Re: [Wicket-user] HTML ids in 2.0-SNAPHOT are being generated even when hardcoded

2006-12-11 Thread Erik van Oosten
Hi Igor,

I also have a few hardcoded ids in my current Wicket 1.2 application.

Regards,
 Erik.


Igor Vaynberg schreef:
> yeah i changed it, didnt think anyone was using this particular facet.
>
> im not sure if we should put it back. the problem is sometimes you can 
> paint yourself into a nasty corner. if you have a component that uses 
> a hardcoded id, and later the user of that component uses it twice in 
> a page, or puts it into a repeater you will have duplicate ids in html 
> which is not legal, and whats worse is it will break ajax/js/css but 
> it will be very hard to track down.
>
> thoughts?
>
> -igor
>

-- 
Erik van Oosten
http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] HTML ids in 2.0-SNAPHOT are being generated even when hardcoded

2006-12-11 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Imo, quite strongly this time, if it is explicitly set, it should be
honored. As for the dangers of having conflicting ids, we could
introduce another debug utility that checks on duplicate ids when (or
after) rendering.

Eelco


On 12/11/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yeah i changed it, didnt think anyone was using this particular facet.
>
> im not sure if we should put it back. the problem is sometimes you can paint
> yourself into a nasty corner. if you have a component that uses a hardcoded
> id, and later the user of that component uses it twice in a page, or puts it
> into a repeater you will have duplicate ids in html which is not legal, and
> whats worse is it will break ajax/js/css but it will be very hard to track
> down.
>
> thoughts?
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 12/11/06, Caleb Land <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've been using 2.0-SNAPSHOT for a while now and I noticed a behavior
> > recently that is new.  If I have an HTML id defined in my markup:
> >
> > 
> >   
> > 
> >
> > When the panel is rendered the HTML id attribute is replaced with
> > something that is generated by Wicket like "labels40".
> >
> > I looked through the svn changelog for MarkupContainer and noticed
> > that the getMarkupId() method has been changed, and the javadoc for
> > that method that said:
> >
> > "If the id attribute is present in the markup attributes of this component
> > it will be used, otherwise the page-relative path of this component will
> > be used."
> >
> > has been deleted...
> >
> > Should I be able to hard code HTML ids in the future or was that
> > "feature" removed?  I used hard coded HTML ids in my Page markup files
> > I sometimes use HTML ids to reference elements from CSS and javascript
> > and I had to use a class instead because of these generated Ids.
> >
> > --
> > Caleb Land
> > ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> >
> >
> -
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> >
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > ___
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>
>

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] HTML ids in 2.0-SNAPHOT are being generated even when hardcoded

2006-12-11 Thread Igor Vaynberg

yeah i changed it, didnt think anyone was using this particular facet.

im not sure if we should put it back. the problem is sometimes you can paint
yourself into a nasty corner. if you have a component that uses a hardcoded
id, and later the user of that component uses it twice in a page, or puts it
into a repeater you will have duplicate ids in html which is not legal, and
whats worse is it will break ajax/js/css but it will be very hard to track
down.

thoughts?

-igor

On 12/11/06, Caleb Land <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


I've been using 2.0-SNAPSHOT for a while now and I noticed a behavior
recently that is new.  If I have an HTML id defined in my markup:


  


When the panel is rendered the HTML id attribute is replaced with
something that is generated by Wicket like "labels40".

I looked through the svn changelog for MarkupContainer and noticed
that the getMarkupId() method has been changed, and the javadoc for
that method that said:

"If the id attribute is present in the markup attributes of this component
it will be used, otherwise the page-relative path of this component will
be used."

has been deleted...

Should I be able to hard code HTML ids in the future or was that
"feature" removed?  I used hard coded HTML ids in my Page markup files
I sometimes use HTML ids to reference elements from CSS and javascript
and I had to use a class instead because of these generated Ids.

--
Caleb Land
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


[Wicket-user] HTML ids in 2.0-SNAPHOT are being generated even when hardcoded

2006-12-11 Thread Caleb Land
I've been using 2.0-SNAPSHOT for a while now and I noticed a behavior
recently that is new.  If I have an HTML id defined in my markup:


  


When the panel is rendered the HTML id attribute is replaced with
something that is generated by Wicket like "labels40".

I looked through the svn changelog for MarkupContainer and noticed
that the getMarkupId() method has been changed, and the javadoc for
that method that said:

"If the id attribute is present in the markup attributes of this component
it will be used, otherwise the page-relative path of this component will
be used."

has been deleted...

