Re: [Wicket-user] Problem with tree width
Matej, Instead of using floats and background images, would it be possible for the tree to use real img/ tags with a set width? I'm not 100% positive, but I think the floats are what prevent overflow: scroll from working properly. Does that sound right? -- Karl -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matej Knopp Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 11:43 AM To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Problem with tree width Sure, and don't forget to provide css to table layout the tree with lines and everything that is at least as good as current solution (which is actually rather good, I think ;-). Because all my attempts to layout the tree-table with table failed at least in firefox. -Matej Igor Vaynberg wrote: time to work on that magical tr replacing ajax stuff :) -Igor On 9/23/06, *Matej Knopp* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Btw. I've commited fix to 1.x that prevents the text from hiding (it's being clipped instead). -Matej Matej Knopp wrote: If it was only tree, I'd be probably using nested divs. The reason for using div per row is actually the TreeTable. Initially, I wanted to build tree table using tabletr... - I couldn't nest table rows. Then I found out that replacing tr in ajax doesn't work in ie (and opera), so I had to use divs instead. However, I still think using nested divs for tree table wouldn't work well. -Matej Karl M. Davis wrote: Matej, I've been wondering why you chose to implement the tree as a set of floated divs rather than as a nested list? The list would be much more semantic and fallback gracefully if the user has CSS turned off as well. This is one of the better examples of this I've seen: http://www.silverstripe.com/downloads/tree/ http://www.silverstripe.com/downloads/tree/ I've been toying with the idea of writing my own implementation of AbstractTree using this HTML and CSS as the overflow issues annoy me... any thoughts? -- Karl *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] *On Behalf Of *Marc-Andre Houle *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2006 5:47 AM *To:* wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net mailto:wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net *Subject:* Re: [Wicket-user] Problem with tree width It is not that important for now, I was just trying to know if the problem was on my side or on the wicket platform. Thanks for your help and I'm pleased to know someone better than me is working on that issue. I'm not really a master in CSS! Marc On 9/22/06, *Matej Knopp* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've fixed the problem of disappearing item captions, but only for tree-table. I'll have to look at tree css, I just had no time. It might some serious changes to stylesheet to get this working for Tree. So if this really is a showstopper for you, try to use tree table (with the css from current svn). -Matej Marc-Andre Houle wrote: Since I got no one to help me, I have continued to search for this problem with no result. Also, maybe I wasn't clear enough to demonstrate the problem, so I will make a new effort to display it. Here is easy Path to demonstrate the problem 1 - got the web developper extension for firefox if it is not already done (Really usefull : https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/60/) 2- go to page http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=: wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.tree.SimpleTreePage 3- Click the link to expand all node 4- Open up the the CSS edit tool ( CTRL-SHIFT-E ) 5 - In div wicket-tree, set the width variable to 15. Now, you should see that some of the element of the table disapred because there was no place to display them. My problem, while not being exclusively that, is related to that. Is it not possible to make the tree scrollable horizontally when the content is larger that the space to display the tree? It seems to be only a CSS problem, but I still
Re: [Wicket-user] Problem with tree width
Indeed, floats are the problem. Unfortunately, I'm not sure images are better solution. The problem is that for line and junction images spans are used with background-image set. The advantage is that the image can be repeated (line) and it also can be centered vertically (junction). Possible solution could be img tags with transparent image and the real image specified using background-image, just as current spans do. It would be worth trying, however due to lack of time I can't do that right now. -Matej Karl M. Davis wrote: Matej, Instead of using floats and background images, would it be possible for the tree to use real img/ tags with a set width? I'm not 100% positive, but I think the floats are what prevent overflow: scroll from working properly. Does that sound right? -- Karl -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matej Knopp Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 11:43 AM To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Problem with tree width Sure, and don't forget to provide css to table layout the tree with lines and everything that is at least as good as current solution (which is actually rather good, I think ;-). Because all my attempts to layout the tree-table with table failed at least in firefox. -Matej Igor Vaynberg wrote: time to work on that magical tr replacing ajax stuff :) -Igor On 9/23/06, *Matej Knopp* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Btw. I've commited fix to 1.x that prevents the text from hiding (it's being clipped instead). -Matej Matej Knopp wrote: If it was only tree, I'd be probably using