Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org year-end fundraising campaign

2012-11-14 Thread Ly Sig
FYI:
Jed managed 16050 posts to vortex. Conclusion, Jed has no need to earn money.
His time is eaten up by addiction to promulgating uncreative, boring script.
Jed is on a donor list for $1,000 with a slippery group of 4 looking for 
research donations.
Only fools send donations to Nigeria and elsewhere if verifiable background and 
educational achievements are not published, to say nothing of Federal 
Non-profit status documentation needed for charitable deduction. 
Reminds me of Jojo who appealed for funds on vortex whereby a Google search 
reveals his occupation as a worm grower for lizard food. A fool and his money 
are soon parted is a proverb found in the poem Five Hundred Points of Good 
Husbandry by Thomas Tusser
Anyone else object to Tin Cup appeals on vortex?
Rossi Fan



Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org year-end fundraising campaign

2012-11-14 Thread Esa Ruoho
Anyone else object to posts like the one below?

Sent from some iDevice. Written by Esa.

On 14 Nov 2012, at 13:54, Ly Sig ly...@ymail.com wrote:

 FYI:
 Jed managed 16050 posts to vortex. Conclusion, Jed has no need to earn money.
 His time is eaten up by addiction to promulgating uncreative, boring script.
 Jed is on a donor list for $1,000 with a slippery group of 4 looking for 
 research donations.
 Only fools send donations to Nigeria and elsewhere if verifiable background 
 and educational achievements are not published, to say nothing of Federal 
 Non-profit status documentation needed for charitable deduction. 
 Reminds me of Jojo who appealed for funds on vortex whereby a Google search 
 reveals his occupation as a worm grower for lizard food. A fool and his 
 money are soon parted is a proverb found in the poem Five Hundred Points of 
 Good Husbandry by Thomas Tusser
 Anyone else object to Tin Cup appeals on vortex?
 Rossi Fan
 



Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org year-end fundraising campaign

2012-11-14 Thread ChemE Stewart
As children in this world we are taught to ask for things.  Jed has every
right.  He provides a valuable service.

Stewart
darkmattersalot.com



On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Esa Ruoho esaru...@gmail.com wrote:

 Anyone else object to posts like the one below?

 Sent from some iDevice. Written by Esa.

 On 14 Nov 2012, at 13:54, Ly Sig ly...@ymail.com wrote:

  FYI:
  Jed managed 16050 posts to vortex. Conclusion, Jed has no need to earn
 money.
  His time is eaten up by addiction to promulgating uncreative, boring
 script.
  Jed is on a donor list for $1,000 with a slippery group of 4 looking for
 research donations.
  Only fools send donations to Nigeria and elsewhere if verifiable
 background and educational achievements are not published, to say nothing
 of Federal Non-profit status documentation needed for charitable deduction.
  Reminds me of Jojo who appealed for funds on vortex whereby a Google
 search reveals his occupation as a worm grower for lizard food. A fool and
 his money are soon parted is a proverb found in the poem Five Hundred
 Points of Good Husbandry by Thomas Tusser
  Anyone else object to Tin Cup appeals on vortex?
  Rossi Fan
 




Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org year-end fundraising campaign

2012-11-14 Thread Peter Gluck
Because trolls and other aggressive people always are posting anonymously
or with nicknames, I want to suggest to Bill Beaty to transform Vortex in a
Forum on which every member should use his or her real, verifiable name.
The courage of cowards is always destructive.
Peter

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Esa Ruoho esaru...@gmail.com wrote:

 Anyone else object to posts like the one below?

 Sent from some iDevice. Written by Esa.

 On 14 Nov 2012, at 13:54, Ly Sig ly...@ymail.com wrote:

  FYI:
  Jed managed 16050 posts to vortex. Conclusion, Jed has no need to earn
 money.
  His time is eaten up by addiction to promulgating uncreative, boring
 script.
  Jed is on a donor list for $1,000 with a slippery group of 4 looking for
 research donations.
  Only fools send donations to Nigeria and elsewhere if verifiable
 background and educational achievements are not published, to say nothing
 of Federal Non-profit status documentation needed for charitable deduction.
  Reminds me of Jojo who appealed for funds on vortex whereby a Google
 search reveals his occupation as a worm grower for lizard food. A fool and
 his money are soon parted is a proverb found in the poem Five Hundred
 Points of Good Husbandry by Thomas Tusser
  Anyone else object to Tin Cup appeals on vortex?
  Rossi Fan
 




-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org year-end fundraising campaign

2012-11-14 Thread Vorl Bek
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:09:13 +0200
Esa Ruoho esaru...@gmail.com wrote:

 Anyone else object to posts like the one below?

I do not. It is always good for Enthusiasts to be cautioned about
how they spend their Money, lest, in an Enthusiastick Fit, they
spend it Foolishly.



Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org year-end fundraising campaign

2012-11-14 Thread Esa Ruoho
Ly Sig, Vorl Bek.. Nuff said.


On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Vorl Bek vorl@antichef.com wrote:

 On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:09:13 +0200
 Esa Ruoho esaru...@gmail.com wrote:

  Anyone else object to posts like the one below?

 I do not. It is always good for Enthusiasts to be cautioned about
 how they spend their Money, lest, in an Enthusiastick Fit, they
 spend it Foolishly.




RE: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org year-end fundraising campaign

2012-11-14 Thread OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
From Ly

 FYI:
 Jed managed 16050 posts to vortex. Conclusion, Jed has no need to earn
money.

This makes no sense. 

 His time is eaten up by addiction to promulgating uncreative, boring
script.

This is an absurd statement.

 Jed is on a donor list for $1,000 with a slippery group of 4 looking for
 research donations. Only fools send donations to Nigeria and elsewhere if
 verifiable background and educational achievements are not published, to
 say nothing of Federal Non-profit status documentation needed for
 charitable deduction.

If Ly is referring to the Martin Fleischman Memorial Project, they appear
far more transparent than whoever Ly appears to be.

Troll.

The rest clipped.

Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



RE: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org year-end fundraising campaign

2012-11-14 Thread OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
From Vorl:

 Esa Ruoho wrote:

 Anyone else object to posts like the one below?

 I do not. It is always good for Enthusiasts to be cautioned
 about how they spend their Money, lest, in an Enthusiastick
 Fit, they spend it Foolishly.

And I do object. While caution is always called for, and while it's not
always the case, blithely accepting advice from complete strangers can be
just as risky as acting on one of those Nigerian messages, particularly when
the stranger's message is filled with disingenuous criticisms filled with
falsehoods.

Vorl, you give me the impression that you are willing to accept any kind of
advice no matter whence it came from, particularly if what the stranger is
pontificating seems to agree with your objectives  pov?

Is that so?

Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org year-end fundraising campaign

2012-11-14 Thread Alain Sepeda
Even if my pseudonimity is no more secret, I would defend pseudonyms.
At worst someone could keep the real identity.

to be simple :
imagine that I say: my employer dump billions in a hole, and i don't want
him to know I know what he is doing...
Imagine I say : my neighbors will burn me like a witch if they learn i
support Nuclear energy
Imagine I say: my family will send my to the psy hospital if they learn i
support Cold Fusion scam

pseudonimity is privacy protection, to help free speech in a real world...


2012/11/14 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com

 Because trolls and other aggressive people always are posting anonymously
 or with nicknames, I want to suggest to Bill Beaty to transform Vortex in a
 Forum on which every member should use his or her real, verifiable name.
 The courage of cowards is always destructive.
 Peter

 On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Esa Ruoho esaru...@gmail.com wrote:

 Anyone else object to posts like the one below?

 Sent from some iDevice. Written by Esa.

 On 14 Nov 2012, at 13:54, Ly Sig ly...@ymail.com wrote:

  FYI:
  Jed managed 16050 posts to vortex. Conclusion, Jed has no need to earn
 money.
  His time is eaten up by addiction to promulgating uncreative, boring
 script.
  Jed is on a donor list for $1,000 with a slippery group of 4 looking
 for research donations.
  Only fools send donations to Nigeria and elsewhere if verifiable
 background and educational achievements are not published, to say nothing
 of Federal Non-profit status documentation needed for charitable deduction.
  Reminds me of Jojo who appealed for funds on vortex whereby a Google
 search reveals his occupation as a worm grower for lizard food. A fool and
 his money are soon parted is a proverb found in the poem Five Hundred
 Points of Good Husbandry by Thomas Tusser
  Anyone else object to Tin Cup appeals on vortex?
  Rossi Fan
 




 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com




[Vo]:UFO claim replicated by news agency camera

2012-11-14 Thread Roarty, Francis X
The ufo is so fast it is invisible to the naked eye but can be observed by 
slowing film - both by original claimant and by the news agency camera that 
validated his claim.  The ufo went undetected by nearby radar installations... 
My posit... relativistic drive/navigation is responsible for the lack of 
detection. Radar is designed to track where not when  :_) this also 
addresses the trajectory issues and sudden accelerations associated with many 
UFO reports when you consider displacement on a temporal vector. I won't put OT 
in front of my posit because it really does derive from the basis of 
relativistic hydrogen and zero point energy where instead of utilizing the 
linkage between the ether and fractionalized hydrogen to produce anomalous 
energy we are instead suggesting using energy to turn this fractional hydrogen 
into a drive mechanism that utilizes a linkage with the ether to drive an 
object relative to  the time axis.
Fran


http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/us/2012/11/13/co-ufo-sightings-in-denver.kdvrhpt=hp_tvvideo#/video/us/2012/11/13/co-ufo-sightings-in-denver.kdvr



Re: [Vo]:UFO claim replicated by news agency camera

2012-11-14 Thread Craig
It's not an alien. :)

1) It's small.
2) It's flown over a local neighborhood.
3) It flies at the same time each day.
4) It's very fast and maneuverable.
5) In one frame, you can see a small flame coming from it.

