Re: Harvesting the Sun... on the cheap

2005-02-09 Thread Grimer
Very interesting Jones.  8-)

As far as the 2nd Law is concerned it's always struck
me that to show it's wrong is a no-brainer. All one 
needs is a chess board and a concept of scale. In the 
classic case of the steam engine where disorder on the
micro-scale is increased, people totally forget that 
order on the macro-scale is increased. They ignore the
fact that the engine has taken Sir Joseph Porter, together
with his Sisters, his Cousins, his Aunts down to 
H.M.S.Pinafore at Portsmouth.

In short they have a thoroughly blinkered view of order.
The concentrate on the fact that the glass is half empty
and fail to see that it is also half full.
Cheers,

Grimer




At 02:43 pm 08-02-05 -0800, Jones wrote wrote:
Hindsight is 20/20 as they say. I hope the lab execs
at Sandia do not have to find that out the hard way...
if it turns out that they dropped funding on a
particularly promising project... or if some ploy was
involved to keep Sam out of the IP picture.

The Sunflower solar-mirror story mentined in FSB (in
another post today) brings an enabling technology to
mind (not mentioned in that story) which even
dispenses with the need for solar cells, per se. 

It involves both conversion of heat to electricity and
the violation of Plank's Law of blackbody radiation.
That's right, the violation of Plank's Law of
blackbody radiation. Yet, does anyone on vortex
remember the photolattice? Why it raised so little
curiosity at the time is a huge mystery. Did it slip
though the lattice G If Plank got a Nobel for
discovering an over-reaching law, shouldn't the
iconoclasts get at least some tiny bit of recognition?

Looking back over files and scientific announcements
relevant to LENR, solar energy and/or greatly
increased efficiency in energy-conversion over the
last few years - this one keeps recurring in
importance: For one thing - because it could fit into
so many other schemes - particularly thermal solar
conversion or LENR heat conversion. Solar thermal is
the easiest of all forms of free energy to harvest
(with mirrors) and a factor of 10-50 times less costly
than using solar cells - but all you normally get for
the low cost is day-time heat - not electricity, and
not particularly high-grade heat at that.

What the photolattice does is to convert low grade
heat into coherent IR light, and very efficiently.
Coherency is the key to efficiency.

When trying to rate a wide range of enabling
technologies in terms of unrealized potential, the
newsbyte that seems now to have had the greatest
easily-realizable potential, to a wide swath of
alternative energy research could be this technology
of the photolattice but has the technology now gone
stagnant? I wish someone at Sandia or Stanford could
answer that one. Here is the reference:

A Novel Photolattice with Extraordinary Properties
By Neil Savage

http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/WEBONLY/wonews/oct03/1003phot.html

A device from Sandia emits infrared radiation at a
fixed wavelength and with a conversion efficiency that
appears to defy Planck’s law

Notice how the editors downplay the part about
Planck’s law - don't want to offend anyone, right?
Eventually, the high-priests of the physics
establisment will also find a way to save-face on this
Law, of course, just as with the soon-to-be-demolished
2nd Law.

N. Savage is not so diplomatic in the story:

15 October  2003—A microscopic device built by
researchers at  Sandia National Laboratory
(Albuquerque, N.M.) could lead to better photovoltaic
cells, more efficient light bulbs, and the rewriting
of basic physics texts.

Researchers  Shawn Lin and James Fleming built a
photonic lattice that  emits infrared radiation only
at a specific wavelength.  The lattice is a type of
photonic band gap crystal, in  which a regular
structure at the scale of microns or nanometers 
allows light to exist only at specific wavelengths

With  the same photolithographic methods used to
manufacture  computer chips, the scientists inscribed
the structure  they wanted in silicon. They then
filled the gaps with  tungsten, the same material that
makes light bulb filaments,  and etched away the
silicon, leaving a three-dimensional waffle of
tungsten rods, piled in a crisscrossing log cabin 
style. The size and spacing of the rods, half a micron
 thick and spaced 1.5 µ m apart, force the photons 
passing between them to fit into particular
wavelengths.

