At 06:43 AM 12/5/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
I always say, I never start it, but I will finish it. An insult will be responded with an insult. A ridicule with a ridicule. This bias will be responded with bias from me.
From his other posts, "finish it" includes continuing the "response" long after other parties stopped. Above, he declares an intention to violate list rules, justified by the perceived violations of others.
If someone else consistently violates list rules, and does not respond to warning, banning is utterly appropriate, even necessary. Jaro Jaro knows what he's doing, and above he shows that it's deliberate. He merely considers it justified. "They did it, so I'll do it back." And he's shown that what he does back is taken to extremes, a slight perceived "insult" becomes a diatribe and an attempt to find whatever insult he can imagine; he typically attempts to outrage whatever group he thinks his "enemy" belongs to.
There is no redeeming value to his participation here.