nested divs. The reason for using div per row is actually the TreeTable. Initially, I wanted to build tree table using tabletr... - I couldn't nest table rows. Then I found out that replacing tr in ajax doesn't work in ie (and opera), so I had to use divs instead. However, I still think using nested divs for tree table wouldn't work well. -Matej Karl M. Davis wrote: Matej, I've been wondering why you chose to implement the tree as a set of floated divs rather than as a nested list? The list would be much more semantic and fallback gracefully if the user has CSS turned off as well. This is one of the better examples of this I've seen: http://www.silverstripe.com/downloads/tree/ http://www.silverstripe.com/downloads/tree/ I've been toying with the idea of writing my own implementation of AbstractTree using this HTML and CSS as the overflow issues annoy me... any thoughts? -- Karl *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] *On Behalf Of *Marc-Andre Houle *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2006 5:47 AM *To:* wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net mailto:wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net *Subject:* Re: [Wicket-user] Problem with tree width It is not that important for now, I was just trying to know if the problem was on my side or on the wicket platform. Thanks for your help and I'm pleased to know someone better than me is working on that issue. I'm not really a master in CSS! Marc On 9/22/06, *Matej Knopp* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've fixed the problem of disappearing item captions, but only for tree-table. I'll have to look at tree css, I just had no time. It might some serious changes to stylesheet to get this working for Tree. So if this really is a showstopper for you, try to use tree table (with the css from current svn). -Matej Marc-Andre Houle wrote: Since I got no one to help me, I have continued to search for this problem with no result. Also, maybe I wasn't clear enough to demonstrate the problem, so I will make a new effort to display it. Here is easy Path to demonstrate the problem 1 - got the web developper extension for firefox if it is not already done (Really usefull : https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/60/) 2- go to page http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=: wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.tree.SimpleTreePage 3- Click the link to expand all node 4- Open up the the CSS edit tool ( CTRL-SHIFT-E
Re: [Wicket-user] Problem with tree width
When I created that very first tree component for Wicket, I started
out with nested lists. Not only was it a pain to get the CSS right,
but also, I could not find a way to separate node links (selecting a
note) from junction links (folding and unfolding without selecting).
Eelco
On 9/22/06, Karl M. Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matej,
I've been wondering why you chose to implement the tree as a set of floated
divs rather than as a nested list? The list would be much more semantic and
fallback gracefully if the user has CSS turned off as well. This is one of
the better examples of this I've seen:
http://www.silverstripe.com/downloads/tree/
I've been toying with the idea of writing my own implementation of
AbstractTree using this HTML and CSS as the overflow issues annoy me... any
thoughts?
-- Karl
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marc-Andre Houle
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 5:47 AM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Problem with tree width
It is not that important for now, I was just trying to know if the problem
was on my side or on the wicket platform.
Thanks for your help and I'm pleased to know someone better than me is
working on that issue. I'm not really a master in CSS!
Marc
On 9/22/06, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've fixed the problem of disappearing item captions, but only for
tree-table. I'll have to look at tree css, I just had no time. It might
some serious changes to stylesheet to get this working for Tree.
So if this really is a showstopper for you, try to use tree table (with
the css from current svn).
-Matej
Marc-Andre Houle wrote:
Since I got no one to help me, I have continued to search for this
problem with no result. Also, maybe I wasn't clear enough to
demonstrate the problem, so I will make a new effort to display it.
Here is easy Path to demonstrate the problem
1 - got the web developper extension for firefox if it is not already
done (Really usefull :
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/60/)
2- go to page
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.tree.SimpleTreePage
3- Click the link to expand all node
4- Open up the the CSS edit tool ( CTRL-SHIFT-E )
5 - In div wicket-tree, set the width variable to 15.
Now, you should see that some of the element of the table disapred
because there was no place to display them. My problem, while not being
exclusively that, is related to that. Is it not possible to make the
tree scrollable horizontally when the content is larger that the space
to display the tree?
It seems to be only a CSS problem, but I still don't know how to solve
it. Using the auto tag for width is not a goot solution. For the
exemple, the tree will take all the place in the page, but when a node
will eventually be more width than the page, it will just also disapear.
I hope I was more clear about the problem. Thinks in advance for any
suggestion or solution.
Marc
On 9/18/06, *Marc-Andre Houle* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got a problem when using the tree. in wicket 1.2.2.
