Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

2023-08-03 Thread Terry Blanton
Leave it to a Brit to take the fun out of everything.

Burned any 5G towers lately?

On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 5:45 PM Frogfall  wrote:

> > And then there's bug chitin:
> >
> > http://www.rexresearch.com/grebenn/grebenn.htm
>
> In the UK they have developed a way to synthesise this.
> It is now widely used as a moulding compound.
> https://img.milli.az/2020/04/09/840379_01.jpg
>
>


Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

2023-08-03 Thread Frogfall
> And then there's bug chitin:
> 
> http://www.rexresearch.com/grebenn/grebenn.htm

In the UK they have developed a way to synthesise this.
It is now widely used as a moulding compound.
https://img.milli.az/2020/04/09/840379_01.jpg



Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

2023-08-03 Thread Jonathan Berry
One design of Grebenikov's echo's a discovery I have made.

The "Paper comb" which is paper folded into a zig-zag pattern, well I have
found that the general type of phenomena which Grebenikov, Kozyrev, and in
truth most everything with extraordinary claims is based on which is
something in the background of space that we might term an aether whatever
it is composed of (dark matter, cold neutrinos, virtual particles, etc) is
affected by such a shape most powerfully when the bends are 90 degrees as
this forms and functions as a Retro-reflector.

If you have something above such a retroreflector, due to the energy being
bounced back to it, it becomes rather highly excited!

Interestingly dynamics in this "Aether" can also repeat and so a Pyramid
with angled sides /\/\/\/\/\ could potentially form an array and thereby
also create a retro-reflector shape.

I believe that this type of form can assist something like an
anti-gravity craft based on this type of technology of affecting the
medium/s of space, aka a UFO.

So yes, Pyramids can IMO help UFO's fly!

If you wonder if you might be able to feel this type of energetic phenomena
try these images, both relate.

https://ibb.co/yqh851j

https://ibb.co/cLBLPBP



On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 at 13:37, Terry Blanton  wrote:

> And then there's bug chitin:
>
> http://www.rexresearch.com/grebenn/grebenn.htm
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 6:37 PM Frogfall  wrote:
>
>> Have a look at this report:
>>
>> NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program
>> https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19980201240
>> Published 1998
>>
>> This stuff was all quite open at the time.
>>
>> In the UK, British Aerospace was also funding antigravity studies, in the
>> shape of "Project Greenglow" - which was mainly Dr Ron Evans, who was based
>> at their Warton aircraft plant, in Lancashire.  At around that time I went
>> along to a talk Ron gave, organised by the Royal Aeronautical Society, at
>> Warton.  He described various aspects of his own project, as well as the
>> Evgeny Podkletnov work, and the NASA program.
>>
>> This was all activity that you could imagine would be described as "top
>> secret", if it cropped up in some fiction novel. However, the researchers
>> seemed to be approaching it as a totally non-classified and open area of
>> study.  For Ron Evans, it was just the continuation of a hobby interest,
>> prior to retirement.  And, as far as I can remember, the actual budgets
>> were tiny.
>>
>>


Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

2023-08-03 Thread Nicholas Palmer
Anybody try any of the experiments? I played with cardboard pyramids in the
late 60s and my controlled experiments did not sweeten sugar solution,
sharpen razor blades, retard decomposition or more speedily germinate
seed...

On Thu, 3 Aug 2023, 02:37 Terry Blanton,  wrote:

> And then there's bug chitin:
>
> http://www.rexresearch.com/grebenn/grebenn.htm
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 6:37 PM Frogfall  wrote:
>
>> Have a look at this report:
>>
>> NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program
>> https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19980201240
>> Published 1998
>>
>> This stuff was all quite open at the time.
>>
>> In the UK, British Aerospace was also funding antigravity studies, in the
>> shape of "Project Greenglow" - which was mainly Dr Ron Evans, who was based
>> at their Warton aircraft plant, in Lancashire.  At around that time I went
>> along to a talk Ron gave, organised by the Royal Aeronautical Society, at
>> Warton.  He described various aspects of his own project, as well as the
>> Evgeny Podkletnov work, and the NASA program.
>>
>> This was all activity that you could imagine would be described as "top
>> secret", if it cropped up in some fiction novel. However, the researchers
>> seemed to be approaching it as a totally non-classified and open area of
>> study.  For Ron Evans, it was just the continuation of a hobby interest,
>> prior to retirement.  And, as far as I can remember, the actual budgets
>> were tiny.
>>
>>


Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

2023-08-02 Thread Terry Blanton
And then there's bug chitin:

http://www.rexresearch.com/grebenn/grebenn.htm

On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 6:37 PM Frogfall  wrote:

