[Vo]:Defkalion Forum - Unfounded Speculation

2012-02-07 Thread Robert Leguillon

While waiting for useful, conclusive information, impatience can lead to data 
prospecting.
 
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=11
 
It seems that forums 11 thru 16 require special permissions.  
Only f=11 displays a forum name: Associates Corner (Registered users of 
associated companies on Hyperion construction and science)
Do any Vortexians have such access? I'd ask AussieGuy, but he seems to have 
disappeared when the lights came on.
 
I'm just a bit curious if there is a great deal of behind-the-scenes 
discussion.  Under the forum statistics, DGT claims 5,031 total posts, of which 
all can be explained by the General  Open Discussions group.  Conversely, 
the forum statistics also claim 537 total topics, of which only 419 are 
currently in the General  Open Discussions group.
 
I'm unfamiliar with the phpBB statistical scheme, so this disparity may be 
readily explainable by the regular removal of spam topics and 
extraneous/duplicated postings. 
 
Thoughts?
 
R.L.  

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Forum - Unfounded Speculation

2012-02-07 Thread Daniel Rocha
Invisible forums and subforums is something common. Sometimes, to see them,
you are required to register on websites. In general, admins and mod uses
hidden forums to discuss forum policies.

I don't think this is a big deal.

2012/2/7 Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com

  While waiting for useful, conclusive information, impatience can lead to
 data prospecting.

 http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=11

 It seems that forums 11 thru 16 require special permissions.
 Only f=11 displays a forum name: *Associates Corner (Registered users of
 associated companies on Hyperion construction and science)*
 Do any Vortexians have such access? I'd ask AussieGuy, but he seems to
 have disappeared when the lights came on.

 I'm just a bit curious if there is a great deal of behind-the-scenes
 discussion.  Under the forum statistics, DGT claims 5,031 total posts, of
 which all can be explained by the General  Open Discussions group.
 Conversely, the forum statistics also claim 537 total topics, of which only
 419 are currently in the General  Open Discussions group.

 I'm unfamiliar with the phpBB statistical scheme, so this disparity may be
 readily explainable by the regular removal of spam topics and
 extraneous/duplicated postings.

 Thoughts?

 R.L.




-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com


Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Forum - Unfounded Speculation

2012-02-07 Thread Alain Sepeda
ah ah, name have disappeared, like LENR on NI communities site...

seems to be talk between engineers and researchers, and business men, far
from the memonomenon scientists ;-)



2012/2/7 Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com

  While waiting for useful, conclusive information, impatience can lead to
 data prospecting.

 http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=11

 It seems that forums 11 thru 16 require special permissions.
 Only f=11 displays a forum name: *Associates Corner (Registered users of
 associated companies on Hyperion construction and science)*
 Do any Vortexians have such access? I'd ask AussieGuy, but he seems to
 have disappeared when the lights came on.

 I'm just a bit curious if there is a great deal of behind-the-scenes
 discussion.  Under the forum statistics, DGT claims 5,031 total posts, of
 which all can be explained by the General  Open Discussions group.
 Conversely, the forum statistics also claim 537 total topics, of which only
 419 are currently in the General  Open Discussions group.

 I'm unfamiliar with the phpBB statistical scheme, so this disparity may be
 readily explainable by the regular removal of spam topics and
 extraneous/duplicated postings.

 Thoughts?

 R.L.



Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Forum - Unfounded Speculation

2012-02-07 Thread Alain Sepeda
the tittle was not admin forum, but associates cornet... and talk of
companies for building and science... mean partners, mean real stuff and
not only cash

one more evidence that Defkalion is not an Internet Dog Company.

and the quick removal mean, that they want to keep quiet and don't want to
spread evidence they are real...
Like Bruce Schneier say for detecting terrorists and alike, I believe in
Profiling more than pretended hard evidence.


2012/2/7 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com

 Invisible forums and subforums is something common. Sometimes, to see
 them, you are required to register on websites. In general, admins and mod
 uses hidden forums to discuss forum policies.

 I don't think this is a big deal.

 2012/2/7 Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com

  While waiting for useful, conclusive information, impatience can lead to
 data prospecting.

 http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=11

 It seems that forums 11 thru 16 require special permissions.
 Only f=11 displays a forum name: *Associates Corner (Registered users of
 associated companies on Hyperion construction and science)*
 Do any Vortexians have such access? I'd ask AussieGuy, but he seems to
 have disappeared when the lights came on.

 I'm just a bit curious if there is a great deal of behind-the-scenes
 discussion.  Under the forum statistics, DGT claims 5,031 total posts, of
 which all can be explained by the General  Open Discussions group.
 Conversely, the forum statistics also claim 537 total topics, of which only
 419 are currently in the General  Open Discussions group.

 I'm unfamiliar with the phpBB statistical scheme, so this disparity may
 be readily explainable by the regular removal of spam topics and
 extraneous/duplicated postings.

 Thoughts?

 R.L.




 --
 Daniel Rocha - RJ
 danieldi...@gmail.com




Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Forum - Unfounded Speculation

2012-02-07 Thread Terry Blanton
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Robert Leguillon
robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:

 Thoughts?

There are 3,154 posts in QA and Older Discussions:

http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/index.php

This was when the forum was open then closed due to too much riffraff
and viral s(c)eptic infections.  While those messages may be read, no
new posts are allowed there.  (Kinda like Besźel is to Ul Qoma.)

T



RE: [Vo]:Defkalion Forum - Unfounded Speculation

2012-02-07 Thread Robert Leguillon

Defkalion Forum Statistics:
* Total posts 5023 
* Total topics 526 
 
 
Discussion
Topics: 132   Posts: 1478 
General Discussion of Hyperion Specs
Topics:  71Posts: 391
QA and Older Discussions
Topics:  205   Posts:  3154 
 
1478+391+3154 = 5023 All posts are present and accounted for
 
132+71+205 = 408 118 topics appear to be unaccounted for
 
After seeing that Associates Corner 
(http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=11) was an off-limits 
area, I was merely speculating that it could hold the 118 remaining topics.
 
It's entirely possible that the calculation of Total topics includes topics 
that have been removed (e.g., SPAM) or moved.  This would allow for a scenario 
in which no posts have been made to forums 11-16.
 
Alternatively, it is possible that the calculation for total posts does not 
include forums 11-16, whereas the topic count may.  Ample caveat is given in 
the thread title that this is completely unfounded speculation.
 
Hence the question Do any Vortexians qualify for access to Associates Corner?
 



 

 Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 15:47:53 -0500
 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Forum - Unfounded Speculation
 From: hohlr...@gmail.com
 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
 
 On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Robert Leguillon
 robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:
 
  Thoughts?
 
 There are 3,154 posts in QA and Older Discussions:
 
 http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/index.php
 
 This was when the forum was open then closed due to too much riffraff
 and viral s(c)eptic infections. While those messages may be read, no
 new posts are allowed there. (Kinda like Besźel is to Ul Qoma.)
 
 T
 
  

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion Forum - Unfounded Speculation

2012-02-07 Thread Terry Blanton
2012/2/7 Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com:

 It's entirely possible that the calculation of Total topics includes topics
 that have been removed (e.g., SPAM) or moved.


From the number of spam posts which create a topic that I have seen, I
would say that you are right-on with that conclusion.

T