Re: [Vo]:LENR through light

2013-11-15 Thread mixent
In reply to  pagnu...@htdconnect.com's message of Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:43:00
-0500 (EST):
Hi,

Please suggest such an effect.

[snip]
While the information you suggest acquiring is valuable, I think the
important issue is not bulk energy absorption, but how hot hot spots
can get - that is, how energy can be super-focused to LENR levels.
Collective effects could occur when oppositely charged particles collide
in strong localized currents or plasmon e-m fields, and result in
surprisingly high energy concentrations.

 -- Lou Pagnucco

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html



Re: [Vo]:LENR through light

2013-11-15 Thread mixent
In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Thu, 14 Nov 2013 17:13:23 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
In a polariton based hot spot, the electrons are part of a dipole where the
hole makes the electron a boson. Therefore *unlimited numbers *of electrons
can populate a hot spot.

You are confusing population of energy states with particle density.
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html



Re: [Vo]:LENR through light

2013-11-15 Thread pagnucco
Robin,

I can quickly suggest a couple of examples where e-m field momentum is
concentrated - in a very counter-intuitive way.

First, look at the references in the recent Vortex thread -
[Vo]:Momentum superkicks from monochromatic e-m fields
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg87201.html

Second, look at section 21-3 (Two kinds of momentum) of Vol.3 of
Feynman's Physics Lectures at URL:
http://www.peaceone.net/basic/Feynman/V3%20Ch21.pdf

Also, you might want to google superoscillations.
One good reference is -
Yield--Optimized Superoscillations
http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.6572

I hope to revisit this topic next week if time permits.

Regards,
Lou Pagnucco


Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
 Hi,

 Please suggest such an effect.

 [snip]
While the information you suggest acquiring is valuable, I think the
important issue is not bulk energy absorption, but how hot hot spots
can get - that is, how energy can be super-focused to LENR levels.
Collective effects could occur when oppositely charged particles collide
in strong localized currents or plasmon e-m fields, and result in
surprisingly high energy concentrations.

 -- Lou Pagnucco

 Regards,

 Robin van Spaandonk

 http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html







Re: [Vo]:LENR through light

2013-11-14 Thread Axil Axil
In electrodynamics http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrodynamics, *circular
polarization*[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_polarization#cite_note-1of
an electromagnetic
wave http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_wave is a
polarizationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarization_(waves)in
which the electric field of the passing wave does not change strength
but only changes direction in a rotary manner.
Circular polarization

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_polarization

In electrodynamics the strength and direction of an electric
fieldhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_fieldis defined by what
is called an electric
field vector http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_field_vector. In the
case of a circularly polarized wave, as seen in the accompanying animation,
the tip of the electric field
vectorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclidean_vector,
at a given point in space, describes a circle as time progresses. If the
wave is frozen in time, the electric field vector of the wave describes a
helix along the direction of propagation.

Circular polarization is a limiting
casehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limiting_caseof the more general
condition of elliptical
polarization http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptical_polarization. The
other special case http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_case is the
easier-to-understand linear
polarizationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_polarization
.
The phenomenon of polarization arises as a consequence of the fact that
light http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation behaves as a
two-dimensional transverse
wavehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transverse_wave#Explanation
.


The magnetic field vector is pointed in the direction of propagation of the
light wave and emanates from a really small center of the circular light
wave.
 -

distortion of circular polarization of light waves result in anapole
magnetic monopoles, where the magnetic field derives from the light wave
comeing from a POINT.


*http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/**papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf*http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf





*Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave like magnetic monopoles*

 One kind of spin-phase topological defects already reported in polariton
quantum fluids are the so-called half-vortices23,24. Different from integer
quantized vortices in scalar fluids where the phase winds from zero to 2p
when going around the vortex core25, half vortices present a simultaneous
rotation of p of both the phase and the polarisation angle around their
core. These objects have been recently predicted to behave like
monopoles26, but
experiments have so far reported half-vortices pinned to local
inhomogeneities of the sample24, preventing any probing of the monopole
physics.