It all points to some type of RC plane being flown at lunch by a local
enthusiast. It's powered by internal combustion.

What else could it be?

Craig

On 11/14/2012 09:01 AM, Roarty, Francis X wrote:

 The ufo is so fast it is invisible to the naked eye but can be
 observed by slowing film -- both by original claimant and by the news
 agency camera that validated his claim.  The ufo went undetected by
 nearby radar installations... My posit... relativistic
 drive/navigation is responsible for the lack of detection. Radar is
 designed to track where not when  :_) this also addresses the
 trajectory issues and sudden accelerations associated with many UFO
 reports when you consider displacement on a temporal vector. I won't
 put OT in front of my posit because it really does derive from the
 basis of relativistic hydrogen and zero point energy where instead of
 utilizing the linkage between the ether and fractionalized hydrogen to
 produce anomalous energy we are instead suggesting using energy to
 turn this fractional hydrogen into a drive mechanism that utilizes a
 linkage with the ether to drive an object relative to  the time axis.

 Fran

  

  

 http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/us/2012/11/13/co-ufo-sightings-in-denver.kdvrhpt=hp_tvvideo#/video/us/2012/11/13/co-ufo-sightings-in-denver.kdvr

  




Re: [Vo]:UFO claim replicated by news agency camera

2012-11-14 Thread Terry Blanton
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Craig cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:



 What else could it be?

 Bugs. :-)


[Vo]:59 GW of coal fired capacity slated for retirement

2012-11-14 Thread Jed Rothwell
Falling natural gas prices plus the cost of upgrading coal fired plants
have made them uneconomical. See:

http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2012/11/report-59-gw-of-coal-fired-generation-capacity-should-retire-could-open-the-door-for-renewable-energy

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:59 GW of coal fired capacity slated for retirement

2012-11-14 Thread Jed Rothwell
Hold on here . . . This is a recommendation from the UCS. There was another
article this morning in the AJC describing actual coal plant closings.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:UFO claim replicated by news agency camera

2012-11-14 Thread Terry Blanton
There is what appears to be a quonset hut near 56th and Clay where these
are said to originate.  You can see it on google maps at:

39.79945, -105.02035


Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org year-end fundraising campaign

2012-11-14 Thread Jed Rothwell
Esa Ruoho esaru...@gmail.com wrote:

Anyone else object to posts like the one below?

 Sent from some iDevice. Written by Esa.

 On 14 Nov 2012, at 13:54, Ly Sig ly...@ymail.com wrote:

  FYI:
  Jed managed 16050 posts to vortex. Conclusion, Jed has no need to earn
 money.
  His time is eaten up by addiction to promulgating uncreative, boring
 script.
  Jed is on a donor list for $1,000 with a slippery group of 4 looking for
 research donations.
  Only fools send donations to Nigeria and elsewhere if verifiable
 background and educational achievements are not published . . .


I have no objection. On the contrary, Ly Sig has performed a valuable
service here, reminding us that many people oppose everything about cold
fusion, even an on-line library of papers. If they could, opponents would
shut shut down LENR-CANR. They do not want anyone to read cold fusion
papers, even papers by Morrison. Fortunately, they have no way to stop me.

This is harmless nonsense. Many, many people have attacked me over the
years. Some have said much worse things than this.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org year-end fundraising campaign

2012-11-14 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote:


 I have no objection. On the contrary, Ly Sig has performed a valuable
 service here, reminding us that many people oppose everything about cold
 fusion, even an on-line library of papers.


That sounds egotistical, as if I meant that an attack on me is an attack on
cold fusion. What I meant is:

Ly Sig says I should not collect donations for LENR-CANR.org. I should pay
for the whole thing myself. That is tantamount to saying it is not worth
having. At least, he sees no need for it. No one else should bother
assisting me me or helping to pay for it.

If you are not willing to pay for a service, and you think it is an affront
that the person providing it even asks for payment, you must have pretty
low opinion of that service. I invite Ly Sig to get all of these papers on
his own from other sources. Not NewEnergyTimes either, since most of their
papers are copied from LENR-CANR.org.

Park and many other opponents say things like this:

If the cold fusion researchers want to do this, fine, let them. But we
should not give them any grant money or even let them work on the clock at
their labs. Let them do it at home on their own time.

