[Vo]:Earth Hour...yeah....

2008-03-29 Thread Kyle Mcallister
Howdy,

Unfortunately, as my good friend John Schnurer is no
longer of this world, he can't do this with me, so
I'll have to do his share of it. He loved mischeif,
even towards the end when his Parkinson's made it
almost impossible for him to type (and sometimes
communicate at all) effectively, so I'm sure he'd have
gotten a kick out of this latest Evil Plan (tm) of
mine.

The local dumbass greeners (save the world! Kill a
human!) have informed me I am to participate in
something called Earth Hour. Not watching TV nor
listening to talk radio, I didn't know what this was.
I googled it, and my retinas almost shit a Christmas
tree when I saw how /dreadful/ the white-text-on-black
looked on my LCD monitor (low power...).

From 8 to 9 pm tonight, I is 'sposed' to turn off
all unnecessary electricity to show good faith in
doing something to save the planet. Excuse me a moment
while I grab my Pepto-Bismol...

...Ahh, much better. Where were we? Oh yes. The Hour
of Doom. Now, being someone who wants to use a .44
Automag on any vehicle that displays an assload of
'awareness ribbons', seeing as they are quite
hypocritical in most cases (I'll make some exceptions
for the truly good out there), I have to ask myself a
few things. Is this gonna do jack shit? Nope. Bet not.
Is Al Gore the Boring going to stop using more
electicity in a single month than I use in a year? I
bet not. Does he have his mansion at 58 F in the
winter? Bet not. Oh, but he uses GREEN energy sources.
Bullshit, this is just pushing the cards around. Mark
my words: the carbon credit/carbonocracy is going to
be as bad or worse than the petrocracy we have right
now.

Back to me...well, now, what do I do to do my part to
bring peace on Earth to all mankind? (the preceding
sentence was supposed to look terrible)

1. Heat is OFF during times I'm at work. I
superinsulated the attic, and I can tolerate 40-45F
for a couple hours while it warms back up. I use about
25-30% less natural gas per month of winter by doing
this.

2. I use almost exclusively fluorescent lighting in my
place, and encourage the landlady to do the same. She
has heeded my words, and we use a lot less power. I
also go around turning stuff off when it is not used.
I hate leaving a light burning for no reason. The only
incandescents I use are for applications where one
must do so: hard-duty worklights that are used in the
cold, bench tools that require smaller bulbs for which
no LED substitute exists. (I ADORE LEDs. Why aren't
there screw-in LED devices? Are there??? Tell me!)

3. I don't use A/C. Who the hell needs it in western
NY? I don't...of course, the superinsulation helps
keep the heat out, so, there's a start.

4. No TV for me, except the occasional movie with my
wife. I like the old transistor radio myself, but I
like chasing numbers stations down, and dislike talk
radio, so...yeah...

5. Flat-panel LCD monitor. 'Nuff said, uses very
little.

6. A few other things from time to time, but these are
low-duty things.

7. I maintain my car carefully, and keep the air
levels up in the tires. As such, I maximize gas
mileage, and with a little careful planning, get the
most out of a Saturday morning of 'making my rounds.'

Electric bill this month: $37, rounded up.
Gas bill this month: $79, rounded up.
Gasoline used: 1 tanks-worth, or 15 U.S. gallons, or
about $50 worth. This was actually a BAD week for
gasoline for me, as I had to go many more places than
usual, for reasons that are no environmentalist's
f**king business.
Did I mention the heat source for my place is a 99%
efficient ventless heater? It also humidifies the air,
so, it helps my sinus problems a good deal.
I use glassware and ceramicware, I don't like paper
plates or styrofoam cups. I try to use everything I
can, and waste as little as I can.

Tonight, however, from 8 to 9 pm, I'm going to take a
vacation from that, and prove *my* point to these
worthless scumbags who scream that 'someone should do
something!' but then say 'Not me!!!' when the cannon
of change is pointed at them. Tonight, I will operate
during that hour, the following:

2x four-foot fluorescent light fixtures, dual bulbs,
40W each.
2x 500W halogen floodlights.
1x Tektronix 465B oscilloscope.
1x Tektronix 475 oscilloscope. (actually gonna use
this...)
1x Hartley oscillator (with the above 'scope)
1x 100W incandescent light.
1x Drill press...I'm just gonna let her idle...
1x 6 bench grinder. Same as above, let her spin...
1x soldering iron, set to MAX, or 40W.
1x shortwave radio.
1x Television + DVD player + amplifier and
speakers...maybe I'll watch Dances With Wolves, ain't
seen that in a while...or some anime? Maybe listen to
Johnny Cash?
1x Computer.
1x Oscillating fan. Too cold for it, but hey, maybe
I'll run it outside.

