It took the AEC/Navy in the 1940’s about 4 years to produce a full scale
prototype reactor for a nuclear sub that went to sea in the early 1950’s
No Poniznuc issues then and only one prototype reactor.
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
From: JonesBeene
Sent: Friday, August 2, 2019 6:17:13 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Patterson (James), Mizuno and the nano-gods
Years ago (~25) the trendiest technological breakthrough in LENR was the
microbeads of James Patterson.
There is some similarity in assessing that episode to the present case of
Mizuno, even as we are anticipating a better outcome. Here is a poorly
written Wiki page on the topic:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patterson_power_cell
Which gives way too much credit to the skeptics. Patterson was doing nano
before nano became cool, as they say … ahead of the world-changing advancements
that nanotechnology now seems to be opening up (even though we are not there
yet). There is little doubt that he had strong gain at times but could not
reproduce it himself. Moreover, Patterson was secretive, and failed to grasp
the operative mechanism of his own technique.
Possibly there was a simple detail which went overlooked… like a tap water
rinse.
In retrospect – and assuming Mizuno is replicated – the moral to the story
could be this – drop the secrecy, drop the vanity and greed, and let others
have full and complete understanding of the anomaly you have found. In the
Patterson CETI cell, it could very easily have been the case that there was the
same overlooked detail like calcite, which went unnoticed.
Moreover, even today with the benefit of several decades of mixed results in
LENR there could easily be another key ingredient besides or in addition to
the those which are obvious - which Mizuno is/was not completely aware of –
even now. There was way too much secrecy back then in the Patterson era – and
millions went unclaimed because of what can be best described as a failure to
see the big picture, Mizuno, to his credit sees the big picture and yet there
may still be annoying details out there which are lurking.
It seems that in the nano world, the nano-god giveth and the nano-god taketh
way… meaning that something as simple as going from 100 nm in thickness down to
30 nm is the difference between no gain and large gain.
The recent video from DeNeum in Estonia of all places, is the type of thing
which could really make a difference if it turns out to be even half as robust
as the Mizuno efforts. If a picture is worth a thousand words, a good vid is
worth 100,000.
In fact, perhaps that video will spur many more of them along the way towards
eventual success – and especially from Master Mizuno himself.
Jones