In this work we report the generation of a different kind of vectorial
topological excitation in a flowing polariton condensate, oblique dark
half-solitons. They are
characterised by a notch in the polariton density of the fluid, and a
simultaneous phase and polarisation rotation of p 2 in the condensate
wavefunction across the soliton27 (as opposed to a phase jump of p for dark
solitons in scalar condensates28). This is manifested in the
*circular polarisation basis* as a deep notch present in only one
polarisation component. We map the polarisation and phase of these objects
evidencing their complex spin structure, and we show that they are indeed
accelerated by the action of the intrinsic effective magnetic field present
in our microcavities, thus behaving as magnetic monopoles

.
* Any field that is concentrated into point source has extreme strength.*


Re: [Vo]:LENR through light

2013-11-14 Thread Axil Axil
Solitary waves have consistently captured the imagination of scientists,
ranging from fundamental breakthroughs in spectroscopy and metrology
enabled by super continuum light, to gap solitons for dispersionless
slow-light, and discrete spatial solitons in lattices, amongst others.
Recent progress in strong Field atomic physics include impressive
demonstrations of attosecond pulses and high-harmonic generation via
photoionization of free-electrons in gases at extreme intensities of *10^^14
W/cm2. *



Soliton dynamics in the multiphoton plasma regime



http://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.5748.pdf


On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:20 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:

 In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:20:35 -0500:
 Hi,
 [snip]
  If the energy of the light wave where compressed into a soliton of 1
 nanometer in diameter carrying a power density of 100
 terawatts/cm2(highest
 observed nanoplasmonic hot spot power density)  would that not compress
 the
 electric field of the light wave localized in the hot spot.

 I suggest you take another look at the experiment you are quoting, and
 extract
 the actual energy in the laser pulse, and the area over which it was
 spread.
 That will give you an energy flux. Since you know what the material is,
 you can
 make a guess at how many atoms absorbed the energy, and determine very
 roughly
 how much each one got. You can also calculate how much each electron would
 get
 if the pulse were absorbed by electrons.
 [snip]
 Regards,

 Robin van Spaandonk

 http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html




Re: [Vo]:LENR through light

2013-11-14 Thread mixent
In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:16:32 -0500:
Hi Axil,

I didn't say I was going to do it, I suggested that you do it. :)

Solitary waves have consistently captured the imagination of scientists,
ranging from fundamental breakthroughs in spectroscopy and metrology
enabled by super continuum light, to gap solitons for dispersionless
slow-light, and discrete spatial solitons in lattices, amongst others.
Recent progress in strong Field atomic physics include impressive
demonstrations of attosecond pulses and high-harmonic generation via
photoionization of free-electrons in gases at extreme intensities of *10^^14
W/cm2. *



Soliton dynamics in the multiphoton plasma regime



http://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.5748.pdf


On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:20 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:

 In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:20:35 -0500:
 Hi,
 [snip]
  If the energy of the light wave where compressed into a soliton of 1
 nanometer in diameter carrying a power density of 100
 terawatts/cm2(highest
 observed nanoplasmonic hot spot power density)  would that not compress
 the
 electric field of the light wave localized in the hot spot.

 I suggest you take another look at the experiment you are quoting, and
 extract
 the actual energy in the laser pulse, and the area over which it was
 spread.
 That will give you an energy flux. Since you know what the material is,
 you can
 make a guess at how many atoms absorbed the energy, and determine very
 roughly
 how much each one got. You can also calculate how much each electron would
 get
 if the pulse were absorbed by electrons.
 [snip]
 Regards,

 Robin van Spaandonk

 http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html


Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html



Re: [Vo]:LENR through light

2013-11-14 Thread pagnucco
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
 In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:21:02 -0500:
 Hi,
 [snip]
Light intensity at 10^^12 (watts/cm2) produces a strong Electric field at
(10^^9) Volts/meter.
 Over a distance of 1 nm (10 Angstrom) this is just 1 Volt.
 [...]

This is correct, but it only shows that a localized electron can only
attain 1eV when crossing that gap unobstructed.

For an electron, 1[eV] corresponds to an approximate momentum of
4 * 10^(-25) [N*sec]  {'N' = Newton}

However, if an electron is trapped in that field, i.e., the mean position
of its wave function is fixed, for a time T instead of accelerating thru
collision-free, it gains a momentum impulse

  = T[sec] * e[C] * 10^9[Volt/meter] {where 'e' = electron charge[Coulomb]}
  = T[sec] * (1.6^10^(-19)[C]) * 10^9 [N/C]
  = T * 1.6^10^(-10) [N*sec]

So, in the latter case, the electron gains T*(10^14) times more momentum.
('T' measured in seconds.)

Possibly, this happens when the electron collides with a particle of
equal and opposite momentum.

In quantum mechanics, a highly localized or oscillatory wave functions
can posses high momentum (or kinetic energy) even when not moving much.

Also, an electron is a fermion, so it really needs to be represented by
a 4-component spinor in the Dirac equation.  It can undergo more
oscillation within the spinor.

