I'm not sure what work you are referring to:
This one had an open top and claimed excess heat.
https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTproduction.pdf
Here's one where he had a top on it and showed mostly no excess heat, but
supposedly excess hydrogen. The alleged episodes of excess heat are pretty
weak.
https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTgenerationa.pdf
Has a top on. Doesn't even talk about excess heat, but instead focused on
excess hydrogen.
https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoThydrogenev.pdf
Looks like he had trouble replicating his own results. Because he had a
top on the beaker?
Jack
On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 9:23 AM Jack Cole wrote:
> Thank you. If true, that refutes my point about his work being debunked.
>
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 8:33 AM Jed Rothwell
> wrote:
>
>> Jack Cole wrote:
>>
>> We disagree, so I'll drop it as not being productive. I believe that the
>>> falseness of Mizuno's previous results was exposed and he/you are unwilling
>>> to spend the time to address the issues that showed how his experiments
>>> were likely compromised.
>>>
>>
>> I did, at the time. I just reiterated the main reason. The method of
>> calorimetry was different. Only part of the water boiled, and none of it
>> left the cell. It is a bomb calorimeter.
>>
>>
>>