Re: [Vo]:Mr. Rossi appears to be busy for the foreseeable future.
I wrote: Any cold fusion cathode work harder will self-destruct to some extent > merely by being exposed to air . . . > That was supposed to say, "any cold fusion cathode or powder will self-destruct . . ." They all self-destruct over time from internal contamination. The powder stops working because the particles stick together, reducing surface area, and because the surface becomes contaminated. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Mr. Rossi appears to be busy for the foreseeable future.
Mary Yugo wrote: > > Rossi can't rely on anyone else at all to help make the wondrous > machines? If he's afraid of reverse engineering, he'd better not sell any > at all! How does he know what his customers will do with them? I believe he thinks it is easy to keep track of a few large customers rather than many small ones. Also it is true that he cannot get a license for kilowatt scale home units for several years. >Or maybe he's relying on that self-destruct mechanism he once claimed? > How would that work? I doubt that mechanism exists. I do not think anyone knows how it would work. Any cold fusion cathode work harder will self-destruct to some extent merely by being exposed to air, and especially to carbon. I would open the cell in a glovebox in nitrogen. Actually, I might open it the first time by remote control. > Couldn't any capable modern high tech shop get past it? Certainly > government labs could. > If there is a mechanism, I expect it could be overcome. As I remarked here a few days ago, if you buy a reactor with 100 cells in it, you might trigger the self-destruct mechanism in the first two or three cells you open, but after that it is likely you will find a way to open a cell without damaging it. You could then reverse engineer it. Ed Storms and others think that merely examining the powder in detail might not yield enough information to reverse engineer it. You would still not know how to fabricate the stuff. Perhaps that is true, but I'm sure that knowing the exact formula and the characteristics of the powder, such as particle size, would be a great help. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Mr. Rossi appears to be busy for the foreseeable future.
> Welcome to Vortex, MY! > Thank you.
Re: [Vo]:Mr. Rossi appears to be busy for the foreseeable future.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Mary Yugo wrote: > Is this credible to anyone? If so, why and how? Welcome to Vortex, MY! T
Re: [Vo]:Mr. Rossi appears to be busy for the foreseeable future.
Is this credible to anyone? If so, why and how? Rossi can't rely on anyone else at all to help make the wondrous machines? If he's afraid of reverse engineering, he'd better not sell any at all! How does he know what his customers will do with them? Or maybe he's relying on that self-destruct mechanism he once claimed? How would that work? Couldn't any capable modern high tech shop get past it? Certainly government labs could. On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Sean True wrote [quoting Rossi]: > > So far we are manufacturing 1 MW plants, and our next 2 years capacity > of production has been already saturated. For the small units we need > at least 1-2 years for the approvals. >
[Vo]:Mr. Rossi appears to be busy for the foreseeable future.
Either his customers are convinced or he is playing a very complex game. There are applications for raw heat in winter that might be worth putting up with leaky gaskets to get. His interactions with the public on his blog are getting shorter, and more like: "please go away, I'm very busy." Blog post: Dear Wladimir Guglinski: So far we are manufacturing 1 MW plants, and our next 2 years capacity of production has been already saturated. For the small units we need at least 1-2 years for the approvals. Your suggestion, anyway, are good, among the infinite possibilities of employ, those are surely possible too. Warm Regards, A.R.