Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell -- Jaro Jaro announces intention to violate list rules
At 06:43 AM 12/5/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote: I always say, I never start it, but I will finish it. An insult will be responded with an insult. A ridicule with a ridicule. This bias will be responded with bias from me. From his other posts, finish it includes continuing the response long after other parties stopped. Above, he declares an intention to violate list rules, justified by the perceived violations of others. If someone else consistently violates list rules, and does not respond to warning, banning is utterly appropriate, even necessary. Jaro Jaro knows what he's doing, and above he shows that it's deliberate. He merely considers it justified. They did it, so I'll do it back. And he's shown that what he does back is taken to extremes, a slight perceived insult becomes a diatribe and an attempt to find whatever insult he can imagine; he typically attempts to outrage whatever group he thinks his enemy belongs to. There is no redeeming value to his participation here.
Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell -- Jaro Jaro announces intention to violate list rules
It is easy to see how wars are waged over religious beliefs... On Wednesday, December 5, 2012, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: At 06:43 AM 12/5/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote: I always say, I never start it, but I will finish it. An insult will be responded with an insult. A ridicule with a ridicule. This bias will be responded with bias from me. From his other posts, finish it includes continuing the response long after other parties stopped. Above, he declares an intention to violate list rules, justified by the perceived violations of others. If someone else consistently violates list rules, and does not respond to warning, banning is utterly appropriate, even necessary. Jaro Jaro knows what he's doing, and above he shows that it's deliberate. He merely considers it justified. They did it, so I'll do it back. And he's shown that what he does back is taken to extremes, a slight perceived insult becomes a diatribe and an attempt to find whatever insult he can imagine; he typically attempts to outrage whatever group he thinks his enemy belongs to. There is no redeeming value to his participation here.
Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell -- Jaro Jaro announces intention to violate list rules
What religious belief? This argument started because danny body felt he can insult me and my beliefs and not suffer a response. This is not about religion, this is about common civilized decency. Jojo - Original Message - From: ChemE Stewart To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 12:38 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell -- Jaro Jaro announces intention to violate list rules It is easy to see how wars are waged over religious beliefs... On Wednesday, December 5, 2012, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: At 06:43 AM 12/5/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote: I always say, I never start it, but I will finish it. An insult will be responded with an insult. A ridicule with a ridicule. This bias will be responded with bias from me. From his other posts, finish it includes continuing the response long after other parties stopped. Above, he declares an intention to violate list rules, justified by the perceived violations of others. If someone else consistently violates list rules, and does not respond to warning, banning is utterly appropriate, even necessary. Jaro Jaro knows what he's doing, and above he shows that it's deliberate. He merely considers it justified. They did it, so I'll do it back. And he's shown that what he does back is taken to extremes, a slight perceived insult becomes a diatribe and an attempt to find whatever insult he can imagine; he typically attempts to outrage whatever group he thinks his enemy belongs to. There is no redeeming value to his participation here.
