Re: [Vo]:Gas driven E-cat = Gas BURNER
Iggy Dalrymple August 12th, 2012 at 10:17 PM Dear Dr Rossi, Regarding the fact that your industrial Hot-Cat can now be driven by gas: What type gas, propane? If driven by gas, do you still require electricity for the controls? If electric is still required, will a battery suffice? Sincerely, Iggy Dalrymple Andrea Rossi August 13th, 2012 at 7:19 AM Dear Iggy Dalrymple: Any gas. We are now designing the best possible catalyzed burner. Warm Regards, A.R. So this is NOT COP=infinity "gas" feedback FROM the eCat .. it's a Propane (or equivalent) replacement of the electric heater.
Re: [Vo]:Gas driven E-cat
No, that reactor is based upon my second theory of aliens farting thru a wormhole... My 1st theory is singularity evaporation from rydberg spears hitting each other head on at tip of spear On Friday, August 10, 2012, bertoldo arpagoni wrote: > WOW! That's a true astonishing achievement! The FART triggered ECAT! I > bet that after this announcement the BEAN's stock market, aside the nickel > one, is going to get a big boost on the near future. Let's see what's > goin'on in Wall Street next Monday opening! > Just matter of solve the smell issue but for the efficient chemical > engineer Andrew Reds that's really a piece of cake. > > I'm suggesting this song to promote the new e-cat generation > > Beans, beans the musical fruit > the more you eat > the more you toot ! > > > > 2012/8/10 Michele Comitini 'cvml', 'michele.comit...@gmail.com');>> > >> I suppose he is speaking of methane. No need for electrical power >> anymore. Seems that Rossi is leaving "competition" in the dust. Read >> below. >> >> >> http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=679&cpage=3#comment-299135 >> >> Andrea Rossi >> August 10th, 2012 at 11:54 AM >> ... >> We are very close to a 1 MW plant with high temperature steam and >> electric power generation. Another important achievement , we got >> today: we are able, now, to make the drive with gas instead of >> electric power. This is extremely important, because now we are able >> to make thermal energy with thermal energy, and with the thermal >> energy produced we can make electric power. All this with 1 MW plants. >> Warm Regards, >> Andrea Rossi >> >> >> mic >> >> >
Re: [Vo]:Gas driven E-cat
Notice that here is no radio frequency generators used now. Cheers: Axil On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 6:24 PM, David Roberson wrote: > I performed some simulations earlier and my results suggested that as long > as you keep the COP to 6 or less, then the system will be stable with a > heat type of control. This matches the gas concept as long as he is > careful not to overheat the device. > > I still see that Rossi always insists that the COP is limited to 6 and he > has been asked if it would be larger on many occasions in his journal. > > Dave > -Original Message- > From: Axil Axil > To: vortex-l > Sent: Fri, Aug 10, 2012 4:20 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Gas driven E-cat > > This implies no computer controls. The Rossi reaction must still be > thermionic. > > Cheers:Axil > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Michele Comitini < > michele.comit...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I suppose he is speaking of methane. No need for electrical power >> anymore. Seems that Rossi is leaving "competition" in the dust. Read >> below. >> >> >> http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=679&cpage=3#comment-299135 >> >> Andrea Rossi >> August 10th, 2012 at 11:54 AM >> ... >> We are very close to a 1 MW plant with high temperature steam and >> electric power generation. Another important achievement , we got >> today: we are able, now, to make the drive with gas instead of >> electric power. This is extremely important, because now we are able >> to make thermal energy with thermal energy, and with the thermal >> energy produced we can make electric power. All this with 1 MW plants. >> Warm Regards, >> Andrea Rossi >> >> >> mic >> >> >
Re: [Vo]:Gas driven E-cat
I performed some simulations earlier and my results suggested that as long as you keep the COP to 6 or less, then the system will be stable with a heat type of control. This matches the gas concept as long as he is careful not to overheat the device. I still see that Rossi always insists that the COP is limited to 6 and he has been asked if it would be larger on many occasions in his journal. Dave -Original Message- From: Axil Axil To: vortex-l Sent: Fri, Aug 10, 2012 4:20 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Gas driven E-cat Thisimplies no computer controls. The Rossi reaction must still bethermionic. Cheers:Axil On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Michele Comitini wrote: I suppose he is speaking of methane. No need for electrical power anymore. Seems that Rossi is leaving "competition" in the dust. Read below. http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=679&cpage=3#comment-299135 Andrea Rossi August 10th, 2012 at 11:54 AM ... We are very close to a 1 MW plant with high temperature steam and electric power generation. Another important achievement , we got today: we are able, now, to make the drive with gas instead of electric power. This is extremely important, because now we are able to make thermal energy with thermal energy, and with the thermal energy produced we can make electric power. All this with 1 MW plants. Warm Regards, Andrea Rossi mic
Re: [Vo]:Gas driven E-cat
WOW! That's a true astonishing achievement! The FART triggered ECAT! I bet that after this announcement the BEAN's stock market, aside the nickel one, is going to get a big boost on the near future. Let's see what's goin'on in Wall Street next Monday opening! Just matter of solve the smell issue but for the efficient chemical engineer Andrew Reds that's really a piece of cake. I'm suggesting this song to promote the new e-cat generation Beans, beans the musical fruit the more you eat the more you toot ! 2012/8/10 Michele Comitini > I suppose he is speaking of methane. No need for electrical power > anymore. Seems that Rossi is leaving "competition" in the dust. Read > below. > > > http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=679&cpage=3#comment-299135 > > Andrea Rossi > August 10th, 2012 at 11:54 AM > ... > We are very close to a 1 MW plant with high temperature steam and > electric power generation. Another important achievement , we got > today: we are able, now, to make the drive with gas instead of > electric power. This is extremely important, because now we are able > to make thermal energy with thermal energy, and with the thermal > energy produced we can make electric power. All this with 1 MW plants. > Warm Regards, > Andrea Rossi > > > mic > >
Re: [Vo]:Gas driven E-cat
This implies no computer controls. The Rossi reaction must still be thermionic. Cheers:Axil On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Michele Comitini < michele.comit...@gmail.com> wrote: > I suppose he is speaking of methane. No need for electrical power > anymore. Seems that Rossi is leaving "competition" in the dust. Read > below. > > > http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=679&cpage=3#comment-299135 > > Andrea Rossi > August 10th, 2012 at 11:54 AM > ... > We are very close to a 1 MW plant with high temperature steam and > electric power generation. Another important achievement , we got > today: we are able, now, to make the drive with gas instead of > electric power. This is extremely important, because now we are able > to make thermal energy with thermal energy, and with the thermal > energy produced we can make electric power. All this with 1 MW plants. > Warm Regards, > Andrea Rossi > > > mic > >
[Vo]:Gas driven E-cat
I suppose he is speaking of methane. No need for electrical power anymore. Seems that Rossi is leaving "competition" in the dust. Read below. http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=679&cpage=3#comment-299135 Andrea Rossi August 10th, 2012 at 11:54 AM ... We are very close to a 1 MW plant with high temperature steam and electric power generation. Another important achievement , we got today: we are able, now, to make the drive with gas instead of electric power. This is extremely important, because now we are able to make thermal energy with thermal energy, and with the thermal energy produced we can make electric power. All this with 1 MW plants. Warm Regards, Andrea Rossi mic
