Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Chuck Sites]

Wow.   Please forgive me if you haven't seen  Dr. Edmund Storms video
interview, but that was one the most convincing theoretical arguments for
as type of fracto-fusion cold fusion event I've seen.   It makes perfect
sense.   I've studied enough electron-micrographs to know that the type of
dislocations in metal lattices occurs all of the time.  It's normal at
interfaces in binary materials; like the Copper/Nickel interface blends.

Fire it up baby!

Chuck Sites

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Terry Blanton  wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Emeka Okafor 
> wrote:
> > A.  Xaaq -- zq q
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
>
> I guess it's more than the mapping s/w, eh?
>
>

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Terry Blanton]

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Emeka Okafor  wrote:
> A.  Xaaq -- zq q
>
> Sent from my iPhone

I guess it's more than the mapping s/w, eh?

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Emeka Okafor]

A.  Xaaq -- zq q

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 24, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Jojo Jaro  wrote:

> Oustanding work Ruby.
>  
> Does anyone know which paper of Roy Stanley he is referring to.  Sorry, I am 
> not very informed about some of the work Ed Storms is referring to.
>  
> Jojo
>  
> PS:  I will write some opinions about this video in my thread.  I did not 
> want to interject my ideas here so as not to pollute this thread.
>  
> - Original Message -
> From: Ruby
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 12:40 PM
> Subject: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold 
> Fusion) by Edmund Storms
> 
> 
> I have uploaded an interview with Edmund Storms on his new theory of what 
> starts the cold fusion reaction. 
> 
> http://coldfusionnow.org/an-explanation-of-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-cold-fusion-by-edmund-storms/
> 
> I'll be on the road, in my truck, headed to the Bay area (San Francisco 
> California region for you non-left-coasters) for another interview, then up 
> to Humboldt County to visit my storage unit (next to Hiro's), camp out in the 
> Redwoods and edit lots more video.
> 
> As such, I won't be monitoring comments on Cold Fusion Now, and I'm going to 
> send any individuals interested in discussing the work here to this thread.  
> Is that illegal on Vortex?
> 
> I am having alot of fun making these videos.  
> Especially now that I've discovered the Zoom text on iMovie.  
> 
> Enjoy!
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ruby Carat
> 
> r...@coldfusionnow.org
> United States 1-707-616-4894
> Skype ruby-carat
> www.coldfusionnow.org

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[mixent]

In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Sat, 25 Aug 2012 00:33:14 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>10% of Rossi's ash was iron(atomic number = 26). How can you get this much
>iron from nickel(atomic number = 28)?

See below?

>
>Answer: Alpha decay of nickel (Atomic number = 2)
>
>2 + 26 = 28 nickel - helium = iron.
>
>Cheers:   Axil
>
>On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:55 PM,  wrote:
>
>> 1H+1H+60Ni => 4He + 4He + 54Fe + 1.417 MeV
>> 1H+1H+61Ni => 4He + 4He + 55Fe + 2.895 MeV
>> 1H+1H+62Ni => 4He + 4He + 56Fe + 3.495 MeV
>> 1H+1H+64Ni => 4He + 4He + 58Fe + 4.690 MeV
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Axil Axil]

It seems that Ed Storms is not the first worker to speculate about the
important roll that cracks play in cold fusion. I ran into another. Here is
what Kenneth Shoulders says in this reference

http://www.spiritofmaat.com/archive/mar2/fox.htm

about cracks in palladium:

*"It is possible that many of the proven over-unity devices and systems
depend on the unknown (or known) generation of High Density Charge Clusters
(HDCC).*

*For example, one possible source of the excess energy and/or new elements
found in deuterium/palladium electrochemical cells could be the production
of HDCC formed when the palladium lattice cracks.*

*It is known that the palladium cathode becomes stressed (from being loaded
with deuterium) and brittle (the well-known hydrogen embrittlement).
Kenneth Shoulders suggests that the crack severs trillions of ionic bonds
which provides a high voltage that quickly shorts out through the
conductive palladium.*
*This short-duration, high-voltage spike produces a charge cluster from the
cathode side and is accelerated to the anode side, but it also picks up
deuterons. The end result can be sufficient velocity to cause nuclear
reactions when the combined charge cluster strikes the palladium anode side
of the crack."*
**
**
**

Cheers:Axil




On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Ruby  wrote:

>
> I have uploaded an interview with Edmund Storms on his new theory of what
> starts the cold fusion reaction.
>
>
> http://coldfusionnow.org/an-explanation-of-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-cold-fusion-by-edmund-storms/
>
> I'll be on the road, in my truck, headed to the Bay area (San Francisco
> California region for you non-left-coasters) for another interview, then up
> to Humboldt County to visit my storage unit (next to Hiro's), camp out in
> the Redwoods and edit lots more video.
>
> As such, I won't be monitoring comments on Cold Fusion Now, and I'm going
> to send any individuals interested in discussing the work here to this
> thread.  Is that illegal on Vortex?
>
> I am having alot of fun making these videos.
> Especially now that I've discovered the Zoom text on iMovie.
>
> Enjoy!
>
>
>  --
> Ruby Carat
>
> r...@coldfusionnow.org
> United States 1-707-616-4894
> Skype ruby-carat
> www.coldfusionnow.org
>

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Jeff Berkowitz]

Having a neutrino detector in your lab would be quite an undertaking. The
"small" one in Sudbury is 40 feet in diameter and full of D2O. Back of the
envelope, I make its weight about 1000 metric tons (which is about 2.2
million pounds for metrically-challenged people).

Jeff

On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Arnaud Kodeck wrote:

>   This video is a good summary of the last evolutions of Edmund Storm’s
> theory. Thank you, Edmund and Ruby to make it happen.
>
> ** **
>
> I’ve a bit of concern regarding neutrino emission. Edmund said that no
> neutrino has been seen and his theory explains it why. That’s good point.
> Nevertheless he has conducted this study with D+D or D+T or D+p reactions.
> In the final product the amount of neutron or proton is the same as in the
> reactants. So there is no need of electron neutrino emission.
>
> ** **
>
> With p+p reaction, the matter is different. We need to have one proton to
> be changed into a neutron which implies the emission of an electron
> neutrino. Celani should check for neutrino emission from his cell presented
> at ICCF17.
>
> ** **
>
> Arnaud
>

RE: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Arnaud Kodeck]

This video is a good summary of the last evolutions of Edmund Storm's
theory. Thank you, Edmund and Ruby to make it happen.

