Re: [webkit-dev] WinLauncher Fail to launch
Hi , ChatKo, I commented that part as well, and following code fails and i get CFNetwork.dll not found error(as message box) HMODULE module = ::LoadLibraryW(exePath); if (!module) return fatalError(programName, L::LoadLibraryW failed.); Brent, I am not sure that if wincairo means winwebkit and its build using following way Tools/Scripts/build-webkit --debug/release? And , I am using Latest Code , I do Tools/Scripts/update-webkit before i start building. regards rsadhu Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 13:50:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] WinLauncher Fail to launch From: cha...@gmail.com To: bfulg...@gmail.com CC: rakeshsa...@hotmail.com; webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org Depending on how long ago he pulled (i think this was fixed in later revisions), you may need to do the following: In /Tools/win/DllLaunchermain.cpp Comment out: //if (!modifyPath(programName)) // return 1; To not check for apple products. On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Brent Fulgham bfulg...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rakesh, If you build the WinCairo port, you don't need iTunes or Safari to be installed. -Brent Sent from my iPhone On Nov 23, 2012, at 12:49 AM, Rakesh Sadhu rakeshsa...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi All,My Webkit Launches now .I needed Safari and ITunes to be installed .I'd like to request Webkit.org that please add these requirements as well. My Winlauncher/Minibrowser launch was failing and after debugging i noticed it fails in reading registry and couldn't find certain packages ,and was getting CFNetwork.dll missing error as well. And After googling i noticed it comes along with Itunes.thanks From: rakeshsa...@hotmail.com To: bfulg...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:49:12 +0530 CC: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] WinLauncher Fail to launch Hi, I tried using WinWinlauncher as well , i get the same error http://pastebin.com/jMikyxWb Am I missing some packages? regards rsadhu CC: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org From: bfulg...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] WinLauncher Fail to launch Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:55:54 -0800 To: rakeshsa...@hotmail.com Hi Rakesh, The WinCairo port only has a partially functional WebKit2 port. Consequently, MiniBrowser does not launch. You must run the WinLauncherLauncher target to see a working program. The WinLauncher project builds a DLL that holds the a trial program logic, but does not run as an executable. This came about during the start if the WebKit2 work (WK2 runs as an external process to the main program executable, hence the new *LauncherLauncher projects.) -Brent Sent from my iPhone On Nov 20, 2012, at 7:45 PM, Rakesh Sadhu rakeshsa...@hotmail.com wrote: Dear All, I've build webkit@135274 on windows Xp using Visual Studio 2005 in debug as well release mode . When I try to launch WinLauncher , MiniBrowser they fail to launch. I tried to launch using VS2005 also , and i get following console Messages.: http://pastebin.com/mkzT0k5g Kindly do provide some pointers . regards rsadhu ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] WinLauncher Fail to launch
Rakesh, for win cairo the command is: Tools/Scripts/build-webkit --wincairo A nice guide using new compilers is here: http://blog.ashodnakashian.com/2012/01/building-webkit-on-windows-7-with-vs2010/ (there is also a VS2008 and VS2012 post) Chris On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Rakesh Sadhu rakeshsa...@hotmail.comwrote: Hi , ChatKo, I commented that part as well, and following code fails and i get CFNetwork.dll not found error(as message box) HMODULE module = ::LoadLibraryW(exePath); if (!module) return fatalError(programName, L::LoadLibraryW failed.); Brent, I am not sure that if wincairo means winwebkit and its build using following way Tools/Scripts/build-webkit --debug/release? And , I am using Latest Code , I do Tools/Scripts/update-webkit before i start building. regards rsadhu -- Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 13:50:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] WinLauncher Fail to launch From: cha...@gmail.com To: bfulg...@gmail.com CC: rakeshsa...@hotmail.com; webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org Depending on how long ago he pulled (i think this was fixed in later revisions), you may need to do the following: In /Tools/win/DllLaunchermain.cpp Comment out: //if (!modifyPath(programName)) // return 1; To not check for apple products. On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Brent Fulgham bfulg...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Rakesh, If you build the WinCairo port, you don't need iTunes or Safari to be installed. -Brent Sent from my iPhone On Nov 23, 2012, at 12:49 AM, Rakesh Sadhu rakeshsa...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi All, My Webkit Launches now . I needed Safari and ITunes to be installed . I'd like to request Webkit.org that please add these requirements as well. My Winlauncher/Minibrowser launch was failing and after debugging i noticed it fails in reading registry and couldn't find certain packages , and was getting CFNetwork.dll missing error as well. And After googling i noticed it comes along with Itunes. thanks -- From: rakeshsa...@hotmail.com To: bfulg...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:49:12 +0530 CC: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] WinLauncher Fail to launch Hi, I tried using WinWinlauncher as well , i get the same error http://pastebin.com/jMikyxWb Am I missing some packages? regards rsadhu -- CC: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org From: bfulg...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] WinLauncher Fail to launch Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:55:54 -0800 To: rakeshsa...@hotmail.com Hi Rakesh, The WinCairo port only has a partially functional WebKit2 port. Consequently, MiniBrowser does not launch. You must run the WinLauncherLauncher target to see a working program. The WinLauncher project builds a DLL that holds the a trial program logic, but does not run as an executable. This came about during the start if the WebKit2 work (WK2 runs as an external process to the main program executable, hence the new *LauncherLauncher projects.) -Brent Sent from my iPhone On Nov 20, 2012, at 7:45 PM, Rakesh Sadhu rakeshsa...@hotmail.com wrote: Dear All, I've build webkit@135274 on windows Xp using Visual Studio 2005 in debug as well release mode . When I try to launch WinLauncher , MiniBrowser they fail to launch. I tried to launch using VS2005 also , and i get following console Messages.: http://pastebin.com/mkzT0k5g Kindly do provide some pointers . regards rsadhu ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
[webkit-dev] Github vs. git.webkit.org
