Re: [VoiceOps] Fax

[Kili Land via VoiceOps]

Faxback is a software fax<>email / fax<>application / fax>sftp / fax<>ata 
offering. They have been around quite a while. Faxback.com is their site for 
more information if you want to look at it.

From: VoiceOps  on behalf of Mark Wiater via 
VoiceOps 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2024 7:12:28 AM
To: voiceops@voiceops.org 
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Fax

NOTE: This is an external message. Please use caution when replying, opening 
attachments or clicking on any links in this e-mail.

WARNING: Replies to this message will go to voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org. If 
you believe this is malicious or are unsure if this is correct, please report 
it using the Report Phish button and our analysts will investigate it.
Isn't FaxBack just sending a return fax to the number you just received a fax 
from, whatever protocol?  Or is the term FaxBack more specific than that?

On 5/23/2024 7:46 AM, Kili Land via VoiceOps wrote:
Faxback is t.38

From: VoiceOps 
<mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org> on behalf 
of Mike Hammett via VoiceOps 
<mailto:voiceops@voiceops.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2024 6:13:02 AM
To: KARIM MEKKAOUI <mailto:amekka...@mektel.ca>
Cc: voiceops@voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops@voiceops.org> 
<mailto:voiceops@voiceops.org>
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Fax

NOTE: This is an external message. Please use caution when replying, opening 
attachments or clicking on any links in this e-mail.
WARNING: Replies to this message will go to 
voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org>. If you 
believe this is malicious or are unsure if this is correct, please report it 
using the Report Phish button and our analysts will investigate it.

Are FaxBack and similar solutions standards-based or are they proprietary? I 
swore they were proprietary, but a friend of mine swears they are t.37.



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com



- Original Message -
From: KARIM MEKKAOUI via VoiceOps 
<mailto:voiceops@voiceops.org>
To: voiceops@voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops@voiceops.org>
Sent: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 21:22:16 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [VoiceOps] Fax

Hi VOIPOPS Community

Do you know about any fax over internet solution that works? We tried multiple 
ATA and multiple ATA configurations, sometime it works sometimes not.

Also, do you know about any eFax solution provider that works good.

Thanks in advance for your help.

KARIM
MEKTEL INC.


___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org<mailto:VoiceOps@voiceops.org>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops


NOTICE: This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed 
and may contain confidential information. Unless stated to the contrary, any 
opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not represent the 
official view of GTT Communications Inc or any of its affiliates. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and 
then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for 
any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person.
All quotes, offers, proposals and any other information in the body of this 
email is subject to, and limited by, the terms and conditions, signed service 
agreement and/or statement of work



___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org<mailto:VoiceOps@voiceops.org>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops



NOTICE: This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed 
and may contain confidential information. Unless stated to the contrary, any 
opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not represent the 
official view of GTT Communications Inc or any of its affiliates. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and 
then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for 
any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person.
All quotes, offers, proposals and any other information in the body of this 
email is subject to, and limited by, the terms and conditions, signed service 
agreement and/or statement of work
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

Re: [VoiceOps] Fax

[Kili Land via VoiceOps]

Faxback is t.38

From: VoiceOps  on behalf of Mike Hammett via 
VoiceOps 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2024 6:13:02 AM
To: KARIM MEKKAOUI 
Cc: voiceops@voiceops.org 
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Fax

NOTE: This is an external message. Please use caution when replying, opening 
attachments or clicking on any links in this e-mail.
WARNING: Replies to this message will go to voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org. If 
you believe this is malicious or are unsure if this is correct, please report 
it using the Report Phish button and our analysts will investigate it.

Are FaxBack and similar solutions standards-based or are they proprietary? I 
swore they were proprietary, but a friend of mine swears they are t.37.



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com



- Original Message -
From: KARIM MEKKAOUI via VoiceOps 
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Sent: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 21:22:16 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [VoiceOps] Fax

Hi VOIPOPS Community

Do you know about any fax over internet solution that works? We tried multiple 
ATA and multiple ATA configurations, sometime it works sometimes not.

Also, do you know about any eFax solution provider that works good.

Thanks in advance for your help.

KARIM
MEKTEL INC.


___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops


NOTICE: This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed 
and may contain confidential information. Unless stated to the contrary, any 
opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not represent the 
official view of GTT Communications Inc or any of its affiliates. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and 
then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for 
any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person.
All quotes, offers, proposals and any other information in the body of this 
email is subject to, and limited by, the terms and conditions, signed service 
agreement and/or statement of work
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

Re: [VoiceOps] Canadian Reputation and Spam

[Kili Land via VoiceOps]

Many thanks to you both.

I don’t need any particular number addressed, it is more on how to direct our 
customers on who to talk to for erroneous blocking.

Right now, it is pretty clear who all to direct someone to when in the USA; 
but, I have been a bit stumped on Canada. It sounds like I have been for good 
reason.