 

I've a bit of concern regarding neutrino emission. Edmund said that no
neutrino has been seen and his theory explains it why. That's good point.
Nevertheless he has conducted this study with D+D or D+T or D+p reactions.
In the final product the amount of neutron or proton is the same as in the
reactants. So there is no need of electron neutrino emission.

 

With p+p reaction, the matter is different. We need to have one proton to be
changed into a neutron which implies the emission of an electron neutrino.
Celani should check for neutrino emission from his cell presented at ICCF17.

 

Arnaud

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Jeff Berkowitz]

My belief now is it does not exist (i.e. not exothermic). Using The Google,
I found one reference on the internets to this reaction:

3 NiO + 2 Al => 3 Ni + Al2O3 + heat

I.e. nickel oxide forming the oxidizer. Which suggests the one I mentioned
isn't thermodynamically possible. But I'm not absolutely sure.

Jeff

On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Arnaud Kodeck wrote:

>  Good idea! I’m not sure Fe2O3 + 3 Ni => 3 NiO + 2 Fe is exothermic or
> even if this reaction may exist.
>
> ** **
>  --
>
> *From:* Jeff Berkowitz [mailto:pdx...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* samedi 25 août 2012 20:11
> *To:* arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be
> *Cc:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions
> (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms
> 
>
>  ** **
>
> Just out of curiosity, does the "Thermite reaction" work with nickel, i.e.
> something like ... Fe2O3 + 3 Ni => 3 NiO + 2 Fe?
>
> Jeff
>

RE: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Arnaud Kodeck]

Good idea! I’m not sure Fe2O3 + 3 Ni => 3 NiO + 2 Fe is exothermic or even
if this reaction may exist.

 

  _  

From: Jeff Berkowitz [mailto:pdx...@gmail.com] 
Sent: samedi 25 août 2012 20:11
To: arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be
Cc: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions
(Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

 

Just out of curiosity, does the "Thermite reaction" work with nickel, i.e.
something like ... Fe2O3 + 3 Ni => 3 NiO + 2 Fe?

Jeff

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Jeff Berkowitz]

Just out of curiosity, does the "Thermite reaction" work with nickel, i.e.
something like ... Fe2O3 + 3 Ni => 3 NiO + 2 Fe?
Jeff

On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Arnaud Kodeck wrote:

>  Is Iron another catalyst of Rossi? If I’m not wrong he said that there
> are more than one catalyst … What is the isotopic quantities found in the
> ash from Rossi?
>
> ** **
>
> Arnaud
>  --
>
> *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* samedi 25 août 2012 06:33
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions
> (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms
> 
>
>  ** **
>
> 10% of Rossi's ash was iron(atomic number = 26). How can you get this much
> iron from nickel(atomic number = 28)?
>
>  
>
> Answer: Alpha decay of nickel (Atomic number = 2)
>
>  
>
> 2 + 26 = 28 nickel - helium = iron.
>
>  
>
> Cheers:   Axil
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:55 PM,  wrote:
>
> In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:13:37 -0400:
> Hi,
> [snip]
>
> > The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not
> consistent
> >to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products. These
> >reaction products include copper, cobalt, zinc, iron, calcium, and so on,
> >together with a mix of the first 19 of the lightest elements.
> >
> >Yes, Rossi's info is questionable by Piantelli info is solid.
> >
> >PS: a top of the line presentation.
>
> 1H+1H+58Ni => 60Zn + 8.538 MeV
> 1H+1H+58Ni => 59Cu + 1H + 3.419 MeV
> 1H+1H+58Ni => 56Ni + 4He + 5.829 MeV
> 1H+1H+58Ni => 32S + 28Si + 1.859 MeV
> 1H+1H+60Ni => 62Zn + 11.277 MeV
> 1H+1H+60Ni => 61Cu + 1H + 4.801 MeV
> 1H+1H+60Ni => 58Ni + 4He + 7.909 MeV
> 1H+1H+60Ni => 4He + 4He + 54Fe + 1.417 MeV
> 1H+1H+60Ni => 50Cr + 12C + 0.365 MeV
> 1H+1H+60Ni => 32S + 30Si + 0.555 MeV
> 1H+1H+60Ni => 34S + 28Si + 1.530 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 62Zn + n + 3.457 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 63Zn + 12.570 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 62Cu + 1H + 5.866 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 59Ni + 4He + 9.088 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 4He + 4He + 55Fe + 2.895 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 51Cr + 12C + 1.806 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 47Ti + 16O + 0.026 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 33S + 30Si + 1.376 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 34S + 29Si + 2.184 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 35S + 28Si + 0.696 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 63Zn + n + 1.974 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 64Zn + 13.835 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 63Cu + 1H + 6.122 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 60Ni + 4He + 9.879 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 4He + 4He + 56Fe + 3.495 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 52Cr + 12C + 3.249 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 48Ti + 16O + 1.057 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 34S + 30Si + 2.197 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 65Zn + n + 5.319 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 66Zn + 16.378 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 65Cu + 1H + 7.453 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 62Ni + 4He + 11.800 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 4He + 4He + 58Fe + 4.690 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 54Cr + 12C + 4.411 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 50Ti + 16O + 3.642 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 34S + 32Si + 1.491 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 36S + 30Si + 2.576 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 33P + 33P + 0.154 MeV
>
> Regards,
>
> Robin van Spaandonk
>
> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
>
> ** **
>

RE: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Arnaud Kodeck]

Is Iron another catalyst of Rossi? If I’m not wrong he said that there are
more than one catalyst … What is the isotopic quantities found in the ash
from Rossi?

 

Arnaud

  _  

From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] 
Sent: samedi 25 août 2012 06:33
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions
(Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

 

10% of Rossi's ash was iron(atomic number = 26). How can you get this much
iron from nickel(atomic number = 28)?

 

Answer: Alpha decay of nickel (Atomic number = 2)

 

2 + 26 = 28 nickel - helium = iron.