In the context I am working on, I'm loading a list of node in the
tree. The problem is that the tree is sometimes not large enough.
Here are the step I have done for now :
First, I wanted to check if the problem was the stylesheet we
use. It doesn't seem's too since the problem can be repeated in
the wicket Tree exemple.. When you use the simple tree in the
exemple and try to feed it with lot ant lot of sub folder or
entering a very long string, it finish by making disapear come of
the node.
So, after that, I wanted to know what can provoke the problem. I
have found that the wicket-tree style in the CVS set a width for the
tree.
div.wicket-tree {
white-space: nowrap;
border: 1px solid #ccc;
width: 20em;
overflow: auto;
margin: 10px;
line-height: 1.5em;
}
I tried to overwrite this with auto, 100% or anything like that.
But finally, it does nothing more interesting.I can put a larger
number, like 40, but it will be ugly on the screen 98% of the time.
Is it possible to make this panel autosizeable or having a
horizontal scrooling bar. I mean, is there a way to make it look
fancier for an all time usage without having object disaprearing
when there is a long horizontale line to display. I'm not much in
CSS coding, so I probably didn't try everything.
Thanks in advance.
Wicket is the best Framwork I ever used. It is the first real
trouble I got for now and I'm sure it is nothing
Re: [Wicket-user] Problem with tree width
Btw. I've commited fix to 1.x that prevents the text from hiding (it's
being clipped instead).
-Matej
Matej Knopp wrote:
If it was only tree, I'd be probably using nested divs. The reason for
using div per row is actually the TreeTable. Initially, I wanted to
build tree table using tabletr... - I couldn't nest table rows. Then
I found out that replacing tr in ajax doesn't work in ie (and opera), so
I had to use divs instead. However, I still think using nested divs for
tree table wouldn't work well.
-Matej
Karl M. Davis wrote:
Matej,
I've been wondering why you chose to implement the tree as a set of
floated divs rather than as a nested list? The list would be much more
semantic and fallback gracefully if the user has CSS turned off as
well. This is one of the better examples of this I've seen:
http://www.silverstripe.com/downloads/tree/
I've been toying with the idea of writing my own implementation of
AbstractTree using this HTML and CSS as the overflow issues annoy me...
any thoughts?
-- Karl
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of
*Marc-Andre Houle
*Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2006 5:47 AM
*To:* wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* Re: [Wicket-user] Problem with tree width
It is not that important for now, I was just trying to know if the
problem was on my side or on the wicket platform.
Thanks for your help and I'm pleased to know someone better than me is
working on that issue. I'm not really a master in CSS!
Marc
On 9/22/06, *Matej Knopp* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've fixed the problem of disappearing item captions, but only for
tree-table. I'll have to look at tree css, I just had no time. It might
some serious changes to stylesheet to get this working for Tree.
So if this really is a showstopper for you, try to use tree table (with
the css from current svn).
-Matej
Marc-Andre Houle wrote:
Since I got no one to help me, I have continued to search for this
problem with no result. Also, maybe I wasn't clear enough to
demonstrate the problem, so I will make a new effort to display it.
Here is easy Path to demonstrate the problem
1 - got the web developper extension for firefox if it is not already
done (Really usefull : https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/60/)
2- go to page
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.tree.SimpleTreePage
3- Click the link to expand all node
4- Open up the the CSS edit tool ( CTRL-SHIFT-E )
5 - In div wicket-tree, set the width variable to 15.
Now, you should see that some of the element of the table disapred
because there was no place to display them. My problem, while
not being
exclusively that, is related to that. Is it not possible to make the
tree scrollable horizontally when the content is larger that the
space
to display the tree?
It seems to be only a CSS problem, but I still don't know how to
solve
it. Using the auto tag for width is not a goot solution. For the
exemple, the tree will take all the place in the page, but when a
node
will eventually be more width than the page, it will just also
disapear.
I hope I was more clear about the problem. Thinks in advance for any
suggestion or solution.
Marc
On 9/18/06, *Marc-Andre Houle* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got a problem when using the tree. in wicket 1.2.2.
In the context I am working on, I'm loading a list of node in
the
tree. The problem is that the tree is sometimes not large
enough.