[OK they used the expensive technique of
photolithography to discover and document the process,
but that does not mean that bulk process cannot be
adapted to manufacture it]

When  Lin and Fleming heated the device in a vacuum to
1250 °C,  the typical operating temperature of a
thermal photovoltaic  (PV) cell, they saw a sharp
emission peak at 1.5 µ m. They calculated that the
peak would translate into an optical-to-electrical 
conversion efficiency in a PV cell of approximately 34
 percent and an electrical power output of about 14
W/cm2.  That’s far greater than the 11 percent

Suppressed science web site

2005-02-09 Thread Jed Rothwell
See:
http://www.suppressedscience.net/
http://www.suppressedscience.net/physics.html



noovoodoo economics

2005-02-09 Thread Jones Beene
Somewhere amidst the cognitive dissonance of world
events, the recent announcement by OPEC that they
intended to force oil to stabilize at $50, and NOT a
whimper of protest from the USA was kind of missed by
many pundits, in all the ferment of world events. 

Not that many months ago, we had protested vigorously
at $20 and similar OPEC vows. Why are we seeming to
acquiesce now, and with record deficits forecast?

Answer: noovoodoo

Hmmm. And does it have anything to do with recent
allegations that the US, with the tacit support of
Kuwait, has opened up secret oil fields in Southern
Iraq through Kuwait ?  and are now pumping two to
three times more oil than is claimed on the books -
and helping to finance the war to a degree that way?
After all, with the deficits racked up in the past
four years, the dollar should be worth pennies next to
the Euro, and one can only suspect that it is being
propped up by some hidden force.

The voodoo part is pretty obvious. Gasoline is still
about $2 in California and the wholesale price dropped
significantly AFTER the OPEC announcement.
Traditionally the wholesale price is 35% of the
selling price with most of the rest going to
Fed/State/County/City  taxes bribes and assorted
payoffs, along with chump-change for the dealer. At
$50 per 42 gallon barrel for crude, gasoline at the
pump should cost at least as $3.50-3.75 now but it
is still at $2; and yes, it does cost over $5 in
Europe now, and probably will here as well... as soon
as the political climate permits it. 

Bush doesn't want a civil war at home in places like
California, who generally hate his administration with
an visceral intensity that other parts of the country
do not even begin to understand. This is a state that
can elect Reagan and Swartznegger, and really any
decent person - especially if they have charisma,
humor, character and intelligence... but cannot
tolerate high-level greed... at least not without the
other three in excess. California is closer to actaul
seccession than most Easterners realize
http://tinyurl.com/67dzy
...and civil disobedience will happen here with with
absolute certainty with $5 gasoline, at least until DC
gets the troops back home to maintain order. He can
then let the price rise in 2008 to as far above $5 at
the pump as possible, and at the same time try to make
it look like it is the Dem/wits fault. And it probably
will be... for not trying harder to get him out of
office.

But I have to admire his moxie with this noovoodoo
plan. It is brilliantly concieved. One can only
suspect that the brains behind it truly have the
initials DC but are not located anywhere near
Capitol Hill.

We are claiming to the world officially that Iraqi
production is about 2 million BBD or about $35 billion
per year at the new higher price... yet at OPEC they
openly laught at that assertion. OTOH compare that
reality with the fact we have already spent, according
to real estimates about $500 billion on the war (only
half of it out-of-pocket and that is the difference
between estimates). Is there a payback to recoup most
of this, through the noovoodoo scheme of DC?

Yup. It looks that way. Way to go, Dick.

If the contested fields are really pumping - you
remember the fileds in South Iraq bordering Kuwait,
which Saddam coveted for decades, and was a big part
of his motivation for the Kuwait invasion - because
they hold more oil than all of Kuwait; and as some
OPEC ministers have confided to reportes - that
Halliburton is now pumping secretly through the new
pipeline an estimated 2-2.5 BBD... yes, the sand-storm
is clearing and now, and it is becomming clear WHY we
did not officiall protest the OPEC cartel's new higher
oil price.

