Re: Terminating search in function
Meino Christian Cramer wrote: I wrote this snippet: fun! Ffunchdr() let date = strftime( %F ) put='/*-*/' put='/**' put=' * desc' put=' *' put=' *' put=' *' put=' * Created: ' . date . ' put=' *' put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' *' put=' * result 0 - Success, -1 - Failure' put=' *' put=' */' ?desc endfun command! Funchdr :call Ffunchdr() This should give nme the header comment for function definitions in C. My problem seems to be the ?desc command at the end. It /should/ move the cursor onto the desc keyword right in the beginning of the comment block. (snip) I suggest using the search() function: call search(desc,bW) Regards, Chip Campbell
Re: Terminating search in function
Meino Christian Cramer wrote: Hi, I wrote this snippet: fun! Ffunchdr() let date = strftime( %F ) put='/*-*/' put='/**' put=' * desc' put=' *' put=' *' put=' *' put=' * Created: ' . date . ' put=' *' put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' *' put=' * result 0 - Success, -1 - Failure' put=' *' put=' */' ?desc endfun command! Funchdr :call Ffunchdr() This should give nme the header comment for function definitions in C. My problem seems to be the ?desc command at the end. It /should/ move the cursor onto the desc keyword right in the beginning of the comment block. But it move the cursor to here: * desc ^ | cursor position My analysis (a too big word...) of the problem is: ? is still waiting for input. I tried ?descCR instead, but now ? tries to find descCR literally and did not find it. There seem to be an exception of the type the commands as you would do normally-rule here...but what is the rule to recognize that the current situation is an exception and what is the solution? Thank you very much in advance for any help ! :) Have a nice weekend! mcc What you're using is a searching range (as in :?desc from the keyboard). It positions the cursor on the first nonblank in the matched line. To use a search command (as in ?desc from the keyboard) in an Ex-command line, use :normal: normal ?desc see :help :range :help :normal Best regards, Tony.
Re: Terminating search in function
From: A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Terminating search in function Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:33:01 +0200 Meino Christian Cramer wrote: Hi, I wrote this snippet: fun! Ffunchdr() let date = strftime( %F ) put='/*-*/' put='/**' put=' * desc' put=' *' put=' *' put=' *' put=' * Created: ' . date . ' put=' *' put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' *' put=' * result 0 - Success, -1 - Failure' put=' *' put=' */' ?desc endfun command! Funchdr :call Ffunchdr() This should give nme the header comment for function definitions in C. My problem seems to be the ?desc command at the end. It /should/ move the cursor onto the desc keyword right in the beginning of the comment block. But it move the cursor to here: * desc ^ | cursor position My analysis (a too big word...) of the problem is: ? is still waiting for input. I tried ?descCR instead, but now ? tries to find descCR literally and did not find it. There seem to be an exception of the type the commands as you would do normally-rule here...but what is the rule to recognize that the current situation is an exception and what is the solution? Thank you very much in advance for any help ! :) Have a nice weekend! mcc What you're using is a searching range (as in :?desc from the keyboard). It positions the cursor on the first nonblank in the matched line. To use a search command (as in ?desc from the keyboard) in an Ex-command line, use :normal: normal ?desc see :help :range :help :normal Best regards, Tony. Hi Tony, :O) thank you,Tony !:O) execute normal ?desc\CR will do the job and it seems, that a final execute normal cw on the found desc cannot be done correctly, since the command is not finished (which it should eb according to the :help normal text). Have a nice weekend! mcc
Re: Terminating search in function
Meino Christian Cramer wrote: From: A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Terminating search in function Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:33:01 +0200 Meino Christian Cramer wrote: Hi, I wrote this snippet: fun! Ffunchdr() let date = strftime( %F ) put='/*-*/' put='/**' put=' * desc' put=' *' put=' *' put=' *' put=' * Created: ' . date . ' put=' *' put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' *' put=' * result 0 - Success, -1 - Failure' put=' *' put=' */' ?desc endfun command! Funchdr :call Ffunchdr() This should give nme the header comment for function definitions in C. My problem seems to be the ?desc command at the end. It /should/ move the cursor onto the desc keyword right in the beginning of the comment block. But it move the cursor to here: * desc ^ | cursor position My analysis (a too big word...) of the problem is: ? is still waiting for input. I tried ?descCR instead, but now ? tries to find descCR literally and did not find it. There seem to be an exception of the type the commands as you would do normally-rule here...but what is the rule to recognize that the current situation is an exception and what is the solution? Thank you very much in advance for any help ! :) Have a nice weekend! mcc What you're using is a searching range (as in :?desc from the keyboard). It positions the cursor on the first nonblank in the matched line. To use a search command (as in ?desc from the keyboard) in an Ex-command line, use :normal: normal ?desc see :help :range :help :normal Best regards, Tony. Hi Tony, :O) thank you,Tony !:O) execute normal ?desc\CR will do the job and it seems, that a final execute normal cw on the found desc cannot be done correctly, since the command is not finished (which it should eb according to the :help normal text). Have a nice weekend! mcc normal cw is not finished since the c (change) commands needs to be told _to_ what you want to change the replaced word. What you can do instead (IIUC) is normal diw (delete inner word) followed by startinsert!. Note that startinsert[!] only makes sense as the last statement of the script (because insert-mode will be delayed until then). Have a nice weekend too. Best regards, Tony.
