Re: [videoblogging] Re: preroll time?
Standard time for pre-roll is :10 or :15 seconds. We buy media for clients, and I placed several :15 ads this month. Best, Zachary On Feb 8, 2008 2:46 AM, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pre-roll? Preferably 3-5 seconds. First Position? 5-10 seconds. I really don't enjoy watching 15 seconds of show and then 15 seconds of commercial. Depending on how long your show is, you can get away with another 15 second spot in the middle or near the end, but those are less coveted by advertisers, for obvious reasons of people not watching the show that long and never seeing the commercial. I also think that the more integrated the ad is with the show, the better. Have your on-air talent do the voiceover or the actual spot. Bill Cammack http://BillCammack.com http://billcammack.com/ --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Jan McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been watching all the networks web shows on and off from the beginning. The least intrusive of them is :05 The longest, :15 All the mid-roll ads are :30 Jn On Feb 7, 2008 6:09 PM, Irina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yeah, anything longer than 5 seconds gets skipped. thats from a much more intensive study from france. cuz you know anything from france is intense :) seriously tho, 5 seconds is long enuf for impact but not long enuf to annoy On Feb 7, 2008 10:47 AM, Kathryn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: HI Jim, Believe it or not research has shown that the most effective pre-roll add is the thirty second pre-roll, http://tinyurl.com/289a95 However research has also show that uses skip videos with pre-rolls, http:// tinyurl.com/24hay9 I used a ten-second pre-roll against my best judgement (client insisted upon it), but my advice to you if you must insert a pre-roll is to keep it as short as possible and hope its over before the user has a chance to click away and then follow up with companion links or a really great mid or post-roll, or even better, convince the client to let you incorporate their product directly into the content. kathryn http://www.synchronis.tv On Feb 7, 2008, at 1:35 PM, Jim Kukral wrote: Does anyone know what the standard time is for a preroll ad? I know there aren't really any standards yet for online video. Just looking for feedback and opinions. 5 seconds? Jim Kukral Check out my video show at www.jimkukral.com. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- http://geekentertainment.tv [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links -- The Faux Press - better than real http://feeds.feedburner.com/diaryofafauxjournalist - RSS http://fauxpress.blogspot.com aim=janofsound air=862.571.5334 skype=janmclaughlin [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Newbie YouTube capture question
I know this must have been asked many times before, but what's the EASIEST and free way to capture YouTube video and put it into a power point. Thanks guys--i appreciate the advice. Z On 15 Mar 2007 10:55:51 -0700, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll never forget that train ride, Randy :) -Original Message- From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of RANDY MANN Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 5:32 AM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [videoblogging] congrats to blip - one to watch ive been watching them for years now ever since that fate full train ride On 14 Mar 2007 17:09:58 -0700, Jen Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED]jensimmons%40gmail.com wrote: Congrats to everyone at blip.tv for being named one of the 100 IP communications companies to watch in 2007 by Pulver! http://pulver.com/pulver100/ http://pulverblog.pulver.com/archives/006604.html - Jen _ Jen Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jensimmons.com http://milkweedmediadesign.com 267-235-6967 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] For research Geeks
hey guys, just found an amazing blog entry that highlights every free tool to track and watch buzz online. wanted to share: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2006/11/24/buzz-monitoring-observing-und-tracking also, wanted to ask how you find out about new information...do you use any remarkable websites or subscribe to an RSS alert worth sharing? -research geek zachary www.quiverandquill.com On 11/27/06, Gary Short [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You don't even need motion picture techniques. A good experiment is to go into a school class of say 8 - 10 year olds and read them the nonsense poem Jabberwocky then film them telling you what the poem is about. It's great fun and a good answer to the question how much of our own perspective taints the news we hear/see/read? Regards, Gary http://www.garyshort.org/ http://www.carnoustiegolflinks.co.uk/ From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com[mailto: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jan / The Faux Press Sent: 27 November 2006 12:16 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Example of how video could change things Oh, Iliya, Iliya, Iliya, Herein lies one of the main points of why it's important to help make people media literate through videoblogging: motion pictures can be shaped to point the truth in lots of different directions. If you learn nothing else from vlogging, this should be it. I'd love to see us - as a group - take that piece of subject video and edit it to say various things using motion picture techniques. XO, Jan On 11/26/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]supercanadian%40gmail.com mailto:supercanadian%40gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure what you mean here. How could that video show anything but the truth. (You don't believe it to be a fake do you?) Are you saying that people might assume extra things not shown in the video? Or am I misunderstanding you? See ya -- The Faux Press - better than real http://fauxpress.blogspot.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Court Validates Blogger Cred's
I think this is a good precedent that the court is affording bloggers with similiar protections as they do journalists: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/27/business/media/27blog.html?_r=1oref=slogin -Zachary www.quiverandquill.com On 11/27/06, Richard (Show) Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks ... I did the resynch thing and it fixed the problem ... Richard On 11/26/06, Adam and Vikki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been having similar problems and I have done three things one - resycn the feed, in the trobleshootise section two - ping the feed three - posting a blank post in my blogger(and I don't know why that works i just found out by accident, I delete it later) repeat! Hope you get it sorted cos I have just subscribed (great idea) Adam --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, Richard (Show) Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The most recent mp4 file on http://inspiredhealing.tv Does not show up in iTunes and I can't figure out why. The feed is: http://feeds.feedburner.com/inspiredhealing Any help appreciated ... Richard p.s. Could it have something to do with the suffix .mp4, which we are using for the first time, rather than .mov? p.p.s. I spent a lot of time fixing an initial MIME type issue with the help of Michael and Google, by creating .htaccess files. I thought that might be the problem but the MIME type thing seems to be working in that firefox seems to be treating/playing it like it does any quicktime file (which is wasn't doing before) -- http://richardhhall.org http://richardshow.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -- http://richardhhall.org http://richardshow.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