Should I be able to hard code HTML ids in the future or was that
"feature" removed?  I used hard coded HTML ids in my Page markup files
I sometimes use HTML ids to reference elements from CSS and javascript
and I had to use a class instead because of these generated Ids.

-- 
Caleb Land
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Can I set wicket to process path for wicket:include file?

2006-12-11 Thread Carfield Yim
It is img inside the HTML what I use Include. What rfe do you mean?

On 12/12/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yes, only img and script/link tags are supported afaik. you need to add an
> rfe for other tags/attributes
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 12/11/06, Carfield Yim < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 12/12/06, Igor Vaynberg < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > wicket should be making or relative paths absolute if they are defined
> in
> > > markup, eg you are not using an attribute modifier to set the path.
> > >
> > Look like not if I use
> >
> http://wicket.sourceforge.net/apidocs/wicket/markup/html/include/Include.html
> > , it just leave it as what it is
> >
> >
> -
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> >
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > ___
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>
>

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Can I set wicket to process path for wicket:include file?

2006-12-11 Thread Igor Vaynberg

yes, only img and script/link tags are supported afaik. you need to add an
rfe for other tags/attributes

-igor


On 12/11/06, Carfield Yim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On 12/12/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> wicket should be making or relative paths absolute if they are defined
in
> markup, eg you are not using an attribute modifier to set the path.
>
Look like not if I use

http://wicket.sourceforge.net/apidocs/wicket/markup/html/include/Include.html
, it just leave it as what it is

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Can I set wicket to process path for wicket:include file?

2006-12-11 Thread Carfield Yim
On 12/12/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> wicket should be making or relative paths absolute if they are defined in
> markup, eg you are not using an attribute modifier to set the path.
>
Look like not if I use
http://wicket.sourceforge.net/apidocs/wicket/markup/html/include/Include.html
, it just leave it as what it is

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


[Wicket-user] 商业合作!

2006-12-11 Thread 李小姐
 尊敬的客户:
 您好!
 因我司进项较多及受多家企业与公司的委托:将每个月票据向外提供代
  开 ;我司以互惠互益解贵公司业务运作`补帐`作帐的燃眉之急;代开如下
  票据服务:★普通商品/运输/广告/建筑安装/海关增值缴款书/服务业等
  各种发票可以向外提供;并可上网查询或税务验证后款的方式与贵司
  合作! 

   商琪!

  手  机: 13510773029
  联系人: 李 小 姐
  E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   深 圳 市 俊 城 贸 易 有 限 公 司 

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Associating markup

2006-12-11 Thread Eelco Hillenius
What you can do for now is just copy-paste that code so that you have
your own FormComponentPanel. That'll work. Note that the one included
in the issue doesn't pick up  tags (though you can just
use HeaderContributor etc as always).

Eelco


On 12/11/06, Rüdiger Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah, I've been waiting for a FormComponentPanel! I tried myself at one
> some weeks ago, but failed horribly :(
>
> I hope I'll find the time to check this out soon, but at the moment I'm
> still developing for 1.2.x. I have at least one component in my current
> project that literally screams for a superclass like that. Palette from
> wicket-extensions also comes to mind at once.
>
> Rüdiger
>
>
> Eelco Hillenius schrieb:
> > This http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-136 is probably
> > closer to what you are looking for. I use it myself, and it works
> > great. It's a simple addition to core, but I'd like to wait putting it
> > in there without introducing a lot of copy 'n paste code. And I'd
> > prefer Juergen to look at that, as he wrote most of the markup
> > association code.
> >
> > Eelco
> >
> > On 12/11/06, Matthijs Wensveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I'm trying to create a generic Form component with its own markup. I was
> >> under the impression that this would be possible using the
> >> wicket:component tag.
> >> An example:
> >>
> >> MyPage.html
> >> 
> >> And here is the form:
> >> 
> >>design mode html
> >> 
> >> 
> >>
> >> MyPage.java
> >>
> >> //.. leave out uninteresting stuff until constructor
> >> public MyPage() {
> >> add(new MyForm("myForm"));
> >> }
> >>
> >> MyForm.html
> >> 
> >> 
> >>
> >>
> >> 
> >> 
> >>
> >> MyForm.java
> >> class MyForm extends Form {
> >> public MyForm() {
> >> add(new Label("formTitle", "The Form"));
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> This does not seem to work however. What am I doing wrong?
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance,
> >>
> >> --
> >> Matthijs Wensveen
> >> Func. Internet Integration
> >> W http://www.func.nl
> >> T +31 20 423
> >> F +31 20 4223500
> >>
> >>
> >> -
> >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share 
> >> your
> >> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> >> ___
> >> Wicket-user mailing list
> >> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >>
> >
> > -
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > ___
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
> >
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Associating one java file with 2 different markups

2006-12-11 Thread Igor Vaynberg

you can use what is called a "variation", see javadoc for
Component.getVariation() - you can override it and return a different
string. there is also a wiki page on variations.