That is tantamount saying, this research should not be allowed. You can't
do experiments after hours at home.

LENR-CANR is a much smaller deal than even the smallest research project.
It calls for a small office, a desk, two computers, a scanner, a couple of
filing cabinets, and travel expenses. It has to be an office away from home
with no distractions or I will waste the whole day reading books and
dithering. It does not cost much, but it ain't free either. People download
400,000 papers a year, so the cost is roughly 2 cents per download. Plus I
do not charge authors for editing and various other services, and I have
some other business here, part time. To be fair, I would say it is about a
penny per download.

I am moving to a smaller office down the hall, which will reduce expenses
by $2000 per year.

Internet used to be a major expense but bandwidth is now very cheap.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:High energy protons emissions/Nov.1 Piantelli Patent

2012-11-14 Thread mixent
In reply to  Eric Walker's message of Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:04:00 -0800:
Hi,

There is another problem I have with the Rydberg option. I would expect
elongated atoms to orient themselves in exactly the opposite direction to that
needed to facilitate fusion, i.e. with the proton as *far* from the target
nucleus as possible. 

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:30 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:

Is there such a thing as deformed Rydberg H2 (as opposed to H)?


I'm not too familiar with the details, but it looks like you can get
Rydberg H2.

http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v95/i13/e133202

I suspect there will be deformation under a field, but I'm not sure.

Eric
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html



Re: [Vo]:UFO claim replicated by news agency camera

2012-11-14 Thread Eric Walker
I can appreciate that it is a UFO, in the technical sense. But did it have 
aliens in it?

Eric

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 14, 2012, at 6:01, Roarty, Francis X francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote:

 The ufo is so fast it is invisible to the naked eye but can be observed by 
 slowing film –  


Re: [Vo]:High energy protons emissions/Nov.1 Piantelli Patent

2012-11-14 Thread Eric Walker
Maybe there is an application to be found in *reducing* the fusion cross 
section. ;)

Eric

On Nov 14, 2012, at 12:17, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:

 In reply to  Eric Walker's message of Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:04:00 -0800:
 Hi,
 
 There is another problem I have with the Rydberg option. I would expect
 elongated atoms to orient themselves in exactly the opposite direction to that
 needed to facilitate fusion, i.e. with the proton as *far* from the target
 nucleus as possible.



RE: [Vo]:High energy protons emissions/Nov.1 Piantelli Patent

2012-11-14 Thread Jones Beene
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker 

Maybe there is an [IRH] application to be found in *reducing* the
fusion cross section. ;)

It was suggested years ago that a hybrid of Hot Fusion and LENR might be
possible, especially with so-called desktop accelerators and extreme
loading ratios characteristic of cold fusion. The overhead cost of hot
fusion must come down by an order of magnitude before it makes sense.

Perhaps the easiest way to imagine this kind of hot-cold-hybrid would be
based on ICF (inertial confinement) ... where the cost savings comes from
using LENR loading techniques to manufacture implosion pellets for
irradiation via coherent beam compression; such as to implode targets with
semiconductor laser arrays or electron beams based on small Wakefield
accelerators. 

This kind of device could conceivably fit in a modified airplane, for
instance, if the reactions were largely neutron free. The Winterberg/Bae
plan was mentioned here a few years ago, and then went quiet; but seems not
to have languished ... but also not to have made a breakthrough.

http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg34994.html

http://nextbigfuture.com/2009/09/conjectured-metastable-super-explosives.htm
l

http://ykbcorp.com/news.html


Jones


attachment: winmail.dat

Re: [Vo]:High energy protons emissions/Nov.1 Piantelli Patent

2012-11-14 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:


 Perhaps the easiest way to imagine this kind of hot-cold-hybrid would be
 based on ICF (inertial confinement) ... where the cost savings comes from
 using LENR loading techniques to manufacture implosion pellets for
 irradiation via coherent beam compression; such as to implode targets with
 semiconductor laser arrays or electron beams based on small Wakefield
 accelerators.


See also:

Rout, R.K., et al., Detection of high tritium activity on the central
titanium electrode of a
plasma focus device. Fusion Technol., 1991. 19: p. 391.

http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RoutRKdetectiono.pdf

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:UFO claim replicated by news agency camera

2012-11-14 Thread ChemE Stewart
Our alien buddies most likely exist in collapsed dark matter.  That is
their drone riding a particle orbital path.  Thousands of miles per second.
 Our next form of transportation. Green is out, rainbow power is where it
is at.

I hope they can help with the comets

Stewart
Darkmattersalot.com

On Wednesday, November 14, 2012, Eric Walker wrote:

 I can appreciate that it is a UFO, in the technical sense. But did it have
 aliens in it?

 Eric

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Nov 14, 2012, at 6:01, Roarty, Francis X 
 francis.x.roa...@lmco.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 
 'francis.x.roa...@lmco.com');
 wrote:

  The ufo is so fast it is invisible to the naked eye but can be observed
 by slowing film –




Re: [Vo]:High energy protons emissions/Nov.1 Piantelli Patent

2012-11-14 Thread ChemE Stewart
Neutrinos knock off protons thru Beta Decay, bad for DNA, what can I say...

Stewart
Darkmattersalot.com

On Wednesday, November 14, 2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:

 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
 'jone...@pacbell.net'); wrote:


 Perhaps the easiest way to imagine this kind of hot-cold-hybrid would be
 based on ICF (inertial confinement) ... where the cost savings comes from
 using LENR loading techniques to manufacture implosion pellets for
 irradiation via coherent beam compression; such as to implode targets with
 semiconductor laser arrays or electron beams based on small Wakefield
 accelerators.


 See also:

 Rout, R.K., et al., Detection of high tritium activity on the central
 titanium electrode of a
 plasma focus device. Fusion Technol., 1991. 19: p. 391.

 http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RoutRKdetectiono.pdf

 - Jed




Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org year-end fundraising campaign

2012-11-14 Thread Jed Rothwell
Here is some information from Christy for people who cannot use PayPal who
wish to contribute:


Other options:

1) [The person] can mail a check, as long as it is in USD.

2) If he already has a PayPal account, he can just send us a payment or I
can send him an invoice to pay, but I have to know how much his donation is
going to be.  This still requires that he have a PayPal account.

3) He can call or fax us with a credit card payment. Phone: 603-485-4700
 or Fax: 603-485-4710

The donate page is set to their standard settings and I don't know if there
is any way around it.  PayPal does require a certain amount of information
in order to take and make payments.


Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org year-end fundraising campaign

2012-11-14 Thread Daniel Rocha
Can I pay in bullions?


2012/11/14 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com

 Here is some information from Christy for people who cannot use PayPal who
 wish to contribute:


 Other options:

 1) [The person] can mail a check, as long as it is in USD.

 2) If he already has a PayPal account, he can just send us a payment or I
 can send him an invoice to pay, but I have to know how much his donation is
 going to be.  This still requires that he have a PayPal account.

 3) He can call or fax us with a credit card payment. Phone: 603-485-4700
  or Fax: 603-485-4710

 The donate page is set to their standard settings and I don't know if
 there is any way around it.  PayPal does require a certain amount of
 information in order to take and make payments.




-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com


Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org year-end fundraising campaign

2012-11-14 Thread Rob Dingemans

Hi,

On 15-11-2012 0:30, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Can I pay in bullions? 


Dunno, but with Paypal you can at least (after exchange) pay with Euros.

Regards,

Rob



[Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into their think collective theoretical skulls!

2012-11-14 Thread MarkI-ZeroPoint
FYI:  they're beginning to discover that, as I have expressed several times
here, you don't need to hit an atom with a sledgehammer to ionize it.  Just
a wee bit of energy at the right frequency and timing (phase).

 

http://phys.org/news/2012-11-supercharge-atoms-x-ray-laser.html

Just as a stretched guitar string can vibrate and sustain a note, a specific
tuning of the laser's properties can cause atoms and molecules to resonate.
The resonance excites the atoms and causes them to shake off electrons at a
rate that otherwise would require higher energies.

 

While it is common knowledge that triggering resonances in atoms will affect
their charged states, it was not clear to anybody what a dramatic effect
this could have in heavy atoms when they are being ionized by a source like
LCLS, Rolles said. It was the highest charge state ever observed with a
single X-ray pulse, which shows that the existing theoretical approaches
have to be modified.

 

Ultra-efficient ionization of heavy atoms by intense X-ray free-electron
laser pulses

Abstract from published paper:

http://www.nature.com/nphoton/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nphoton.2012.261.ht
ml

 

-Mark Iverson

 



Re: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into their think collective theoretical skulls!

2012-11-14 Thread Terry Blanton
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:26 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.netwrote:

 FYI:  they’re beginning to discover that, as I have expressed several
 times here, you don’t need to hit an atom with a sledgehammer to ionize
 it.  Just a wee bit of energy at the right frequency and timing (phase)…**
 **



Indeed.  So, look at what frequency 350 deg Celsius
triggers in the H2 atom.


RE: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into their think collective theoretical skulls!

2012-11-14 Thread MarkI-ZeroPoint
Another problem Terry is that if one is using a source that is a subharmonic
then you cannot hit it with a continuous train of EM; you have to use
pulses, as they did in this experiment.

-mark iverson

 

 

From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 6:22 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into
their think collective theoretical skulls!

 

 

 

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:26 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
wrote:

FYI:  they're beginning to discover that, as I have expressed several times
here, you don't need to hit an atom with a sledgehammer to ionize it.  Just
a wee bit of energy at the right frequency and timing (phase).

 

 

Indeed.  So, look at what frequency 350 deg Celsius

triggers in the H2 atom.  

 



RE: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into their think collective theoretical skulls!

2012-11-14 Thread MarkI-ZeroPoint
Another thing that has confused the situation is the difference of how
frequency is represented as one goes to higher and higher frequencies in the
EM spectrum… it uses Hertz up to microwave/millimeterwave frequencies; but
then changes to 'wave number' when it gets into optical frequencies…  maybe
this will help:

Name Wavelength Frequency (Hz)Photon Energy (eV)
Gamma rayless than 0.01nm   10 EHZ  100keV - 300+  GeV
X-Ray 0.01 nm to 10 nm   30 EHz - 30 PHZ 120 eV - 120   keV
Ultraviolet  10 nm - 390 nm  30 PHZ - 790 THz  3 eV - 124eV
Visible 390 nm - 750 nm 790 THz - 405 THz  1.7   eV -   3.3  eV
Infrared750 nm - 1 mm   405 THz - 300 GHz  1.24 meV -   1.7  eV
Microwave 1 mm - 1 meter300 GHz - 300 MHz  1.24 µeV -   1.24meV
Radio 1  m - 100,000km  300 GHz -   3  Hz 12.4  feV -   1.24meV


From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 6:22 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into
their think collective theoretical skulls!


On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:26 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
wrote:
FYI:  they’re beginning to discover that, as I have expressed several times
here, you don’t need to hit an atom with a sledgehammer to ionize it.  Just
a wee bit of energy at the right frequency and timing (phase)…


Indeed.  So, look at what frequency 350 deg Celsius
triggers in the H2 atom.  




RE: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into their think collective theoretical skulls!

2012-11-14 Thread MarkI-ZeroPoint
It might not be as simple as 350degs. if applied continuously as the heat
is, then exact frequencies are essential, thus, one probably needs something
like 350.01282874934 degs!

-mark iverson

 

From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 6:22 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into
their think collective theoretical skulls!

 

 

 

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:26 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
wrote:

FYI:  they're beginning to discover that, as I have expressed several times
here, you don't need to hit an atom with a sledgehammer to ionize it.  Just
a wee bit of energy at the right frequency and timing (phase).

 

 

Indeed.  So, look at what frequency 350 deg Celsius

triggers in the H2 atom.  

 



Re: [Vo]:High energy protons emissions/Nov.1 Piantelli Patent

2012-11-14 Thread Jeff Berkowitz
There's actually a whole spectrum of these ideas, correct? For example
Robin's concept of using an MCF device as a source of 14.1MeV neutrons to
force fission in actinides (e.g. nuclear waste). Has anyone tried to
summarize or assemble a list of these? It could span from the completely
mainstream (I think Robin's concept is completely mainstream from a
physics standpoint) to the completely, well, you know.  ;-)

Jeff


On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:

 -Original Message-
 From: Eric Walker

 Maybe there is an [IRH] application to be found in *reducing* the
 fusion cross section. ;)

 It was suggested years ago that a hybrid of Hot Fusion and LENR might be
 possible, especially with so-called desktop accelerators and extreme
 loading ratios characteristic of cold fusion. The overhead cost of hot
 fusion must come down by an order of magnitude before it makes sense.

 Perhaps the easiest way to imagine this kind of hot-cold-hybrid would be
 based on ICF (inertial confinement) ... where the cost savings comes from
 using LENR loading techniques to manufacture implosion pellets for
 irradiation via coherent beam compression; such as to implode targets with
 semiconductor laser arrays or electron beams based on small Wakefield
 accelerators.

 This kind of device could conceivably fit in a modified airplane, for
 instance, if the reactions were largely neutron free. The Winterberg/Bae
 plan was mentioned here a few years ago, and then went quiet; but seems not
 to have languished ... but also not to have made a breakthrough.

 http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg34994.html


 http://nextbigfuture.com/2009/09/conjectured-metastable-super-explosives.htm
 l

 http://ykbcorp.com/news.html


 Jones





Re: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into their think collective theoretical skulls!

2012-11-14 Thread David Roberson
If you actually apply heat as in joule heating, the energy covers a wide range 
of frequencies.  There is a limited amount at any one narrow band, but all of 
the bands have at least a small amount.


Dave



-Original Message-
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Nov 14, 2012 10:55 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into 
their think collective theoretical skulls!



It might not be as simple as 350degs… if applied continuously as the heat is, 
then exact frequencies are essential, thus, one probably needs something like 
350.01282874934 degs!
-mark iverson
 

From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 6:22 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into 
their think collective theoretical skulls!

