Re: [webkit-dev] Tagging bug names with a platform name: limit to platform-specific patches

2010-01-22 Thread Anton Muhin
Thanks a lot, Maciej.

yours,
anton.

On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:

 On Jan 21, 2010, at 3:37 AM, Anton Muhin wrote:

 On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:

 On Jan 20, 2010, at 8:18 AM, Darin Adler wrote:

 Hi folks.

 We’ve never formalized this, but I believe that patches tagged with a 
 particular platform name such as

     [Qt] Add new API for fluffy bunnies

 should be limited to one particular platform’s code. If the patch changes 
 more than a trivial bit of platform-independent code, even if the change 
 is only for the benefit of a signle platform, I suggest we not use the 
 platform name prefix.

 Makes sense to me. I would also like to suggest that people should *not* 
 use the bracket convention for things besides platform, like [dom] or 
 [style-queue]. Some people (e.g. me) use queries to split bracket-prefix 
 patches into a separate list, and it's better not to hide general-purpose 
 patches.

 Sorry for using those, tried to be a good citizen :)

 Should be tags like dom, v8 omitted completely or is there some other
 way to communicate the system?

 Tagging with [v8] is fine since that's essentially a port-specific component 
 that many reviewers are not knowledgable about. But [dom] is not necessary. 
 If you wan to indicate the component, you can use the component field in the 
 bug. Or just mention the DOM in the bug title. It's not super important 
 either way.

 Regards,
 Maciej


___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev


Re: [webkit-dev] Tagging bug names with a platform name: limit to platform-specific patches

2010-01-21 Thread Tor Arne Vestbø

Darin Adler wrote:

Hi folks.

We’ve never formalized this, but I believe that patches tagged with a
particular platform name such as

[Qt] Add new API for fluffy bunnies

should be limited to one particular platform’s code. If the patch
changes more than a trivial bit of platform-independent code, even if
the change is only for the benefit of a signle platform, I suggest we
not use the platform name prefix.


Agreed. Note also that we have keywords for both Qt and Gtk, so if a 
patch deals largely with platform-independent code, but has consequences 
for either of these ports, for example new API requirements or DRT 
hooks, please add the keyword to it pops up in filters.


tor arne

___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev


Re: [webkit-dev] Tagging bug names with a platform name: limit to platform-specific patches

2010-01-21 Thread Anton Muhin
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:

 On Jan 20, 2010, at 8:18 AM, Darin Adler wrote:

 Hi folks.

 We’ve never formalized this, but I believe that patches tagged with a 
 particular platform name such as

     [Qt] Add new API for fluffy bunnies

 should be limited to one particular platform’s code. If the patch changes 
 more than a trivial bit of platform-independent code, even if the change is 
 only for the benefit of a signle platform, I suggest we not use the platform 
 name prefix.

 Makes sense to me. I would also like to suggest that people should *not* use 
 the bracket convention for things besides platform, like [dom] or 
 [style-queue]. Some people (e.g. me) use queries to split bracket-prefix 
 patches into a separate list, and it's better not to hide general-purpose 
 patches.

Sorry for using those, tried to be a good citizen :)

Should be tags like dom, v8 omitted completely or is there some other
way to communicate the system?

yours,
anton.
 ___
 webkit-dev mailing list
 webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
 http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev


Re: [webkit-dev] Tagging bug names with a platform name: limit to platform-specific patches

2010-01-21 Thread Chang.Shu
Just want to add my two cents.
Based on my own experience, I think a patch that targets to fix a 
platform-specific problem but ends up making changes in platform-independent 
code, often means either the fix is problematic or a new bug/test case needs to 
be created for the independent part only.

Chang

-Original Message-
From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org 
[mailto:webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org] On Behalf Of ext Darin Adler
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:19 AM
To: WebKit Development
Subject: [webkit-dev] Tagging bug names with a platform name: limit to 
platform-specific patches

Hi folks.

We've never formalized this, but I believe that patches tagged with a 
particular platform name such as

 [Qt] Add new API for fluffy bunnies

should be limited to one particular platform's code. If the patch changes more 
than a trivial bit of platform-independent code, even if the change is only for 
the benefit of a signle platform, I suggest we not use the platform name prefix.

-- Darin

___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev


Re: [webkit-dev] Tagging bug names with a platform name: limit to platform-specific patches

2010-01-21 Thread Maciej Stachowiak

On Jan 21, 2010, at 3:37 AM, Anton Muhin wrote:

 On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
 
 On Jan 20, 2010, at 8:18 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
 
 Hi folks.
 
 We’ve never formalized this, but I believe that patches tagged with a 
 particular platform name such as
 
 [Qt] Add new API for fluffy bunnies
 
 should be limited to one particular platform’s code. If the patch changes 
 more than a trivial bit of platform-independent code, even if the change is 
 only for the benefit of a signle platform, I suggest we not use the 
 platform name prefix.
 
 Makes sense to me. I would also like to suggest that people should *not* use 
 the bracket convention for things besides platform, like [dom] or 
 [style-queue]. Some people (e.g. me) use queries to split bracket-prefix 
 patches into a separate list, and it's better not to hide general-purpose 
 patches.
 
 Sorry for using those, tried to be a good citizen :)
 
 Should be tags like dom, v8 omitted completely or is there some other
 way to communicate the system?

Tagging with [v8] is fine since that's essentially a port-specific component 
that many reviewers are not knowledgable about. But [dom] is not necessary. If 
you wan to indicate the component, you can use the component field in the bug. 
Or just mention the DOM in the bug title. It's not super important either way.

Regards,
Maciej

___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev


Re: [webkit-dev] Tagging bug names with a platform name: limit to platform-specific patches

2010-01-20 Thread Kenneth Christiansen
Sounds like a good idea, I'm all for it.

Kenneth

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:

 Hi folks.

 We’ve never formalized this, but I believe that patches tagged with a
 particular platform name such as

 [Qt] Add new API for fluffy bunnies

 should be limited to one particular platform’s code. If the patch changes
 more than a trivial bit of platform-independent code, even if the change is
 only for the benefit of a signle platform, I suggest we not use the platform
 name prefix.

-- Darin

 ___
 webkit-dev mailing list
 webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
 http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev




-- 
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Technical Lead / Senior Software Engineer
Qt Labs Americas, Nokia Technology Institute, INdT
Phone  +55 81 8895 6002 / E-mail kenneth.christiansen at openbossa.org
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev


Re: [webkit-dev] Tagging bug names with a platform name: limit to platform-specific patches

2010-01-20 Thread Maciej Stachowiak

On Jan 20, 2010, at 8:18 AM, Darin Adler wrote:

 Hi folks.
 
 We’ve never formalized this, but I believe that patches tagged with a 
 particular platform name such as
 
 [Qt] Add new API for fluffy bunnies
 
 should be limited to one particular platform’s code. If the patch changes 
 more than a trivial bit of platform-independent code, even if the change is 
 only for the benefit of a signle platform, I suggest we not use the platform 
 name prefix.

Makes sense to me. I would also like to suggest that people should *not* use 
the bracket convention for things besides platform, like [dom] or 
[style-queue]. Some people (e.g. me) use queries to split bracket-prefix 
patches into a separate list, and it's better not to hide general-purpose 
patches.

Regards,
Maciej

___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev