[videoblogging] Self-contained vs. reference

2005-08-17 Thread BevSykes





Can someone please tell me the difference between 
saving as a "self contained" movie and as a "reference movie"? It makes 
HUGE difference in the size of a file (26 MB vs. 116 MB for this one 
file!)

Thanks
Bev




  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Explains
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Self-contained vs. reference

2005-08-17 Thread BevSykes





Thanks for all the answers.

-Bev

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Andreas 
  Haugstrup 
  To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 4:04 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [videoblogging] 
  Self-contained vs. reference
  On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:55:33 +0200, BevSykes [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote: Can someone please tell me the difference between 
  saving as a "self  contained" movie and as a "reference 
  movie"? It makes HUGE difference  in the size of a file 
  (26 MB vs. 116 MB for this one file!)Self-contained: All of the movie 
  is in one file.Reference: New movie is dependent on old movie (ie. you 
  need both for it to work). So the reference movie isn't actually 
  smaller - it's just broken into bits.- Andreas-- 
  URL:http://www.solitude.dk/Commentary 
  on media, communication, culture and technology.

  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.