-igor


On 12/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:







Hello all,
I have an issue where on the same page I have to use the same component.
My
application is datadriven, and those components need to have different
names and different business rules that are loaded on the runtime per
component. At the end of the day I want to have different htmls to be
attached to be associated to the same java component. How do I do it.
THank you
Gennadiy


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Associating markup

2006-12-11 Thread Rüdiger Schulz
Ah, I've been waiting for a FormComponentPanel! I tried myself at one
some weeks ago, but failed horribly :(

I hope I'll find the time to check this out soon, but at the moment I'm
still developing for 1.2.x. I have at least one component in my current
project that literally screams for a superclass like that. Palette from
wicket-extensions also comes to mind at once.

Rüdiger


Eelco Hillenius schrieb:
> This http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-136 is probably
> closer to what you are looking for. I use it myself, and it works
> great. It's a simple addition to core, but I'd like to wait putting it
> in there without introducing a lot of copy 'n paste code. And I'd
> prefer Juergen to look at that, as he wrote most of the markup
> association code.
> 
> Eelco
> 
> On 12/11/06, Matthijs Wensveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'm trying to create a generic Form component with its own markup. I was
>> under the impression that this would be possible using the
>> wicket:component tag.
>> An example:
>>
>> MyPage.html
>> 
>> And here is the form:
>> 
>>design mode html
>> 
>> 
>>
>> MyPage.java
>>
>> //.. leave out uninteresting stuff until constructor
>> public MyPage() {
>> add(new MyForm("myForm"));
>> }
>>
>> MyForm.html
>> 
>> 
>>
>>
>> 
>> 
>>
>> MyForm.java
>> class MyForm extends Form {
>> public MyForm() {
>> add(new Label("formTitle", "The Form"));
>> }
>> }
>>
>> This does not seem to work however. What am I doing wrong?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> --
>> Matthijs Wensveen
>> Func. Internet Integration
>> W http://www.func.nl
>> T +31 20 423
>> F +31 20 4223500
>>
>>
>> -
>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
>> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>> ___
>> Wicket-user mailing list
>> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>>
> 
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> 
> 


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


[Wicket-user] Associating one java file with 2 different markups

2006-12-11 Thread Gennadiy . Vasilevskiy





Hello all,
I have an issue where on the same page I have to use the same component. My
application is datadriven, and those components need to have different
names and different business rules that are loaded on the runtime per
component. At the end of the day I want to have different htmls to be
attached to be associated to the same java component. How do I do it.
THank you
Gennadiy


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] funny?[OT}

2006-12-11 Thread Gwyn Evans
I wonder if my comment will emerge from blog moderation!...

Just asked if there was anything behind his claims (of Wicket users)
and noted the lack of equanimity compared with when he claimed the
reverse regarding refactoring!

/Gwyn

On 11/12/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That comment on Howard's blog was a bit flamish, but otoh HLS seems to
> have very long toes. Wow, remarks like 'One of the great things about
> the Tapestry community is that they are quite a bit more enlightened
> than uses in other communities' are pretty snobbish indeed.
>
> There are a couple of instances that can be found where HLS seems to
> have a particular problem with Wicket (users). The idea that Wicket is
> based on Tapestry is so wrong though. Jonathan read a book on Tapestry
> before starting Wicket. Some of the ideas stuck, and terms like
> Application and RequestCycle etc can be traced back to that, but he
> thought in general Tapestry wasn't what he was looking for, and
> decided to write a framework that did suit his own needs. He told me
> that some of the underlying ideas he used for Wicket were ideas he
> advocated over at SUN years before that. Anyway, anyone with at least
> some basic understanding of *both* frameworks (and Howard himself
> doesn't seem to fit into that category if one was to judge from his
> remarks) would know that in fact they hardly have anything in common,
> both in terms of how it is implemented, and how the programming model
> works.
>
> I also like to state that even though we obviously think Wicket is a
> better alternative (and for my own taste so are GWT and Echo) to
> Tapestry, we don't hate Tapestry and go out harassing it's community
> where we can, but on the contrary usually praise it as one of the
> better web dev frameworks for Java.
>
> Eelco
>
>
> On 12/11/06, Francis Amanfo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok, I've found that comment from Howard on Wicket:
> >
> > "Wicket is an interesting refactoring of Tapestry that has a small, very
> > vocal community built around it. However, if I was to fork the Tapestry
> > community and create a new code base from scratch, you can guarantee that
> > what I came up with would not be as unambitous as Wicket!"
> >
> > To read more see
> > http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=38407
> >
> >
> > On 12/11/06, Francis Amanfo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > However, I vaguely remember sometime back when Howard made a similar
> > comment about Wicket at theserverside.com. At least, I hope he realizes how
> > bad that feels.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/11/06, Iman Rahmatizadeh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hmm,
> > > > I think that was a cruel thing to say. Open source is all about open
> > idea's. Many wicket users have been using tapestry before and have now
> > switched to wicket, and surely many idea's in the wicket world come from
> > tapestry. If tapestry 5 is implementing some idea's from wicket, I think
> > everybody here welcomes that and there's no need to make a hype about it.
> > > > However, I did a google on the tapestry mailing list archives to see
> > exactly who has a "disturbing trend" of starting a flame war. I didn't find
> > anything anywhere, so I assume the people on this list is not of the type
> > howard thinks they are :-).
> > > >
> > > > Iman
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 12/11/06, Francis Amanfo < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi guys,
> > > > >
> > > > > A blog comment poster asked Howard if the upcoming Tapestry 5 is a
> > refactor of Wicket.
> > > > >
> > https://beta.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4110180&postID=266226734789322024
> > > > > I think it wasn't a nice thing to say but hope the poster was trying
> > to be funny.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Beware of bugs in the above code;
> > > > > I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
> > > > > -Donald Knuth
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > -
> > > > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > > > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
> > share your
> > > > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > > > >
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > > > >
> > > > > ___
> > > > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > > > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > >
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > -
> > > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> > your
> > > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > > >
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-scriptaculous release

2006-12-11 Thread Ryan Sonnek

I'll take some time to update the wiki with some info.  That's a heck of a
lot easier than updating the maven-site.  =)


On 12/11/06, Filippo Diotalevi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On 12/11/06, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey wicket users,
> Just wanted to let everyone know I just released the first version of
the
> wicket-contrib-scriptaculous project.  It's based on wicket-2.0, so it
might
> not work for everyone, but give it a try if your interested!
>
>
http://jroller.com/page/wireframe/?anchor=wicket_scriptaculous_snapshot_release
>
> wicket-stuff admins:
> Not sure where the wicket-stuff repository is, so this release is hosted
on
> my public maven repository ( http://maven.codecrate.com)

Congrats Ryan!

as a side note, we really need to update the wicket-stuff website,
since only a few of the wicket-stuff subprojects are documented...
Ryan, do you have any documentation for  wicket-contrib-scriptaculous
? we could start putting it on the wiki, e.g. in this page:
http://wicket-stuff.sourceforge.net/wiki-stuff/WicketContribScriptaculous

--
  filippo

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Associating markup

2006-12-11 Thread Eelco Hillenius
This http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-136 is probably
closer to what you are looking for. I use it myself, and it works
great. It's a simple addition to core, but I'd like to wait putting it
in there without introducing a lot of copy 'n paste code. And I'd
prefer Juergen to look at that, as he wrote most of the markup
association code.

Eelco

On 12/11/06, Matthijs Wensveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to create a generic Form component with its own markup. I was
> under the impression that this would be possible using the
> wicket:component tag.
> An example:
>
> MyPage.html
> 
> And here is the form:
> 
>design mode html
> 
> 
>
> MyPage.java
>
> //.. leave out uninteresting stuff until constructor
> public MyPage() {
> add(new MyForm("myForm"));
> }
>
> MyForm.html
> 
> 
>
>
> 
> 
>
> MyForm.java
> class MyForm extends Form {
> public MyForm() {
> add(new Label("formTitle", "The Form"));
> }
> }
>
> This does not seem to work however. What am I doing wrong?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> --
> Matthijs Wensveen
> Func. Internet Integration
> W http://www.func.nl
> T +31 20 423
> F +31 20 4223500
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] funny?[OT}

2006-12-11 Thread Eelco Hillenius
That comment on Howard's blog was a bit flamish, but otoh HLS seems to
have very long toes. Wow, remarks like 'One of the great things about
the Tapestry community is that they are quite a bit more enlightened
than uses in other communities' are pretty snobbish indeed.