Re: Terminating search in function
Meino Christian Cramer wrote: From: A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Terminating search in function Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:00:14 +0200 Meino Christian Cramer wrote: From: A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Terminating search in function Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:33:01 +0200 Meino Christian Cramer wrote: Hi, I wrote this snippet: fun! Ffunchdr() let date = strftime( %F ) put='/*-*/' put='/**' put=' * desc' put=' *' put=' *' put=' *' put=' * Created: ' . date . ' put=' *' put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' *' put=' * result 0 - Success, -1 - Failure' put=' *' put=' */' ?desc endfun command! Funchdr :call Ffunchdr() This should give nme the header comment for function definitions in C. My problem seems to be the ?desc command at the end. It /should/ move the cursor onto the desc keyword right in the beginning of the comment block. But it move the cursor to here: * desc ^ | cursor position My analysis (a too big word...) of the problem is: ? is still waiting for input. I tried ?descCR instead, but now ? tries to find descCR literally and did not find it. There seem to be an exception of the type the commands as you would do normally-rule here...but what is the rule to recognize that the current situation is an exception and what is the solution? Thank you very much in advance for any help ! :) Have a nice weekend! mcc What you're using is a searching range (as in :?desc from the keyboard). It positions the cursor on the first nonblank in the matched line. To use a search command (as in ?desc from the keyboard) in an Ex-command line, use :normal: normal ?desc see :help :range :help :normal Best regards, Tony. Hi Tony, :O) thank you,Tony !:O) execute normal ?desc\CR will do the job and it seems, that a final execute normal cw on the found desc cannot be done correctly, since the command is not finished (which it should eb according to the :help normal text). Have a nice weekend! mcc normal cw is not finished since the c (change) commands needs to be told _to_ what you want to change the replaced word. What you can do instead (IIUC) is normal diw (delete inner word) followed by startinsert!. Note that startinsert[!] only makes sense as the last statement of the script (because insert-mode will be delayed until then). Have a nice weekend too. Best regards, Tony. Hi Tony, ...the normal diw+startinsert!-trick works nice ! Thanks a lot -- such little helpers like the now finally working Function-header-function() are the _real_ stuff helping one to speed up the daily work -- and of course the helping hands, which make the helper-function work ... :O) Happy VIMming! mcc BTW, instead of all those put statements, wouldn't it be simpler to have your template as a separate file, and use :r filename to insert it after the cursor? Best regards, Tonoy.
Re: Terminating search in function
Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
execute normal ?desc\CR
Yes. There is also :call search('pattern', 'b'). It is a bit less
painful substitute to exe normal ?pattern\cr.