***BONUS!***
1x 1HP 3450rpm motor, connected to nothing, for NO
GOOD REASON.
1x charcoal BBQ grill, for NO GOOD REASON.
Idle my Buick Regal for one hour. It's actually good
for the motor to run it out a while. Give me the
opportunity 

Re: [Vo]:Earth Hour...yeah....

2008-03-29 Thread OrionWorks
From Kyle,

...

 Electric bill this month: $37, rounded up.
 Gas bill this month: $79, rounded up.
 Gasoline used: 1 tanks-worth, or 15 U.S.
 gallons, or about $50 worth.

...

I'm impressed!

Knock yourself out tonight!

Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.orionWorks.com'
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:Earth Hour...yeah....

2008-03-29 Thread Kyle Mcallister
--- OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm impressed!
 
 Knock yourself out tonight!
 

Heh, thanks Steven. I /probably/ was being mostly
sarcastic in my evil plan statement of action, as
I'll probably be making Hartley oscillators all night,
as well as chasing down the rumors I hear from a
friend that there are a few nice, old 1940's style
365pF air-variable capacitors just hanging around an
old dump, gathering dust. Unclaimed, I might add. If
weather permits, we're gonna go fetch 'em.

Thing is, I am, despite appearances, very concerned
about the environment, particularly destruction of
rain forests. That's something that bothers me badly.
But I can't stand the way the issue has been so
politicized. People are making money off this, when
they should be spending money to fix it. But I try to
conserve as much as I possibly can, whilst not
destroying my quality of life. It's been saving me a
hell of a lot of money, too, but that's not why I do
it.

If I absolutely KNEW for a dead certain fact that it
would be used to build EFFECTIVE solar collectors, or
wind farms, or what have you, I'd bite the bullet and
pay an extra $1 per gallon, starting right now. But I
have no proof this will happen. I live in New York,
the land of taxes that pay for the lazy to do no work,
or for hookers for the Governor, and so on. I trust no
taxes here. I'm opposed to more taxes on gasoline,
because I know it will not be used to solve the
problem.

One thing I don't get is why solar costs so much more
than nuclear or coal fired. There's almost no moving
parts, and much less to break down, it seems to me.
There's got to be some politics in this somewhere, but
I don't know exactly where. As much as we disagree on
things, I'm wondering if Jed can shed some light on
this. Where _really_ is the cost discrepancy coming
from? If we build the damned things in the desert,
where there's plenty of Sun, what's the deal? If it is
efficiency, hell, you just build more for less cost
per unit. Big deal. The fuel is free...what gives?

I'm a heck of a fan of solar heat for houses...but it
seems like no one likes that idea any more. Pity, it
can work wonders. Even up here, people have made
thermal cisterns to store up heat over the summer, and
they heat their homes in the winter with the hot
water.

In the end, it seems to boil down to one thing: the
more you tax, the more it's wasted on 'special
interest groups,' which nowadays can mean ANYTHING.

As for me, once was a Republican. Not any more. Just
an American, blue-collar man, who tries to be the best
he can for his wife, and tries to help those he can.
That's about all I am. Sworn to no political party.

I'm also told I'm pretty weird. Might be true.

--Kyle, who in the past couple of days, has come to
the conclusion that nothing oscillates when you want
it to, but always will when you DON'T want it to. 


  

Special deal for Yahoo! users  friends - No Cost. Get a month of Blockbuster 
Total Access now 
http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text3.com



Re: [Vo]:Earth Hour...yeah....

2008-03-29 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to  Kyle Mcallister's message of Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:53:36 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
I'm opposed to more taxes on gasoline,
because I know it will not be used to solve the
problem.
[snip]
The point of the extra taxes isn't to raise money to solve the problem, it's to
raise the price so people buy less.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

The shrub is a plant.



Re: [Vo]:Earth Hour...yeah....

