Re: [videoblogging] Re: veoh article with interesting statements from the company

2006-04-20 Thread Halcyon Lujah



Speaking of Dmitry, he was interviewed on CNBC:http://veoh.com/videoDetails.html?v=e58555GeFRX7g8
-halcyon

p.s. are the people who have issues with Veoh unhappy with the way they fixed it? or just upset they made a mistake in the first place?Or something else? Is anyone's content on Veoh that doesn't want it there? 



On 4/20/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote: 

Veoh.com is where you can see the transcoded flv previews.Btw, I like Veoh way more than crApple iTunes. 
God forbid people speak out against precious Apple. At least people... humans... speak to us here from Veoh. Christ, the CEO responded! When has anyone from Apple contributed to the conversation of videoblogging?
sull


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Re: veoh article with interesting statements from the company

2006-04-20 Thread Stephanie Bryant



In my case, I'm commenting on the historical action-- Veoh's taken
down my stuff. I'm ok with that. I think the ideal solution would be
to offer an attributed, non-preview, non-hosted listing in the veoh
directory, but at least they're no longer infringing on any of my
stuff.

--Stephanei

On 4/20/06, Halcyon Lujah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Speaking of Dmitry, he was interviewed on CNBC:
 http://veoh.com/videoDetails.html?v=e58555GeFRX7g8

 -halcyon

 p.s. are the people who have issues with Veoh unhappy with the way they
 fixed it? or just upset they made a mistake in the first place? Or
 something else? Is anyone's content on Veoh that doesn't want it there?





 On 4/20/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
 
  Veoh.com is where you can see the transcoded flv previews.
 
  Btw, I like Veoh way more than crApple iTunes.
  God forbid people speak out against precious Apple.
 
  At least people... humans... speak to us here from Veoh. Christ, the CEO
 responded!
  When has anyone from Apple contributed to the conversation of
 videoblogging?
 
 
  sull


 
 YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


 Visit your group videoblogging on the web.

 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

 



--
Stephanie Bryant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blogs, vlogs, and audioblogs at:
http://www.mortaine.com/blogs


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












Re: [videoblogging] Re: veoh article with interesting statements from the company

2006-04-20 Thread Devlon



On 4/20/06, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



watching this video, i can't help but think that 2 weeks ago when I looked at veoh and saw all my friends videos on veoh, populating their pages, that perhaps all those faces, all those independant producers using veoh helped them land this deal. 
I am curious... anyone interested in the technology/service that veoh is offering (ignore the bad blood)?Personally, I think they have a good site, and a good service. I've chosen not to list my stuff because I don't believe their actions were accidental and I don't believe in their business practices. It's great that they are trying to make amends, butI've still got my opinions.
And it is a shame, because I think they do have a good thing. Maybe not the best thing for videobloggers, but as Anne has said in the past for they seem more suited independent film-makers, etc.
I just can't see myself using it any time soon...On 4/20/06, 
Halcyon Lujah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




Speaking of Dmitry, he was interviewed on CNBC:http://veoh.com/videoDetails.html?v=e58555GeFRX7g8
-halcyon

p.s. are the people who have issues with Veoh unhappy with the way they fixed it? or just upset they made a mistake in the first place?Or something else? Is anyone's content on Veoh that doesn't want it there? 



On 4/20/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote: 

Veoh.com is where you can see the transcoded flv previews.Btw, I like Veoh way more than crApple iTunes. 
God forbid people speak out against precious Apple. At least people... humans... speak to us here from Veoh. Christ, the CEO responded! When has anyone from Apple contributed to the conversation of videoblogging?
sull


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group videoblogging on the web.


  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service

.



  








-- Josh Leo
www.JoshLeo.com


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group videoblogging on the web.

  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
.



  








-- ~Devlonhttp://loadedpun.com | http://mefeedia.com
http://8bitme.blogspot.com | http://devlonduthie.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Fireant
  
  
Individual
  
  
Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Re: veoh article with interesting statements from the company

2006-04-20 Thread Michael Sullivan



I think the technology and probably Dmitry's experience in this space and with P2P technology is by far a larger factor than the amount of content and users that Veoh has or had. People investing money are not usually ignorant to the core factors. The fact is, Veoh can and now likely will become a serious alternative venue for independent media makers. They have made it clear that they specialize in longer form higher quality videos.
Maybe not that enticing to some videobloggers who have no intention on creating 'more produced' and ellaborate video works, but looking forward it will be nice to have such an optional platform to utilize. 
I can see you, Josh, making a brillian short film. Something above and beyond what you have already created. I can see you wanting to distribute a high quality version of it and not wanting to jump through the traditional hoops of the industry... and instead choosing to consider a service like Veoh.
Also, imagine all the filmmakers who are not bloggers. Anything that gives them a new vehicle for moving out their content to the masses at no cost that is far from a bad thing!sull
On 4/20/06, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



watching this video, i can't help but think that 2 weeks ago when I looked at veoh and saw all my friends videos on veoh, populating their pages, that perhaps all those faces, all those independant producers using veoh helped them land this deal. 
I am curious... anyone interested in the technology/service that veoh is offering (ignore the bad blood)?I just can't see myself using it any time soon...
On 4/20/06, 
Halcyon Lujah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




Speaking of Dmitry, he was interviewed on CNBC:http://veoh.com/videoDetails.html?v=e58555GeFRX7g8
-halcyon

p.s. are the people who have issues with Veoh unhappy with the way they fixed it? or just upset they made a mistake in the first place?Or something else? Is anyone's content on Veoh that doesn't want it there? 