Here are the step I have done for now :
First, I wanted to check if the problem was the stylesheet we
use. It doesn't seem's too since the problem can be
repeated in
the wicket Tree exemple.. When you use the simple tree in the
exemple and try to feed it with lot ant lot of sub folder or
entering a very long string, it finish by making disapear
come of
the node.
So, after that, I wanted to know what can provoke the problem. I
have found that the wicket-tree style in the CVS set a width
for the
tree.
div.wicket-tree {
white-space: nowrap;
border: 1px solid #ccc;
width: 20em;
overflow: auto;
margin: 10px;
line-height: 1.5em;
}
I tried to overwrite
Re: [Wicket-user] Problem with tree width
time to work on that magical tr replacing ajax stuff :)-IgorOn 9/23/06, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw. I've commited fix to 1.x that prevents the text from hiding (it'sbeing clipped instead).
-MatejMatej Knopp wrote: If it was only tree, I'd be probably using nested divs. The reason for using div per row is actually the TreeTable. Initially, I wanted to build tree table using tabletr... - I couldn't nest table rows. Then
I found out that replacing tr in ajax doesn't work in ie (and opera), so I had to use divs instead. However, I still think using nested divs for tree table wouldn't work well. -Matej
Karl M. Davis wrote: Matej, I've been wondering why you chose to implement the tree as a set of floated divs rather than as a nested list?The list would be much more
semantic and fallback gracefully if the user has CSS turned off as well.This is one of the better examples of this I've seen: http://www.silverstripe.com/downloads/tree/
I've been toying with the idea of writing my own implementation of AbstractTree using this HTML and CSS as the overflow issues annoy me... any thoughts?
-- Karl *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] *On Behalf Of *Marc-Andre Houle *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2006 5:47 AM
*To:* wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net *Subject:* Re: [Wicket-user] Problem with tree width It is not that important for now, I was just trying to know if the
problem was on my side or on the wicket platform. Thanks for your help and I'm pleased to know someone better than me is working on that issue.I'm not really a master in CSS!
Marc On 9/22/06, *Matej Knopp* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've fixed the problem of disappearing item captions, but only for tree-table. I'll have to look at tree css, I just had no time. It might some serious changes to stylesheet to get this working for Tree.
So if this really is a showstopper for you, try to use tree table (with the css from current svn). -Matej Marc-Andre Houle wrote:
Since I got no one to help me, I have continued to search for this problem with no result.Also, maybe I wasn't clear enough to demonstrate the problem, so I will make a new effort to display it.
Here is easy Path to demonstrate the problem 1 - got the web developper extension for firefox if it is not already done (Really usefull :
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/60/) 2- go to page
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.tree.SimpleTreePage 3- Click the link to expand all node
4- Open up the the CSS edit tool ( CTRL-SHIFT-E ) 5 - In div wicket-tree, set the width variable to 15. Now, you should see that some of the element of the table disapred
because there was no place to display them.My problem, while not being exclusively that, is related to that.Is it not possible to make the tree scrollable horizontally when the content is larger that the
space to display the tree? It seems to be only a CSS problem, but I still don't know how to solve it.Using the auto tag for width is not a goot solution.For the
exemple, the tree will take all the place in the page, but when a node will eventually be more width than the page, it will just also disapear.
I hope I was more clear about the problem.Thinks in advance for any suggestion or solution. Marc
On 9/18/06, *Marc-Andre Houle* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I got a problem when using the tree. in wicket
1.2.2. In the context I am working on, I'm loading a list of node in the tree.The problem is that the tree is sometimes not large
enough. Here are the step I have done for now : First, I wanted to check if the problem was the stylesheet we use. It doesn't seem's too since the problem can be
repeated in the wicket Tree exemple..When you use the simple tree in the exemple and try to feed it with lot ant lot of sub folder or entering a very long string, it finish by making disapear
come of the node. So, after that, I wanted to know what can provoke the problem.I have found that the wicket-tree style in the CVS set a width
for the tree. div.wicket-tree { white-space: nowrap; border: 1px solid #ccc;
width: 20em; overflow: auto; margin: 10px; line-height: 1.5em; }
I tried to overwrite this with auto, 100% or anything like that. But finally, it does nothing more interesting.I can put a larger number, like 40, but it will be ugly on the screen 98% of the
time. Is it possible to make this panel autosizeable or having a horizontal scrooling bar.I mean, is there a way to make it look
fancier for an all time usage without having object disaprearing when there is a long horizontale line to display.I'm not much in CSS coding, so I probably didn't try everything.
