[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Robert Lynn]

unsubscribe

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Mason Ainsworth]

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Terry Blanton]

send that same message to vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com to unsubscribe.

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 5:09 PM Andrea Selva 
wrote:

>
>

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Andrea Selva]

[Vo]:UNSUBSCRIBE

[Bill VonBrock]

Unsubscribe



--

  Bill VonBrock

  bil...@postpro.net







On Tue, Mar 21, 2017, at 12:37 PM, Peter Gluck wrote:

> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-21-2017-lenr-info-and-15-discussions.html
> 

> peter

> 

> -- 

> Dr. Peter Gluck

> Cluj, Romania

> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Terry Blanton]

send it to

vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com


Virus-free.
www.avast.com

<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Robert Lynn  wrote:

>

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Robert Lynn]

Re: [Vo]:Unsubscribe me, please

[Lawrence de Bivort]

Thanks, and thanks for all the superb work you are doing for the LENR 
community, Jed.

Lawry


> On Oct 27, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Jed Rothwell  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Lawrence de Bivort  > wrote:
> Thanks.
> 
> Lawrence de Bivort
> 
> You have to do it yourself.
> 
> To unsubscribe, send a *blank* message to:
>   vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com 
>   Put the single word "unsubscribe" in the subject line of the header.  No
>   quotes around "unsubscribe," of course.

Re: [Vo]:Unsubscribe me, please

[John Berry]

"Bi Vort"., quite appropriate.

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Jed Rothwell  wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Lawrence de Bivort 
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Lawrence de Bivort
>>
>
> You have to do it yourself.
>
> To unsubscribe, send a *blank* message to:
>   vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com
>   Put the single word "unsubscribe" in the subject line of the header.  No
>   quotes around "unsubscribe," of course.
>

Re: [Vo]:Unsubscribe me, please

[Jed Rothwell]

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Lawrence de Bivort 
wrote:

> Thanks.
>
> Lawrence de Bivort
>

You have to do it yourself.

To unsubscribe, send a *blank* message to:
  vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com
  Put the single word "unsubscribe" in the subject line of the header.  No
  quotes around "unsubscribe," of course.

[Vo]:Unsubscribe me, please

[Lawrence de Bivort]

Thanks.

Lawrence de Bivort


> On Oct 22, 2016, at 4:53 PM, Jed Rothwell  wrote:
> 
> a.ashfield mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
>  
> Yes I was referring to high school grads for that rating, but it really 
> doesn't matter.
> 
> You are right that it does not matter for the problem of AI replacing jobs. 
> However, in a separate issue, you said that our current graduates are "dead 
> last in the world in math and science." I do not think that is true. It is a 
> statistical illusion caused by our high graduation rate. If every state and 
> every country sent 76% of kids to college the way New York does, they would 
> all be far behind the U.S. They send only a tiny elite instead. Which makes 
> them look better.
> 
> As it happens, they send most of their best people to U.S. universities. 
> Fortunately for us, these people tend to stay in the U.S. The "brain drain" 
> that began in the 1940s continues today, and the U.S. is the beneficiary. I 
> used to work with graduating classes from Georgia Tech., and I saw that. 
> Somehow, the U.S. has managed to capture the creme de la creme talent from 
> every nation on earth. Whatever we are doing right, we should keep doing it.
> 
> I am reminded of that by the recent crop of Japanese Nobel winners. Most of 
> them either studied in the U.S., made the contribution that won the prize in 
> the U.S., or they are now U.S. citizens. Shuji Nakamura, the guy who invented 
> the blue LED, became an American citizen some time ago. He wrote a book about 
> how angry he was with Japanese society and with the company he worked at. He 
> is much happier in the U.S.
> 
> So, we do not lack for engineering talent. However, as you say, that does not 
> help the burgeoning employment crisis caused by AI. It probably makes it 
> worse.
> 
> 
> It is not so much the college grads that will be losing their jobs (although 
> some like pharmacists etc will.) it is more that there won't be other jobs to 
> go to.
> 
> Yup. Big problem!
> 
> - Jed
> 

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Paul St. Denis]

-- 

Paul St. Denis

Multimedia Coordinator

Teaching & Learning Lab

Room S1430 Melville Library

Stony Brook University,

West Campus Stony Brook, NY 11794 631.632.1033

t...@stonybrook.edu

RE: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson]

Dang! I always forget to use the correct address when unsubscribing. 

 

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson]

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Ludwik Kowalski]

RE: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[MarkI-ZeroPoint]

 To unsubscribe, send a *blank* message to:
  vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com
  Put the single word "unsubscribe" in the subject line of the header.  No
  quotes around "unsubscribe," of course.



 

From: Mark Goldes [mailto:m...@aesopenergy.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 11:57 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:unsubscribe

 

Mark Goldes

Chairman, CEO, AESOP Energy LLC 

 

707 861-9070

 

AESOP Institute website: www.aesopinstitute.org

 

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Mark Goldes]

Mark Goldes
Chairman, CEO, AESOP Energy LLC

707 861-9070

AESOP Institute website: www.aesopinstitute.org

[Vo]:UNSUBSCRIBE

[Mark Goldes]

Mark Goldes
Chairman, CEO, AESOP Energy LLC

707 861-9070

AESOP Institute website: www.aesopinstitute.org

Re: RV: [Vo]:Unsubscribe

[Jed Rothwell]

 To unsubscribe, send a *blank* message to:
  vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com
  Put the single word "unsubscribe" in the subject line of the header.  No
  quotes around "unsubscribe," of course.


http://www.amasci.com/weird/wvort.html

RV: [Vo]:Unsubscribe

[Hauke Hein]

-Mensaje original-

Desde: "Hauke Hein" 
Enviado: 6 de agosto de 2015 00:21
Para: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Asunto: [Vo]:Unsubscribe



--- Enviado con Outlook.com, Real Life Real Timeª Mobile ---

[Vo]:Unsubscribe

[Hauke Hein]

--- Enviado con Outlook.com, Real Life Real Timeª Mobile ---

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Gary Steckly]

Welcome to the Hotel California (you can check out any time you like... ; -)
On Aug 27, 2014 5:00 PM, "Jed Rothwell"  wrote:

>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Mark Gibbs  wrote:
>
>> Thanks to all who noticed and kindly commented on my leaving the Vortex-L
>> list (apparently actually getting off the list takes rather longer than I
>> expected …).
>>
>
> You will never leave by this method. You are trapped! It is like walking
> into the closet instead of out of the front door.
>
>
>
>
>  To unsubscribe, send a *blank* message to:
>   vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com
>   Put the single word "unsubscribe" in the subject line of the header.  No
>   quotes around "unsubscribe," of course.
>
>
>

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Jed Rothwell]

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Mark Gibbs  wrote:

> Thanks to all who noticed and kindly commented on my leaving the Vortex-L
> list (apparently actually getting off the list takes rather longer than I
> expected …).
>

You will never leave by this method. You are trapped! It is like walking
into the closet instead of out of the front door.



 To unsubscribe, send a *blank* message to:
  vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com
  Put the single word "unsubscribe" in the subject line of the header.  No
  quotes around "unsubscribe," of course.

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Jojo Iznart]

My friend, you're the one causing great controversy and much questions for me.  
I'm simply responding to questions.  I haven't started a thread about religion 
at all.  You and other start the discussion about religion this time around.


Jojo


  - Original Message - 
  From: Daniel Rocha 
  To: John Milstone 
  Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 9:14 PM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe


  He's out because Jojo is spamming Vo with bullshith.




  2014-08-26 4:17 GMT-03:00 Peter Gluck :

  This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (peter.gl...@gmail.com) 
Add cleanup rule | More info 



Mark, I and the history of LENR will regret your absence. You are a fine 
journalist- was you forced to do this?
Peter


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com







  -- 
  Daniel Rocha - RJ
  danieldi...@gmail.com

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Mark Gibbs]

Thanks to all who noticed and kindly commented on my leaving the Vortex-L
list (apparently actually getting off the list takes rather longer than I
expected …).

Since you ask, I’m quitting because I simply don’t have the time to keep up
with all of the posts to the list most of which are definitely not in my
field. If something hot in LENR comes up and anyone cares to nudge me, I’d
be grateful but until then I’ll be keeping my fingers crossed for  a
breakthrough …

Best regards,
Mark.

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Daniel Rocha]

He's out because Jojo is spamming Vo with bullshith.


2014-08-26 4:17 GMT-03:00 Peter Gluck :

>  [image: Boxbe]  This message is eligible
> for Automatic Cleanup! (peter.gl...@gmail.com) Add cleanup rule
> 
> | More info
> 
>
> Mark, I and the history of LENR will regret your absence. You are a fine
> journalist- was you forced to do this?
> Peter
>
> --
> Dr. Peter Gluck
> Cluj, Romania
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
>
>


-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Peter Gluck]

Mark, I and the history of LENR will regret your absence. You are a fine
journalist- was you forced to do this?
Peter


On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Axil Axil  wrote:

> It is unlucky for Mark that he will be missing the biggest breaking story
> that there will be in this millennium. Maybe he will come back to vortex
> when the good news hits,
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Blaze Spinnaker  > wrote:
>
>> Awwwh.   :(
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Mark Gibbs  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Axil Axil]

It is unlucky for Mark that he will be missing the biggest breaking story
that there will be in this millennium. Maybe he will come back to vortex
when the good news hits,


On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Blaze Spinnaker 
wrote:

> Awwwh.   :(
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Mark Gibbs  wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Blaze Spinnaker]

Awwwh.   :(


On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Mark Gibbs  wrote:

>
>
>

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Mark Gibbs]

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Terry Blanton]

It goes to vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[James Bowery]

A true loss.  I doubt anything I said contributed to his departure because
I was genuinely seeking his guidance since he, unlike many here, seemed
willing to discuss the economic particulars of experimental tests of his
direction.  No matter what you may think of his direction, his willingness
to discuss such particulars places him head and shoulders above the crowd.


On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Edmund Storms wrote:

>
>
>

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Edmund Storms]

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[John Franks]

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Terry Blanton]

Send it to
vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com


On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Mark Snoswell wrote:

> unsubscribe
>
>

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Mark Snoswell]

unsubscribe

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Eydhah Almatrafi]

Unsubscribe

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[William E. Milliken]

unsubscribe

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Roger B]

“I am Life Eternal. I was Krishna, I was Buddha, I was Jesus and now I am Meher 
Baba.”

Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 22:49:04 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Johannes Kepler's 4th Law of Planetary Motion
From: cheme...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com

I like it.
I will add that in addition, in order to conform to my new quantum theory of 
gravity, those planets will actually have black brane cores and magnetic fields 
strings and will be streaming energetic and massive quantum particles and 
strings within the gravitational wind between the planetary bodies, warping and 
bending spacetime in a not quite so smooth way as Einstein imagined.  These 
high energy quantum particles and closed strings will decay over time and 
create electromagnetic and thermodynamic disturbances around the planets which, 
if they are on planet Earth, will recognize as their weather and auroras.

Stewartdarkmattersalot.com

On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:36 PM,   wrote:

In reply to  OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson's message of Wed, 5 Jun 2013

20:57:45 -0500:

Hi Steven,

[snip]

>Special case 2: This includes the unique circumstance where there exists

>zero angular momentum, (where the orbital eccentricity is "1"). What happens

>in this case is that the satellite drops directly towards the central mass

>and makes "virtual" contact with the center in 1/2 of the orbital period. If

>the satellite were to magically "bounce" back at 100%, it would return to

>the exact same original position in another 1/2 of an orbital period.



I had been wondering about this on and off for years, but never got around to

working it out. Thanks! :)

(I kind of suspected as much,because a sine wave is the axial shadow of a

circular orbit, and a simple oscillator is described by a sine wave - however,

this assumes a constant "k", which is not true of gravitational or electric

fields, where it depends on the radius, leading to a quadratic rather than a

linear function. Hope I got that right ;)

[snip]

Regards,



Robin van Spaandonk



http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html




  

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Terry Blanton]

Send it to

vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com

subject:  unsubscribe

On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 9:29 PM, George Baldwin
<0georgebaldw...@gmail.com>wrote:

> **
>
>

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[George Baldwin]

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Danny Ross Lunsford]

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[John Steck]

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[John Steck]

unsubscribe
  

RE: [Vo]:Unsubscribe

[OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson]

Dave, Abd,

 

FWIW, 

 

I think Jojo possesses considerable intellectual intelligence and presence.
Speaking strictly from a religious POV, it's "Gods" gift to Jojo. I know I
would not have been able to have kept up with Jojo if I had tried to discuss
many of the "OT" topics he was interested in discussing strictly from an
intellectual POV. I chose to engage Jojo more from what I'd call an
emotional plane of existence. Perhaps that was a contributing factor as to
why some in the Collective may have felt that at one point I ended up
inflaming matters. I guess one could also say that I got get a little
emotional about certain matters, particularly Jojo's stance on the birther
issue. I finally realized it was time for me to bow out of the picture. As
Dirty Harry once said: A good man has got to know his limitations.

 

What I'm trying to say here is that it's Jojo emotional intelligence
quotient that I seriously question, NOT his unique gift of intellect.
Suggesting that residents of Bangladesh, and a good chunk of Florida simply
pack up their bags and move to higher ground when the tides and hurricanes
come in is, in my view, a prime example of witnessing someone who possesses
a serious deficit of emotional empathy. 

 

http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg68060.html

 

Leaders in positions of power who possess similar deficits have the
potential to generate a huge amount of pain and suffering if they did not
have the foresight to surround themselves with strong-willed advisers whose
job it is to keep their leader reigned in within acceptable bounds of
civilized behavior. Sans such advise one has to wait for the abused subjects
to finally get around to stringing their leader up. Unfortunately, the
latter action can take a painful amount of time and wasted bloodshed.

 

Welding the shiny sword of logic and intellect for all to be in awe of, a
unique gift bestowed on human beings by a Higher Power; but a gift that has
not been filtered through the guidelines of empathy can lead one into making
unfortunate decisions and actions.

 

Regards,

Steven Vincent Johnson

www.OrionWorks.com

www.zazzle.com/orionworks

Re: [Vo]:Unsubscribe

[Abd ul-Rahman Lomax]

At 01:18 PM 8/11/2012, David Roberson wrote:
It is not good form to kick a man once he is down.  Why not just 
cease the battle and get back to useful posting?




That's a question, so I'll answer. No reason why not, except for 
questions like this. I assume "the battle" is over. Thanks for sharing. 

Re: [Vo]:Unsubscribe

[David Roberson]

It is not good form to kick a man once he is down.  Why not just cease the 
battle and get back to useful posting?

Dave


-Original Message-
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax 
To: vortex-l 
Sent: Sat, Aug 11, 2012 1:06 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Unsubscribe


At 01:11 AM 8/11/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
>

This was beautiful. The "computer expert" who had no clue about lossy 
compression (calling it "lousy compression," which is the opposite of 
what it is), who didn't know how to express scientific notation in 
ASCII text, blaming, instead, the "primitive" software of this 
mailing list -- which is simply standard mailing list software, 
albeit old -- also doesn't know how to follow intructions to 
unsubscribe from a mailing list.

Let's hope he figured it out.

His last post, a few seconds before he attempted to unsubscribe, had, 
as a reply to Eric Walker:

>But I am tired of this.  You may have the last word.  I will not be 
>posting this forum anymore.  You may celebrate.  You win.  Go ahead 
>and destroy this fine forum with your off-topic posts just to "gab 
>with friends".

He'd also written in response to me that:

>[...] You have succeeded in wearing me down with your useless words.
>
>So, I'll let you have the last word. [...]

Someone who sincerely intends to let someone else "have the last 
word" will listen to it, then refrain from responding. "You may have 
the last word" uttered while making a speech and then walking out of 
the room before anyone can respond is pure hypocrisy. It is far, far 
from gracious.

Jojo did not necessarily intend to let us know that he'd actually 
unsubscribed. This was, then, a clumsy mistake.

If someone writes, critizing my behavior with Jojo, I'll read it. 
I'll respond if requested to do so. If I have a question, I'll ask 
it. Otherwise, a critic may have the last word.





 

Re: [Vo]:Unsubscribe

[Abd ul-Rahman Lomax]

At 01:11 AM 8/11/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:




This was beautiful. The "computer expert" who had no clue about lossy 
compression (calling it "lousy compression," which is the opposite of 
what it is), who didn't know how to express scientific notation in 
ASCII text, blaming, instead, the "primitive" software of this 
mailing list -- which is simply standard mailing list software, 
albeit old -- also doesn't know how to follow intructions to 
unsubscribe from a mailing list.


Let's hope he figured it out.

His last post, a few seconds before he attempted to unsubscribe, had, 
as a reply to Eric Walker:


But I am tired of this.  You may have the last word.  I will not be 
posting this forum anymore.  You may celebrate.  You win.  Go ahead 
and destroy this fine forum with your off-topic posts just to "gab 
with friends".


He'd also written in response to me that:


[...] You have succeeded in wearing me down with your useless words.

So, I'll let you have the last word. [...]


Someone who sincerely intends to let someone else "have the last 
word" will listen to it, then refrain from responding. "You may have 
the last word" uttered while making a speech and then walking out of 
the room before anyone can respond is pure hypocrisy. It is far, far 
from gracious.


Jojo did not necessarily intend to let us know that he'd actually 
unsubscribed. This was, then, a clumsy mistake.


If someone writes, critizing my behavior with Jojo, I'll read it. 
I'll respond if requested to do so. If I have a question, I'll ask 
it. Otherwise, a critic may have the last word.

[Vo]:Unsubscribe

[Jojo Jaro]

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Terry Blanton]

send it to:

vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com

T

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Randall Fink 
wrote:
>

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Randall Fink]

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Dusty Bradshaw]

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Harry Veeder]

That is a great idea.
I'm leaving too.
Correa was right. The Vortex list does not live up to its ideals.
Harry

On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Dusty Bradshaw wrote:

> unsubsribe
>
> -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
>
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Dusty Bradshaw]

unsubsribe

-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-



Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Andre Blum]

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Terry Blanton]

Send this to

vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com

with unsubscribe in the subject header.

Live long and prosper!

,\\ //
  --

T

On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Dusty Bradshaw wrote:

>
>
> -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
>
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Dusty Bradshaw]

-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-



Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Terry Blanton]

Send it to

vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com

T

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Claudio Eterno
 wrote:
>
>

[Vo]:"unsubscribe"

[Claudio Eterno]

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Claudio Eterno]

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Bill Traweek]

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[lloyd kinder]

- Good Day. Lloyd
nhc.lefora.com


--- On Sat, 7/16/11, vortex-digest-requ...@eskimo.com 
 wrote:

From: vortex-digest-requ...@eskimo.com 
Subject: vortex-digest Digest V2011 #1148
To: vortex-dig...@eskimo.com
Date: Saturday, July 16, 2011, 7:15 PM

[Vo]:unsubscribe..

[azube1]

From: Stephen A. Lawrence 
>To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 9:41 AM
>Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-Cat vs. Water Heater for coffee/tea...
>
>
> 
>
>On 11-06-23 04:23 AM, Joshua Cude wrote: 
>
>>
>>
>>On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Mark Iverson  wrote:
>>
>>
>>> 
>>>  
>>>You might think that all this time on the steam quality is quibbling over 
>>>minor details, but one of the senior contributors to the Vort collective 
>>>calculated that if only 5% (by mass) of the water going in was not vaporized 
>>>(i.e., ended up as liquid water in the outflowing steam), it would pretty 
>>>much wipe out all excess energy being claimed by Rossi. 
>>
>> 
>>No. Where do you get that? What senior contributer said that? If 95% of the 
>>water (by mass) is converted to steam then Rossi's claims are 95% right. 
>>(Well, ignoring discrepancies in flow rate and input power.) 
>>
>> 
>>What is true is that if the output is 5 % liquid by *volume*, then Rossi's 
>>claims are 6 or 7 times too high. Because 5% liquid by volume corresponds to 
>>99 % liquid by mass.   
>That would probably have been Horace, and I think he may have meant
"by volume".  The calculations are in the archive, among the most
recent posts from Horace just before he bowed out due to lack of
time, if anyone cares to go digging.
>
>
>
>

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[David VanDerryt]

Please unsubscribe me.

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Dennis]

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[southronfolk]

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[svj]

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Terry Blanton]

On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> Frank wrote:
>
>
>> Leving aol dial up and moving on to high speed service.
>>
>
> Welcome to 1990!
>
> That's not how you unsubscribe, by the way.
>
>
To:  vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com
Subject:  Unsubscribe

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Jed Rothwell]

Frank wrote:


> Leving aol dial up and moving on to high speed service.
>

Welcome to 1990!

That's not how you unsubscribe, by the way.

- Jed

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[fznidarsic]

Leving aol dial up and moving on to high speed service.

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[DonEMitchell]

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[bhairava]

[Vo]:Unsubscribe

[PHILIP WINESTONE]

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Jeff Fink]

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[lloyd kinder]

unsubscribe


  

RE: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Roarty, Francis X]

Thanks terry -
I keep getting doubles from forwarded home subscription so am
trying to clean house a little.
Fran

-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 12:05 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

That needs to go to vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com in order to unsubscribe.

On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Roarty, Francis
X wrote:
>
>

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Terry Blanton]

That needs to go to vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com in order to unsubscribe.

On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Roarty, Francis
X wrote:
>
>

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Roarty, Francis X]

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Robert Hoffmann]

unsubscribe

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Robert Hoffmann]

unsubscribe

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[leaking pen]

whoops, thanks terry.  i even recall when that happened previously.
and... my other email was already subscribed?  da hell?

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> you have to send that to
>
> vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:24 PM, leaking pen wrote:
>> unsubscribe
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Terry Blanton]

you have to send that to

vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:24 PM, leaking pen wrote:
> unsubscribe
>
>

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[leaking pen]

unsubscribe

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Terry Blanton]

vortex-l-request, I mean.

On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Terry Blanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You must send this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:01 AM, Benjamin Rozanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Terry Blanton]

You must send this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:01 AM, Benjamin Rozanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Benjamin Rozanski]

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

[Terry Blanton]

send to:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:09 AM, John Steck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[John Steck]

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Charles M. Brown]

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[EnergyLab]

[Vo]:unsubscribe

[Steven Vincent Johnson]

Consolidating to Gmail
---
Steven Vincent Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://orionworks.com

[Vo]: unsubscribe

[Rodney Runner]

-Original Message-
From: Mike Carrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 5:02 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Optics question

There is a misunderstanding of the nature of DLP technology. The active 
element is an array of tiny mirrors created by silicon machining techniques,

one for each pixel. Each mirror can be tilted by a small angle under control

from a TV signal. That tilt determines wihether the light falling on it goes

to a location on the screen or to a dump. The average intensityof each pixel

is determined by the fraction of time the mirror illuminates the screen. The

individual mirrors do not scan, they only switch light to or away from one 
location on the screen. The optics, once fixed, are quite robust. The only 
variable is the lamp. which has finite life and must be changed.

Mike Carrell
---

> In reply to  Hoyt A. Stearns Jr.'s message of Sat, 6 Jan 2007 
> 17:41:40 -0700:
> Hi,
> [snip]
>>
>>
>>In a digital light processing (DLP) display, a light source (soon to be a
>>tri color laser) projects on an array of movable mirrors.  The light for 
>>the
>>dark parts of the image are sent to a beam dump.  That seems wasteful.  Is
>>it possible to collect that light and re-introduce it into the primary
>>source?
>
> Instead of using the mirrors to direct the beam to a beam dump, simply 
> turn the
> laser off for a fraction of a second. This will require a change in the 
> logic
> and electronics, but is much more efficient (instead of recovering the 
> energy,
> it is simply not used in the first place). It also means that the mirrors 
> can
> continue to scan the line, maintaining momentum. Then the mirrors need not

> be as
> easy to maneuver, which is technically simpler and cheaper to implement, 
> as well
> as resulting in a more robust design that produces a better quality image.
> Regards,
>
> Robin van Spaandonk
>
> http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/
>
> Competition provides the motivation,
> Cooperation provides the means.
>
>
> 
> This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T. 
> Department.
> 

[Vo]: unsubscribe

[R Stiffler]

Re: [Vo]: unsubscribe

[Terry Blanton]

As before, you must send a null message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the subject header saying unsubscribe.



On 11/24/06, Christopher Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


unsubscribe - Please




Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com

Re: [Vo]: unsubscribe - "Please"

[Christopher Arnold]

--- Christopher Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> 
> unsubscribe - Please
> 
> 
>  
>

> Do you Yahoo!?
> Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail
> beta.
> http://new.mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 



 

Want to start your own business?
Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index

[Vo]: unsubscribe

[Christopher Arnold]

unsubscribe - Please


 

Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com

[Vo]: unsubscribe

[Christopher Arnold]

unsubscribe 
		 All-new Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.

Re: [Vo]: unsubscribe

[leaking pen]

same way you subscribed, but in reverse.  
On 8/2/06, Anthony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey Guys,How do I unsubscribe?Thanks!Anthony
-- That which yields isn't always weak. 

[Vo]: unsubscribe

[Anthony]

Hey Guys,

How do I unsubscribe?

Thanks!
Anthony