On 4/20/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote: 

Veoh.com is where you can see the transcoded flv previews.Btw, I like Veoh way more than crApple iTunes. 
God forbid people speak out against precious Apple. At least people... humans... speak to us here from Veoh. Christ, the CEO responded! When has anyone from Apple contributed to the conversation of videoblogging?
sull


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group videoblogging on the web.


  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service

.



  








-- Josh Leo
www.JoshLeo.com


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group videoblogging on the web.

  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
.



  








-- Sullhttp://vlogdir.com http://SpreadTheMedia.org


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Re: veoh article with interesting statements from the company

2006-04-20 Thread Josh Leo



I am still waiting to hear back from dmitri, he stood me up for a WATM interview we had scheduled last week (understandable with all the big deal talk going on now) he said maybe this week but I am still waiting to hear from him... hopefully I can get some more information specially geared towards vloggers and how we can work together!
On 4/20/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



On 4/20/06, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




watching this video, i can't help but think that 2 weeks ago when I looked at veoh and saw all my friends videos on veoh, populating their pages, that perhaps all those faces, all those independant producers using veoh helped them land this deal. 
I am curious... anyone interested in the technology/service that veoh is offering (ignore the bad blood)?Personally, I think they have a good site, and a good service. I've chosen not to list my stuff because I don't believe their actions were accidental and I don't believe in their business practices. It's great that they are trying to make amends, butI've still got my opinions.
And it is a shame, because I think they do have a good thing. Maybe not the best thing for videobloggers, but as Anne has said in the past for they seem more suited independent film-makers, etc.

I just can't see myself using it any time soon...On 4/20/06, 
Halcyon Lujah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:





Speaking of Dmitry, he was interviewed on CNBC:http://veoh.com/videoDetails.html?v=e58555GeFRX7g8
-halcyon

p.s. are the people who have issues with Veoh unhappy with the way they fixed it? or just upset they made a mistake in the first place?Or something else? Is anyone's content on Veoh that doesn't want it there? 



On 4/20/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote: 

Veoh.com is where you can see the transcoded flv previews.Btw, I like Veoh way more than crApple iTunes. 
God forbid people speak out against precious Apple. At least people... humans... speak to us here from Veoh. Christ, the CEO responded! When has anyone from Apple contributed to the conversation of videoblogging?
sull


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group videoblogging on the web.



  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:


[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service


.



  








-- Josh Leo

www.JoshLeo.com


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group videoblogging on the web.


  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service

.



  








-- ~Devlon
http://loadedpun.com | http://mefeedia.com

http://8bitme.blogspot.com | http://devlonduthie.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  


Fireant
  
  

Individual
  
  

Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group videoblogging on the web.

  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
.



  








-- Josh Leowww.JoshLeo.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Fireant
  
  
Individual
  
  
Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[videoblogging] Re: veoh article with interesting statements from the company

2006-04-19 Thread David Howell



First the Wired article and now this??

*eye twitch*

Screw it...I quit. I'm going back to Internet Radio.

David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Anne Walk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


http://www.siliconbeat.com/entries/2006/04/18/controversial_video_hosting_company_veoh_raises_125m.html
 
 He said Veoh from the beginning had wanted to upload only content
from RSS
 feeds which users had explicitly submitted to Veoh. He said Veoh had
 required publishers submitting feeds to insert a specific snippet of
code
 verifying they were owners of the feed. However, he said Veoh's
process was
 bugged, and wasn't identifying which content was owned by the
submitters
 and which wasn't. As a result, when outsiders submitted copyrighted
content,
 Veoh ended up uploading it when it shouldn't have. He said he has since
 nuked all content that hasn't been adequately submitted.
 
 rewriting history so soon?
 
 --
 Anne Walk
 http://loadedpun.com










  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Fireant
  
  
Individual
  
  
Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












Re: [videoblogging] Re: veoh article with interesting statements from the company

2006-04-19 Thread Devlon



lol, yeah it's a kick in the balls today David.On 4/19/06, David Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



First the Wired article and now this??

*eye twitch*

Screw it...I quit. I'm going back to Internet Radio.

David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Anne Walk

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


http://www.siliconbeat.com/entries/2006/04/18/controversial_video_hosting_company_veoh_raises_125m.html

 
 He said Veoh from the beginning had wanted to upload only content
from RSS
 feeds which users had explicitly submitted to Veoh. He said Veoh had
 required publishers submitting feeds to insert a specific snippet of
code
 verifying they were owners of the feed. However, he said Veoh's
process was
 bugged, and wasn't identifying which content was owned by the
submitters
 and which wasn't. As a result, when outsiders submitted copyrighted
content,
 Veoh ended up uploading it when it shouldn't have. He said he has since
 nuked all content that hasn't been adequately submitted.
 
 rewriting history so soon?
 
 --
 Anne Walk
 http://loadedpun.com










  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  


Fireant
  
  

Individual
  
  

Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group videoblogging on the web.

  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
.



  










-- ~Devlonhttp://loadedpun.com | http://mefeedia.com
http://8bitme.blogspot.com | http://devlonduthie.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Fireant
  
  
Individual
  
  
Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.