I appreciate the information!
Kili



From: Calvin E. 
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2024 9:21 AM
To: Kili Land 
Cc: voiceops 
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Canadian Reputation and Spam

NOTE: This is an external message. Please use caution when replying, opening 
attachments or clicking on any links in this e-mail.
YouMail has a Canada user base and analyzes that traffic the same as the USA. 
Their data is available a few different ways, depending on your needs. I.E. 
blocking known spammers inbound, or feedback on what your own calling numbers 
are doing outbound.

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 6:13 AM Kili Land via VoiceOps 
mailto:voiceops@voiceops.org>> wrote:
Question for the hive mind, as I am not as well versed on Canadian info as I am 
on USA info. In the USA we have Hiya, TNS, Robokiller, IceHook etc for caller 
of reputation. I would assume there are similar in Canada. Does anyone have any 
references they can point me to regarding such?

I am cognizant of S/S. I am more interested in the SPAM blocking like what 
occurs in the USA via reputation scores/flags.

I have been searching for a couple of days but have only found info on the NCNs 
and S/S handling and nothing really referencing caller id reputation.

Thanks,
Kili

NOTICE: This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed 
and may contain confidential information. Unless stated to the contrary, any 
opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not represent the 
official view of GTT Communications Inc or any of its affiliates. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and 
then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for 
any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person.
All quotes, offers, proposals and any other information in the body of this 
email is subject to, and limited by, the terms and conditions, signed service 
agreement and/or statement of work

___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org<mailto:VoiceOps@voiceops.org>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

NOTICE: This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed 
and may contain confidential information. Unless stated to the contrary, any 
opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not represent the 
official view of GTT Communications Inc or any of its affiliates. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and 
then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for 
any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person.
All quotes, offers, proposals and any other information in the body of this 
email is subject to, and limited by, the terms and conditions, signed service 
agreement and/or statement of work
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

[VoiceOps] Canadian Reputation and Spam

[Kili Land via VoiceOps]

Question for the hive mind, as I am not as well versed on Canadian info as I am 
on USA info. In the USA we have Hiya, TNS, Robokiller, IceHook etc for caller 
of reputation. I would assume there are similar in Canada. Does anyone have any 
references they can point me to regarding such?

I am cognizant of S/S. I am more interested in the SPAM blocking like what 
occurs in the USA via reputation scores/flags.

I have been searching for a couple of days but have only found info on the NCNs 
and S/S handling and nothing really referencing caller id reputation.

Thanks,
Kili

NOTICE: This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed 
and may contain confidential information. Unless stated to the contrary, any 
opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not represent the 
official view of GTT Communications Inc or any of its affiliates. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and 
then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for 
any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person.
All quotes, offers, proposals and any other information in the body of this 
email is subject to, and limited by, the terms and conditions, signed service 
agreement and/or statement of work
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

[VoiceOps] FCC FRN Equivalents

[Kili Land via VoiceOps]

Hey all. Sorry to be a bother but my Google-fu is failing here.

I am trying to find something similar to CORES for CRTC, IFT, OFCOM/DCMS, etc.  
We are wanting to add that information as part of the KYC/KYB that we do for 
onboarding new customers.

And, for CRTC (and soon France), something similar to the FCC’s RMD database. I 
found a list of registered telecom companies for CRTC; but, it’s just a list of 
company names.

I know CRTC hasn’t gone as far as the FCC on issuing full blocks on violators 
of S/S; but, does CRTC have a notification distro or site for S/S violators?

Thanks for any assistance you can provide.
Kili

NOTICE: This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed 
and may contain confidential information. Unless stated to the contrary, any 
opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not represent the 
official view of GTT Communications Inc or any of its affiliates. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and 
then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for 
any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person.
All quotes, offers, proposals and any other information in the body of this 
email is subject to, and limited by, the terms and conditions, signed service 
agreement and/or statement of work
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

Re: [VoiceOps] Termination to China issues

[Kili Land via VoiceOps]

Also called to US Embassy in Beijing +86-10-8531-3000

IDT = Fail
TSYS = Fail
Colt = Fail

ATT Wireless = Success

From: VoiceOps  on behalf of Jared Geiger 

Date: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 at 2:00 PM
To:
Cc: VoiceOps 
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Termination to China issues
NOTE: This is an external message. Please use caution when replying, opening 
attachments or clicking on any links in this e-mail.
I was able to reach the US Embassy in Beijing +86-10-8531-3000 via 3 of my 
carriers. TATA rejected the call attempts though.

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 9:55 AM Peter Beckman via VoiceOps 
mailto:voiceops@voiceops.org>> wrote:
I've got a less than happy customer in China who isn't getting their calls.
I tried two different carriers -- the first gave me an audio but no
signaling "All circuits to this country are busy now" and the other playing
a busy signal inline but also without signaling.

Am I just unlucky to have two carriers using the same route to China, or is
there an issue with calls from the US to China across the board?

---
Peter Beckman  Internet Guy
beck...@angryox.com 
http://www.angryox.com/
---
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

NOTICE: This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed 
and may contain confidential information. Unless stated to the contrary, any 
opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not represent the 
official view of GTT Communications Inc or any of its affiliates. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and 
then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for 
any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person.
All quotes, offers, proposals and any other information in the body of this 
email is subject to, and limited by, the terms and conditions, signed service 
agreement and/or statement of work
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

Re: [VoiceOps] Anyone from AT (BellSouth) able to look at some number reachability issues?