2008-03-29 Thread PHILIP WINESTONE
One thing I don't get is why solar costs so much more
than nuclear or coal fired. There's almost no moving
parts, and much less to break down, it seems to me.
There's got to be some politics in this somewhere, but
I don't know exactly where.

A broad subject... One factor is that the amount of power can only be the 
maximum number of watts/sq metre... multiplied of course by the overall system 
efficiency. All seriously limiting of course.  Add computerized tracking and we 
have a huge capital cost increase. Another factor is the fact that these 
collectors (photovoltaic or thermal) tend to become wonderful sails under windy 
conditions, so they have to be installed ruggedly.  On roofs, that costs lots.  
In addition, installing them on roofs means that the roofing membranes have to 
be made watertight... You get the drift.  The overall question is: How many 
watts can be obtained from a huge system and at what capital cost.  Used to be 
a no-brainer.  Wasn't financially justifiable.  Now, I dunno.

My (somewhat educated) opinion on the uses of solar, was that small independent 
systems in very hot, sunny climates could be justified based on the 
alternative: expensive power from the grid.  A decent application was the 
installation of smallish systems that would drive the ceiling fans in apartment 
blocks in India.  Power up around 10:00 am and power down around 2:00 or 3:00 
pm - the hottest period of the day.  A system, some wires, some inexpensive DC 
fans.  

Then there was a proposal we undertook to pump water using small solar pumping 
stations, for irrigation in the Sahel region of Africa.  Couldn't get the 
political guys to see the sense in that to the point of funding it.  Better to 
sell (or give) guns and bombs to the Africans.

P.


- Original Message 
From: Kyle Mcallister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 7:53:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Earth Hour...yeah

--- OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm impressed!
 
 Knock yourself out tonight!
 

Heh, thanks Steven. I /probably/ was being mostly
sarcastic in my evil plan statement of action, as
I'll probably be making Hartley oscillators all night,
as well as chasing down the rumors I hear from a
friend that there are a few nice, old 1940's style
365pF air-variable capacitors just hanging around an
old dump, gathering dust. Unclaimed, I might add. If
weather permits, we're gonna go fetch 'em.

Thing is, I am, despite appearances, very concerned
about the environment, particularly destruction of
rain forests. That's something that bothers me badly.
But I can't stand the way the issue has been so
politicized. People are making money off this, when
they should be spending money to fix it. But I try to
conserve as much as I possibly can, whilst not
destroying my quality of life. It's been saving me a
hell of a lot of money, too, but that's not why I do
it.

If I absolutely KNEW for a dead certain fact that it
would be used to build EFFECTIVE solar collectors, or
wind farms, or what have you, I'd bite the bullet and
pay an extra $1 per gallon, starting right now. But I
have no proof this will happen. I live in New York,
the land of taxes that pay for the lazy to do no work,
or for hookers for the Governor, and so on. I trust no
taxes here. I'm opposed to more taxes on gasoline,
because I know it will not be used to solve the
problem.

One thing I don't get is why solar costs so much more
than nuclear or coal fired. There's almost no moving
parts, and much less to break down, it seems to me.
There's got to be some politics in this somewhere, but
I don't know exactly where. As much as we disagree on
things, I'm wondering if Jed can shed some light on
this. Where _really_ is the cost discrepancy coming
from? If we build the damned things in the desert,
where there's plenty of Sun, what's the deal? If it is
efficiency, hell, you just build more for less cost
per unit. Big deal. The fuel is free...what gives?

I'm a heck of a fan of solar heat for houses...but it
seems like no one likes that idea any more. Pity, it
can work wonders. Even up here, people have made
thermal cisterns to store up heat over the summer, and
they heat their homes in the winter with the hot
water.

In the end, it seems to boil down to one thing: the
more you tax, the more it's wasted on 'special
interest groups,' which nowadays can mean ANYTHING.

As for me, once was a Republican. Not any more. Just
an American, blue-collar man, who tries to be the best
he can for his wife, and tries to help those he can.
That's about all I am. Sworn to no political party.

I'm also told I'm pretty weird. Might be true.

--Kyle, who in the past couple of days, has come to
the conclusion that nothing oscillates when you want
it to, but always will when you DON'T want it to. 


  

Special deal for Yahoo! users  friends - No Cost. Get a month of Blockbuster