-- Lou Pagnucco




Re: [Vo]:LENR through light

2013-11-14 Thread pagnucco
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
 In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:20:35 -0500:
 Hi, [snip]
 If the energy of the light wave where compressed into a soliton of 1
nanometer in diameter carrying a power density of 100
 terawatts/cm2(highest
observed nanoplasmonic hot spot power density)  would that not compress
 the electric field of the light wave localized in the hot spot.

 I suggest you take another look at the experiment you are quoting, and
 extract the actual energy in the laser pulse, and the area over which
 it was spread. That will give you an energy flux. Since you know what
 the material is, you can make a guess at how many atoms absorbed the
 energy, and determine very roughly how much each one got. You can
 also calculate how much each electron would get if the pulse were
 absorbed by electrons [...]

Robin,

While the information you suggest acquiring is valuable, I think the
important issue is not bulk energy absorption, but how hot hot spots
can get - that is, how energy can be super-focused to LENR levels.
Collective effects could occur when oppositely charged particles collide
in strong localized currents or plasmon e-m fields, and result in
surprisingly high energy concentrations.

 -- Lou Pagnucco




Re: [Vo]:LENR through light

2013-11-14 Thread Axil Axil
In a polariton based hot spot, the electrons are part of a dipole where the
hole makes the electron a boson. Therefore *unlimited numbers *of electrons
can populate a hot spot.

The electrons combine with light and lose weight. They can weight as little
as 20 micro electron volts. These low mass polaritons will become entangled
and form a high temperature BEC.

When the Hot spot becomes mobile and forms  a polariton bullet, these boson
connected electrons lose their holes and the electrons leave the hotspot
repelled by the coulomb force.. Only light remains and this light based
soliton spin structure may have been observed in many LENR experiments as
monopoles.

As I posted elsewhere, the magnetic field of this monopole comes from a
POINT in the center of a  EMF current ring making it extremely concentrated
and very powerful. This energy focusing is what enables energy levels to
reach high enough power levels for nuclear disruption to occur.





On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:20 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:

 Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
  In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:21:02 -0500:
  Hi,
  [snip]
 Light intensity at 10^^12 (watts/cm2) produces a strong Electric field at
 (10^^9) Volts/meter.
  Over a distance of 1 nm (10 Angstrom) this is just 1 Volt.
  [...]

 This is correct, but it only shows that a localized electron can only
 attain 1eV when crossing that gap unobstructed.

 For an electron, 1[eV] corresponds to an approximate momentum of
 4 * 10^(-25) [N*sec]  {'N' = Newton}

 However, if an electron is trapped in that field, i.e., the mean position
 of its wave function is fixed, for a time T instead of accelerating thru
 collision-free, it gains a momentum impulse

   = T[sec] * e[C] * 10^9[Volt/meter] {where 'e' = electron charge[Coulomb]}
   = T[sec] * (1.6^10^(-19)[C]) * 10^9 [N/C]
   = T * 1.6^10^(-10) [N*sec]

 So, in the latter case, the electron gains T*(10^14) times more momentum.
 ('T' measured in seconds.)

 Possibly, this happens when the electron collides with a particle of
 equal and opposite momentum.

 In quantum mechanics, a highly localized or oscillatory wave functions
 can posses high momentum (or kinetic energy) even when not moving much.

 Also, an electron is a fermion, so it really needs to be represented by
 a 4-component spinor in the Dirac equation.  It can undergo more
 oscillation within the spinor.

 -- Lou Pagnucco





Re: [Vo]:LENR through light

2013-11-14 Thread pagnucco
Whoops! - I realize my analysis cannot be correct.
I should have replaced the classical constant force with a linear
potential, which should give a different answer.  Needs to be reworked.
-- Lou Pagnucco
pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
 Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
 In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:21:02 -0500:
 Hi,
 [snip]
Light intensity at 10^^12 (watts/cm2) produces a strong Electric field
 at
(10^^9) Volts/meter.
 Over a distance of 1 nm (10 Angstrom) this is just 1 Volt.
 [...]

 This is correct, but it only shows that a localized electron can only
 attain 1eV when crossing that gap unobstructed.