> Have a look at this report:
>
> NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program
> https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19980201240
> Published 1998
>
> This stuff was all quite open at the time.
>
> In the UK, British Aerospace was also funding antigravity studies, in the
> shape of "Project Greenglow" - which was mainly Dr Ron Evans, who was based
> at their Warton aircraft plant, in Lancashire.  At around that time I went
> along to a talk Ron gave, organised by the Royal Aeronautical Society, at
> Warton.  He described various aspects of his own project, as well as the
> Evgeny Podkletnov work, and the NASA program.
>
> This was all activity that you could imagine would be described as "top
> secret", if it cropped up in some fiction novel. However, the researchers
> seemed to be approaching it as a totally non-classified and open area of
> study.  For Ron Evans, it was just the continuation of a hobby interest,
> prior to retirement.  And, as far as I can remember, the actual budgets
> were tiny.
>
>


Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

2023-08-02 Thread Frogfall
Have a look at this report:

NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19980201240
Published 1998

This stuff was all quite open at the time.

In the UK, British Aerospace was also funding antigravity studies, in the shape 
of "Project Greenglow" - which was mainly Dr Ron Evans, who was based at their 
Warton aircraft plant, in Lancashire.  At around that time I went along to a 
talk Ron gave, organised by the Royal Aeronautical Society, at Warton.  He 
described various aspects of his own project, as well as the Evgeny Podkletnov 
work, and the NASA program.

This was all activity that you could imagine would be described as "top 
secret", if it cropped up in some fiction novel. However, the researchers 
seemed to be approaching it as a totally non-classified and open area of study. 
 For Ron Evans, it was just the continuation of a hobby interest, prior to 
retirement.  And, as far as I can remember, the actual budgets were tiny.



Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

2023-08-02 Thread ROGER ANDERTON


also means that "they" have been lying about the theoretical physics - 
namely Einstein has a lot of things wrong (such as Equivalence 
Principle) but "they" haven't been allowing those things to be 
corrected.


-- Original Message --
From: "Terry Blanton" 
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, 2 Aug, 23 At 14:33
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

If there's any truth to the testimony before Congress, we already have 
the tech.


On Wed, Aug 2, 2023, 5:56 AM ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote:



<CY LO, DAVID P. CHAN & RICHARD C. Y. HUI - Oversights of Einstein & 
Maxwell andInvalidity of E = mc^2 8 August Vigier Conference 2018 
see paper:  The Temperature Dependence of Gravitation for the Metallic 
Balls - Measured with a Torsion Balance Scale The Global Journal of 
Science Frontier Research Vol 17 Issue 4


https://studio.youtube.com/video/oPw3xK-9tVQ/edit 
<https://studio.youtube.com/video/oPw3xK-9tVQ/edit>







-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell" <mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com> >

To: vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 2 Aug, 23 At 02:01
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

That is very interesting! And sad. I wonder how much truth there is to 
reports of antigravity? Perhaps we will never know . . .








Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

2023-08-02 Thread Terry Blanton
If there's any truth to the testimony before Congress, we already have the
tech.

On Wed, Aug 2, 2023, 5:56 AM ROGER ANDERTON 
wrote:

> <
>
> I got antigravity because Einstein wrong about Equivalence Principle.
>
>
> see video
>
>
> CY LO, DAVID P. CHAN & RICHARD C. Y. HUI - Oversights of Einstein &
> Maxwell and Invalidity of E = mc^2 8 August Vigier Conference 2018 see
> paper: The Temperature Dependence of Gravitation for the Metallic Balls -
> Measured with a Torsion Balance Scale The Global Journal of Science
> Frontier Research Vol 17 Issue 4
>
>
> https://studio.youtube.com/video/oPw3xK-9tVQ/edit
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Jed Rothwell" 
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Wednesday, 2 Aug, 23 At 02:01
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li
>
> That is very interesting! And sad. I wonder how much truth there is to
> reports of antigravity? Perhaps we will never know . . .
>
>


Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

2023-08-02 Thread ROGER ANDERTON


<CY LO, DAVID P. CHAN & RICHARD C. Y. HUI - Oversights of Einstein & 
Maxwell andInvalidity of E = mc^28 August Vigier Conference 2018see 
paper: The Temperature Dependence of Gravitation for the Metallic Balls 
- Measured with a Torsion Balance ScaleThe Global Journal of Science 
Frontier Research Vol 17 Issue 4


https://studio.youtube.com/video/oPw3xK-9tVQ/edit






-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell" 
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, 2 Aug, 23 At 02:01
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

That is very interesting! And sad. I wonder how much truth there is to 
reports of antigravity? Perhaps we will never know . . .






Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li

2023-08-01 Thread Jed Rothwell
That is very interesting! And sad. I wonder how much truth there is to
reports of antigravity? Perhaps we will never know . . .