This off-the-book oil goes to Europe anyway. The logic
is that they have not paid for our invasion, and
cannot do so politically, though we are all  in the
same boat together - ERGO, they should be made to pay
the new artificial price through market
manipulation... 

...sounds logical to me, and yes, there are many any
claim that even the older voodoo model worked in the
long run. Three of fours years of this and Europe has
effectively paid its fair share. It does not hurt that
the Hubbert curve, ect makes it look like oil has
nearly peaked, but even if it has, the $50 price was
too much, too soon for normal market moves even in a
partially free-market that is dominated by US
interests, even if those interests are wearing
abayas and shailas in front of the Arab press...

Most of them were educated here anyway, know economics
better than most CPas, and have mansions and bank
accounts in the US and Europe... just in case...

Remember these haunting words from a man who even
managed to beat the hangman: 
Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought
to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you
have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and
denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger. It works the same in
any country.

  

Re: noovoodoo economics

2005-02-09 Thread Jones Beene

--- Rick Monteverde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Jones -
 
 There was an article a year or so ago in
 Pop-Sci-Mech whatever showing how we could in fact
 defeat California rather quickly if we had to,
 complete with great graphics of missle launches,
 satellites, etc. I'm not afraid of Californians.
 Bring 'em on.

Good point. But it's a little like shooting yourself
in the foot, isn't it? more like in the 'nads,
according to Hollywood... Tell ya' what We'll give
you the guberantor in exchange for letting us dispense
with the ABC axis of evil. Everybody will be happy
(except the Enronites and Halliburton, etc.), and the
balance of power will stay about the same, but we will
have a real hero in Washington with less
petro-government to weight down progress. Maybe the
ABC boys can use Goering's ploy to defeat the hangman,
as there should be lots of under-used cyanide around
San Quentin ... or maybe Ken Lay will come to the
resue of his old pals  ;-)

Jones



[OFF TOPIC] Time to start Filtering again

2005-02-09 Thread Don Wiegel

I noticed that:  Frederick Sparber signed his last Reply as:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Signing off the list.
 
Frederick
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 
Vortex is the greatest news list on the internet for stimulating
conversations. Personally .. I enjoy most all of the subjects discussed.
 
However ... There are some Great Minds out there who do not like the Off
Topic conversions.
 
For awhile you all put [OFF TOPIC] in the subject line .. When you were Off
Topic
 
This allows those who want to .. To Filter out this type of conversion.
 
Could you all start doing this again .. Maybe this would get Mr. Sparber
back.
 
Also .. Remember PlainTEXT only.
 
-DonW-



Re: [OFF TOPIC] Time to start Filtering again

2005-02-09 Thread Horace Heffner
At 1:13 PM 2/9/5, Don Wiegel wrote:
I noticed that:  Frederick Sparber signed his last Reply as:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Signing off the list.

Frederick
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Vortex is the greatest news list on the internet for stimulating
conversations. Personally .. I enjoy most all of the subjects discussed.

However ... There are some Great Minds out there who do not like the Off
Topic conversions.

For awhile you all put [OFF TOPIC] in the subject line .. When you were Off
Topic

This allows those who want to .. To Filter out this type of conversion.

Could you all start doing this again .. Maybe this would get Mr. Sparber
back.

Also .. Remember PlainTEXT only.

-DonW-


Fred will be back when he has something to say.  He signs off and on the
list frequently.  He just signs off when he doesn't have time to or doesn't
want to converse.

I certainly do agree with use of the [OFF TOPIC] or [OT] designations when
the discussion drifts completely away from a science topic.   I should also
note I personally have enjoyed reading some of the OT discussions.

Regards,

Horace Heffner  




charging for energy consumption.

2005-02-09 Thread Harry Veeder

While modern physics represents all forms of energy as equivalent through
the conservation laws, is every form of energy consumption morally equal?
.e.g. Some types of energy consumption keep people from freezing. Is this
use of energy morally equivalent to the energy used to operate a shopping
mall?  

