Re: [Vo]:The Leptonic Monopole

2020-01-20 Thread Axil Axil
The EVO is know to be carried in both water and gas (ohmasa gas and browns
gas) as well as free traveling particles that is now called strange
radiation. As Holmlid has shown, the particle is super fluidic and hard to
contain which means it can pass through the smallest hole and can climb out
of a closed container. By the way, the UDH being a superfluid means that
the UDH is involved with  Bose condensation. coherence, and entanglement.

See

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superfluidity

On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 1:56 PM Jones Beene  wrote:

> Hmm... Chernobyl. Well if that disaster is to be used as proof of new
> particle - then it fits right into Wallace's thinking - it would seem.
>
> If an electrical explosion of a generator was involved as a trigger to a
> runaway fission event - then this could indicate that Wallace's particle is
> indeed likely to be the culprit since there is such a large inventory of
> iron in an electrical generator... and his particle is almost neutral - so
> getting a flux of them into the thick walled fission reactor is not a
> problem so long as there is proximity to the source.
>
> I was not aware there was a "nearby generator" at Chernobyl, since at
> nuclear facilities in the USA the steam turbines and the generators are
> located in a separate hall, which is located rather too far from the
> reactor enclosure to provide any kind of large flux (no matter what new
> particle would be involved).
>
>
> Axil Axil  wrote:
>
> > When Leonid Urutskoev, a top nuclear scientist in Russia was asked to
> analyze the Chernobyl reactor disaster, he came to the conclusion that the
> official reason put forth for its cause was wrong. He suspected that the
> disaster was produced by a number of electrical explosions in a nearby
> generator.
>
>
>


Re: [Vo]:The Leptonic Monopole

2020-01-20 Thread Jones Beene
 Hmm... Chernobyl. Well if that disaster is to be used as proof of new particle 
- then it fits right into Wallace's thinking - it would seem.

If an electrical explosion of a generator was involved as a trigger to a 
runaway fission event - then this could indicate that Wallace's particle is 
indeed likely to be the culprit since there is such a large inventory of iron 
in an electrical generator... and his particle is almost neutral - so getting a 
flux of them into the thick walled fission reactor is not a problem so long as 
there is proximity to the source.

I was not aware there was a "nearby generator" at Chernobyl, since at nuclear 
facilities in the USA the steam turbines and the generators are located in a 
separate hall, which is located rather too far from the reactor enclosure to 
provide any kind of large flux (no matter what new particle would be involved).


Axil Axil  wrote: 
 > When Leonid Urutskoev, a top nuclear scientist in Russia was asked to 
 > analyze the Chernobyl reactor disaster, he came to the conclusion that the 
 > official reason put forth for its cause was wrong. He suspected that the 
 > disaster was produced by a number of electrical explosions in a nearby 
 > generator.

  

Re: [Vo]:The Leptonic Monopole

2020-01-20 Thread Axil Axil
I posted on this subject back on 2/8/2017 as follows:

http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LochakGlowenergyn.pdf Low-energy nuclear
reactions and the leptonic monopole Georges Lochak, Leonid Urutskoev When
Leonid Urutskoev, a top nuclear scientist in Russia was asked to analyze
the Chernobyl reactor disaster, he came to the conclusion that the official
reason put forth for its cause was wrong. He suspected that the disaster
was produced by a number of electrical explosions in a nearby generator.

See for background:


