegas myself, but a lot of people who do a lot more professional video production than I do speak very highly of it. And I think there's even some cheap-o under $100 beginner version as well... -mOn 11/28/05, Joan Khoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm already using Windows Movie Maker and want to do a lot more with my videos. Just hoping for some input on other editing software. I'm assuming from your reaction Pinnacle is a no no? :) Joan http://rantingsofjoan.blogspot.com On 11/29/05, blackhelicoptersvideo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh my god...please dont lead someone towards Pinnacle. I cant think ofa worse NLE to have someone attempt to use.My opinion would be, if you are a beginner, to use Windows Movie Makerif you dont want to spend any money. Adobe Premiere Elements if you want to stay under $100.More advanced...Adobe Premiere.--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com , Kunga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For what platform? Mac OS X or Windoze XP? Mac iMovie. PC Pinnacle Studio Plus 10 -- Taylor Barcroft http://www.blogger.com/profile/11159903 New Media Publisher, Editor, Video Journalist, Podcaster, Futurecaster Santa Cruz CA, Beach of the Silicon Valley URL http://FutureMedia.org RSS http://feeds.feedburner.com/FutureMedia iTunes http://tinyurl.com/8ql87 On Nov 28, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Joan Khoo wrote: Hi guys! I was just wondering what video editing software do you use and what do you think of it. Cheers Joan http://rantingsofjoan.blogspot.com Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM~- Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- -mhttp://www.secretelite.com/michael YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- -mhttp://www.secretelite.com/michael SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Typepad Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Free, private blog?
Livejournal should work, but I suspect that might be blocked as well. -mOn 11/19/05, jonny goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone know of free blog that is password protected so people have to log in to view it? 360.yahoo.com is can do this, but I can't use Yahoo for this as it's blocked by board of Education filters at the site where I'll be. I want something easy to set up and free a la blogger. Also, I'd like it to be able to handle around 50 people logging into it at once with the same login. Thanks! YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- -mhttp://www.secretelite.com/michael YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Compression techniques - file size ratios
I'm not sure about your compression figuers, but QT7 is now available for Windows. Also vlc (http://www.videolan.org) has experimental support for H.264 although I guess that's not really ready for prime time by definition. -mOn 11/9/05, Will [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After numerous attempts of trying different compression settings an codecs - I ended up with a with a 19.8 mb file that was 5 minutes long. This works out to about 4mb/minute. I was wondering if this is a common size for a file this long? Is there any stats out there on what kind of compression ratios vodcasters are using? My final version was compressed using 3ivx - dual pass. I had orginally had the size down to 11 mb using h.264 with the same quality but I discovered that only QT 7 could play this - which ruled out a lot users. BTW - any windows users that couldn't see the inaugural version of tiny tube because of the QT7 can now view it. Will http://www.tiny-tube.com SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group videoblogging on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. -- -mhttp://www.secretelite.com/michael SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: YouTube - WTF?
Speaking of Sorenson Squeeze there's also Discreet Cleaner and Cleaner XL. Actually I guess it's Autodesk Cleaner now since the acquistion but whatever. I'm not sure what Cleaner costs - Cleaner XL is a bit more expensive than $99. But just pointing it out as another industry standard compression and media conversion tool. And for MPEG there's TMPGEnc which has gotten quite good reviews over on DV-L although it's known for being a bit fussy/verbose as far as the options and settings it offers. But then again if you're anal about compression then that's a good thing, right? -m On 11/9/05, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/8/05, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well flash, of course. The advantage of flash video is that it'sprobably the most compatible format there is for Internet viewing.Of course the disadvantage is that it's not easy to create a flashvideo, Sorenson Squeeze does it very nicely and easily, costs $99. You can choose your bitrate, and independently set audio bitrate and window size. I change the settings depending on what's in the video (and how important the audio is) to optimize filesize while trying not to compromise the viewer experience. -- -mhttp://www.secretelite.com/michael SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