I view some forms of energy consumption as a public good and these should be
provided free of charge. Of course the taxpayer will ultimately pay but
consider how the modern highway system was built.


Harry





Cluster Chemistry

2005-02-09 Thread Terry Blanton
http://www.science.psu.edu/alert/Castleman1-2005.htm

Clusters of Aluminum Atoms Found to Have Properties of
Other Elements Reveal a New Form of Chemistry
13 January 2005—A research team has discovered
clusters of aluminum atoms that have chemical
properties similar to single atoms of metallic and
nonmetallic elements when they react with iodine. The
discovery opens the door to using 'superatom
chemistry' based on a new periodic table of cluster
elements to create unique compounds with distinctive
properties never seen before. The results of the
research, headed jointly by Shiv N. Khanna, professor
of physics at Virginia Commonwealth University and A.
Welford Castleman Jr., the Evan Pugh Professor of
Chemistry and Physics and the Eberly Family
Distinguished Chair in Science at Penn State
University, will be reported in the 14 January 2005
issue of the journal Science.

Depending on the number of aluminum atoms in the
cluster, we have demonstrated 'superatoms' exhibiting
the properties of either halogens or alkaline earth
metals, says Castleman. This result suggests the
intriguing potential of this chemistry in nanoscale
synthesis. The discovery could have practical
applications in the fields of medicine, food
production and photography.

The researchers examined the chemical properties,
electronic structure, and geometry of aluminum
clusters both theoretically and experimentally in
chemical compounds with iodine atoms. They found that
a cluster of 13 aluminum atoms behaves like a single
iodine atom, while a cluster of 14 aluminum atoms
behaves like an alkaline earth atom. The discovery of
these new iodine compounds, which include aluminum
clusters, is critical because it reveals a new form of
'superatom' chemistry, said Khanna. In the future,
we may apply this chemistry, building on our previous
knowledge, to create new materials for energy
applications and even medical devices.

To make their discovery, the research team replaced
iodine atoms with the aluminum clusters in naturally
occurring chains or networks of iodine atoms and
molecules known as polyiodides. When the researchers
substituted the iodine atom with the aluminum cluster,
Al13, they observed that the entire chemistry of the
compound changed--causing the other iodine molecules
to break apart and bind individually to the cluster.
The researchers then were able to bind 12 iodine atoms
to a single Al13 cluster, forming a completely new
class of polyiodides. Our production of such a
species is a stirring development that may lead to new
compounds with a completely new class of chemistry and
applications, says Castleman. Along with the
discovery that Al14 clusters appear to behave
similarly to alkaline earth atoms when combined with
iodine, these new results give further evidence that
we are really on our way to the development of a
periodic table of the 'cluster elements'.

The researchers conducted experimental reactivity
studies that indicate that certain aluminum-cluster
superatoms are highly stable by nature. The team's
related theoretical investigations reveal that the
enhanced stability of these superatoms is associated
with a balance in their atomic and electronic states.
While the clusters resemble atoms of other elements in
their interactions, their chemistry is unique,
creating stable compounds with bonds that are not
identical to those of single atoms.

Using stable clusters provides a possible route to an
adaptive chemistry that introduces the
aluminum-cluster species into nanoscale materials,
tailoring them to create desirable properties. The
flexibility of an Al13 cluster to act as an iodine
atom shows that superatoms can have synthetic utility,
providing an unexplored 'third dimension' to the
traditional periodic table of elements, said Khanna.
Applications using Al13 clusters instead of iodine in
polymers may lead to the development of improved
conducting materials. Assembling Al13I units may
provide aluminum materials that will not oxidize, and
may help overcome a major problem in fuels that burn
aluminum particles.

The theoretical investigations for this project were
conducted by Khanna with N.O. Jones, a graduate
student in the physics department at Virginia
Commonwealth University, and the experimental work was
conducted by Castleman with Denis Bergeron and Patrick
J. Roach, graduate students in the chemistry
department at Penn State.

This research was supported by the U. S. Air Force
Office of Scientific Research and the U. S. Department
of Energy.

end



__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250



[OT] Noovoodoo economics and portmanteau words

2005-02-09 Thread Jones Beene

--- RC Macaulay wrote:
 
 http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/HUD403A.html

I almost wish you hadn't sent that reference, Richard,
as it really makes me realize how far we have strayed
in the never-ending battle of greed vs. fair
government (not to mention wanting to puke at those
who think the present administration has moral
principles  because they are backed by the religious
right). To think that this great country is willingly
turning away from a long tradition of well,
crony-capitalism to what amounts to a petro-criminal
oligarchy, sustained by religious fundamentalism... is
almost sickening. In effect we now are approaching the
equivalent of an Americanized Taliban entrenched in
place of a true democracy. 

From the reference:

Much of America's net foreign debt, along with that
of countries such as Argentina, is owed to these
flight-capital centers. This has become the meaning of
globalization in its financial dimension.

There is humor in this, I suppose. But it is of the
you have to laugh or else you cry-type of humor. 

You own two cows. under ~ 
~ Fascism - you  keep both cows, state regulates milk
production, dictates who you sell to, and the price. 
~ Communism - confiscates one cow, regulates milk
production, confiscates most of your milk and profit 
and gives it to unproductive people. 
~ Socialism - lets  you keep both cows, confiscates
most of your profit and gives it to unproductive
people, but let's you vote for the leader who promises
to change things and never does.
~ Democratic Bureaucracy - lets  you keep both cows,
confiscates most of your profit and gives it to
unproductive people. It also buys a large portion of
your  milk and then pours it down the drain. Then it
raises taxes to fund elaborate, expensive studies to
find out why government  is so inefficient.
~ Libertarian Capitalist Republic  - Lets you keep
both cows, the milk, and your profit. It regulates
nothing. You sell one cow and buy a bull. This form of
government only exists in the imagination, however.
~ New American Crony Capitalist Petrocracy - Lets you
keep both cows, and about 60% of the profit. It
regulates nothing directly, but borrows using you cow,
bull, and new calves for collateral. You try to sell
the milk but find the only buyer is an offshore bank,
and they want to take out a second mortgage on
everything to make sure that you buy your tractor fuel
at the new inflated price ... etc etc

Sad

BTW for more of a smile, and for the benefit of any
who did not finish the Sunday Puzzle, there is the
subject of my favorite le mot juste which is the
portmanteau word or morphword...which is a literary
trend that did not begin with either the Beatles nor
email, but goes back to Lewis Carrol, James Joyce and
especially the French, who have so few words to begin
with (OTOH they all sound very nice on the ear). 

Noovoodoo is the not necessarily French nor even the
newest in the long lineage (Petrocracy is a few hours
newer) some others:

bionic ..biology + electronic
blog .web + log
brunch .breakfast + lunch
camcorder camera + recorder
email electronic + mail
factoid ..fact + oid
fantabulous ..fantastic + fabulous
infomercial ...information + commercial
motel.motor + hotel
smog.smoke + fog

... and of course, pundit... wordplay specialist +
idiot

hey, as your local pundit, I represent that remark

Jones



Re: solving really big problems

2005-02-09 Thread RC Macaulay



Revtec, interesting questions, more to ponder than 
to reply.

It depends on whether one believes in God ..or .. 
whether one believes God.

Richard

Blank Bkgrd.gif

Re: SOLVING REALLY BIG PROBLEMS

2005-02-09 Thread revtec

- Original Message - 
From: Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Bob Flower [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Andy Becan [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: SOLVING REALLY BIG PROBLEMS



 --- revtec wrote:

  Perhaps the reduction in CO2 emissions will be more
  than offset by the waste heat output of billions of
  CF engines, and that global warming will accelerate
  by direct heating alone!  Could it be that with
  perfecting CF we are about to open pandora's box?

