[videoblogging] This cam will change everything!

2009-03-24 Thread Renat Zarbailov
If the low-light capability of this camcorder is good, coming out in April, it 
will change the way we look at professional equipment.
http://www.macvideo.tv/camera-technology/features/index.cfm?articleId=109356

On another note, have you seen this? http://tinyurl.com/cuok88

If you spread this video like wildfire, rate it, and or subscribe I will come 
visit you in your State to say hi, and even film you dancing through the 
streets for the iDance project...


Thanks!!!

Renat



Re: [videoblogging] This cam will change everything!

2009-03-24 Thread Rupert
Great.  I heard about this camera a while ago - thanks for the reminder.
I see they have the pro GY-HM700 coming out this month as well,  
shoulder mounted, with interchangeable Canon lens and other goodies  
for the cost of a small car.
They say the HM100 will be under $4k, though.
Which is still twice as much as I paid for my car.
Although not as much as I've paid the mechanic since I bought it.

On 23-Mar-09, at 11:26 PM, Renat Zarbailov wrote:

 If the low-light capability of this camcorder is good, coming out in  
 April, it will change the way we look at professional equipment.
 http://www.macvideo.tv/camera-technology/features/index.cfm?articleId=109356

 On another note, have you seen this? http://tinyurl.com/cuok88

 If you spread this video like wildfire, rate it, and or subscribe I  
 will come visit you in your State to say hi, and even film you  
 dancing through the streets for the iDance project...

 Thanks!!!

 Renat


 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] This cam will change everything!

2009-03-24 Thread Jay dedman
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Renat Zarbailov innom...@gmail.com wrote:
 If the low-light capability of this camcorder is good, coming out in
April,
 it will change the way we look at professional equipment.

http://www.macvideo.tv/camera-technology/features/index.cfm?articleId=109356

Verdi sent me this note:

If you read the JVC tech stuff (it's buried in there) you find that it
 records MPEG2 Long GOP at up to 35Mbps (this is basically HDV at a
 higher bit rate) and then sticks it in a .mov wrapper. So it sounds
 cool but if it's anything like editing the HDV from my Canon, it's
 possible but not very enjoyable. Editing HDV is so frustrating that it
 makes me happy to transcode to an intermediate format.


So it remains to be seen how easily you can edit these clips in FCP. I'd
like to see it in action under normal circumstances..

jay

-- 
http://ryanishungry.com
http://jaydedman.com
http://twitter.com/jaydedman
917 371 6790


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] This cam will change everything!

2009-03-24 Thread Brook Hinton
I'm skeptical. This is not revolutionary.
There are two existing camcorder lines that compete with this, albeit a
grand or two over the price (assuming this comes in around 4k) - the Sony
EX1, and Panasonic's HVX200. Both have more control and professional
features. The EX1 has 1/2 inch chips (the difference between, say, regular
8mm and Super 16 in terms of depth of field control) and unbelievable low
light performance with a 35mbps codec similar to JVC's. The Panasonic uses a
codec that isn't subject to the perils of temporal compression (but does
have an issue re its lower res chips). With the JVC and for the matter the
Sony, you still need to transcode if you want to work efficiently in
anything but a cuts-and-dissolves only environment. Final Cut Pro already
deals with these formats natively. JVC is just finally introducing a
competing product. The whole direct to quicktime thing is just hype.
DVCPro HD is already FCP compatible and doesn't need transcoding. Any
temporal codec is going to need transcoding for professional use whether its
native quicktime or not: its just the nature of the beast - the basic
physical reality of GOP structure.

The one fantastic, revolutionary thing is that it uses SDHC cards instead of
a proprietary and more expensive card format. But it's 1/4 chips and mpeg2.
 The 35mbps codec, if its anything like Sony's, will be significantly better
than HDV though. If you're looking at ye olde classic DV equivalents, this
is a dressed up tapeless TRV900. not a tapeless DVX-100 or  XL1.

The lens is another variable. In HD, the lens is a huge factor. None of the
cams in this range have had particularly good lenses, but that's not
surprising given the cost of HD lenses.

That doesn't mean its not good or a good value, its just not particularly
groundbreaking. I'll look at it closely when its available, but if I'm in
the market in something for this range I suspect I'll wait and save a little
bit more for something like an EX1.



___
Brook Hinton
film/video/audio art
www.brookhinton.com
studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] This cam will change everything!

2009-03-24 Thread Rupert
Great post.  I liked your comparison to ye olde DV cam options.  It's  
been so long since I've kept up with camera technology developments  
that these kind of reference points are quite useful.

On 24-Mar-09, at 10:06 AM, Brook Hinton wrote:
  If you're looking at ye olde classic DV equivalents, this
 is a dressed up tapeless TRV900. not a tapeless DVX-100 or XL1.

 ___
 Brook Hinton
 film/video/audio art
 www.brookhinton.com
 studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab

 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]