RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Nature of time and space==

[Russ George]

For many years some few of us, in the lab not in our armchairs, have been doing 
just this. Proposing new names for others work and discoveries doesn’t further 
the progress of science.

 

From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Saturday, February 6, 2016 11:55 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Nature of time and space==

 

Associate Professor Vaccaro can save herself a huge amount of time and money by 
using the B-mesons and the K-mesons produced in Leif Holmlid's experiment than 
to go to CERN where these special mesons are usually found. She first needs to 
get up to speed using Holmlid's technique in her own LAB and begin to 
understand why there are no unstable isotopes produced in the LENR fusion 
reactions that she is producing there. 

 

On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Russ George  > wrote:

Time out ;) or is it time in… the game is afoot!  
http://atom-ecology.russgeorge.net/2016/02/06/the-force-of-time/

 

 

From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com  ] 
Sent: Saturday, February 6, 2016 11:06 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Nature of time and space==

 

LENR produces K-mesons and B-mesons which violate CPT symmetry.  This is where 
the electrons come from that are created in LENR. The counter reaction is the 
backward flow of time when radioactive isotopes are stabilized in a LENR 
reaction. This negative time is produced by the development of negative vacuum 
energy. 

 

Because this mass of the electron is created from the vacuum and is reacted 
from nothing, there is a negative gravity produced as a countering reaction. 
This is dark energy produced by inflation.

 

Cold fusion happens all over space in huge amounts.

 

Cold fusion is just one trivial implication of the LENR reaction that will be 
revealed to science when LENR is taken seriously by the professional theorists 
in science.

 

On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Bob Cook  > wrote:

Fran--

 

Take a look at the following link regarding the nature of time and space.  I 
noticed it when reading you last email regarding crack production you sent. 

 

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/01/160128122011.htm

 

Bob Cook

 

 

 

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Nature of time and space==

[Axil Axil]

Associate Professor Vaccaro can save herself a huge amount of time and
money by using the B-mesons and the K-mesons produced in Leif Holmlid's
experiment than to go to CERN where these special mesons are usually found.
She first needs to get up to speed using Holmlid's technique in her own LAB
and begin to understand why there are no unstable isotopes produced in the
LENR fusion reactions that she is producing there.

On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Russ George  wrote:

> Time out ;) or is it time in… the game is afoot!
> http://atom-ecology.russgeorge.net/2016/02/06/the-force-of-time/
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, February 6, 2016 11:06 AM
> *To:* vortex-l
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Nature of time and space==
>
>
>
> LENR produces K-mesons and B-mesons which violate CPT symmetry.  This is
> where the electrons come from that are created in LENR. The counter
> reaction is the backward flow of time when radioactive isotopes are
> stabilized in a LENR reaction. This negative time is produced by the
> development of negative vacuum energy.
>
>
>
> Because this mass of the electron is created from the vacuum and is
> reacted from nothing, there is a negative gravity produced as a countering
> reaction. This is dark energy produced by inflation.
>
>
>
> Cold fusion happens all over space in huge amounts.
>
>
>
> Cold fusion is just one trivial implication of the LENR reaction that will
> be revealed to science when LENR is taken seriously by the professional
> theorists in science.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Bob Cook  wrote:
>
> Fran--
>
>
>
> Take a look at the following link regarding the nature of time and space.
> I noticed it when reading you last email regarding crack production you
> sent.
>
>
>
> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/01/160128122011.htm
>
>
>
> Bob Cook
>
>
>
>
>

[Vo]:Volume 18 of the Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science

[Jed Rothwell]

See:

http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BiberianJPjcondensedq.pdf

Here is the index for all volumes:

http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1495

- Jed

RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Nature of time and space==

[Frank roarty]

Bob, It is an interesting article and It agrees with my own neo Lorentzian
perspective that virtual particles are the medium of the temporal axis only
becoming physical when passing thru what it perceive as a 2d spatial plane
even though we experience it as 3d. IMHO all physical matter and our
definition of elements in the periodic table are the result of these
particles passing thru or becoming stuck and persisting in our plane as
matter and continuing to interact / maintained in our plane by the energy of
the passing stream - the future and past being reservoirs  of unphysical
virtual particles flowing like water with detours and eddys  when it
intersects our plane where matter already occupies it's intersection point.
M proved there is little or no spatial bias to the ether and Lorentzian
formulas tell us there is a pythgorean relationship wrt time dilation and
contraction so why cant we accept an ether that lives on the time axis and
passes thru our plane at 90 degrees to all spatial axis?