 
 

 

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:26 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:

FYI:  they’re beginning to discover that, as I have expressed several times 
here, you don’t need to hit an atom with a sledgehammer to ionize it.  Just a 
wee bit of energy at the right frequency and timing (phase)…
 


 

Indeed.  So, look at what frequency 350 deg Celsius

triggers in the H2 atom.  

 

 


[Vo]:(Audio) Lewis Larsen at ANS Meeting LENR Panel Session

2012-11-14 Thread pagnucco
(Audio)
Lewis Larsen presentation at Panel Session at American Nuclear Society
National Meeting, San Diego CA, Nov. 14

http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/audio-larsenelectroweak-neutron-production-and-capture-in-lightning-dischargesans-san-diego-nov-14-2012




[Vo]:another interesting explanation

2012-11-14 Thread Eric Walker
See the My Personal Theory section of the post from Ron Maimon at
physics.SE:

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/3799/why-is-cold-fusion-considered-bogus/13734

Ron had a long post here for a while now, but very recently he updated it
to include new material in his explanation section.  The basic gist (of the
section, not the update):

In order to have fusion under chemical conditions, you have to find a way
to bridge the gap in energy between the chemical realm, in eVs, and the
nuclear realm, in MeVs.  Conveniently, the K shell of the Pd atom has 20KeV
of ionization energy.  If a K shell electron is kicked out (by a photon,
for example), the resulting hole will potentially attract a proton or
deuteron nearby, transferring 20KeV to the incoming particle.  If there are
two such holes, and two deuterons are brought in, they will meet with
sufficient energy to fuse.  The resulting alpha particle will then race
through the neighborhood of the fusion event, ionizing Pd atoms as it goes
and giving rise to new holes in turn.

Ron sees problems with this explanation, but it is interesting nonetheless.
 He also has an explanation for transmutations which is worth looking at.

Fascinatingly, Kirk Shanahan is one of the commenters on the post.  It's a
small world.

Eric


RE: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into their think collective theoretical skulls!

2012-11-14 Thread MarkI-ZeroPoint
I don’t think this experiment would fit into that explanation though, would it? 
 This was a coherent laser source at a specific energy (aka, frequency) of 
1.5kev. 

 

Regardless of how the heat is being applied (cond, conv, rad) in something like 
the eCAT, it ultimately ends up in lattice vibrations… which are nothing more 
than quantums of heat randomly being ejected from one atom into another.

 

-Mark

 

From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 8:26 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into 
their think collective theoretical skulls!

 

If you actually apply heat as in joule heating, the energy covers a wide range 
of frequencies.  There is a limited amount at any one narrow band, but all of 
the bands have at least a small amount. 

 

Dave



-Original Message-
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Nov 14, 2012 10:55 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into 
their think collective theoretical skulls!

It might not be as simple as 350degs… if applied continuously as the heat is, 
then exact frequencies are essential, thus, one probably needs something like 
350.01282874934 degs!

-mark iverson

 

From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com? ] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 6:22 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into 
their think collective theoretical skulls!

 

 

 

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:26 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:

FYI:  they’re beginning to discover that, as I have expressed several times 
here, you don’t need to hit an atom with a sledgehammer to ionize it.  Just a 
wee bit of energy at the right frequency and timing (phase)…

 

 

Indeed.  So, look at what frequency 350 deg Celsius

triggers in the H2 atom.  

 



RE: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into their think collective theoretical skulls!

2012-11-14 Thread MarkI-ZeroPoint
Here’s the excerpt from the abstract:

“we report an unprecedentedly high degree of ionization of xenon atoms by 1.5 
keV free-electron laser pulses to charge states with ionization energies far 
exceeding the photon energy.”

 

Also keep in mind that this is a coherent light source…  

 

Wonder if it’d have the same effect if they simple rotated the barrel 90 
degrees?

-Mark

 

From: MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 10:06 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into 
their think collective theoretical skulls!

 

I don’t think this experiment would fit into that explanation though, would it? 
 This was a coherent laser source at a specific energy (aka, frequency) of 
1.5kev. 

 

Regardless of how the heat is being applied (cond, conv, rad) in something like 
the eCAT, it ultimately ends up in lattice vibrations… which are nothing more 
than quantums of heat randomly being ejected from one atom into another.

 

-Mark

 

From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 8:26 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into 
their think collective theoretical skulls!

 

If you actually apply heat as in joule heating, the energy covers a wide range 
of frequencies.  There is a limited amount at any one narrow band, but all of 
the bands have at least a small amount. 

 

Dave

-Original Message-
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Nov 14, 2012 10:55 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into 
their think collective theoretical skulls!