Hi, It looks like that the github mirror and git.webkit.org still has different SHA ids for commits. Is this final, or is the plan still to switch to the git.webkit.org SHA ids? For our MIPS staging repository we created a new mirror on github from git.webkit.org, and now we were asked by the github admins to reduce the repository to less than 1GB. I assume that if we would fork from the github.com/WebKit/webkit repository, then it would be fine with the github admins. However, if it is still the plan to switch to the git.webkit.org SHA ids in the github mirror as well, then we would like to avoid the extra work of rebasing our work to the github mirror commits, and then rebasing it back when the transition is made. We have to decide in the next couple days, because github will disable access to our repository again, so any status update on this transition plan would be helpful. Alternatively, if you have any experience with the github admins in how to ask for more space for webkit repositories, any advice would be very appreciated. Best Regards, Gergely Kis ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Github vs. git.webkit.org
This has come up in the past. I believe the current recommended path is to use the github.com SHAs and just live in a github-only world. https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2012-March/020002.html has some discussion. https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/UsingGitHub I am not aware of any plan to change the SHAs in the github mirror or git.webkit.org (which is unfortunate, but the current reality). -eric On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Gergely Kis gerg...@homejinni.com wrote: Hi, It looks like that the github mirror and git.webkit.org still has different SHA ids for commits. Is this final, or is the plan still to switch to the git.webkit.org SHA ids? For our MIPS staging repository we created a new mirror on github from git.webkit.org, and now we were asked by the github admins to reduce the repository to less than 1GB. I assume that if we would fork from the github.com/WebKit/webkit repository, then it would be fine with the github admins. However, if it is still the plan to switch to the git.webkit.org SHA ids in the github mirror as well, then we would like to avoid the extra work of rebasing our work to the github mirror commits, and then rebasing it back when the transition is made. We have to decide in the next couple days, because github will disable access to our repository again, so any status update on this transition plan would be helpful. Alternatively, if you have any experience with the github admins in how to ask for more space for webkit repositories, any advice would be very appreciated. Best Regards, Gergely Kis ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Github vs. git.webkit.org
Yes, I remember that thread now, and you're correct: https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2012-April/020494.html One answer is to take your mirror and make it the main mirror on GitHub instead of Tor's. On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Gergely Kis gerg...@homejinni.com wrote: Hi, Yes, I saw that thread, but I got confused by this other thread: https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2012-April/020339.html Here most of the participants seemed to agree that moving the 2 repositories to use the same SHA ids is the best course of action. In any case, if the github repo is the way to go now, then we will do the transition... Thanks, Gergely On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote: This has come up in the past. I believe the current recommended path is to use the github.com SHAs and just live in a github-only world. https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2012-March/020002.html has some discussion. https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/UsingGitHub I am not aware of any plan to change the SHAs in the github mirror or git.webkit.org (which is unfortunate, but the current reality). -eric On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Gergely Kis gerg...@homejinni.com wrote: Hi, It looks like that the github mirror and git.webkit.org still has different SHA ids for commits. Is this final, or is the plan still to switch to the git.webkit.org SHA ids? For our MIPS staging repository we created a new mirror on github from git.webkit.org, and now we were asked by the github admins to reduce the repository to less than 1GB. I assume that if we would fork from the github.com/WebKit/webkit repository, then it would be fine with the github admins. However, if it is still the plan to switch to the git.webkit.org SHA ids in the github mirror as well, then we would like to avoid the extra work of rebasing our work to the github mirror commits, and then rebasing it back when the transition is made. We have to decide in the next couple days, because github will disable access to our repository again, so any status update on this transition plan would be helpful. Alternatively, if you have any experience with the github admins in how to ask for more space for webkit repositories, any advice would be very appreciated. Best Regards, Gergely Kis ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Github vs. git.webkit.org
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Gergely Kis gerg...@homejinni.com wrote: Yes, I saw that thread, but I got confused by this other thread: https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2012-April/020339.html Here most of the participants seemed to agree that moving the 2 repositories to use the same SHA ids is the best course of action. Unfortunately, the folks who maintain the mirror don't appear to agree. Given that they've been gracious enough to let us use their mirror, it's hard for us to ask them to change how they run it. In any case, if the github repo is the way to go now, then we will do the transition... That's likely the path of least resistance. Adam On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote: This has come up in the past. I believe the current recommended path is to use the github.com SHAs and just live in a github-only world. https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2012-March/020002.html has some discussion. https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/UsingGitHub I am not aware of any plan to change the SHAs in the github mirror or git.webkit.org (which is unfortunate, but the current reality). -eric On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Gergely Kis gerg...@homejinni.com wrote: Hi, It looks like that the github mirror and git.webkit.org still has different SHA ids for commits. Is this final, or is the plan still to switch to the git.webkit.org SHA ids? For our MIPS staging repository we created a new mirror on github from git.webkit.org, and now we were asked by the github admins to reduce the repository to less than 1GB. I assume that if we would fork from the github.com/WebKit/webkit repository, then it would be fine with the github admins. However, if it is still the plan to switch to the git.webkit.org SHA ids in the github mirror as well, then we would like to avoid the extra work of rebasing our work to the github mirror commits, and then rebasing it back when the transition is made. We have to decide in the next couple days, because github will disable access to our repository again, so any status update on this transition plan would be helpful. Alternatively, if you have any experience with the github admins in how to ask for more space for webkit repositories, any advice would be very appreciated. Best Regards, Gergely Kis ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