[Kili Land]

Dunno about anyone from ATT being in here; but, can say that ATT is having a 
wider outage than just 256824. We’re getting rejects from them across the 
board.

--Kili


From: VoiceOps  on behalf of Hunter Fuller via 
VoiceOps 
Date: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 11:18 PM
To: VoiceOps 
Subject: [VoiceOps] Anyone from AT (BellSouth) able to look at some number 
reachability issues?
NOTE: This is an external message. Please use caution when replying, opening 
attachments or clicking on any links in this e-mail.
WARNING: Replies to this message will go to voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org. If 
you believe this is malicious or are unsure if this is correct, please report 
it using the Report Phish button and our analysts will investigate it.

If anyone from AT (especially the old BellSouth area) is here, maybe
you can save our wretched souls. It appears AT customers suddenly
can't call any of our numbers as of this afternoon, instead receiving
announcement "Your call cannot be completed at this time." Seems to
apply to AT Wireless customers, as well as AT fixed service
(VoIP/PRI) customers.

I suspect this is due to the fact that our numbers were previously
with AT (delivered on a handful of PRIs) but were ported out to
Comcast about 2 years ago. So obviously I cannot open a ticket with
AT, not being an AT customer. Comcast has already concluded there
is not much they can directly do about this.

The affected numbers are 256-824-1000 through 256-824-7999 (total of
7,000 numbers).

Any and all assistance would be greatly appreciated!

--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH M-1A
+1 256 824 5331

Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Network Engineering
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

NOTICE: This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed 
and may contain confidential information. Unless stated to the contrary, any 
opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not represent the 
official view of GTT Communications Inc or any of its affiliates. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and 
then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for 
any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person.
All quotes, offers, proposals and any other information in the body of this 
email is subject to, and limited by, the terms and conditions, signed service 
agreement and/or statement of work
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

Re: [VoiceOps] USF is 33.4% for 2Q2021

[Kili Land]

Everything is > this year.  Pretty much can expect it to keep climbing.

You can’t print more money in one year than in the entire history of your 
country and not have an economic impact.

It’s not going back down. That’s a given.

~K


From: VoiceOps  On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 10:24 AM
To: Peter Beckman 
Cc: VoiceOps 
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] USF is 33.4% for 2Q2021

NOTE: This is an external message. Please use caution when replying, opening 
attachments or clicking on any links in this e-mail.
Slush. Fund.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com




From: "Peter Beckman" mailto:beck...@angryox.com>>
To: "VoiceOps" mailto:voiceops@voiceops.org>>
Sent: Wednesday, June 9, 2021 11:15:16 PM
Subject: [VoiceOps] USF is 33.4% for 2Q2021

Um. Wow. This is crazy. Why is it 33.4%???

2 years ago it was 18.8%. This is DOUBLE!

Will it stop increasing? Go back down? Are we doomed?

Beckman
---
Peter Beckman  Internet Guy
beck...@angryox.com 
http://www.angryox.com/
---
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops


NOTICE: This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed 
and may contain confidential information. Unless stated to the contrary, any 
opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not represent the 
official view of GTT Communications Inc or any of its affiliates. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and 
then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for 
any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person.
All quotes, offers, proposals and any other information in the body of this 
email is subject to, and limited by, the terms and conditions, signed service 
agreement and/or statement of work
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

Re: [VoiceOps] Verizon Business CNAM admin

[Kili Land]

Verizon does not supply us with CNAM, that is done via a dip with Syniverse.

What is the number and I can show you what Syniverse is providing just for 
confirmation.


From: VoiceOps  On Behalf Of Alexander Lopez
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2019 2:00 PM
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: [VoiceOps] Verizon Business CNAM admin

Does anyone on this list have a contact method for asking VZ business to update 
a CNAM record?

It appears correct on every API I can query but on any number that VZ 
terminates it appears incorrectly.


___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

Re: [VoiceOps] Verizon Business CNAM admin

[Kili Land]

Hah - never mindI totally spaced this was on the voiceops distro and not my 
from our voiceops internal distro - seems my rules for my mail sorting have 
broken. Please ignore my previous response.

From: Kili Land
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2019 2:04 PM
To: Alexander Lopez ; voiceops@voiceops.org
Cc: Dawn Marie Henderson 
Subject: RE: Verizon Business CNAM admin

Verizon does not supply us with CNAM, that is done via a dip with Syniverse.

What is the number and I can show you what Syniverse is providing just for 
confirmation.


From: VoiceOps 
mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org>> On Behalf 
Of Alexander Lopez
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2019 2:00 PM
To: voiceops@voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops@voiceops.org>
Subject: [VoiceOps] Verizon Business CNAM admin

Does anyone on this list have a contact method for asking VZ business to update 
a CNAM record?

It appears correct on every API I can query but on any number that VZ 
terminates it appears incorrectly.


___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops