[Vo]:Wanted: rented brain w/insurance

[Don]

Hi Vortex People!


Thanks to everyone that loaned me a piece of their brain.

I'm in complete overload.  Where to start?

On manifolds in spaces:  My last more-smarter question: Is 
higher-manifold physics theory, encompassing measured anomalies in the 
3D +time space, by using the math like linear algebra applied in lots of 
dimensions (as needed) to represent known operators of a correlate 
mathematical process-model to real space-timing that predicts force 
effects. (I do mean math and not maths.)


On scale: I learned from AlienScientist (YouTube) how Frank Znidarsic's 
alternate-algebra fits a toy-model picture-book I always thought 
physicists were talking about.  My best guess what you guys represent in 
grammar.  So I got excited.  My learned response was to be quiet. Still 
excited.


On Scale:  Superluminal switching speeds are available via tuned-length 
coaxial signal feeds to switched-antenna segments that are 
algorithmically-switched as a set comprising one complex oscillator.  At 
least we would do it that way in the boonies if a super-luminal scale 
harmony needed contained as a balanced orb of energy.


I've gotten such a download of information from you all.  Big thanks.

Stay tuned for what may hatch.  Not sure.


Cheers,

DonEM

*
*

Re: toroidal waves Re: [Vo]:Wanted: rented brain

[Don]

Awesome links!  Thanks Bill!


-Don

On 3/20/2021 6:06 AM, William Beaty wrote:

On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:

In the far field the toroidal field components can be
(most of the time) neglected. Most of the literature about pure toroidal
fields or scalar EM waves is classified. But just google some terms I 
gave.


The Corum bros wrote the following in 2008, caduceus toroid antennas:
http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Reference_Material/Corum/Toroidal%20helix%20antenna.pdf 



George Hathaway had brief funding to work on toroid antenna 
experiments in

2011 (I don't know if this is paywalled PDF:)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251709920_Electromagnetic_Radiation_Experiments_with_Transmitting_Contra-Wound_Toroidal_Coils 



Also the infamous "missing" Corum rotary-fields paper from the 1994 
proceedings of Tesla Symposium is found here:

https://1lib.us/book/3499511/84d6bd?regionChanged==236683546



(( ( (  (   (    (O)    )   )  ) ) )))
William J. Beaty    SCIENCE HOBBYIST website
billb at amasci com http://amasci.com
EE/programmer/sci-exhibits   amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair
Seattle, WA  206-762-3818    unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci

Re: toroidal waves Re: [Vo]:Wanted: rented brain

[William Beaty]

On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:

In the far field the toroidal field components can be
(most of the time) neglected. Most of the literature about pure toroidal
fields or scalar EM waves is classified. But just google some terms I gave.


The Corum bros wrote the following in 2008, caduceus toroid antennas:
http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Reference_Material/Corum/Toroidal%20helix%20antenna.pdf

George Hathaway had brief funding to work on toroid antenna experiments in
2011 (I don't know if this is paywalled PDF:)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251709920_Electromagnetic_Radiation_Experiments_with_Transmitting_Contra-Wound_Toroidal_Coils

Also the infamous "missing" Corum rotary-fields paper from the 1994 
proceedings of Tesla Symposium is found here:

https://1lib.us/book/3499511/84d6bd?regionChanged==236683546



(( ( (  (   ((O))   )  ) ) )))
William J. BeatySCIENCE HOBBYIST website
billb at amasci com http://amasci.com
EE/programmer/sci-exhibits   amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair
Seattle, WA  206-762-3818unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci

Re: [Vo]:Wanted: rented brain

[William Beaty]

Note that in this month's Analog SF magazine, there's a nice little 
FE-device inventor story, "Damocles," S. McMullen, where a WW1 death-ray 
invention ends up just where such inventions would end up, if actually 
successful.


   March https://www.analogsf.com/current-issue/table-of-contents/



On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, William Beaty wrote:

Also OT, some crazy 2005 fiction to consider:

  the Aether vortical objects of N. Tesla
  http://web.archive.org/web/20050213014146/https://farshores.org/wmtesla.htm



(( ( (  (   ((O))   )  ) ) )))
William J. BeatySCIENCE HOBBYIST website
billb at amasci com http://amasci.com
EE/programmer/sci-exhibits   amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair
Seattle, WA  206-762-3818unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci

Re: toroidal waves Re: [Vo]:Wanted: rented brain

[Robert Lee]

It is referred to as 5th density; not 5th dimension. Torsion, (or toroidal,) 
fields were actually expounded upon by Russian scientist, (Shipov, Heim, 
Kozarev, etc.) who did EXTENSIVE research and experimentation on torsion 
fields. This throws string theory out the window and explains the function of 
gravity, spin, electromagnetics and quantum geometric fields with quantum black 
holes at their vertices. No protons, neutrons or electrons in this model and 
gives a unified theory of everything.
TORSION FIELDS - Theory of Physical Vacuum - Shipov and Heim - JustPaste.it  
|  
|   
|   
|   ||

   |

  |
|  
|   |  
TORSION FIELDS - Theory of Physical Vacuum - Shipov and Heim - JustPaste.it
 

  |   |

  |

  |

  
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
 
  On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:30 AM, CB Sites wrote:   
Interesting references.  It reminded me of something I recalled from one of my 
EM classes many years ago where the professor injected that adding a 5th 
Dimension allowed for the unification of EM and Gravity and the basis for a 
theory of everything.   Later learning that it was Kaluza-Klien theory and it's 
been around since the early 1900s.  So as a quick background, a wikipedia 
reference may help.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaluz-Klein_theory.
Recently there was a proposal that the dark matter problem could be solved by 
the introduction of a 5th dimension, and there have been other cosmological 
hints of a 5th dimension and an elegant model of black-holes can be built in 5 
dimensions.   So maybe there is something to the addition of a higher dimension 
when dealing with EM.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 8:29 AM Jürg Wyttenbach  wrote:

  
The main problem with classic thinking is people cannot escape their mind or 
what they are able to see.
 

 
 
The full extent of EM theory can only be grasped in higher dimension than 4.
 
As a starter you can dig into Maxwell on S3 : 
 
https://www.math.upenn.edu/grad/dissertations/ParsleyThesis.pdf.
 
But you must go to SO(4) (S5 for rotations) to get the true picture of the 
basic static relation between source charge and EM fields, what leads to the 
stable nucleus. 
 
 

 
 
So everything you today read about black holes etc. is outrageous nonsense, as 
today's accepted.. physics has no clue about the structure of mass.
 
By the way:  Toroidal fields first were investigated by Tesla --> Tesla coils. 
All EM waves basically are toroidal but we try to make them as spherical as 
possible. In the far field the toroidal field components can be (most of the 
time) neglected. Most of the literature about pure toroidal fields or scalar EM 
waves is classified. But just google some terms I gave.
 
 
J.W.
 
 

 
 On 18.03.2021 11:32, William Beaty wrote:
  
 
 Cosmic strings in a garage-lab? 
 
 The main thing seemingly missing from Maxwell is ...closed ring-defects or 
"smoke rings."  They appear in fluids, but not in fluid-analogy for EM fields.  
Some amperes trapped in a superconducting ring are similar, but b-fields are 
not EM Torsion.  Hugo Gernsback had tiny articles about pulsed coils which 
launch ring-vorticies rather than EM waves.  (Where would he get such an idea?) 
 Maybe cosmic strings are accidentally produced by sharp-pulsed circuitry? If 
one hits you in the face, would you feel anything?  (Obviously the signature to 
watch for is odd EM pulses which travel far *slower* than lightspeed.  If coils 
don't detect them, maybe an NE-2 bulb might respond?  Try to persuade one to 
coast to a halt. (Seal it in an argon-filled Mumetal box, keep it as a pet?) 
 
 
 RM Kiehn, heterodoxy-attracting topologist of U. Texas Houston, has this 
too-obscure paper below, which I've been meaning to figure out someday, found 
on his old site "Cartan's Corner." 
 
   http://www22.pair.com/csdc/pdf/rmktop.pdf 
 
   see his site: http://www22.pair.com/csdc/ 
 
   New add: http://www22.pair.com/csdc/car/carfre56.htm 
 
 Also, large article pdf collection:  http://www22.pair.com/csdc/pdf/ 
 
 Hey, Keihn autobio http://www22.pair.com/csdc/pdf/autobio.pdf 
 
 list of papers: 
https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/R-M-Kiehn-2024567949 
 http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Robert_M_Kiehn 
 
   Kiehn 2017, Photons, propogating topological singularities 
   https://tinyurl.com/kiehnsphotons  (Nature of light: what is a photon?) 
   https://www.amazon.com/Nature-Light-What-Photon/dp/0367387107/ 
 
 --- 
 
 Also OT, some crazy 2005 fiction to consider: 
 
    the Aether vortical objects of N. Tesla 
   http://web.archive.org/web/20050213014146/https://farshores.org/wmtesla.htm
 
 
 On Wed, 17 Mar 2021, Don wrote: 
 
Tutor wanted: An astute mathematical-physicist that will explain what 
 topology is talking about in regard to electromagnetic theory, and provide 
 contemporary speak for me to assimilate in discussion over free 
 web-conferencing software.   
 
 
 (( ( (  (   (    (O)    )   )  ) ) ))) 
 William J. Beaty  

Re: toroidal waves Re: [Vo]:Wanted: rented brain

[Jürg Wyttenbach]

Kaluza-Klein has been started by Einstein too but it/he failed due to 
misunderstanding the nature of time in mass.


As in GR where S^3 is the solution topology he did go to S^4 the other 
failure in thinking as a simply connected surface cannot carry/ be 
smoothly covered by flux due to crossing!! This happens when you model 
stuff without knowing its nature (EM flux = magnetic flux lines).



All mass is rotation only, that involves always a plane (manifold) = 
1x1. So 5 dimensions is a bad match. you need to go from 4 --> 6 at 
least. Also you have to understand that  the basic action is 1x1-->1 
(rotation covers 3 independent orthogonal acting dimensions) . This can 
be done with the Biot Savart operator. From this you construct 3 
rotation bodies in the 4 rotation frame and then 4 rotation bodies in 
the 5 rotation frame and finally you get the combined center 5 rotation 
body in the 6D frame. SO(4) has 4 symmetric rotations + one asymmetric. 
This 5th rotation is where the golden ratio comes into play and makes 
all 5 rotations looking symmetric.


The other surprise is that all looks like standard torus mechanics at 
the end.



J.W.

On 18.03.2021 15:30, CB Sites wrote:
Interesting references.  It reminded me of something I recalled from 
one of my EM classes many years ago where the professor injected that 
adding a 5th Dimension allowed for the unification of EM and Gravity 
and the basis for a theory of everything.   Later learning that it was 
Kaluza-Klien theory and it's been around since the early 1900s.  So as 
a quick background, a wikipedia reference may help. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaluz-Klein_theory 
.


Recently there was a proposal that the dark matter problem could be 
solved by the introduction of a 5th dimension, and there have been 
other cosmological hints of a 5th dimension and an elegant model of 
black-holes can be built in 5 dimensions.   So maybe there is 
something to the addition of a higher dimension when dealing with EM.


On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 8:29 AM Jürg Wyttenbach > wrote:


The main problem with classic thinking is people cannot escape
their mind or what they are able to see.


The full extent of EM theory can only be grasped in higher
dimension than 4.

As a starter you can dig into Maxwell on S^3 :

https://www.math.upenn.edu/grad/dissertations/ParsleyThesis.pdf
.

But you must go to SO(4) (S^5 for rotations) to get the true
picture of the basic static relation between source charge and EM
fields, what leads to the stable nucleus.


So everything you today read about black holes etc. is outrageous
nonsense, as today's accepted.. physics has no clue about the
structure of mass.

By the way:  Toroidal fields first were investigated by Tesla -->
Tesla coils. All EM waves basically are toroidal but we try to
make them as spherical as possible. In the far field the toroidal
field components can be (most of the time) neglected. Most of the
literature about pure toroidal fields or scalar EM waves is
classified. But just google some terms I gave.

J.W.


On 18.03.2021 11:32, William Beaty wrote:


Cosmic strings in a garage-lab?

The main thing seemingly missing from Maxwell is ...closed
ring-defects or "smoke rings."  They appear in fluids, but not in
fluid-analogy for EM fields.  Some amperes trapped in a
superconducting ring are similar, but b-fields are not EM
Torsion.  Hugo Gernsback had tiny articles about pulsed coils
which launch ring-vorticies rather than EM waves.  (Where would
he get such an idea?)  Maybe cosmic strings are accidentally
produced by sharp-pulsed circuitry? If one hits you in the face,
would you feel anything?  (Obviously the signature to watch for
is odd EM pulses which travel far *slower* than lightspeed.  If
coils don't detect them, maybe an NE-2 bulb might respond?  Try
to persuade one to coast to a halt. (Seal it in an argon-filled
Mumetal box, keep it as a pet?)


RM Kiehn, heterodoxy-attracting topologist of U. Texas Houston,
has this too-obscure paper below, which I've been meaning to
figure out someday, found on his old site "Cartan's Corner."

http://www22.pair.com/csdc/pdf/rmktop.pdf


  see his site: http://www22.pair.com/csdc/


  New add: http://www22.pair.com/csdc/car/carfre56.htm


Also, large article pdf collection:
http://www22.pair.com/csdc/pdf/ 

Hey, Keihn autobio http://www22.pair.com/csdc/pdf/autobio.pdf


list of papers:

Re: toroidal waves Re: [Vo]:Wanted: rented brain

[CB Sites]

Interesting references.  It reminded me of something I recalled from one of
my EM classes many years ago where the professor injected that adding a 5th
Dimension allowed for the unification of EM and Gravity and the basis for a
theory of everything.   Later learning that it was Kaluza-Klien theory and
it's been around since the early 1900s.  So as a quick background, a
wikipedia reference may help.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaluz-Klein_theory.

Recently there was a proposal that the dark matter problem could be solved
by the introduction of a 5th dimension, and there have been other
cosmological hints of a 5th dimension and an elegant model of black-holes
can be built in 5 dimensions.   So maybe there is something to the addition
of a higher dimension when dealing with EM.

On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 8:29 AM Jürg Wyttenbach  wrote:

> The main problem with classic thinking is people cannot escape their mind
> or what they are able to see.
>
>
> The full extent of EM theory can only be grasped in higher dimension than
> 4.
>
> As a starter you can dig into Maxwell on S3 :
>
> https://www.math.upenn.edu/grad/dissertations/ParsleyThesis.pdf.
>
> But you must go to SO(4) (S5 for rotations) to get the true picture of
> the basic static relation between source charge and EM fields, what leads
> to the stable nucleus.
>
>
> So everything you today read about black holes etc. is outrageous
> nonsense, as today's accepted.. physics has no clue about the structure of
> mass.
>
> By the way:  Toroidal fields first were investigated by Tesla --> Tesla
> coils. All EM waves basically are toroidal but we try to make them as
> spherical as possible. In the far field the toroidal field components can
> be (most of the time) neglected. Most of the literature about pure toroidal
> fields or scalar EM waves is classified. But just google some terms I gave.
>
> J.W.
>
>
> On 18.03.2021 11:32, William Beaty wrote:
>
>
> Cosmic strings in a garage-lab?
>
> The main thing seemingly missing from Maxwell is ...closed ring-defects or
> "smoke rings."  They appear in fluids, but not in fluid-analogy for EM
> fields.  Some amperes trapped in a superconducting ring are similar, but
> b-fields are not EM Torsion.  Hugo Gernsback had tiny articles about pulsed
> coils which launch ring-vorticies rather than EM waves.  (Where would he
> get such an idea?)  Maybe cosmic strings are accidentally produced by
> sharp-pulsed circuitry? If one hits you in the face, would you feel
> anything?  (Obviously the signature to watch for is odd EM pulses which
> travel far *slower* than lightspeed.  If coils don't detect them, maybe an
> NE-2 bulb might respond?  Try to persuade one to coast to a halt. (Seal it
> in an argon-filled Mumetal box, keep it as a pet?)
>
>
> RM Kiehn, heterodoxy-attracting topologist of U. Texas Houston, has this
> too-obscure paper below, which I've been meaning to figure out someday,
> found on his old site "Cartan's Corner."
>
>   http://www22.pair.com/csdc/pdf/rmktop.pdf
>
>   see his site: http://www22.pair.com/csdc/
>
>   New add: http://www22.pair.com/csdc/car/carfre56.htm
>
> Also, large article pdf collection:  http://www22.pair.com/csdc/pdf/
>
> Hey, Keihn autobio http://www22.pair.com/csdc/pdf/autobio.pdf
>
> list of papers:
> https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/R-M-Kiehn-2024567949
> http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Robert_M_Kiehn
>
>   Kiehn 2017, Photons, propogating topological singularities
>   https://tinyurl.com/kiehnsphotons  (Nature of light: what is a photon?)
>   https://www.amazon.com/Nature-Light-What-Photon/dp/0367387107/
>
> ---
>
> Also OT, some crazy 2005 fiction to consider:
>
>the Aether vortical objects of N. Tesla
>
> http://web.archive.org/web/20050213014146/https://farshores.org/wmtesla.htm
>
>
> On Wed, 17 Mar 2021, Don wrote:
>
> Tutor wanted: An astute mathematical-physicist that will explain what
> topology is talking about in regard to electromagnetic theory, and provide
> contemporary speak for me to assimilate in discussion over free
> web-conferencing software.
>
>
> (( ( (  (   ((O))   )  ) ) )))
> William J. BeatySCIENCE HOBBYIST website
> billb at amasci com http://amasci.com
> EE/programmer/sci-exhibits   amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair
> Seattle, WA  206-762-3818unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci
>
> --
> Jürg Wyttenbach
> Bifangstr. 22
> 8910 Affoltern am Albis
>
> +41 44 760 14 18
> +41 79 246 36 06
>
>

toroidal waves Re: [Vo]:Wanted: rented brain

[Jürg Wyttenbach]

The main problem with classic thinking is people cannot escape their 
mind or what they are able to see.



The full extent of EM theory can only be grasped in higher dimension than 4.

As a starter you can dig into Maxwell on S^3 :

https://www.math.upenn.edu/grad/dissertations/ParsleyThesis.pdf.

But you must go to SO(4) (S^5 for rotations) to get the true picture of 
the basic static relation between source charge and EM fields, what 
leads to the stable nucleus.



So everything you today read about black holes etc. is outrageous 
nonsense, as today's accepted.. physics has no clue about the structure 
of mass.


By the way:  Toroidal fields first were investigated by Tesla --> Tesla 
coils. All EM waves basically are toroidal but we try to make them as 
spherical as possible. In the far field the toroidal field components 
can be (most of the time) neglected. Most of the literature about pure 
toroidal fields or scalar EM waves is classified. But just google some 
terms I gave.


J.W.


On 18.03.2021 11:32, William Beaty wrote:


Cosmic strings in a garage-lab?

The main thing seemingly missing from Maxwell is ...closed 
ring-defects or "smoke rings."  They appear in fluids, but not in 
fluid-analogy for EM fields.  Some amperes trapped in a 
superconducting ring are similar, but b-fields are not EM Torsion.  
Hugo Gernsback had tiny articles about pulsed coils which launch 
ring-vorticies rather than EM waves.  (Where would he get such an 
idea?)  Maybe cosmic strings are accidentally produced by sharp-pulsed 
circuitry? If one hits you in the face, would you feel anything?  
(Obviously the signature to watch for is odd EM pulses which travel 
far *slower* than lightspeed.  If coils don't detect them, maybe an 
NE-2 bulb might respond?  Try to persuade one to coast to a halt. 
(Seal it in an argon-filled Mumetal box, keep it as a pet?)



RM Kiehn, heterodoxy-attracting topologist of U. Texas Houston, has 
this too-obscure paper below, which I've been meaning to figure out 
someday, found on his old site "Cartan's Corner."


  http://www22.pair.com/csdc/pdf/rmktop.pdf

  see his site: http://www22.pair.com/csdc/

  New add: http://www22.pair.com/csdc/car/carfre56.htm

Also, large article pdf collection: http://www22.pair.com/csdc/pdf/

Hey, Keihn autobio http://www22.pair.com/csdc/pdf/autobio.pdf

list of papers:
https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/R-M-Kiehn-2024567949 


http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Robert_M_Kiehn

  Kiehn 2017, Photons, propogating topological singularities
  https://tinyurl.com/kiehnsphotons  (Nature of light: what is a photon?)
  https://www.amazon.com/Nature-Light-What-Photon/dp/0367387107/

---

Also OT, some crazy 2005 fiction to consider:

   the Aether vortical objects of N. Tesla
http://web.archive.org/web/20050213014146/https://farshores.org/wmtesla.htm


On Wed, 17 Mar 2021, Don wrote:

Tutor wanted: An astute mathematical-physicist that will explain what
topology is talking about in regard to electromagnetic theory, and 
provide

contemporary speak for me to assimilate in discussion over free
web-conferencing software.


(( ( (  (   (    (O)    )   )  ) ) )))
William J. Beaty    SCIENCE HOBBYIST website
billb at amasci com http://amasci.com
EE/programmer/sci-exhibits   amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair
Seattle, WA  206-762-3818    unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci


--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis

+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06

Re: [Vo]:Wanted: rented brain

[William Beaty]

Cosmic strings in a garage-lab?

The main thing seemingly missing from Maxwell is ...closed ring-defects or 
"smoke rings."  They appear in fluids, but not in fluid-analogy for EM 
fields.  Some amperes trapped in a superconducting ring are similar, but 
b-fields are not EM Torsion.  Hugo Gernsback had tiny articles about 
pulsed coils which launch ring-vorticies rather than EM waves.  (Where 
would he get such an idea?)  Maybe cosmic strings are accidentally 
produced by sharp-pulsed circuitry? If one hits you in the face, would you 
feel anything?  (Obviously the signature to watch for is odd EM pulses 
which travel far *slower* than lightspeed.  If coils don't detect them, 
maybe an NE-2 bulb might respond?  Try to persuade one to coast to a halt. 
(Seal it in an argon-filled Mumetal box, keep it as a pet?)



RM Kiehn, heterodoxy-attracting topologist of U. Texas Houston, has this 
too-obscure paper below, which I've been meaning to figure out someday, 
found on his old site "Cartan's Corner."


  http://www22.pair.com/csdc/pdf/rmktop.pdf

  see his site: http://www22.pair.com/csdc/

  New add: http://www22.pair.com/csdc/car/carfre56.htm

Also, large article pdf collection:  http://www22.pair.com/csdc/pdf/

Hey, Keihn autobio http://www22.pair.com/csdc/pdf/autobio.pdf

list of papers:
https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/R-M-Kiehn-2024567949
http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Robert_M_Kiehn

  Kiehn 2017, Photons, propogating topological singularities
  https://tinyurl.com/kiehnsphotons  (Nature of light: what is a photon?)
  https://www.amazon.com/Nature-Light-What-Photon/dp/0367387107/

---

Also OT, some crazy 2005 fiction to consider:

   the Aether vortical objects of N. Tesla
   http://web.archive.org/web/20050213014146/https://farshores.org/wmtesla.htm


On Wed, 17 Mar 2021, Don wrote:

Tutor wanted: An astute mathematical-physicist that will explain what
topology is talking about in regard to electromagnetic theory, and provide
contemporary speak for me to assimilate in discussion over free
web-conferencing software.  


(( ( (  (   ((O))   )  ) ) )))
William J. BeatySCIENCE HOBBYIST website
billb at amasci com http://amasci.com
EE/programmer/sci-exhibits   amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair
Seattle, WA  206-762-3818unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci

[Vo]:Wanted: rented brain

[Don]

*A Help-Wanted posting to the Vortex People (hosted by William J. Beaty)
*

By DonEMitchell, wannabe mathematician


*Tutor wanted: *An astute mathematical-physicist that will explain what 
topology is talking about in regard to electromagnetic theory, and 
provide contemporary speak for me to assimilate in discussion over free 
web-conferencing software.


Cash-up-front paid prior to the tutoring session (online cash-transfer).

I anticipate one session per week, and from one to six sessions.

I am not screening for 'the best,' but trolling for the willing.

Drop me a message off-list with further questions, and suggest times you 
are available --and how much recompense you will tutor me for per hour.


Tanx,

DonEMitchell

Amateur Engineer and Newbie Woodworker

Director of Bucket List Operations --BLO

Westcliffe, Colorado, USA