 For an electron, 1[eV] corresponds to an approximate momentum of
 4 * 10^(-25) [N*sec]  {'N' = Newton}

 However, if an electron is trapped in that field, i.e., the mean position
 of its wave function is fixed, for a time T instead of accelerating thru
 collision-free, it gains a momentum impulse

   = T[sec] * e[C] * 10^9[Volt/meter] {where 'e' = electron
 charge[Coulomb]}
   = T[sec] * (1.6^10^(-19)[C]) * 10^9 [N/C]
   = T * 1.6^10^(-10) [N*sec]

 So, in the latter case, the electron gains T*(10^14) times more momentum.
 ('T' measured in seconds.)

 Possibly, this happens when the electron collides with a particle of
 equal and opposite momentum.

 In quantum mechanics, a highly localized or oscillatory wave functions
 can posses high momentum (or kinetic energy) even when not moving much.

 Also, an electron is a fermion, so it really needs to be represented by
 a 4-component spinor in the Dirac equation.  It can undergo more
 oscillation within the spinor.

 -- Lou Pagnucco








[Vo]:LENR through light

2013-11-13 Thread Axil Axil
How do the intense electric fields arise that are responsible for cooper
pair formation of protons in LENR via the Shukla-Eliasson effect?

You don’t need electron concentration to produce strong electric fields.
Intense Light concentration will also produce a proportionately large
electric field.


Light intensity at 10^^12 (watts/cm2) produces a strong Electric field at
(10^^9) Volts/meter.

Reference:

See Page 3, chapter 2.  - Basic concepts of nonlinear optics on table 1 in

http://www.mitr.p.lodz.pl/evu/lectures/Vauthey.pdf

Introduction to nonlinear optical spectroscopic techniques for
investigating ultrafast processes

In conclusion, a soliton of intense super-fluidic and coherent light will
form cooper pairs of protons in the close proximity of the light based
soliton. The Ni/H reactor may be acting as a polariton laser turned in on
itself in a dark mode producing long lived, coherent, and stable Light
based solitons in a zero loss mode.


Regarding Ed Storms quote:

 “Many explanations have been proposed that are based on imagined ways
energy could accumulate in sufficient amount in the chemical lattice to
overcome the Coulomb barrier, either directly or as result of neutron
formation. These processes also occasionally involve accumulation of extra
electrons between the hydrogen nuclei as another way to hide the barrier.
These suggestions ignore the severe limitations a chemical lattice imposes
on energy accumulation and electron structure. Some proposed processes even
ignore obvious conflicts with what has been observed. Consequently, none
have been useful in directing future research or have achieved universal
acceptance.”

Both huge magnetic and electric fields can be generated using light without
the handicap of coulomb repulsion limiting the power levels achievable in
these EM fields.


Re: [Vo]:LENR through light

2013-11-13 Thread mixent
In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:21:02 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Light intensity at 10^^12 (watts/cm2) produces a strong Electric field at
(10^^9) Volts/meter.
Over a distance of 1 nm (10 Angstrom) this is just 1 Volt.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html



Re: [Vo]:LENR through light

2013-11-13 Thread Axil Axil
 If the energy of the light wave where compressed into a soliton of 1
nanometer in diameter carrying a power density of 100 terawatts/cm2(highest
observed nanoplasmonic hot spot power density)  would that not compress the
electric field of the light wave localized in the hot spot.

For example, the magnetic component of the light wave is proportional to
the electric component.

As has been demonstrated in the DGT reactor, the magnetic field is 1.6t at
20 cms. If this magnetic field is produce by a soliton 1 nanometer in
diameter, would not the magnetic field coming out of the soliton be 10 to
the 16th power tesla.

I would expect that the electric field component of the light wave would be
amplified in like proportions.


Thought?


On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:34 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:

 In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:21:02 -0500:
 Hi,
 [snip]
 Light intensity at 10^^12 (watts/cm2) produces a strong Electric field at
 (10^^9) Volts/meter.
 Over a distance of 1 nm (10 Angstrom) this is just 1 Volt.

 Regards,

 Robin van Spaandonk

 http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html




Re: [Vo]:LENR through light

2013-11-13 Thread mixent
In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:20:35 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
 If the energy of the light wave where compressed into a soliton of 1
nanometer in diameter carrying a power density of 100 terawatts/cm2(highest
observed nanoplasmonic hot spot power density)  would that not compress the
electric field of the light wave localized in the hot spot.

I suggest you take another look at the experiment you are quoting, and extract
the actual energy in the laser pulse, and the area over which it was spread.
That will give you an energy flux. Since you know what the material is, you can
make a guess at how many atoms absorbed the energy, and determine very roughly
how much each one got. You can also calculate how much each electron would get
if the pulse were absorbed by electrons.
[snip]
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html