I don't think this back flow of "time" would even allow us to  communicate
much less travel thru time.  I think f/h are  contracted atoms sent from our
inertial plane down into these pockets where the density of this stream is
reduced by  Casimir geometry. It is equivalent to the paradox twin stationed
near a black hole trying to to communicate with himself in the future via
messages sent out on mail rockets that escape the relativistic well and can
communicate with each other.. both rockets age faster and can communicate
with each other but can not get the info back to the "slow" twin without
experiencing the same Lorentzian translation back to the original inertial
frame.

Fran

 

 

 

: Saturday, February 06, 2016 11:25 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Nature of time and space==

 

Fran--

 

Take a look at the following link regarding the nature of time and space.  I
noticed it when reading you last email regarding crack production you sent. 

 

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/01/160128122011.htm

 

Bob Cook

 

 

RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Nature of time and space==

[Russ George]

Don’t get me wrong, I like many of your ideas

 

From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Saturday, February 6, 2016 12:42 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Nature of time and space==

 

I don't like to invent new names for things. In my posts, I like to use the 
names that professional science uses as far as my limited knowledge of that 
subject allows. Keeping all this terms stright is not easy but is vital for 
proper communication.

 

If there is any contradictions in my terminology, I will be obliged to correct 
it to the best of my ability.

 

On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Russ George  > wrote:

For many years some few of us, in the lab not in our armchairs, have been doing 
just this. Proposing new names for others work and discoveries doesn’t further 
the progress of science.

 

From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com  ] 
Sent: Saturday, February 6, 2016 11:55 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Nature of time and space==

 

Associate Professor Vaccaro can save herself a huge amount of time and money by 
using the B-mesons and the K-mesons produced in Leif Holmlid's experiment than 
to go to CERN where these special mesons are usually found. She first needs to 
get up to speed using Holmlid's technique in her own LAB and begin to 
understand why there are no unstable isotopes produced in the LENR fusion 
reactions that she is producing there. 

 

On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Russ George  > wrote:

Time out ;) or is it time in… the game is afoot!  
http://atom-ecology.russgeorge.net/2016/02/06/the-force-of-time/

 

 

From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com  ] 
Sent: Saturday, February 6, 2016 11:06 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Nature of time and space==

 

LENR produces K-mesons and B-mesons which violate CPT symmetry.  This is where 
the electrons come from that are created in LENR. The counter reaction is the 
backward flow of time when radioactive isotopes are stabilized in a LENR 
reaction. This negative time is produced by the development of negative vacuum 
energy. 

 

Because this mass of the electron is created from the vacuum and is reacted 
from nothing, there is a negative gravity produced as a countering reaction. 
This is dark energy produced by inflation.

 

Cold fusion happens all over space in huge amounts.

 

Cold fusion is just one trivial implication of the LENR reaction that will be 
revealed to science when LENR is taken seriously by the professional theorists 
in science.

 

On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Bob Cook  > wrote:

Fran--

 

Take a look at the following link regarding the nature of time and space.  I 
noticed it when reading you last email regarding crack production you sent. 

 

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/01/160128122011.htm

 

Bob Cook

 

 

 

 

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Nature of time and space==

[Axil Axil]

I don't like to invent new names for things. In my posts, I like to use the
names that professional science uses as far as my limited knowledge of that
subject allows. Keeping all this terms stright is not easy but is vital for
proper communication.

If there is any contradictions in my terminology, I will be obliged to
correct it to the best of my ability.

On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Russ George  wrote:

> For many years some few of us, in the lab not in our armchairs, have been
> doing just this. Proposing new names for others work and discoveries
> doesn’t further the progress of science.
>
>
>
> *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, February 6, 2016 11:55 AM
> *To:* vortex-l
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Nature of time and space==
>
>
>
> Associate Professor Vaccaro can save herself a huge amount of time and
> money by using the B-mesons and the K-mesons produced in Leif Holmlid's
> experiment than to go to CERN where these special mesons are usually found.
> She first needs to get up to speed using Holmlid's technique in her own LAB
> and begin to understand why there are no unstable isotopes produced in the
> LENR fusion reactions that she is producing there.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Russ George  wrote:
>
> Time out ;) or is it time in… the game is afoot!
> http://atom-ecology.russgeorge.net/2016/02/06/the-force-of-time/
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, February 6, 2016 11:06 AM
> *To:* vortex-l
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Nature of time and space==
>
>
>
> LENR produces K-mesons and B-mesons which violate CPT symmetry.  This is
> where the electrons come from that are created in LENR. The counter
> reaction is the backward flow of time when radioactive isotopes are
> stabilized in a LENR reaction. This negative time is produced by the
> development of negative vacuum energy.
>
>
>
> Because this mass of the electron is created from the vacuum and is
> reacted from nothing, there is a negative gravity produced as a countering
> reaction. This is dark energy produced by inflation.
>
>
>
> Cold fusion happens all over space in huge amounts.
>
>
>
> Cold fusion is just one trivial implication of the LENR reaction that will
> be revealed to science when LENR is taken seriously by the professional
> theorists in science.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Bob Cook  wrote:
>
> Fran--
>
>
>
> Take a look at the following link regarding the nature of time and space.
> I noticed it when reading you last email regarding crack production you
> sent.
>
>
>
> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/01/160128122011.htm
>
>
>
> Bob Cook
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

[Vo]:LENR's 22 year delay good info today

[Peter Gluck]

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/02/feb-6-2016-lenr-responsibility-for-22.html
 what else could I say?

Peter
-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

[Vo]:Re: [Vo] Nature of time and space==

[Bob Cook]

Fran--

Take a look at the following link regarding the nature of time and space.  I 
noticed it when reading you last email regarding crack production you sent. 

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/01/160128122011.htm

Bob Cook

Re: [Vo]:Re: BLP demo video

[David Roberson]

After a bit of thought I came to the conclusion that the silver drop will be 
shot in a direction that is directed away from the capacitor bank.  This 
direction is along the length of the two electrodes in a manner similar to the 
path expected for the projectile of a rail gun.  You can visualize this by 
realizing that the current carrying pair of wires that are a portion of a loop 
will repel each other and attempt to become oriented into a round loop.  This 
demonstrates the desire for a current carrying configuration to achieve the 
minimum inductance.

The energy stored within an inductor is calculated by E=1/2*L*I^2.  When the 
inductance(L) is reduced while holding the current(I) constant mechanical work 
is generated to maintain the energy(E) conserved.  This is the source of the 
force that drives the drip and any conducting plasma outwards.

An inductive loop will make every effort to keep its current constant if it is 
confined as a fixed shaped inductor.  And, if the silver vapor attempts to open 
the circuit by dispersing, and thus increasing its dynamic resistance, the 
voltage appearing across that plasma vapor will rise rapidly.  The net voltage 
can become many times greater than the original source(5 volts) which might 
explain some of the high energy radiation seen.  Of course the duration of the 
high voltage spike is important as well and must be considered if a reasonable 
model of the total system behavior is constructed.

Mills and team have spent a great deal of effort to control the inductance of 
the mechanical design of their generator.  The size of the conductors leading 
to the electrodes is impressive as well as the very low inductive connecting 
straps between the energy storage capacitors.  This evidently is required to 
ensure that a large amount of energy is deposited into the drips for a short 
time duration.