There are a couple of instances that can be found where HLS seems to
have a particular problem with Wicket (users). The idea that Wicket is
based on Tapestry is so wrong though. Jonathan read a book on Tapestry
before starting Wicket. Some of the ideas stuck, and terms like
Application and RequestCycle etc can be traced back to that, but he
thought in general Tapestry wasn't what he was looking for, and
decided to write a framework that did suit his own needs. He told me
that some of the underlying ideas he used for Wicket were ideas he
advocated over at SUN years before that. Anyway, anyone with at least
some basic understanding of *both* frameworks (and Howard himself
doesn't seem to fit into that category if one was to judge from his
remarks) would know that in fact they hardly have anything in common,
both in terms of how it is implemented, and how the programming model
works.

I also like to state that even though we obviously think Wicket is a
better alternative (and for my own taste so are GWT and Echo) to
Tapestry, we don't hate Tapestry and go out harassing it's community
where we can, but on the contrary usually praise it as one of the
better web dev frameworks for Java.

Eelco


On 12/11/06, Francis Amanfo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I've found that comment from Howard on Wicket:
>
> "Wicket is an interesting refactoring of Tapestry that has a small, very
> vocal community built around it. However, if I was to fork the Tapestry
> community and create a new code base from scratch, you can guarantee that
> what I came up with would not be as unambitous as Wicket!"
>
> To read more see
> http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=38407
>
>
> On 12/11/06, Francis Amanfo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However, I vaguely remember sometime back when Howard made a similar
> comment about Wicket at theserverside.com. At least, I hope he realizes how
> bad that feels.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/11/06, Iman Rahmatizadeh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hmm,
> > > I think that was a cruel thing to say. Open source is all about open
> idea's. Many wicket users have been using tapestry before and have now
> switched to wicket, and surely many idea's in the wicket world come from
> tapestry. If tapestry 5 is implementing some idea's from wicket, I think
> everybody here welcomes that and there's no need to make a hype about it.
> > > However, I did a google on the tapestry mailing list archives to see
> exactly who has a "disturbing trend" of starting a flame war. I didn't find
> anything anywhere, so I assume the people on this list is not of the type
> howard thinks they are :-).
> > >
> > > Iman
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/11/06, Francis Amanfo < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi guys,
> > > >
> > > > A blog comment poster asked Howard if the upcoming Tapestry 5 is a
> refactor of Wicket.
> > > >
> https://beta.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4110180&postID=266226734789322024
> > > > I think it wasn't a nice thing to say but hope the poster was trying
> to be funny.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Beware of bugs in the above code;
> > > > I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
> > > > -Donald Knuth
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> -
> > > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
> share your
> > > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > > >
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > > >
> > > > ___
> > > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> -
> > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > >
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Beware of bugs in the above code;
> > I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
> > -Donald Knuth
> > I don't make predictions. I never have,
> > and I never will.
> >   

Re: [Wicket-user] Associating markup

2006-12-11 Thread Igor Vaynberg

see the custom template loading example will help you here.

otherwise there are two approaches

wrapping the form in a border - this is much better supported in 2.0

-igor


On 12/11/06, Matthijs Wensveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hi,
I'm trying to create a generic Form component with its own markup. I was
under the impression that this would be possible using the
wicket:component tag.
An example:

MyPage.html

And here is the form:

   design mode html



MyPage.java

//.. leave out uninteresting stuff until constructor
public MyPage() {
add(new MyForm("myForm"));
}

MyForm.html


   
   



MyForm.java
class MyForm extends Form {
public MyForm() {
add(new Label("formTitle", "The Form"));
}
}

This does not seem to work however. What am I doing wrong?

Thanks in advance,

--
Matthijs Wensveen
Func. Internet Integration
W http://www.func.nl
T +31 20 423
F +31 20 4223500


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Can I set wicket to process path for wicket:include file?

2006-12-11 Thread Igor Vaynberg

wicket should be making or relative paths absolute if they are defined in
markup, eg you are not using an attribute modifier to set the path.

-igor


On 12/11/06, Carfield Yim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


If I use the relative path at HTML include file for image, wicket will
not process and add context path as the template. Can I told wicket to
do so?

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Associating markup

2006-12-11 Thread Juergen Donnerstag
wicket:component is not realy supported and it is not working at all
in 2.0 (yet). Doesn't javadoc mention that it is experimental?

Juergen

On 12/11/06, Matthijs Wensveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to create a generic Form component with its own markup. I was
> under the impression that this would be possible using the
> wicket:component tag.
> An example:
>
> MyPage.html
> 
>And here is the form:
>
>   design mode html
>
> 
>
> MyPage.java
>
> //.. leave out uninteresting stuff until constructor
> public MyPage() {
>add(new MyForm("myForm"));
> }
>
> MyForm.html
> 
>
>   
>   
>
> 
>
> MyForm.java
> class MyForm extends Form {
> public MyForm() {
>add(new Label("formTitle", "The Form"));
> }
> }
>
> This does not seem to work however. What am I doing wrong?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> --
> Matthijs Wensveen
> Func. Internet Integration
> W http://www.func.nl
> T +31 20 423
> F +31 20 4223500
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


[Wicket-user] Associating markup

2006-12-11 Thread Matthijs Wensveen
Hi,
I'm trying to create a generic Form component with its own markup. I was 
under the impression that this would be possible using the 
wicket:component tag.
An example:

MyPage.html

And here is the form:

   design mode html



MyPage.java

//.. leave out uninteresting stuff until constructor
public MyPage() {
add(new MyForm("myForm"));
}

MyForm.html


   
   



MyForm.java
class MyForm extends Form {
public MyForm() {
add(new Label("formTitle", "The Form"));
}
}

This does not seem to work however. What am I doing wrong?

Thanks in advance,

-- 
Matthijs Wensveen
Func. Internet Integration
W http://www.func.nl
T +31 20 423
F +31 20 4223500 


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-scriptaculous release

2006-12-11 Thread Filippo Diotalevi
On 12/11/06, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey wicket users,
> Just wanted to let everyone know I just released the first version of the
> wicket-contrib-scriptaculous project.  It's based on wicket-2.0, so it might
> not work for everyone, but give it a try if your interested!
>
 > http://jroller.com/page/wireframe/?anchor=wicket_scriptaculous_snapshot_release
>
> wicket-stuff admins:
> Not sure where the wicket-stuff repository is, so this release is hosted on
> my public maven repository ( http://maven.codecrate.com)

Congrats Ryan!

as a side note, we really need to update the wicket-stuff website,
since only a few of the wicket-stuff subprojects are documented...
Ryan, do you have any documentation for  wicket-contrib-scriptaculous
? we could start putting it on the wiki, e.g. in this page:
http://wicket-stuff.sourceforge.net/wiki-stuff/WicketContribScriptaculous

--
  filippo

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-scriptaculous release

2006-12-11 Thread Ryan Sonnek

Thanks.  I was mainly wondering if wicket-stuff had a maven repository.
Something so that I can create releases simply by doing:
mvn deploy


On 12/11/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Congrats on the release. You did spark some questions though:

What do you mean by wicket stuff repository?

Subversion? Check the code menu item at:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/wicket-stuff

Downloads? Check the admin menu item at:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/wicket-stuff
and read up on the release documentation of sourceforge.

Maven? we don't have a Wicket Stuff maven repository for snapshots.
Final releases (or possibly beta's, but I have some reservations on
those) can be submitted to the maven team (see uploading artifacts to
the central repository documentation).

Martijn

On 12/11/06, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey wicket users,
> Just wanted to let everyone know I just released the first version of
the
> wicket-contrib-scriptaculous project.  It's based on wicket-2.0, so it
might
> not work for everyone, but give it a try if your interested!
>
>
http://jroller.com/page/wireframe/?anchor=wicket_scriptaculous_snapshot_release
>
> wicket-stuff admins:
> Not sure where the wicket-stuff repository is, so this release is hosted
on
> my public maven repository ( http://maven.codecrate.com)
>
>
-
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
>
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>
>


--
Vote for Wicket at the
http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
Wicket 1.2.3 is as easy as 1-2-3. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-scriptaculous release

2006-12-11 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Congrats on the release. You did spark some questions though:

What do you mean by wicket stuff repository?

Subversion? Check the code menu item at:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/wicket-stuff

Downloads? Check the admin menu item at:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/wicket-stuff
and read up on the release documentation of sourceforge.

Maven? we don't have a Wicket Stuff maven repository for snapshots.
Final releases (or possibly beta's, but I have some reservations on
those) can be submitted to the maven team (see uploading artifacts to
the central repository documentation).

