RE: [Vo]:Hydrino and Parkhomov seminar January 29

2015-01-16 Thread Jones Beene
Peter,

 

Does this seminar imply that Parkhomov is leaning towards a fractional hydrogen 
(hydrino) explanation for the thermal gain, or is his attendance coincidental ?

 

Jones

 

From: Peter Gluck 

 

Deae Readers 

 

a bit earlier than usual, I wrote

 

:http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/01/a-charismatic-seminar-on-hydrino-and.html

 

Waiting for good news- from you too

 

Peter




 

 



Re: [Vo]:Hydrino and Parkhomov seminar January 29

2015-01-16 Thread Peter Gluck
No, there are two independent presentations and i have no idea
what wil Samsonenko say about hydrinos. His conference is
exkurs in Russian that is a digression. If I get an opportunity
I will ask him before the data of presentation.
As regarding Parkhomov he is dedicated to the experimental aprt
and says the inner mechanism of the reaction is a very difficult task.

As you can see, the Lugano testers are also silent- gossip says they will
publish something next month- but what?

Peter


On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:

 Peter,



 Does this seminar imply that Parkhomov is leaning towards a fractional
 hydrogen (hydrino) explanation for the thermal gain, or is his attendance
 coincidental ?



 Jones



 *From:* Peter Gluck



 Deae Readers



 a bit earlier than usual, I wrote



 :
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/01/a-charismatic-seminar-on-hydrino-and.html



 Waiting for good news- from you too



 Peter









-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


Re: [Vo]:Hydrino and Parkhomov seminar January 29

2015-01-16 Thread Lennart Thornros
Hello Peter ,
Always good to see your blog.
I especially think the article about the patent situation is right. I would
even go further and say that 'patents are seldom worth the paper they are
written on and certainly not worth all the costs involved'.
A good idea is not possible to steal as it contains more than can be in
writing and therefore it has its own protection. However, just the
technical idea has very little value. The whole idea incl. of organization,
business plan, team etc needs to be present.


Best Regards ,
Lennart Thornros

www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com
lenn...@thornros.com
+1 916 436 1899
202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648

“Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment
to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:

 No, there are two independent presentations and i have no idea
 what wil Samsonenko say about hydrinos. His conference is
 exkurs in Russian that is a digression. If I get an opportunity
 I will ask him before the data of presentation.
 As regarding Parkhomov he is dedicated to the experimental aprt
 and says the inner mechanism of the reaction is a very difficult task.

 As you can see, the Lugano testers are also silent- gossip says they will
 publish something next month- but what?

 Peter


 On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:

 Peter,



 Does this seminar imply that Parkhomov is leaning towards a fractional
 hydrogen (hydrino) explanation for the thermal gain, or is his attendance
 coincidental ?



 Jones



 *From:* Peter Gluck



 Deae Readers



 a bit earlier than usual, I wrote



 :
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/01/a-charismatic-seminar-on-hydrino-and.html



 Waiting for good news- from you too



 Peter









 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com