Yakov
Re: Terminating search in function
From: A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Terminating search in function Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 12:29:36 +0200 Meino Christian Cramer wrote: From: A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Terminating search in function Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:00:14 +0200 Meino Christian Cramer wrote: From: A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Terminating search in function Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:33:01 +0200 Meino Christian Cramer wrote: Hi, I wrote this snippet: fun! Ffunchdr() let date = strftime( %F ) put='/*-*/' put='/**' put=' * desc' put=' *' put=' *' put=' *' put=' * Created: ' . date . ' put=' *' put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' *' put=' * result 0 - Success, -1 - Failure' put=' *' put=' */' ?desc endfun command! Funchdr :call Ffunchdr() This should give nme the header comment for function definitions in C. My problem seems to be the ?desc command at the end. It /should/ move the cursor onto the desc keyword right in the beginning of the comment block. But it move the cursor to here: * desc ^ | cursor position My analysis (a too big word...) of the problem is: ? is still waiting for input. I tried ?descCR instead, but now ? tries to find descCR literally and did not find it. There seem to be an exception of the type the commands as you would do normally-rule here...but what is the rule to recognize that the current situation is an exception and what is the solution? Thank you very much in advance for any help ! :) Have a nice weekend! mcc What you're using is a searching range (as in :?desc from the keyboard). It positions the cursor on the first nonblank in the matched line. To use a search command (as in ?desc from the keyboard) in an Ex-command line, use :normal: normal ?desc see :help :range :help :normal Best regards, Tony. Hi Tony, :O) thank you,Tony !:O) execute normal ?desc\CR will do the job and it seems, that a final execute normal cw on the found desc cannot be done correctly, since the command is not finished (which it should eb according to the :help normal text). Have a nice weekend! mcc normal cw is not finished since the c (change) commands needs to be told _to_ what you want to change the replaced word. What you can do instead (IIUC) is normal diw (delete inner word) followed by startinsert!. Note that startinsert[!] only makes sense as the last statement of the script (because insert-mode will be delayed until then). Have a nice weekend too. Best regards, Tony. Hi Tony, ...the normal diw+startinsert!-trick works nice ! Thanks a lot -- such little helpers like the now finally working Function-header-function() are the _real_ stuff helping one to speed up the daily work -- and of course the helping hands, which make the helper-function work ... :O) Happy VIMming! mcc BTW, instead of all those put statements, wouldn't it be simpler to have your template as a separate file, and use :r filename to insert it after the cursor? Best regards, Tonoy. Hi Tony, ...hrrr clear answer: yesno! :O) Yes: It would be the cleaner and more flexible way to implement this, no doubt! No : Currently it is the only thing inserting an header/template or such into text. It would just add another file to care of. As soon as I have more than a single template to handle, it will surely the better way to do it with seperated files. By the way: Is there a way to puts more than a single line? Something like an HERE-doc? :h permutations of 'here-doc' gives me nothing... Keep hacking! mcc
Re: Terminating search in function
Meino Christian Cramer wrote: From: A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] BTW, instead of all those put statements, wouldn't it be simpler to have your template as a separate file, and use :r filename to insert it after the cursor? Best regards, Tony. Hi Tony, ...hrrr clear answer: yesno! :O) Yes: It would be the cleaner and more flexible way to implement this, no doubt! No : Currently it is the only thing inserting an header/template or such into text. It would just add another file to care of. As soon as I have more than a single template to handle, it will surely the better way to do it with seperated files. By the way: Is there a way to puts more than a single line? Something like an HERE-doc? :h permutations of 'here-doc' gives me nothing... Keep hacking! mcc See :help :append and :help :insert. I didn't know about them either but I knew that perl EOF (or similar) could start a here-document for any of the 5 interpreted languages. :helpgrep brought (among others) a page where :append and :insert were mentioned. Best regards, Tony.
Terminating search in function
Hi, I wrote this snippet: fun! Ffunchdr() let date = strftime( %F ) put='/*-*/' put='/**' put=' * desc' put=' *' put=' *' put=' *' put=' * Created: ' . date . ' put=' *' put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' * parameter: put=' *' put=' * result 0 - Success, -1 - Failure' put=' *' put=' */' ?desc endfun command! Funchdr :call Ffunchdr() This should give nme the header comment for function definitions in C. My problem seems to be the ?desc command at the end. It /should/ move the cursor onto the desc keyword right in the beginning of the comment block. But it move the cursor to here: * desc ^ | cursor position My analysis (a too big word...) of the problem is: ? is still waiting for input. I tried ?descCR instead, but now ? tries to find descCR literally and did not find it. There seem to be an exception of the type the commands as you would do normally-rule here...but what is the rule to recognize that the current situation is an exception and what is the solution? Thank you very much in advance for any help ! :) Have a nice weekend! mcc