 

Cheers:   Axil

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:55 PM,  wrote:

In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:13:37 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]

> The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not consistent
>to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products. These
>reaction products include copper, cobalt, zinc, iron, calcium, and so on,
>together with a mix of the first 19 of the lightest elements.
>
>Yes, Rossi's info is questionable by Piantelli info is solid.
>
>PS: a top of the line presentation.

1H+1H+58Ni => 60Zn + 8.538 MeV
1H+1H+58Ni => 59Cu + 1H + 3.419 MeV
1H+1H+58Ni => 56Ni + 4He + 5.829 MeV
1H+1H+58Ni => 32S + 28Si + 1.859 MeV
1H+1H+60Ni => 62Zn + 11.277 MeV
1H+1H+60Ni => 61Cu + 1H + 4.801 MeV
1H+1H+60Ni => 58Ni + 4He + 7.909 MeV
1H+1H+60Ni => 4He + 4He + 54Fe + 1.417 MeV
1H+1H+60Ni => 50Cr + 12C + 0.365 MeV
1H+1H+60Ni => 32S + 30Si + 0.555 MeV
1H+1H+60Ni => 34S + 28Si + 1.530 MeV
1H+1H+61Ni => 62Zn + n + 3.457 MeV
1H+1H+61Ni => 63Zn + 12.570 MeV
1H+1H+61Ni => 62Cu + 1H + 5.866 MeV
1H+1H+61Ni => 59Ni + 4He + 9.088 MeV
1H+1H+61Ni => 4He + 4He + 55Fe + 2.895 MeV
1H+1H+61Ni => 51Cr + 12C + 1.806 MeV
1H+1H+61Ni => 47Ti + 16O + 0.026 MeV
1H+1H+61Ni => 33S + 30Si + 1.376 MeV
1H+1H+61Ni => 34S + 29Si + 2.184 MeV
1H+1H+61Ni => 35S + 28Si + 0.696 MeV
1H+1H+62Ni => 63Zn + n + 1.974 MeV
1H+1H+62Ni => 64Zn + 13.835 MeV
1H+1H+62Ni => 63Cu + 1H + 6.122 MeV
1H+1H+62Ni => 60Ni + 4He + 9.879 MeV
1H+1H+62Ni => 4He + 4He + 56Fe + 3.495 MeV
1H+1H+62Ni => 52Cr + 12C + 3.249 MeV
1H+1H+62Ni => 48Ti + 16O + 1.057 MeV
1H+1H+62Ni => 34S + 30Si + 2.197 MeV
1H+1H+64Ni => 65Zn + n + 5.319 MeV
1H+1H+64Ni => 66Zn + 16.378 MeV
1H+1H+64Ni => 65Cu + 1H + 7.453 MeV
1H+1H+64Ni => 62Ni + 4He + 11.800 MeV
1H+1H+64Ni => 4He + 4He + 58Fe + 4.690 MeV
1H+1H+64Ni => 54Cr + 12C + 4.411 MeV
1H+1H+64Ni => 50Ti + 16O + 3.642 MeV
1H+1H+64Ni => 34S + 32Si + 1.491 MeV
1H+1H+64Ni => 36S + 30Si + 2.576 MeV
1H+1H+64Ni => 33P + 33P + 0.154 MeV

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

 

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Axil Axil]

10% of Rossi's ash was iron(atomic number = 26). How can you get this much
iron from nickel(atomic number = 28)?

Answer: Alpha decay of nickel (Atomic number = 2)

2 + 26 = 28 nickel - helium = iron.

Cheers:   Axil

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:55 PM,  wrote:

> In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:13:37 -0400:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> > The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not
> consistent
> >to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products. These
> >reaction products include copper, cobalt, zinc, iron, calcium, and so on,
> >together with a mix of the first 19 of the lightest elements.
> >
> >Yes, Rossi's info is questionable by Piantelli info is solid.
> >
> >PS: a top of the line presentation.
>
> 1H+1H+58Ni => 60Zn + 8.538 MeV
> 1H+1H+58Ni => 59Cu + 1H + 3.419 MeV
> 1H+1H+58Ni => 56Ni + 4He + 5.829 MeV
> 1H+1H+58Ni => 32S + 28Si + 1.859 MeV
> 1H+1H+60Ni => 62Zn + 11.277 MeV
> 1H+1H+60Ni => 61Cu + 1H + 4.801 MeV
> 1H+1H+60Ni => 58Ni + 4He + 7.909 MeV
> 1H+1H+60Ni => 4He + 4He + 54Fe + 1.417 MeV
> 1H+1H+60Ni => 50Cr + 12C + 0.365 MeV
> 1H+1H+60Ni => 32S + 30Si + 0.555 MeV
> 1H+1H+60Ni => 34S + 28Si + 1.530 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 62Zn + n + 3.457 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 63Zn + 12.570 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 62Cu + 1H + 5.866 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 59Ni + 4He + 9.088 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 4He + 4He + 55Fe + 2.895 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 51Cr + 12C + 1.806 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 47Ti + 16O + 0.026 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 33S + 30Si + 1.376 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 34S + 29Si + 2.184 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 35S + 28Si + 0.696 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 63Zn + n + 1.974 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 64Zn + 13.835 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 63Cu + 1H + 6.122 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 60Ni + 4He + 9.879 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 4He + 4He + 56Fe + 3.495 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 52Cr + 12C + 3.249 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 48Ti + 16O + 1.057 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 34S + 30Si + 2.197 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 65Zn + n + 5.319 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 66Zn + 16.378 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 65Cu + 1H + 7.453 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 62Ni + 4He + 11.800 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 4He + 4He + 58Fe + 4.690 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 54Cr + 12C + 4.411 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 50Ti + 16O + 3.642 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 34S + 32Si + 1.491 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 36S + 30Si + 2.576 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 33P + 33P + 0.154 MeV
>
> Regards,
>
> Robin van Spaandonk
>
> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
>
>

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Eric Walker]

Le Aug 24, 2012 à 11:46 AM, Jed Rothwell  a écrit :

> That would include transmuting deuterium into tritium, by the way.

This is always a possibility, of course.  But I think it would require either a 
transition from D to 3He and then a very slow inverse beta decay, or, 
alternatively, some kind of neutron capture. This leads one to wonder whether 
the tritium comes from something else, such as the spallation of a heavier 
nucleus by way of a fast particle.  Another factor pointing in this direction 
is the observation that tritium is possibly the only radioisotope seen in any 
significant quantity, whereas other transmutations are generally to stable 
isotopes.

Eric

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[mixent]

In reply to  ChemE Stewart's message of Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:09:19 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Great, and how much of the environment did we just irradiate with high
>level gammas?

Prompt gammas are not a problem, because they can be absorbed and converted to
heat immediately. It's radioactive nuclei producing gammas over the long term
that are potentially a problem. You also need to consider that short half-lived
isotopes are also not much of a problem because they only need to be contained
for a short time before they become inert.

>
>On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:55 PM,  wrote:
>
>> In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:13:37 -0400:
>> Hi,
>> [snip]
>> > The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not
>> consistent
>> >to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products. These
>> >reaction products include copper, cobalt, zinc, iron, calcium, and so on,
>> >together with a mix of the first 19 of the lightest elements.
>> >
>> >Yes, Rossi's info is questionable by Piantelli info is solid.
>> >
>> >PS: a top of the line presentation.
>>
>> 1H+1H+58Ni => 60Zn + 8.538 MeV
>> 1H+1H+58Ni => 59Cu + 1H + 3.419 MeV
>> 1H+1H+58Ni => 56Ni + 4He + 5.829 MeV
>> 1H+1H+58Ni => 32S + 28Si + 1.859 MeV
>> 1H+1H+60Ni => 62Zn + 11.277 MeV
>> 1H+1H+60Ni => 61Cu + 1H + 4.801 MeV
>> 1H+1H+60Ni => 58Ni + 4He + 7.909 MeV
>> 1H+1H+60Ni => 4He + 4He + 54Fe + 1.417 MeV
>> 1H+1H+60Ni => 50Cr + 12C + 0.365 MeV
>> 1H+1H+60Ni => 32S + 30Si + 0.555 MeV
>> 1H+1H+60Ni => 34S + 28Si + 1.530 MeV
>> 1H+1H+61Ni => 62Zn + n + 3.457 MeV
>> 1H+1H+61Ni => 63Zn + 12.570 MeV
>> 1H+1H+61Ni => 62Cu + 1H + 5.866 MeV
>> 1H+1H+61Ni => 59Ni + 4He + 9.088 MeV
>> 1H+1H+61Ni => 4He + 4He + 55Fe + 2.895 MeV
>> 1H+1H+61Ni => 51Cr + 12C + 1.806 MeV
>> 1H+1H+61Ni => 47Ti + 16O + 0.026 MeV
>> 1H+1H+61Ni => 33S + 30Si + 1.376 MeV
>> 1H+1H+61Ni => 34S + 29Si + 2.184 MeV
>> 1H+1H+61Ni => 35S + 28Si + 0.696 MeV
>> 1H+1H+62Ni => 63Zn + n + 1.974 MeV
>> 1H+1H+62Ni => 64Zn + 13.835 MeV
>> 1H+1H+62Ni => 63Cu + 1H + 6.122 MeV
>> 1H+1H+62Ni => 60Ni + 4He + 9.879 MeV
>> 1H+1H+62Ni => 4He + 4He + 56Fe + 3.495 MeV
>> 1H+1H+62Ni => 52Cr + 12C + 3.249 MeV
>> 1H+1H+62Ni => 48Ti + 16O + 1.057 MeV
>> 1H+1H+62Ni => 34S + 30Si + 2.197 MeV
>> 1H+1H+64Ni => 65Zn + n + 5.319 MeV
>> 1H+1H+64Ni => 66Zn + 16.378 MeV
>> 1H+1H+64Ni => 65Cu + 1H + 7.453 MeV
>> 1H+1H+64Ni => 62Ni + 4He + 11.800 MeV
>> 1H+1H+64Ni => 4He + 4He + 58Fe + 4.690 MeV
>> 1H+1H+64Ni => 54Cr + 12C + 4.411 MeV
>> 1H+1H+64Ni => 50Ti + 16O + 3.642 MeV
>> 1H+1H+64Ni => 34S + 32Si + 1.491 MeV
>> 1H+1H+64Ni => 36S + 30Si + 2.576 MeV
>> 1H+1H+64Ni => 33P + 33P + 0.154 MeV
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Robin van Spaandonk
>>
>> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
>>
>>
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[ChemE Stewart]

Great, and how much of the environment did we just irradiate with high
level gammas?

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:55 PM,  wrote:

> In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:13:37 -0400:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> > The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not
> consistent
> >to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products. These
> >reaction products include copper, cobalt, zinc, iron, calcium, and so on,
> >together with a mix of the first 19 of the lightest elements.
> >
> >Yes, Rossi's info is questionable by Piantelli info is solid.
> >
> >PS: a top of the line presentation.
>
> 1H+1H+58Ni => 60Zn + 8.538 MeV
> 1H+1H+58Ni => 59Cu + 1H + 3.419 MeV
> 1H+1H+58Ni => 56Ni + 4He + 5.829 MeV
> 1H+1H+58Ni => 32S + 28Si + 1.859 MeV
> 1H+1H+60Ni => 62Zn + 11.277 MeV
> 1H+1H+60Ni => 61Cu + 1H + 4.801 MeV
> 1H+1H+60Ni => 58Ni + 4He + 7.909 MeV
> 1H+1H+60Ni => 4He + 4He + 54Fe + 1.417 MeV
> 1H+1H+60Ni => 50Cr + 12C + 0.365 MeV
> 1H+1H+60Ni => 32S + 30Si + 0.555 MeV
> 1H+1H+60Ni => 34S + 28Si + 1.530 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 62Zn + n + 3.457 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 63Zn + 12.570 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 62Cu + 1H + 5.866 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 59Ni + 4He + 9.088 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 4He + 4He + 55Fe + 2.895 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 51Cr + 12C + 1.806 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 47Ti + 16O + 0.026 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 33S + 30Si + 1.376 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 34S + 29Si + 2.184 MeV
> 1H+1H+61Ni => 35S + 28Si + 0.696 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 63Zn + n + 1.974 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 64Zn + 13.835 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 63Cu + 1H + 6.122 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 60Ni + 4He + 9.879 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 4He + 4He + 56Fe + 3.495 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 52Cr + 12C + 3.249 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 48Ti + 16O + 1.057 MeV
> 1H+1H+62Ni => 34S + 30Si + 2.197 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 65Zn + n + 5.319 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 66Zn + 16.378 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 65Cu + 1H + 7.453 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 62Ni + 4He + 11.800 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 4He + 4He + 58Fe + 4.690 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 54Cr + 12C + 4.411 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 50Ti + 16O + 3.642 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 34S + 32Si + 1.491 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 36S + 30Si + 2.576 MeV
> 1H+1H+64Ni => 33P + 33P + 0.154 MeV
>
> Regards,
>
> Robin van Spaandonk
>
> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
>
>

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[mixent]

In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:13:37 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
> The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not consistent
>to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products. These
>reaction products include copper, cobalt, zinc, iron, calcium, and so on,
>together with a mix of the first 19 of the lightest elements.
>
>Yes, Rossi's info is questionable by Piantelli info is solid.
>
>PS: a top of the line presentation.

1H+1H+58Ni => 60Zn + 8.538 MeV
1H+1H+58Ni => 59Cu + 1H + 3.419 MeV
1H+1H+58Ni => 56Ni + 4He + 5.829 MeV
1H+1H+58Ni => 32S + 28Si + 1.859 MeV
1H+1H+60Ni => 62Zn + 11.277 MeV
1H+1H+60Ni => 61Cu + 1H + 4.801 MeV
1H+1H+60Ni => 58Ni + 4He + 7.909 MeV
1H+1H+60Ni => 4He + 4He + 54Fe + 1.417 MeV
1H+1H+60Ni => 50Cr + 12C + 0.365 MeV
1H+1H+60Ni => 32S + 30Si + 0.555 MeV
1H+1H+60Ni => 34S + 28Si + 1.530 MeV
1H+1H+61Ni => 62Zn + n + 3.457 MeV
1H+1H+61Ni => 63Zn + 12.570 MeV
1H+1H+61Ni => 62Cu + 1H + 5.866 MeV
1H+1H+61Ni => 59Ni + 4He + 9.088 MeV
1H+1H+61Ni => 4He + 4He + 55Fe + 2.895 MeV
1H+1H+61Ni => 51Cr + 12C + 1.806 MeV
1H+1H+61Ni => 47Ti + 16O + 0.026 MeV
1H+1H+61Ni => 33S + 30Si + 1.376 MeV
1H+1H+61Ni => 34S + 29Si + 2.184 MeV
1H+1H+61Ni => 35S + 28Si + 0.696 MeV
1H+1H+62Ni => 63Zn + n + 1.974 MeV
1H+1H+62Ni => 64Zn + 13.835 MeV
1H+1H+62Ni => 63Cu + 1H + 6.122 MeV
1H+1H+62Ni => 60Ni + 4He + 9.879 MeV
1H+1H+62Ni => 4He + 4He + 56Fe + 3.495 MeV
1H+1H+62Ni => 52Cr + 12C + 3.249 MeV
1H+1H+62Ni => 48Ti + 16O + 1.057 MeV
1H+1H+62Ni => 34S + 30Si + 2.197 MeV
1H+1H+64Ni => 65Zn + n + 5.319 MeV
1H+1H+64Ni => 66Zn + 16.378 MeV
1H+1H+64Ni => 65Cu + 1H + 7.453 MeV
1H+1H+64Ni => 62Ni + 4He + 11.800 MeV
1H+1H+64Ni => 4He + 4He + 58Fe + 4.690 MeV
1H+1H+64Ni => 54Cr + 12C + 4.411 MeV
1H+1H+64Ni => 50Ti + 16O + 3.642 MeV
1H+1H+64Ni => 34S + 32Si + 1.491 MeV
1H+1H+64Ni => 36S + 30Si + 2.576 MeV
1H+1H+64Ni => 33P + 33P + 0.154 MeV

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Terry Blanton]

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Ruby  wrote:
>
> An alert viewer let me know about the 10^12 is a trillion typo.

Like I said in my private message, what's an order of magnitude error
among friends?

I also edited the DGT post but it won't reappear until the moderators
approve the edit.

T

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Ruby]

An alert viewer let me know about the 10^12 is a trillion typo.

I HAD to upload a fresh vid, couldn't get the tweak right in Youtube

Storms interview UPDATED video link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNodilc6su0

Getting to the youtube, most people will be able to find it.

Woo hoo - the global theatre is ROCKIN.


On 8/23/12 9:40 PM, Ruby wrote:
I have uploaded an interview with Edmund Storms on his new theory of 
what starts the cold fusion reaction.


--
Ruby Carat

r...@coldfusionnow.org 
United States 1-707-616-4894
Skype ruby-carat
www.coldfusionnow.org 

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Jed Rothwell]

Kelley Trezise  wrote:

**
> In what proportions are these transmutations occuring. If they are
> one-hundredthousandth of the amount of fusion of deurium and so contribute
> little in the way of net heat out . . .
>

As far as I know, they contribute far less energy than the deuterium
reactions.


they are just a side reaction but an important one as they provide
> testament of a nuclear reaction.
>

True again. But they may be very important as a clue to how the reaction
works. The question becomes: What sort of principle reaction can give rise
to intermittent transmutations as a side-effect?

That would include transmuting deuterium into tritium, by the way.

- Jed

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[James Bowery]

Perhaps of relevance is the H-Chain modeling described in this paper:

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1110.1746v1.pdf

The homogeneous (i.e., equispaced), linear, and peri-
odic chain of Hydrogen atoms (hereafter, the H-chain) is
commonly believed to be the simplest physical system de-
scribed by the one-band, periodic, one-dimensional (1D)
Hubbard Hamiltonian1 (see Eq. 11). This Hamiltonian
is *exactly solvable*2 and its solution predicts the H-chain
to be always a Mott-Hubbard (i.e., a strongly correlated)
insulator.


Strong electronic correlation in the Hydrogen chain: a variational Monte
Carlo study

Lorenzo Stella, Claudio Attaccalite, Sandro Sorella, Angel Rubio
(Submitted on 8 Oct 2011)

Abstract:

In this article, we report a fully ab initio variational Monte Carlo study
of the linear, and periodic chain of Hydrogen atoms, a prototype system
providing the simplest example of strong electronic correlation in low
dimensions. In particular, we prove that numerical accuracy comparable to
that of benchmark density matrix renormalization group calculations can be
achieved by using a highly correlated Jastrow-antisymmetrized geminal power
variational wave function. Furthermore, by using the so-called "modern
theory of polarization" and by studying the spin-spin and dimer-dimer
correlations functions, we have characterized in details the crossover
between the weakly and strongly correlated regimes of this atomic chain.
Our results show that variational Monte Carlo provides an accurate and
flexible alternative to highly correlated methods of quantum chemistry
which, at variance with these methods, can be also applied to a strongly
correlated solid in low dimensions close to a crossover or a phase
transition.


On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Ruby  wrote:

>
> I have uploaded an interview with Edmund Storms on his new theory of what
> starts the cold fusion reaction.
>
>
> http://coldfusionnow.org/an-explanation-of-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-cold-fusion-by-edmund-storms/
>
> I'll be on the road, in my truck, headed to the Bay area (San Francisco
> California region for you non-left-coasters) for another interview, then up
> to Humboldt County to visit my storage unit (next to Hiro's), camp out in
> the Redwoods and edit lots more video.
>
> As such, I won't be monitoring comments on Cold Fusion Now, and I'm going
> to send any individuals interested in discussing the work here to this
> thread.  Is that illegal on Vortex?
>
> I am having alot of fun making these videos.
> Especially now that I've discovered the Zoom text on iMovie.
>
> Enjoy!
>
>
>  --
> Ruby Carat
>
> r...@coldfusionnow.org
> United States 1-707-616-4894
> Skype ruby-carat
> www.coldfusionnow.org
>

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Harry Veeder]

have dislocations been considered?

http://www.ic.arizona.edu/ic/mse257/class_notes/disclocation.html

http://kasap3.usask.ca/images/photos/dislocation.gif

harry

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Kelley Trezise  wrote:
> In what proportions are these transmutations occuring. If they are
> one-hundredthousandth of the amount of fusion of deurium and so contribute
> little in the way of net heat out they are just a side reaction but an
> important one as they provide testament of a nuclear reaction. The
> transmutation of larger atomic species may be a side reaction.
>
> I think people are being too dismissive of the idea of a nano structure/void
> or topology being important in this process. If the effect can be conjured
> up using materials other than palladium or nickle then what does that
> suggest? What conditions are common to all those various systems? Can the
> phenomena be brought to life in a pure crystal of a substance or does it
> require defects be present? If that is so then it is to some degree a
> surface effect. What is common to all the systems that have produced a LENR
> effect?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Axil Axil
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 11:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions
> (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms
>
> The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not consistent
> to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products. These reaction
> products include copper, cobalt, zinc, iron, calcium, and so on, together
> with a mix of the first 19 of the lightest elements.
>
> Yes, Rossi's info is questionable by Piantelli info is solid.
>
> PS: a top of the line presentation.
>
>
> Cheers:  Axil
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Ruby  wrote:
>>
>>
>> I have uploaded an interview with Edmund Storms on his new theory of what
>> starts the cold fusion reaction.
>>
>>
>> http://coldfusionnow.org/an-explanation-of-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-cold-fusion-by-edmund-storms/
>>
>> I'll be on the road, in my truck, headed to the Bay area (San Francisco
>> California region for you non-left-coasters) for another interview, then up
>> to Humboldt County to visit my storage unit (next to Hiro's), camp out in
>> the Redwoods and edit lots more video.
>>
>> As such, I won't be monitoring comments on Cold Fusion Now, and I'm going
>> to send any individuals interested in discussing the work here to this
>> thread.  Is that illegal on Vortex?
>>
>> I am having alot of fun making these videos.
>> Especially now that I've discovered the Zoom text on iMovie.
>>
>> Enjoy!
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ruby Carat
>>
>> r...@coldfusionnow.org
>> United States 1-707-616-4894
>> Skype ruby-carat
>> www.coldfusionnow.org
>
>

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Kelley Trezise]

In what proportions are these transmutations occuring. If they are 
one-hundredthousandth of the amount of fusion of deurium and so contribute 
little in the way of net heat out they are just a side reaction but an 
important one as they provide testament of a nuclear reaction. The 
transmutation of larger atomic species may be a side reaction. 

I think people are being too dismissive of the idea of a nano structure/void or 
topology being important in this process. If the effect can be conjured up 
using materials other than palladium or nickle then what does that suggest? 
What conditions are common to all those various systems? Can the phenomena be 
brought to life in a pure crystal of a substance or does it require defects be 
present? If that is so then it is to some degree a surface effect. What is 
common to all the systems that have produced a LENR effect?
  - Original Message - 
  From: Axil Axil 
  To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 11:13 PM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold 
Fusion) by Edmund Storms


  The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not consistent to 
what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products. These reaction 
products include copper, cobalt, zinc, iron, calcium, and so on, together with 
a mix of the first 19 of the lightest elements. 

  Yes, Rossi's info is questionable by Piantelli info is solid.

  PS: a top of the line presentation.


  Cheers:  Axil





  On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Ruby  wrote:


I have uploaded an interview with Edmund Storms on his new theory of what 
starts the cold fusion reaction.  


http://coldfusionnow.org/an-explanation-of-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-cold-fusion-by-edmund-storms/

I'll be on the road, in my truck, headed to the Bay area (San Francisco 
California region for you non-left-coasters) for another interview, then up to 
Humboldt County to visit my storage unit (next to Hiro's), camp out in the 
Redwoods and edit lots more video.

As such, I won't be monitoring comments on Cold Fusion Now, and I'm going 
to send any individuals interested in discussing the work here to this thread.  
Is that illegal on Vortex?

I am having alot of fun making these videos.  
Especially now that I've discovered the Zoom text on iMovie.  

Enjoy!



-- 
Ruby Carat

r...@coldfusionnow.org
United States 1-707-616-4894
Skype ruby-carat
www.coldfusionnow.org

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Terry Blanton]

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:23 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint  wrote:

> Well, no, it’s not illegal, but if your send a troll or someone like
> MaryYugo over here, we might have to tickle you until Rossi does a proper
> test to satisfy the Collective!

That could be cruel, unusual, possibly perpetual punishment!

T 

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[ChemE Stewart]

I agree with Frank.

I will only add that a local STRONG QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL FORCE can also
red-shift any energy that escapes its grasp, resulting in weak radiation to
outside observers.  It also has the advantage of creating collective, high
energy blue-shifted radiation near the SOURCE of quantum gravity that can
take down local coulomb barriers of atoms that happen by.

This is number 7 on my list of predictions from revision 12 of my theory.

Stewart
http://wp.me/p26aeb-4



On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:57 AM,  wrote:

> Ed's theory can not explain the lack of radiation.  The ONLY way a nuclear
> reaction can proceed without producing radiation is in the case where the
> range of the strong nuclear force exceeds that of the coulombic.
>
>  Ed start by assuming that the range of the force fields is not a
> conserved property.
>
>  Frank Znidarsic
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ruby 
> To: vortex-l 
> Sent: Fri, Aug 24, 2012 12:40 am
> Subject: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold
> Fusion) by Edmund Storms
>
>
> I have uploaded an interview with Edmund Storms on his new theory of what
> starts the cold fusion reaction.
>
>
> http://coldfusionnow.org/an-explanation-of-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-cold-fusion-by-edmund-storms/
>
> I'll be on the road, in my truck, headed to the Bay area (San Francisco
> California region for you non-left-coasters) for another interview, then up
> to Humboldt County to visit my storage unit (next to Hiro's), camp out in
> the Redwoods and edit lots more video.
>
> As such, I won't be monitoring comments on Cold Fusion Now, and I'm going
> to send any individuals interested in discussing the work here to this
> thread.  Is that illegal on Vortex?
>
> I am having alot of fun making these videos.
> Especially now that I've discovered the Zoom text on iMovie.
>
> Enjoy!
>
>
>  --
> Ruby Carat
>
> r...@coldfusionnow.org
> United States 1-707-616-4894
> Skype ruby-carat
> www.coldfusionnow.org
>

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[fznidarsic]

Ed's theory can not explain the lack of radiation.  The ONLY way a nuclear 
reaction can proceed without producing radiation is in the case where the range 
of the strong nuclear force exceeds that of the coulombic.  


Ed start by assuming that the range of the force fields is not a conserved 
property.


Frank Znidarsic



-Original Message-
From: Ruby 
To: vortex-l 
Sent: Fri, Aug 24, 2012 12:40 am
Subject: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold 
Fusion)  by Edmund Storms


  
  I have uploaded an interview with Edmund Storms on his new theory  of 
what starts the cold fusion reaction.  
  
  
http://coldfusionnow.org/an-explanation-of-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-cold-fusion-by-edmund-storms/
  
  I'll be on the road, in my truck, headed to the Bay area (San  
Francisco California region for you non-left-coasters) for another  
interview, then up to Humboldt County to visit my storage unit  (next to 
Hiro's), camp out in the Redwoods and edit lots more  video.
  
  As such, I won't be monitoring comments on Cold Fusion Now, and  I'm 
going to send any individuals interested in discussing the  work here to 
this thread.  Is that illegal on Vortex?
  
  I am having alot of fun making these videos.  
  Especially now that I've discovered the Zoom text on iMovie.  
  
  Enjoy!
  
  

-- 
  Ruby Carat
  
  r...@coldfusionnow.org
  United States 1-707-616-4894
  Skype ruby-carat
  www.coldfusionnow.org
  
 

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Jojo Jaro]

Oustanding work Ruby.

Does anyone know which paper of Roy Stanley he is referring to.  Sorry, I am 
not very informed about some of the work Ed Storms is referring to.

Jojo

PS:  I will write some opinions about this video in my thread.  I did not want 
to interject my ideas here so as not to pollute this thread.

  - Original Message - 
  From: Ruby 
  To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 12:40 PM
  Subject: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold 
Fusion) by Edmund Storms



  I have uploaded an interview with Edmund Storms on his new theory of what 
starts the cold fusion reaction.  

  
http://coldfusionnow.org/an-explanation-of-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-cold-fusion-by-edmund-storms/

  I'll be on the road, in my truck, headed to the Bay area (San Francisco 
California region for you non-left-coasters) for another interview, then up to 
Humboldt County to visit my storage unit (next to Hiro's), camp out in the 
Redwoods and edit lots more video.

  As such, I won't be monitoring comments on Cold Fusion Now, and I'm going to 
send any individuals interested in discussing the work here to this thread.  Is 
that illegal on Vortex?

  I am having alot of fun making these videos.  
  Especially now that I've discovered the Zoom text on iMovie.  

  Enjoy!



  -- 
  Ruby Carat

  r...@coldfusionnow.org
  United States 1-707-616-4894
  Skype ruby-carat
  www.coldfusionnow.org

RE: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[MarkI-ZeroPoint]

Ruby Carat wrote:

". and I'm going to send any individuals interested in discussing the work
here to this thread.  Is that illegal on Vortex?"



Well, no, it's not illegal, but if your send a troll or someone like
MaryYugo over here, we might have to tickle you until Rossi does a proper
test to satisfy the Collective!  J

 

-Mark Iverson

 

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Peter Gluck]

I will ask them, DGTG analytical studies need much work,
anyway they see transmutation and nucleosynthesis.
Very solid and reliable data, still far from complete interpretation.
Peter

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote:

> is it coherent with DGT claims about isotopic anomalies ?
>
>
> 2012/8/24 Axil Axil 
>
>>  The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not
>> consistent to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products.
>> These reaction products include copper, cobalt, zinc, iron, calcium, and so
>> on, together with a mix of the first 19 of the lightest elements.
>>
>> Yes, Rossi's info is questionable by Piantelli info is solid.
>>
>> PS: a top of the line presentation.
>>
>>
>> Cheers:  Axil
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Ruby  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I have uploaded an interview with Edmund Storms on his new theory of
>>> what starts the cold fusion reaction.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://coldfusionnow.org/an-explanation-of-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-cold-fusion-by-edmund-storms/
>>>
>>> I'll be on the road, in my truck, headed to the Bay area (San Francisco
>>> California region for you non-left-coasters) for another interview, then up
>>> to Humboldt County to visit my storage unit (next to Hiro's), camp out in
>>> the Redwoods and edit lots more video.
>>>
>>> As such, I won't be monitoring comments on Cold Fusion Now, and I'm
>>> going to send any individuals interested in discussing the work here to
>>> this thread.  Is that illegal on Vortex?
>>>
>>> I am having alot of fun making these videos.
>>> Especially now that I've discovered the Zoom text on iMovie.
>>>
>>> Enjoy!
>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> Ruby Carat
>>>
>>> r...@coldfusionnow.org
>>> United States 1-707-616-4894
>>> Skype ruby-carat
>>> www.coldfusionnow.org
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Alain Sepeda]

is it coherent with DGT claims about isotopic anomalies ?

2012/8/24 Axil Axil 

>  The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not
> consistent to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products.
> These reaction products include copper, cobalt, zinc, iron, calcium, and so
> on, together with a mix of the first 19 of the lightest elements.
>
> Yes, Rossi's info is questionable by Piantelli info is solid.
>
> PS: a top of the line presentation.
>
>
> Cheers:  Axil
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Ruby  wrote:
>
>>
>> I have uploaded an interview with Edmund Storms on his new theory of what
>> starts the cold fusion reaction.
>>
>>
>> http://coldfusionnow.org/an-explanation-of-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-cold-fusion-by-edmund-storms/
>>
>> I'll be on the road, in my truck, headed to the Bay area (San Francisco
>> California region for you non-left-coasters) for another interview, then up
>> to Humboldt County to visit my storage unit (next to Hiro's), camp out in
>> the Redwoods and edit lots more video.
>>
>> As such, I won't be monitoring comments on Cold Fusion Now, and I'm going
>> to send any individuals interested in discussing the work here to this
>> thread.  Is that illegal on Vortex?
>>
>> I am having alot of fun making these videos.
>> Especially now that I've discovered the Zoom text on iMovie.
>>
>> Enjoy!
>>
>>
>>  --
>> Ruby Carat
>>
>> r...@coldfusionnow.org
>> United States 1-707-616-4894
>> Skype ruby-carat
>> www.coldfusionnow.org
>>
>
>

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Peter Gluck]

And it is also not consistent with the Defkalion analyses.
It is a complex issue.
Peter

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Axil Axil  wrote:

> The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not consistent
> to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products. These
> reaction products include copper, cobalt, zinc, iron, calcium, and so on,
> together with a mix of the first 19 of the lightest elements.
>
> Yes, Rossi's info is questionable by Piantelli info is solid.
>
> PS: a top of the line presentation.
>
>
> Cheers:  Axil
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Ruby  wrote:
>
>>
>> I have uploaded an interview with Edmund Storms on his new theory of what
>> starts the cold fusion reaction.
>>
>>
>> http://coldfusionnow.org/an-explanation-of-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-cold-fusion-by-edmund-storms/
>>
>> I'll be on the road, in my truck, headed to the Bay area (San Francisco
>> California region for you non-left-coasters) for another interview, then up
>> to Humboldt County to visit my storage unit (next to Hiro's), camp out in
>> the Redwoods and edit lots more video.
>>
>> As such, I won't be monitoring comments on Cold Fusion Now, and I'm going
>> to send any individuals interested in discussing the work here to this
>> thread.  Is that illegal on Vortex?
>>
>> I am having alot of fun making these videos.
>> Especially now that I've discovered the Zoom text on iMovie.
>>
>> Enjoy!
>>
>>
>>  --
>> Ruby Carat
>>
>> r...@coldfusionnow.org
>> United States 1-707-616-4894
>> Skype ruby-carat
>> www.coldfusionnow.org
>>
>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Axil Axil]

 The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not consistent
to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products. These
reaction products include copper, cobalt, zinc, iron, calcium, and so on,
together with a mix of the first 19 of the lightest elements.

Yes, Rossi's info is questionable by Piantelli info is solid.

PS: a top of the line presentation.


Cheers:  Axil




On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Ruby  wrote:

>
> I have uploaded an interview with Edmund Storms on his new theory of what
> starts the cold fusion reaction.
>
>
> http://coldfusionnow.org/an-explanation-of-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-cold-fusion-by-edmund-storms/
>
> I'll be on the road, in my truck, headed to the Bay area (San Francisco
> California region for you non-left-coasters) for another interview, then up
> to Humboldt County to visit my storage unit (next to Hiro's), camp out in
> the Redwoods and edit lots more video.
>
> As such, I won't be monitoring comments on Cold Fusion Now, and I'm going
> to send any individuals interested in discussing the work here to this
> thread.  Is that illegal on Vortex?
>
> I am having alot of fun making these videos.
> Especially now that I've discovered the Zoom text on iMovie.
>
> Enjoy!
>
>
>  --
> Ruby Carat
>
> r...@coldfusionnow.org
> United States 1-707-616-4894
> Skype ruby-carat
> www.coldfusionnow.org
>

[Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms

[Ruby]

I have uploaded an interview with Edmund Storms on his new theory of 
what starts the cold fusion reaction.


http://coldfusionnow.org/an-explanation-of-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-cold-fusion-by-edmund-storms/

I'll be on the road, in my truck, headed to the Bay area (San Francisco 
California region for you non-left-coasters) for another interview, then 
up to Humboldt County to visit my storage unit (next to Hiro's), camp 
out in the Redwoods and edit lots more video.


As such, I won't be monitoring comments on Cold Fusion Now, and I'm 
going to send any individuals interested in discussing the work here to 
this thread.  Is that illegal on Vortex?


I am having alot of fun making these videos.
Especially now that I've discovered the Zoom text on iMovie.

Enjoy!


--
Ruby Carat

r...@coldfusionnow.org 
United States 1-707-616-4894
Skype ruby-carat
www.coldfusionnow.org