It might not be as simple as 350degs… if applied continuously as the heat is, 
then exact frequencies are essential, thus, one probably needs something like 
350.01282874934 degs!

-mark iverson

 

From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com? ] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 6:22 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into 
their think collective theoretical skulls!

 

 

 

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:26 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:

FYI:  they’re beginning to discover that, as I have expressed several times 
here, you don’t need to hit an atom with a sledgehammer to ionize it.  Just a 
wee bit of energy at the right frequency and timing (phase)…

 

 

Indeed.  So, look at what frequency 350 deg Celsius

triggers in the H2 atom.  

 



RE: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into their think collective theoretical skulls!

2012-11-14 Thread MarkI-ZeroPoint
There’s “Supplemental Info”, which is a freely downloadable PDF…

 

http://www.nature.com/nphoton/journal/vaop/ncurrent/extref/nphoton.2012.261-s1.pdf

 

-mark

 

From: MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 10:13 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into 
their think collective theoretical skulls!

 

Here’s the excerpt from the abstract:

“we report an unprecedentedly high degree of ionization of xenon atoms by 1.5 
keV free-electron laser pulses to charge states with ionization energies far 
exceeding the photon energy.”

 

Also keep in mind that this is a coherent light source…  

 

Wonder if it’d have the same effect if they simple rotated the barrel 90 
degrees?

-Mark

 

From: MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 10:06 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into 
their think collective theoretical skulls!

 

I don’t think this experiment would fit into that explanation though, would it? 
 This was a coherent laser source at a specific energy (aka, frequency) of 
1.5kev. 

 

Regardless of how the heat is being applied (cond, conv, rad) in something like 
the eCAT, it ultimately ends up in lattice vibrations… which are nothing more 
than quantums of heat randomly being ejected from one atom into another.

 

-Mark

 

From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 8:26 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into 
their think collective theoretical skulls!

 

If you actually apply heat as in joule heating, the energy covers a wide range 
of frequencies.  There is a limited amount at any one narrow band, but all of 
the bands have at least a small amount. 

 

Dave

-Original Message-
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Nov 14, 2012 10:55 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into 
their think collective theoretical skulls!

It might not be as simple as 350degs… if applied continuously as the heat is, 
then exact frequencies are essential, thus, one probably needs something like 
350.01282874934 degs!

-mark iverson

 

From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com? ] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 6:22 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into 
their think collective theoretical skulls!

 

 

 

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:26 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:

FYI:  they’re beginning to discover that, as I have expressed several times 
here, you don’t need to hit an atom with a sledgehammer to ionize it.  Just a 
wee bit of energy at the right frequency and timing (phase)…

 

 

Indeed.  So, look at what frequency 350 deg Celsius

triggers in the H2 atom.  

 



Re: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into their think collective theoretical skulls!

2012-11-14 Thread David Roberson
I see what you mean.  My mistake.


Dave



-Original Message-
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Nov 15, 2012 1:13 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into 
their think collective theoretical skulls!



Here’s the excerpt from the abstract:
“we report an unprecedentedly high degree of ionization of xenon atoms by 1.5 
keV free-electron laser pulses to charge states with ionization energies far 
exceeding the photon energy.”
 
Also keep in mind that this is a coherent light source…  
 
Wonder if it’d have the same effect if they simple rotated the barrel 90 
degrees?
-Mark
 

From: MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 10:06 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into 
their think collective theoretical skulls!

 
I don’t think this experiment would fit into that explanation though, would it? 
 This was a coherent laser source at a specific energy (aka, frequency) of 
1.5kev. 
 
Regardless of how the heat is being applied (cond, conv, rad) in something like 
the eCAT, it ultimately ends up in lattice vibrations… which are nothing more 
than quantums of heat randomly being ejected from one atom into another.
 
-Mark
 

From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 8:26 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into 
their think collective theoretical skulls!

 
If you actually apply heat as in joule heating, the energy covers a wide range 
of frequencies.  There is a limited amount at any one narrow band, but all of 
the bands have at least a small amount. 

 

Dave

-Original Message-
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Nov 14, 2012 10:55 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into 
their think collective theoretical skulls!


It might not be as simple as 350degs… if applied continuously as the heat is, 
then exact frequencies are essential, thus, one probably needs something like 
350.01282874934 degs!

-mark iverson

 


From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 6:22 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:FYI: its all about resonances... it's finally getting into 
their think collective theoretical skulls!


 

 


 


On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:26 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:


FYI:  they’re beginning to discover that, as I have expressed several times 
here, you don’t need to hit an atom with a sledgehammer to ionize it.  Just a 
wee bit of energy at the right frequency and timing (phase)…

 



 


Indeed.  So, look at what frequency 350 deg Celsius


triggers in the H2 atom.