  I brought this up before without getting a single
  comment.  Did I have silent agreement with this
  concern from most of the group, or am I considered
  totally nuts

 Not sure what you are referring to specifically, but
 back in April when I brought up the subject of thermal
 pollution in a long post to vortex, I believe it was
 you (or someone using the name revtec) who
 commented,

 I personally believe that we are overrating our
 ability to thermally affect  this planet, and that the
 earth is thermally self regulating to a much  greater
 degree than we give it credit for.

 Do I take it that you are now coming around to getting
 a proper understanding of the issue of thermal
 pollution, and now chiding others for following your
 previous advice?

 Jones

No.  I still believe the Earth has a propensity for self regulation.  But if
human activity manages to push the planet beyond the control limits a
concerned God can make further adjustments.

Jeff




Re: Cluster Chemistry

2005-02-09 Thread Grimer
At 03:01 pm 09-02-05 -0900, you wrote:
At 1:25 PM 2/9/5, Terry Blanton wrote:
http://www.science.psu.edu/alert/Castleman1-2005.htm

Clusters of Aluminum Atoms Found to Have Properties of
Other Elements Reveal a New Form of Chemistry
13 January 2005’ÄîA research team has discovered
clusters of aluminum atoms that have chemical
properties similar to single atoms of metallic and
nonmetallic elements

[snip]

Given that aluminum nanopowders are used in solid rocket fuels and
explosives, could it be possible that aluminum nanopowders absorbed into
the body can act like a wide variety of toxins, while not being readily
detectable as such?  Might there be a relation to Desert Storm Syndrome?
One also has to wonder about the possibility of nano-cluster formation in
the body when aluminum compound containing food, like some baking powders,
acidic food in aluminum cans, food in containers with aluminum foil tops,
food in plastic containers that are aluminized on the inside, or pickles
containing alum, is consumed.

Regards,

Horace Heffner 

 
Whilst on the subject of clusters it occurs to me that since 
there seems to be a whole new discipline of inorganic cluster
chemistry out there waiting to be discovered, there may also be
a whole new discipline of hydroic chemistry also waiting to be
discovered.

On his excellent website Professor Chaplin describes some of these
clusters; and the power laws for water and water vapour strongly 
suggest the these clusters comprise a self similar hierarchy as 
outlined in Buchanan's very readable book, UBIQUITY.

Though I hate to admit it, maybe my harp playing Spanish 
daughter-in-law is not quite so daft as I imagine by 
believing in Homeopathy. 

It appears I might have hoisted myself on my own petard. 8-(

Cheers,

Frank Grimer






Re: SOLVING REALLY BIG PROBLEMS

2005-02-09 Thread Steven Krivit


At 08:21 PM 2/9/2005 -0500, you wrote:
Jeff writes:
 What is our collective goal regarding the commercialization of
CF? 
 Is it to reduce the level of CO2 emissions to reverse global
warming? 

I think Bockris put it most succinctly: It is the basis of a way
to continue our Civilization. 
I've got more comments on the way regarding this in #9 and #10 of the
forthcoming issues of New Energy Times.

 Perhaps the reduction in CO2
emissions will be more than offset by the waste heat output of billions
of CF
 engines, and that global warming will accelerate by direct heating
alone!
Nope. Can't happen. Two reasons:
1. As I show in the book, cold fusion is so efficient, it would greatly
reduce primary energy use for a long time, even if energy consumption
increases. See chapters 14 and 15.
2. Heat from engines leaves the atmosphere in about a half hour. You
would have to increase heat from motors by a huge factor before it would
have a serious impact.
To add to what Jed said,
It was my understanding that global warming was primarily because of
solar radiation hitting the earth, reflecting back towards space, but
intercepted by the greenhouse gasses which absorb the wavelengths of
reflected radiation and converts it into thermal energy, thereby creating
a transparent blanket. 
Not so much from the heat that is generated initially from terrestrial
sources. Yes? No?

Steve