I'm not sure what work you are referring to: This one had an open top and claimed excess heat. https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTproduction.pdf
Here's one where he had a top on it and showed mostly no excess heat, but supposedly excess hydrogen. The alleged episodes of excess heat are pretty weak. https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTgenerationa.pdf Has a top on. Doesn't even talk about excess heat, but instead focused on excess hydrogen. https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoThydrogenev.pdf Looks like he had trouble replicating his own results. Because he had a top on the beaker? Jack On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 9:23 AM Jack Cole <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you. If true, that refutes my point about his work being debunked. > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 8:33 AM Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Jack Cole <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> We disagree, so I'll drop it as not being productive. I believe that the >>> falseness of Mizuno's previous results was exposed and he/you are unwilling >>> to spend the time to address the issues that showed how his experiments >>> were likely compromised. >>> >> >> I did, at the time. I just reiterated the main reason. The method of >> calorimetry was different. Only part of the water boiled, and none of it >> left the cell. It is a bomb calorimeter. >> >> >>