https://arxiv.org/ftp/nucl-ex/papers/0304/0304024.pdf
To prove his theory, he came up with a new type of experiment using
electrically exploding arcs in titanium foil. He found that the residue
from the pure titanium foil explosion contained new elements, elements
produced by transmutation. But he also found that dissolved uranium salts
in the water that surrounded the titanium foil explosion channel was found
to fission because of the detection of the fission element byproducts
produced by the explosion. This implied that the explosion of the titanium
foil had an effect at two separate locations, first, inside the titanium
foil itself and second outside of the explosion channel at a considerable
distance from the explosion. Urutskoev asked around the Russian nuclear
community and found that other than neutrons, the only thing that could
produce fission in uranium was muons. But U235 did not fission as expected,
U238 fissioned as the even isotope reaction rule in LENR dictate. The LENR
reaction sent out something that produced the reaction at a distance from
the primary zone of causation (Nuclear active environment - NAE) that
caused even isotopes of uranium to fission. Next, Urutskoev placed the
titanium ash on a photographic emulsion (film) and spotted charged
particles coming out of that ash that behaved like magnetic monopoles. What
this all means is that the LENR reaction is a complex multi-faceted
reaction consisting of many stages and causations. In detail, the NAE
produces nuclear reactions but it also produces particles that can exist
independently once created and can produce nuclear reaction remote n space
and time from the NAE. From the reference above: "Here are some conclusions
based on the presented experimental data 1. The particle which left the
trace in the nuclear emulsion is charged, as nuclear emulsions are
insensitive to neutrons. 2. The particle cannot have electric charge, as
otherwise it could not be able to pass through two meters of atmospheric
air and two layers of black paper. 3. The particle does not have high
energy, as no delta-electrons are observed. 4. The mechanism of the
interaction between the particle and the photosensitive layer is not clear.
Assuming the Coulomb mechanism, the absorbed energy estimated using the
darkening area equals around 1 GeV. 5. The radiation is of nuclear origin;
it interacts with magnetic fields. This calls for a discussion of Lochak’s
magnetic monopole. Lochak created his theory 20 years before our
experiments [9 – 12], that is, before those results for understanding and
explaining of which we are now attempting to use it. It should be
emphasized that this is a good omen for a theory. It is always suspicious
when the theories are created specially to explain an experimental
observation. They are like the circles drawn on a target after a shoot has
been made." To supplement with some knowledge that we have acquired from
other research: The Surface Plasmon Polariton: an analog monopole produces
a monopole magnetic field. The SPP is naturally found on the surface of
metal including metallic nanoparticles. The SPP a boson is coherent and
will readily form Bose condensates. The Ultra dense hydrogen nanoparticle
is coherent and formed under high pressure conditions or via catalysts. The
UDH as a superconductor will allow SPP formation on its surface spin wave.
Once created, the UDH can persist indefinitely on its own and travel in
swarms of coherent particles that will share in the nuclear energy (fusion
and fission) that the swarm will generate via entangled muon generated
outreach.

A UDH swarm

http://restframe.com/mm/images/actual_setup.jpg

tracks from Fig. 1 are correlated as a group but cannot all be overlaid on
top of each other. These tracks appear to be correlated, yet twisted or
acted upon by some central force. The tracks were digitized in a vector
graphics editor and shown in Fig. 2.

http://restframe.com/mm/images/vector_swarm_d.jpg

Measurements taken at successive common points of corresponding tracks
indicate a swarm of identical particles each going through coordinated
abrupt transitions at each vertex or kink. The field influence on
corresponding track segments are geometric centers.

http://restframe.com/mm/images/15.jpg

---

Since 2017, this particle has  been identified as an Exotic Vacuum Object
(EVO) as discovered by Ken Shoulders. It is a tachyonic bubb

[Vo]:The Leptonic Monopole

2020-01-20 Thread Jones Beene
 The theory of aneutrino-like particle known as the "leptonic monopole" has 
some physicalevidence for it. The theory comes from Georges Lochak and can 
explain some ofthe oddities of LENR as non-chemical conversion of mass to 
energy. A keyconcept is "pseudo-magnetism"
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076567015000178

https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aiep.2015.01.001
John Wallace from Virginia has possibly provided the physical evidence,and 
actually measured a very small mass entity that he calls a 
BELC(Bose-Einstein-Like Condensate). Poor choice of naming and not everyone is 
convinced. 

Anyway, the Lochakversion is massless, whereas the Wallace version has mass, 
which is all-important for LENR, but both conceptscould be stretched perhaps to 
include a tiny almost immeasurable mass which is abillion times less than the 
mass of an electron. The particle could possibly decay viamagnetic (spin) 
coupling, thus producing thermal gain in a new way.Wallacefound the unusual 
properties of this particle in pure iron. He presented atAsti and his work 
refutes the standard model, which (refutation) seems to have a lot ofsupport of 
late. There is a new paper online. Brian Ahern is presently trying to validate 
experimentally the Wallace hypothesis.