Dave

 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: mixent 
To: vortex-l 
Sent: Fri, Feb 5, 2016 8:05 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: BLP demo video

In reply to  David Roberson's message of Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:34:07 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>The document referred to by Axil show that the energy holding capacitors are 
>wired up in series/parallel so that they can only deliver an open circuit 
>voltage of a bit greater than 5 volts.  The design reminds me of a rail gun 
>where the conductive silver fuel drops act as a switch that allows the high 
>current to flow.  It is also apparent that Mills has designed a low inductance 
>circuit which allows for a very large current and di/dt to exist.

See http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg106564.html & also
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg106568.html

Then replace tungsten with silver, or try silver impacting on a tungsten
electrode.
>
>There is reason to suspect that most of the open circuit supply voltage would 
>be dropped within the network series inductance during the short pulse so I 
>would expect to see quite a bit less than 5 volts appearing across the plasma 
>and highly conductive silver drop.  This is especially true if the active 
>pulse is short in duration.  But, a short drive pulse duration also suggests 
>less drive power requirement per pulse.

Consider the collapse of the magnetic field in the plasma itself.
>
>I am curious about the effects of the extremely large current pulse conducted 
>through the fuel drop.  Would the resulting magnetic forces tend to drive the 
>drip outwards or compress it by some pinch action?  After all, a rail gun 
>projects the shell quite strongly in one direction.

...or the effect on ions caught in the collapsing field.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

[Vo]:Magnets levitate above a superconductor: New properties of superconductors discovered

[H Ucar]

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/02/160204150916.htm


"In this study, we identify some unexpected alignment of the electrons -- a 
finding that is likely generic to the high temperature superconductors and in 
time may turn out be a key ingredient of the problem," said Professor Hawthorn.


Why electrons or paired ones would not establish bound states like the spinning 
magnets in my experiments and exhibit such alignments? As the article above 
highlights the Meissner efect, magnetism is likely involved.
The way of the bound state in my experiments, spinning magnets have room for 
making bounds simultaneously on both sides of the axis,  allowing chains.

[Vo]:nano cracks made easy -new method

[Roarty, Francis X]

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/02/160202110807.htm

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Nature of time and space==

[Axil Axil]

LENR produces K-mesons and B-mesons which violate CPT symmetry.  This is
where the electrons come from that are created in LENR. The counter
reaction is the backward flow of time when radioactive isotopes are
stabilized in a LENR reaction. This negative time is produced by the
development of negative vacuum energy.

Because this mass of the electron is created from the vacuum and is reacted
from nothing, there is a negative gravity produced as a countering
reaction. This is dark energy produced by inflation.

Cold fusion happens all over space in huge amounts.

Cold fusion is just one trivial implication of the LENR reaction that will
be revealed to science when LENR is taken seriously by the professional
theorists in science.

On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Bob Cook  wrote:

> Fran--
>
> Take a look at the following link regarding the nature of time and space.
> I noticed it when reading you last email regarding crack production you
> sent.
>
> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/01/160128122011.htm
>
> Bob Cook
>
>

RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Nature of time and space==

[Russ George]

Time out ;) or is it time in… the game is afoot!  
http://atom-ecology.russgeorge.net/2016/02/06/the-force-of-time/

 

 

From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Saturday, February 6, 2016 11:06 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Nature of time and space==

 

LENR produces K-mesons and B-mesons which violate CPT symmetry.  This is where 
the electrons come from that are created in LENR. The counter reaction is the 
backward flow of time when radioactive isotopes are stabilized in a LENR 
reaction. This negative time is produced by the development of negative vacuum 
energy. 

 

Because this mass of the electron is created from the vacuum and is reacted 
from nothing, there is a negative gravity produced as a countering reaction. 
This is dark energy produced by inflation.

 

Cold fusion happens all over space in huge amounts.

 

Cold fusion is just one trivial implication of the LENR reaction that will be 
revealed to science when LENR is taken seriously by the professional theorists 
in science.

 

On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Bob Cook  > wrote:

Fran--

 

Take a look at the following link regarding the nature of time and space.  I 
noticed it when reading you last email regarding crack production you sent. 

 

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/01/160128122011.htm

 

Bob Cook