Thanks in advance. Wicket is the best Framwork I ever used.It is the first real trouble I got for now and I'm sure
Re: [Wicket-user] Problem with tree width
Sure, and don't forget to provide css to table layout the tree with lines and everything that is at least as good as current solution (which is actually rather good, I think ;-). Because all my attempts to layout the tree-table with table failed at least in firefox. -Matej Igor Vaynberg wrote: time to work on that magical tr replacing ajax stuff :) -Igor On 9/23/06, *Matej Knopp* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Btw. I've commited fix to 1.x that prevents the text from hiding (it's being clipped instead). -Matej Matej Knopp wrote: If it was only tree, I'd be probably using nested divs. The reason for using div per row is actually the TreeTable. Initially, I wanted to build tree table using tabletr... - I couldn't nest table rows. Then I found out that replacing tr in ajax doesn't work in ie (and opera), so I had to use divs instead. However, I still think using nested divs for tree table wouldn't work well. -Matej Karl M. Davis wrote: Matej, I've been wondering why you chose to implement the tree as a set of floated divs rather than as a nested list? The list would be much more semantic and fallback gracefully if the user has CSS turned off as well. This is one of the better examples of this I've seen: http://www.silverstripe.com/downloads/tree/ http://www.silverstripe.com/downloads/tree/ I've been toying with the idea of writing my own implementation of AbstractTree using this HTML and CSS as the overflow issues annoy me... any thoughts? -- Karl *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] *On Behalf Of *Marc-Andre Houle *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2006 5:47 AM *To:* wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net mailto:wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net *Subject:* Re: [Wicket-user] Problem with tree width It is not that important for now, I was just trying to know if the problem was on my side or on the wicket platform. Thanks for your help and I'm pleased to know someone better than me is working on that issue. I'm not really a master in CSS! Marc On 9/22/06, *Matej Knopp* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've fixed the problem of disappearing item captions, but only for tree-table. I'll have to look at tree css, I just had no time. It might some serious changes to stylesheet to get this working for Tree. So if this really is a showstopper for you, try to use tree table (with the css from current svn). -Matej Marc-Andre Houle wrote: Since I got no one to help me, I have continued to search for this problem with no result. Also, maybe I wasn't clear enough to demonstrate the problem, so I will make a new effort to display it. Here is easy Path to demonstrate the problem 1 - got the web developper extension for firefox if it is not already done (Really usefull : https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/60/) 2- go to page http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.tree.SimpleTreePage 3- Click the link to expand all node 4- Open up the the CSS edit tool ( CTRL-SHIFT-E ) 5 - In div wicket-tree, set the width variable to 15. Now, you should see that some of the element of the table disapred because there was no place to display them. My problem, while not being exclusively that, is related to that. Is it not possible to make the tree scrollable horizontally when the content is larger that the space to display the tree? It seems to be only a CSS problem, but I still don't know how to solve it. Using the auto tag for width is not a goot solution. For the exemple, the tree will take all the place in the page, but when a node will eventually be more width than the page, it will just also disapear. I hope I was more clear about the problem. Thinks in advance for any suggestion or solution
Re: [Wicket-user] Problem with tree width
I've fixed the problem of disappearing item captions, but only for
tree-table. I'll have to look at tree css, I just had no time. It might
some serious changes to stylesheet to get this working for Tree.
So if this really is a showstopper for you, try to use tree table (with
the css from current svn).
-Matej
Marc-Andre Houle wrote:
Since I got no one to help me, I have continued to search for this
problem with no result. Also, maybe I wasn't clear enough to
demonstrate the problem, so I will make a new effort to display it.
Here is easy Path to demonstrate the problem
1 - got the web developper extension for firefox if it is not already
done (Really usefull : https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/60/)
2- go to page
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.tree.SimpleTreePage
3- Click the link to expand all node
4- Open up the the CSS edit tool ( CTRL-SHIFT-E )
5 - In div wicket-tree, set the width variable to 15.
Now, you should see that some of the element of the table disapred
because there was no place to display them. My problem, while not being
exclusively that, is related to that. Is it not possible to make the
tree scrollable horizontally when the content is larger that the space
to display the tree?
It seems to be only a CSS problem, but I still don't know how to solve
it. Using the auto tag for width is not a goot solution. For the
exemple, the tree will take all the place in the page, but when a node
will eventually be more width than the page, it will just also disapear.
I hope I was more clear about the problem. Thinks in advance for any
suggestion or solution.
Marc
On 9/18/06, *Marc-Andre Houle* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got a problem when using the tree. in wicket 1.2.2.
In the context I am working on, I'm loading a list of node in the
tree. The problem is that the tree is sometimes not large enough.
Here are the step I have done for now :
First, I wanted to check if the problem was the stylesheet we
use. It doesn't seem's too since the problem can be repeated in
the wicket Tree exemple.. When you use the simple tree in the
exemple and try to feed it with lot ant lot of sub folder or
entering a very long string, it finish by making disapear come of
the node.
So, after that, I wanted to know what can provoke the problem. I
have found that the wicket-tree style in the CVS set a width for the
tree.
div.wicket-tree {
white-space: nowrap;
border: 1px solid #ccc;
width: 20em;
overflow: auto;
margin: 10px;
line-height: 1.5em;
}
I tried to overwrite this with auto, 100% or anything like that.
But finally, it does nothing more interesting.I can put a larger
number, like 40, but it will be ugly on the screen 98% of the time.
Is it possible to make this panel autosizeable or having a
horizontal scrooling bar. I mean, is there a way to make it look
fancier for an all time usage without having object disaprearing
when there is a long horizontale line to display. I'm not much in
CSS coding, so I probably didn't try everything.
Thanks in advance.
Wicket is the best Framwork I ever used. It is the first real
trouble I got for now and I'm sure it is nothing big.
Marc
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Problem with tree width
It is not that important for now, I was just trying to know if the problem was on my side or on the wicket platform. Thanks for your help and I'm pleased to know someone better than me is working on that issue. I'm not really a master in CSS!
MarcOn 9/22/06, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've fixed the problem of disappearing item captions, but only fortree-table. I'll have to look at tree css, I just had no time. It mightsome serious changes to stylesheet to get this working for Tree.So if this really is a showstopper for you, try to use tree table (with
the css from current svn).-MatejMarc-Andre Houle wrote: Since I got no one to help me, I have continued to search for this problem with no result.Also, maybe I wasn't clear enough to
demonstrate the problem, so I will make a new effort to display it. Here is easy Path to demonstrate the problem 1 - got the web developper extension for firefox if it is not already done (Really usefull :
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/60/) 2- go to page
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.tree.SimpleTreePage 3- Click the link to expand all node 4- Open up the the CSS edit tool ( CTRL-SHIFT-E )
5 - In div wicket-tree, set the width variable to 15. Now, you should see that some of the element of the table disapred because there was no place to display them.My problem, while not being
exclusively that, is related to that.Is it not possible to make the tree scrollable horizontally when the content is larger that the space to display the tree? It seems to be only a CSS problem, but I still don't know how to solve
it.Using the auto tag for width is not a goot solution.For the exemple, the tree will take all the place in the page, but when a node will eventually be more width than the page, it will just also disapear.
I hope I was more clear about the problem.Thinks in advance for any suggestion or solution. Marc On 9/18/06, *Marc-Andre Houle*
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I got a problem when using the tree. in wicket 1.2.2. In the context I am working on, I'm loading a list of node in the
tree.The problem is that the tree is sometimes not large enough. Here are the step I have done for now : First, I wanted to check if the problem was the stylesheet we use. It doesn't seem's too since the problem can be repeated in
the wicket Tree exemple..When you use the simple tree in the exemple and try to feed it with lot ant lot of sub folder or entering a very long string, it finish by making disapear come of
the node. So, after that, I wanted to know what can provoke the problem.I have found that the wicket-tree style in the CVS set a width for the tree.
div.wicket-tree { white-space: nowrap; border: 1px solid #ccc; width: 20em; overflow: auto; margin: 10px; line-height: 1.5em; }
I tried to overwrite this with auto, 100% or anything like that. But finally, it does nothing more interesting.I can put a larger number, like 40, but it will be ugly on the screen 98% of the time.
Is it possible to make this panel autosizeable or having a horizontal scrooling bar.I mean, is there a way to make it look fancier for an all time usage without having object disaprearing
when there is a long horizontale line to display.I'm not much in CSS coding, so I probably didn't try everything. Thanks in advance. Wicket is the best Framwork I ever used.It is the first real
trouble I got for now and I'm sure it is nothing big. Marc -
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user-Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net
's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share youropinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
Re: [Wicket-user] Problem with tree width
Since I got no one to help me, I have continued to search for this problem with no result. Also, maybe I wasn't clear enough to demonstrate the problem, so I will make a new effort to display it.Here is easy Path to demonstrate the problem
1 - got the web developper extension for firefox if it is not already done (Really usefull : https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/60/)2- go to page
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:wicket.examples.ajax.builtin.tree.SimpleTreePage3- Click the link to expand all node4- Open up the the CSS edit tool ( CTRL-SHIFT-E )
5 - In div wicket-tree, set the width variable to 15.Now, you should see that some of the element of the table disapred because there was no place to display them. My problem, while not being exclusively that, is related to that. Is it not possible to make the tree scrollable horizontally when the content is larger that the space to display the tree?
It seems to be only a CSS problem, but I still don't know how to solve it. Using the auto tag for width is not a goot solution. For the exemple, the tree will take all the place in the page, but when a node will eventually be more width than the page, it will just also disapear.
I hope I was more clear about the problem. Thinks in advance for any suggestion or solution.MarcOn 9/18/06, Marc-Andre Houle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I got a problem when
using the tree. in wicket 1.2.2.
In the context I am
working on, I'm loading a list of node in the tree. The problem is that the
tree is sometimes not large enough.
Here are the step I
have done for now :
First, I wanted to
check ifthe problem wasthe stylesheet we use.It doesn't seem's too since
the problem can be repeated in the wicket Tree exemple.. When you use the
simple tree in the exemple and try to feed it with lot ant lot of sub folder or
entering a very long string, it finish by making disapear come of the
node.
So, after that, I
wanted to know what can provoke the problem. I have found that the wicket-tree
style in the CVS set a width for the tree.
div.wicket-tree { white-space: nowrap; border: 1px solid #ccc; width: 20em; overflow: auto; margin: 10px; line-height: 1.5em;}
I tried to overwrite
this with auto, 100% or anything like that. But finally, it does nothing more
interesting. I can put a larger number, like 40, but it will be ugly on the
screen 98% of the time.
Is it possible to
make this panel autosizeable or having a horizontal scrooling bar. I mean, is
there a way to make it look fancier for an all time usage without having object
disaprearing when there is a long horizontale line to display. I'm not much in
CSS coding, so I probably didn't try everything.
Thanks in
advance.
Wicket is the best
Framwork I ever used. It is the first real trouble I got for now and I'm sure
it is nothing big.
Marc
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Problem with tree width
I got a problem when
using the tree. in wicket 1.2.2.
In the context I am
working on, I'm loading a list of node in the tree. The problem is that the
tree is sometimes not large enough.
Here are the step I
have done for now :
First, I wanted to
check ifthe problem wasthe stylesheet we use.It doesn't seem's too since
the problem can be repeated in the wicket Tree exemple.. When you use the
simple tree in the exemple and try to feed it with lot ant lot of sub folder or
entering a very long string, it finish by making disapear come of the
node.
So, after that, I
wanted to know what can provoke the problem. I have found that the wicket-tree
style in the CVS set a width for the tree.
div.wicket-tree { white-space: nowrap; border: 1px solid #ccc; width: 20em; overflow: auto; margin: 10px; line-height: 1.5em;}
I tried to overwrite
this with auto, 100% or anything like that. But finally, it does nothing more
interesting. I can put a larger number, like 40, but it will be ugly on the
screen 98% of the time.
Is it possible to
make this panel autosizeable or having a horizontal scrooling bar. I mean, is
there a way to make it look fancier for an all time usage without having object
disaprearing when there is a long horizontale line to display. I'm not much in
CSS coding, so I probably didn't try everything.
Thanks in
advance.
Wicket is the best
Framwork I ever used. It is the first real trouble I got for now and I'm sure
it is nothing big.
Marc
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