Martijn

On 12/11/06, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey wicket users,
> Just wanted to let everyone know I just released the first version of the
> wicket-contrib-scriptaculous project.  It's based on wicket-2.0, so it might
> not work for everyone, but give it a try if your interested!
>
> http://jroller.com/page/wireframe/?anchor=wicket_scriptaculous_snapshot_release
>
> wicket-stuff admins:
> Not sure where the wicket-stuff repository is, so this release is hosted on
> my public maven repository ( http://maven.codecrate.com)
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>
>


-- 
Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
Wicket 1.2.3 is as easy as 1-2-3. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


[Wicket-user] wicket-scriptaculous release

2006-12-11 Thread Ryan Sonnek

Hey wicket users,
Just wanted to let everyone know I just released the first version of the
wicket-contrib-scriptaculous project.  It's based on wicket-2.0, so it might
not work for everyone, but give it a try if your interested!

http://jroller.com/page/wireframe/?anchor=wicket_scriptaculous_snapshot_release

wicket-stuff admins:
Not sure where the wicket-stuff repository is, so this release is hosted on
my public maven repository (http://maven.codecrate.com)
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


[Wicket-user] Can I set wicket to process path for wicket:include file?

2006-12-11 Thread Carfield Yim
If I use the relative path at HTML include file for image, wicket will
not process and add context path as the template. Can I told wicket to
do so?

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] funny?[OT}

2006-12-11 Thread Francis Amanfo

Ok, I've found that comment from Howard on Wicket:

"Wicket is an interesting refactoring of Tapestry that has a small, very
vocal community built around it. However, if I was to fork the Tapestry
community and create a new code base from scratch, you can guarantee that
what I came up with would not be as unambitous as Wicket!"

To read more see
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=38407

On 12/11/06, Francis Amanfo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


However, I vaguely remember sometime back when Howard made a similar
comment about Wicket at theserverside.com. At least, I hope he realizes
how bad that feels.

On 12/11/06, Iman Rahmatizadeh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmm,
> I think that was a cruel thing to say. Open source is all about open
> idea's. Many wicket users have been using tapestry before and have now
> switched to wicket, and surely many idea's in the wicket world come from
> tapestry. If tapestry 5 is implementing some idea's from wicket, I think
> everybody here welcomes that and there's no need to make a hype about it.
> However, I did a google on the tapestry mailing list archives to see
> exactly who has a "disturbing trend" of starting a flame war. I didn't find
> anything anywhere, so I assume the people on this list is not of the type
> howard thinks they are :-).
>
> Iman
>
> On 12/11/06, Francis Amanfo < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > A blog comment poster asked Howard if the upcoming Tapestry 5 is a
> > refactor of Wicket.
> > https://beta.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4110180&postID=266226734789322024
> >
> > I think it wasn't a nice thing to say but hope the poster was trying
> > to be funny.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Beware of bugs in the above code;
> > I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
> > -Donald Knuth
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
> > share your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> >
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> >
> > ___
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>
>
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>
>


--
Beware of bugs in the above code;
I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
-Donald Knuth
I don't make predictions. I never have,
and I never will.
-Tony Blair





--
Beware of bugs in the above code;
I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
   -Donald Knuth
I don't make predictions. I never have,
and I never will.
   -Tony Blair
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] funny?[OT}

2006-12-11 Thread Francis Amanfo

However, I vaguely remember sometime back when Howard made a similar comment
about Wicket at theserverside.com. At least, I hope he realizes how bad that
feels.

On 12/11/06, Iman Rahmatizadeh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hmm,
I think that was a cruel thing to say. Open source is all about open
idea's. Many wicket users have been using tapestry before and have now
switched to wicket, and surely many idea's in the wicket world come from
tapestry. If tapestry 5 is implementing some idea's from wicket, I think
everybody here welcomes that and there's no need to make a hype about it.
However, I did a google on the tapestry mailing list archives to see
exactly who has a "disturbing trend" of starting a flame war. I didn't find
anything anywhere, so I assume the people on this list is not of the type
howard thinks they are :-).

Iman

On 12/11/06, Francis Amanfo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> A blog comment poster asked Howard if the upcoming Tapestry 5 is a
> refactor of Wicket.
> https://beta.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4110180&postID=266226734789322024
>
> I think it wasn't a nice thing to say but hope the poster was trying to
> be funny.
>
>
> --
> Beware of bugs in the above code;
> I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
> -Donald Knuth
>
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
>
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>
>

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user






--
Beware of bugs in the above code;
I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
   -Donald Knuth
I don't make predictions. I never have,
and I never will.
   -Tony Blair
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] funny?[OT}

2006-12-11 Thread Iman Rahmatizadeh

Hmm,
I think that was a cruel thing to say. Open source is all about open idea's.
Many wicket users have been using tapestry before and have now switched to
wicket, and surely many idea's in the wicket world come from tapestry. If
tapestry 5 is implementing some idea's from wicket, I think everybody here
welcomes that and there's no need to make a hype about it.
However, I did a google on the tapestry mailing list archives to see exactly
who has a "disturbing trend" of starting a flame war. I didn't find anything
anywhere, so I assume the people on this list is not of the type howard
thinks they are :-).

Iman

On 12/11/06, Francis Amanfo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hi guys,

A blog comment poster asked Howard if the upcoming Tapestry 5 is a
refactor of Wicket.
https://beta.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4110180&postID=266226734789322024

I think it wasn't a nice thing to say but hope the poster was trying to be
funny.


--
Beware of bugs in the above code;
I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
-Donald Knuth


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


[Wicket-user] funny?[OT}

2006-12-11 Thread Francis Amanfo

Hi guys,

A blog comment poster asked Howard if the upcoming Tapestry 5 is a refactor
of Wicket.
https://beta.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4110180&postID=266226734789322024
I think it wasn't a nice thing to say but hope the poster was trying to be
funny.


--
Beware of bugs in the above code;
I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
   -Donald Knuth
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Review: Wicket course

2006-12-11 Thread Nino Wael
Looks nice, having planned something similiar(at least using same technoligies) 
in the future.



Having some sort of client with local db, and a backend server. Have you had 
any trouble maintaining the client/server part of the application and or whats 
your 2 cent on this topic?



  _

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stefan Lindner
Sent: 10. december 2006 00:38
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Review: Wicket course



Maybe we could provide the wicket world with an online demo of our Wicket based 
application. It is an application for public health care organisations in 
germany, especially post op. pain management. The application runs on a tablet 
pc (with a local database that synchronizes with a central database), on normal 
pcs an on mobile phones with java me. A short preview ot the tablet pc 
component may be viewed under http://visiopad.visionet.de/VisioPAD. The PIN is 
05142. It is currently best viewed with Internet Explorer (because of Windows 
XP Tablet PC Editon).

We plan to put the whole application online for public viewing.



It is based upon Wicket 2.0, EJB3 (backend Ingres, PostgreSL, HSQLDB, Oracle 
etc) and JBoss.



If you select "Annerose Duffner" as patient and klick on "PCA" = Patient 
Controlled Analgesie you may view a funny embeded SVG graphic (if you have 
installed the SVG viewer from adobe).



Currently we are stuck with the not working ImageMap class in Wicket 2 
(http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-146). Maybe someone could help us 
at this point.



Any suggestions and opinions eare wollcome.



Stefan Lindner

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


[Wicket-user] Howard said that you can learn from that whole thing and compare it to Iraq.

2006-12-11 Thread Sampson G. Lara

She was going off on him and even on Robin. Siobahn also complained about not 
being invited to the roasts or anything.
Artie lost so he's got another loss. Two Day Free Sirius Trial Discussed. She 
said she likes to see his blue eyes in the Howard TV shows. Howard asked Artie 
how he remembers the lines for the stuff he shot.
There were a lot of Marines who were slaughtered there on the island because 
they didn't know that the Japanese were hidden in underground passageways on 
the island. Howard said he remembers the engineers at these stations being some 
fat guy who didn't want to be there. Howard said he'll be going back to talk to 
Scott about that whole thing. Siobahn also complained about not being invited 
to the roasts or anything.
He went to ask them about his pay and he was told he was lucky that he was 
working there at all. Howard was wondering if they should load up the shows on 
Wednesday and Thursday with a ton of stuff or just do the regular show.
Robin threw in the C-word as she was talking to Cousin It so Howard told her to 
save that for the free preview days later this week.
She was going off on him and even on Robin. He said it was a progressive AM 
radio station in the Boston area called WNTN.
He's got a lot of people he thinks about all day and she's not on that list.
Gary said that Carmen was in town last week and they never heard from her. 
Howard said that he doesn't love her and it's not his fault if she doesn't have 
a family.
Howard said that Scott the Engineer is the skinniest of the engineers and the 
most motivated.
He said they had better not show that on the one cent preview they're doing. 
Howard played some of the audio from that opening for the World Series where 
Artie was rambling off a bunch of lines. The caller told him he really has to 
wear those dark glasses to cover up his face.
That led to Howard going off on the Howard TV guys because they're making him 
look like a monster on TV.
He said he could never memorize stuff in school because he was so disinterested 
in that stuff.

rotunda.gif
Description: GIF image
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user