[Wicket-user] Session management

2006-08-28 Thread Nino Wael








Hi



I was wondering how wicket maintains its
session state. We are currently working on a crossbrowser application, where
our application(wicket) lives within an Iframe. If we hit refresh on the page,
wicket looses its session id. As far as I can see wicket does store the session
id in a cookie?





Regards Nino






-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Session management

2006-08-28 Thread Janne Hietamäki
On 28.8.2006, at 10.53, Nino Wael wrote: Hi I was wondering how wicket maintains it’s session state. We are currently working on a crossbrowser application, where our application(wicket) lives within an Iframe. If we hit refresh on the page, wicket looses its session id. As far as I can see wicket does store the session id in a cookie?Wicket has nothing to do with this, it uses normal servlet container for session management. Servlet spec states there have to be cookies and session id parameter for fallback. So, yes, the session id is stored in a cookie.Janne-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Session management

2006-08-28 Thread Nino Wael









That was what I thought, I
do know that wicket is not the bad guy hereJ



Whats the default timeout
on the cookie? Or am I barking up the wrong leg?



.regards Nino











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janne Hietamäki
Sent: 28. august 2006 09:56
To:
wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Session
management











On 28.8.2006, at 10.53, Nino Wael wrote:









Hi



I
was wondering how wicket maintains its session state. We are currently working
on a crossbrowser application, where our application(wicket) lives within an
Iframe. If we hit refresh on the page, wicket looses its session id. As far as
I can see wicket does store the session id in a cookie?



Wicket has nothing to do with this, it uses normal servlet container
for session management. Servlet spec states there have to be cookies and
session id parameter for fallback. So, yes, the session id is stored in a cookie.











Janne








-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Session management

2006-08-28 Thread Janne Hietamäki
Session cookie expires when browser is shut down, but on the server side the default is 30 minutes. This can be altered in the web.xml by adding something like this:session-config  session-timeout60/session-timeout/session-configJanneOn 28.8.2006, at 11.00, Nino Wael wrote: That was what I thought, I do know that wicket is not the bad guy hereJ Whats the default timeout on the cookie? Or am I barking up the wrong leg? .regards Nino From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Janne Hietamäki Sent: 28. august 2006 09:56 To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Session management     On 28.8.2006, at 10.53, Nino Wael wrote:Hi I was wondering how wicket maintains it’s session state. We are currently working on a crossbrowser application, where our application(wicket) lives within an Iframe. If we hit refresh on the page, wicket looses its session id. As far as I can see wicket does store the session id in a cookie? Wicket has nothing to do with this, it uses normal servlet container for session management. Servlet spec states there have to be cookies and session id parameter for fallback. So, yes, the session id is stored in a cookie.    -
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Session management

2006-08-28 Thread Nino Wael








Ahh, wasnt sure if you
used something special.



We use both mounted urls
and url parameters, im wondering if this could give us the problem so for
example we could have a link like this:



http://Server/viewer/overblik/Y03



where this is the raw
page http://server/viewer and parameters are
overblik and Y03. the whole lot are set as the source of the IFRAME, could any
of this break the session id?



Regards Nino











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janne Hietamäki
Sent: 28. august 2006 10:06
To:
wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Session
management







Session cookie expires when browser is shut down, but on the server
side the default is 30 minutes. This can be altered in the web.xml by adding something like this:

















session-config





 session-timeout60/session-timeout





/session-config

















Janne









On 28.8.2006, at 11.00, Nino Wael wrote:









That was what I thought, I do know that wicket is
not the bad guy hereJ





Whats the default timeout on the cookie? Or am I
barking up the wrong leg?



.regards Nino











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Janne Hietamäki
Sent: 28. august 2006 09:56
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Session
management













On 28.8.2006, at
10.53, Nino Wael wrote:












Hi



I
was wondering how wicket maintains its session state. We are currently
working on a crossbrowser application, where our application(wicket) lives
within an Iframe. If we hit refresh on the page, wicket looses its session id.
As far as I can see wicket does store the session id in a cookie?



Wicket has nothing
to do with this, it uses normal servlet container for session management.
Servlet spec states there have to be cookies and session id parameter for
fallback. So, yes, the session id is stored in a cookie.






























-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Session management

2006-08-28 Thread Janne Hietamäki
What kind of problems do you really have? May be you should check this http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Using_framesJanneOn 28.8.2006, at 11.23, Nino Wael wrote: Ahh, wasnt sure if you used something special. We use both mounted urls and url parameters, im wondering if this could give us the problem so for example we could have a link like this: http://Server/viewer/overblik/Y03 where this is the raw page http://server/viewer and parameters are overblik and Y03. the whole lot are set as the source of the IFRAME, could any of this break the session id? Regards Nino From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Janne Hietamäki Sent: 28. august 2006 10:06 To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Session management   Session cookie expires when browser is shut down, but on the server side the default is 30 minutes. This can be altered in the web.xml by adding something like this:        session-config    session-timeout60/session-timeout  /session-config        Janne    On 28.8.2006, at 11.00, Nino Wael wrote:That was what I thought, I do know that wicket is not the bad guy hereJ  Whats the default timeout on the cookie? Or am I barking up the wrong leg? .regards Nino From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Janne Hietamäki Sent: 28. august 2006 09:56 To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Session management      On 28.8.2006, at 10.53, Nino Wael wrote:  Hi I was wondering how wicket maintains it’s session state. We are currently working on a crossbrowser application, where our application(wicket) lives within an Iframe. If we hit refresh on the page, wicket looses its session id. As far as I can see wicket does store the session id in a cookie? Wicket has nothing to do with this, it uses normal servlet container for session management. Servlet spec states there have to be cookies and session id parameter for fallback. So, yes, the session id is stored in a cookie.        -Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easierDownload IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimohttp://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user  Janne HietamäkiTeknologiajohtajaOy Cemron AbOsoite:Kehräsaari33200 Tamperehttp://www.cemron.fipuh. +358 40 724 7680[EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Session management

2006-08-28 Thread Nino Wael
Our problem is that every time you hit the refresh, wicket apparently looses 
track of session. And creates a new sessionid.
 
 
The above is not so critical in it self, yet. But we have to create 
authentication, so the user can login if user wants to. I've tested the above 
with a simple html page on my laptop linking directly to our base page without 
being mounted or having parameters encapsuled in the url, this if working just 
fine. 
 
So im thinking that it could either be the way that the other vendor generates 
the iframe to wicket that causes this or it might be the encapsulation of 
parameters that does it or a combination?
 
 
 
regards Nino
 

-Oprindelig meddelelse- 
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] på vegne af Janne Hietamäki 
Sendt: ma 28-08-2006 10:34 
Til: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net 
Cc: 
Emne: Re: [Wicket-user] Session management



What kind of problems do you really have? May be you should check this 
http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Using_frames

Janne

On 28.8.2006, at 11.23, Nino Wael wrote:


Ahh, wasnt sure if you used something special.

 

We use both mounted urls and url parameters, im wondering if 
this could give us the problem so for example we could have a link like this:

 

http://Server/viewer/overblik/Y03

 

where this is the raw page http://server/viewer and parameters 
are overblik and Y03. the whole lot are set as the source of the IFRAME, could 
any of this break the session id?

 

Regards Nino

 


  _  


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Janne Hietamäki
Sent: 28. august 2006 10:06
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Session management

 

Session cookie expires when browser is shut down, but on the 
server side the default is 30 minutes. This can be altered in the web.xml by 
adding something like this:

 

 

session-config

  session-timeout60/session-timeout

/session-config

 

 

Janne

 

On 28.8.2006, at 11.00, Nino Wael wrote:





That was what I thought, I do know that wicket is not the bad 
guy here:-)

 

Whats the default timeout on the cookie? Or am I barking up the 
wrong leg?

 

.regards Nino

 


  _  


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Janne Hietamäki
Sent: 28. august 2006 09:56
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Session management

 

 

On 28.8.2006, at 10.53, Nino Wael wrote:






Hi

 

I was wondering how wicket maintains it’s session state. We are 
currently working on a crossbrowser application, where our application(wicket) 
lives within an Iframe. If we hit refresh on the page, wicket looses its 
session id. As far as I can see wicket does store the session id in a cookie?

Wicket has nothing to do with this, it uses normal servlet 
container for session management. Servlet spec states there have to be cookies 
and session id parameter for fallback. So, yes, the session id is stored in a 
cookie.

 





 


-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, 
security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make 
your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on 
Apache Geronimo

http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



Janne Hietamäki
Teknologiajohtaja
Oy Cemron Ab

Osoite:
Kehräsaari
33200 Tampere
http://www.cemron.fi http://www.cemron.fi/ 

puh. ꥞ 40 724 7680
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



winmail.dat

Re: [Wicket-user] Session management

2006-08-28 Thread Johan Compagner
you could use the FireFox plugin Tamper Data and look what is sent to wicket.See if the session cookie is sent to the server yes or no.johanOn 8/28/06, 
Nino Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our problem is that every time you hit the refresh, wicket apparently looses track of session. And creates a new sessionid.The above is not so critical in it self, yet. But we have to create authentication, so the user can login if user wants to. I've tested the above with a simple html page on my laptop linking directly to our base page without being mounted or having parameters encapsuled in the url, this if working just fine.
So im thinking that it could either be the way that the other vendor generates the iframe to wicket that causes this or it might be the encapsulation of parameters that does it or a combination?regards Nino
-Oprindelig meddelelse-Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] på vegne af Janne HietamäkiSendt: ma 28-08-2006 10:34
Til: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.netCc:Emne: Re: [Wicket-user] Session managementWhat kind of problems do you really have? May be you should check this 
http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Using_framesJanneOn 28.8.2006, at 11.23, Nino Wael wrote:Ahh, wasnt sure if you used something special.
We use both mounted urls and url parameters, im wondering if this could give us the problem so for example we could have a link like this:
http://Server/viewer/overblik/Y03where this is the raw page http://server/viewer and parameters are overblik and Y03. the whole lot are set as the source of the IFRAME, could any of this break the session id?
Regards Nino_From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Janne HietamäkiSent: 28. august 2006 10:06To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Session managementSession cookie expires when browser is shut down, but on the server side the default is 30 minutes. This can be altered in the 
web.xml by adding something like this:session-configsession-timeout60/session-timeout/session-config
JanneOn 28.8.2006, at 11.00, Nino Wael wrote:That was what I thought, I do know that wicket is not the bad guy here:-)
Whats the default timeout on the cookie? Or am I barking up the wrong leg?.regards Nino_From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Janne HietamäkiSent: 28. august 2006 09:56
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: Re: [Wicket-user] Session managementOn 28.8.2006
, at 10.53, Nino Wael wrote:HiI was wondering how wicket maintains it's session state. We are currently working on a crossbrowser application, where our application(wicket) lives within an Iframe. If we hit refresh on the page, wicket looses its session id. As far as I can see wicket does store the session id in a cookie?
Wicket has nothing to do with this, it uses normal servlet container for session management. Servlet spec states there have to be cookies and session id parameter for fallback. So, yes, the session id is stored in a cookie.
-Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easierDownload IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-userJanne Hietamäki
TeknologiajohtajaOy Cemron AbOsoite:Kehräsaari33200 Tamperehttp://www.cemron.fi 
http://www.cemron.fi/puh. ꥞ 40 724 7680[EMAIL PROTECTED]-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easierDownload IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___
Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Session management

2006-08-28 Thread Nino Wael








Im using Paros, trying out the plugin for firefox.



But as far as I can see



Wicket asks to set a new
session(initial page):



http://img181.imageshack.us/my.php?image=session1pq3.jpg





second hit:

http://img245.imageshack.us/img245/8315/session2vh3.jpg





regards Nino









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Johan Compagner
Sent: 28. august 2006 10:49
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Session
management





you could use the FireFox
plugin Tamper Data and look what is sent to wicket.
See if the session cookie is sent to the server yes or no.

johan





On 8/28/06, Nino
Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

Our problem is that every
time you hit the refresh, wicket apparently looses track of session. And
creates a new sessionid.


The above is not so critical in it self, yet. But we have to create
authentication, so the user can login if user wants to. I've tested the above
with a simple html page on my laptop linking directly to our base page without
being mounted or having parameters encapsuled in the url, this if working just
fine. 

So im thinking that it could either be the way that the other vendor generates
the iframe to wicket that causes this or it might be the encapsulation of
parameters that does it or a combination?



regards Nino 


-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
på vegne af Janne Hietamäki
Sendt: ma 28-08-2006 10:34 
Til: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc:
Emne: Re: [Wicket-user] Session
management



What kind of problems do you
really have? May be you should check this http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Using_frames

Janne

On 28.8.2006, at 11.23, Nino
Wael wrote:


Ahh,
wasnt sure if you used something special. 



We
use both mounted urls and url parameters, im wondering if this could give us
the problem so for example we could have a link like this:



 http://Server/viewer/overblik/Y03



where
this is the raw page http://server/viewer
and parameters are overblik and Y03. the whole lot are set as the source of the
IFRAME, could any of this break the session id? 



Regards
Nino




_


From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Janne Hietamäki
Sent:
28. august 2006 10:06
To:
wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net

Subject:
Re: [Wicket-user] Session management



Session
cookie expires when browser is shut down, but on the server side the default is
30 minutes. This can be altered in the web.xml by adding something like this:





session-config

session-timeout60/session-timeout

/session-config






Janne



On
28.8.2006, at 11.00, Nino Wael wrote:





That
was what I thought, I do know that wicket is not the bad guy here:-) 



Whats
the default timeout on the cookie? Or am I barking up the wrong leg?



.regards
Nino




_


From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Janne Hietamäki
Sent:
28. august 2006 09:56 
To:
wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject:
Re: [Wicket-user] Session management





On
28.8.2006 , at 10.53, Nino Wael wrote:






Hi



I
was wondering how wicket maintains it's session state. We are currently working
on a crossbrowser application, where our application(wicket) lives within an
Iframe. If we hit refresh on the page, wicket looses its session id. As far as
I can see wicket does store the session id in a cookie? 

Wicket
has nothing to do with this, it uses normal servlet container for session
management. Servlet spec states there have to be cookies and session id
parameter for fallback. So, yes, the session id is stored in a cookie. 









-
Using
Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? 
Get
stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download
IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo

http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___
Wicket-user
mailing list

Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



Janne Hietamäki 
Teknologiajohtaja
Oy Cemron Ab

Osoite:
Kehräsaari
33200 Tampere
http://www.cemron.fi
 http://www.cemron.fi/

puh. ꥞ 40 724 7680
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




- 
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo 
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642

Re: [Wicket-user] Session management

2006-08-28 Thread Nino Wael








This migth be a stupid
question but does getPageMap().clear(); clear the session aswell?







Regards Nino











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nino Wael
Sent: 28. august 2006 11:04
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Session
management





Im using Paros, trying out the plugin for firefox.



But as far as I can see



Wicket asks to set a new
session(initial page):



http://img181.imageshack.us/my.php?image=session1pq3.jpg





second hit:

http://img245.imageshack.us/img245/8315/session2vh3.jpg





regards Nino









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Johan Compagner
Sent: 28. august 2006 10:49
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Session
management





you could use the FireFox
plugin Tamper Data and look what is sent to wicket.
See if the session cookie is sent to the server yes or no.

johan



On 8/28/06, Nino
Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

Our problem is that every
time you hit the refresh, wicket apparently looses track of session. And
creates a new sessionid.


The above is not so critical in it self, yet. But we have to create
authentication, so the user can login if user wants to. I've tested the above
with a simple html page on my laptop linking directly to our base page without
being mounted or having parameters encapsuled in the url, this if working just
fine. 

So im thinking that it could either be the way that the other vendor generates
the iframe to wicket that causes this or it might be the encapsulation of
parameters that does it or a combination?



regards Nino 


-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
på vegne af Janne Hietamäki
Sendt: ma 28-08-2006 10:34 
Til: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc:
Emne: Re: [Wicket-user] Session
management



What kind of problems do you
really have? May be you should check this http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Using_frames

Janne

On 28.8.2006, at 11.23, Nino
Wael wrote:


Ahh,
wasnt sure if you used something special. 



We
use both mounted urls and url parameters, im wondering if this could give us
the problem so for example we could have a link like this:



 http://Server/viewer/overblik/Y03



where
this is the raw page http://server/viewer
and parameters are overblik and Y03. the whole lot are set as the source of the
IFRAME, could any of this break the session id? 



Regards
Nino




_


From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Janne Hietamäki
Sent:
28. august 2006 10:06
To:
wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net

Subject:
Re: [Wicket-user] Session management



Session
cookie expires when browser is shut down, but on the server side the default is
30 minutes. This can be altered in the web.xml by adding something like this:





session-config

session-timeout60/session-timeout

/session-config






Janne



On
28.8.2006, at 11.00, Nino Wael wrote:





That
was what I thought, I do know that wicket is not the bad guy here:-) 



Whats
the default timeout on the cookie? Or am I barking up the wrong leg?



.regards
Nino




_


From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Janne Hietamäki
Sent:
28. august 2006 09:56 
To:
wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject:
Re: [Wicket-user] Session management





On
28.8.2006 , at 10.53, Nino Wael wrote:






Hi



I
was wondering how wicket maintains it's session state. We are currently working
on a crossbrowser application, where our application(wicket) lives within an
Iframe. If we hit refresh on the page, wicket looses its session id. As far as
I can see wicket does store the session id in a cookie? 

Wicket
has nothing to do with this, it uses normal servlet container for session
management. Servlet spec states there have to be cookies and session id
parameter for fallback. So, yes, the session id is stored in a cookie. 









-
Using
Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? 
Get
stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download
IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo

http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___
Wicket-user
mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



Janne Hietamäki 
Teknologiajohtaja
Oy Cemron Ab

Osoite:
Kehräsaari
33200 Tampere
http://www.cemron.fi
 http://www.cemron.fi/

puh. ꥞ 40 724 7680
[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Wicket-user] Session management

2006-08-28 Thread Janne Hietamäki
If the page and the iframe content does not originate from the same  
server the browser security settings can cause the cookies are not  
accepted. For example on firefox setting Preferences/Privacy/Cookies/ 
for the originating site only should not be set.

If the cookie is set, the Cookie-header is sent on every request  
going to the server and you should see it on Paros.

Janne

On 28.8.2006, at 11.46, Nino Wael wrote:

 Our problem is that every time you hit the refresh, wicket  
 apparently looses track of session. And creates a new sessionid.


 The above is not so critical in it self, yet. But we have to create  
 authentication, so the user can login if user wants to. I've tested  
 the above with a simple html page on my laptop linking directly to  
 our base page without being mounted or having parameters encapsuled  
 in the url, this if working just fine.

 So im thinking that it could either be the way that the other  
 vendor generates the iframe to wicket that causes this or it might  
 be the encapsulation of parameters that does it or a combination?



 regards Nino


   -Oprindelig meddelelse-
   Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] på vegne af Janne  
 Hietamäki
   Sendt: ma 28-08-2006 10:34
   Til: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
   Cc:
   Emne: Re: [Wicket-user] Session management
   
   

   What kind of problems do you really have? May be you should check  
 this http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Using_frames

   Janne

   On 28.8.2006, at 11.23, Nino Wael wrote:


   Ahh, wasnt sure if you used something special.

   

   We use both mounted urls and url parameters, im wondering if 
 this  
 could give us the problem so for example we could have a link like  
 this:

   

   http://Server/viewer/overblik/Y03

   

   where this is the raw page http://server/viewer and parameters  
 are overblik and Y03. the whole lot are set as the source of the  
 IFRAME, could any of this break the session id?

   

   Regards Nino

   

   
   _


   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wicket- 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janne Hietamäki
   Sent: 28. august 2006 10:06
   To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
   Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Session management

   

   Session cookie expires when browser is shut down, but on the  
 server side the default is 30 minutes. This can be altered in the  
 web.xml by adding something like this:

   

   

   session-config

 session-timeout60/session-timeout

   /session-config

   

   

   Janne

   

   On 28.8.2006, at 11.00, Nino Wael wrote:

   
   
   

   That was what I thought, I do know that wicket is not the bad 
 guy  
 here:-)

   

   Whats the default timeout on the cookie? Or am I barking up the 
  
 wrong leg?

   

   .regards Nino


-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Session management

2006-08-28 Thread Korbinian Bachl
why dont you disable cookies in web.xml and rely on url rewriting then???

Regards,

Korbinian 

 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag 
 von Nino Wael
 Gesendet: Montag, 28. August 2006 15:32
 An: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 Betreff: Re: [Wicket-user] Session management
 
 I see the problem, as a default firefox actually allows 3rd 
 party cookies. But we are targeting IE 6(SP2) which does not 
 by default allow 3rd party cookies.
 
 Thanks for your mail. 
 
 Regards Nino
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
 Of Janne Hietamäki
 Sent: 28. august 2006 13:17
 To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Session management
 
 If the page and the iframe content does not originate from 
 the same server the browser security settings can cause the 
 cookies are not accepted. For example on firefox setting 
 Preferences/Privacy/Cookies/ for the originating site only 
 should not be set.
 
 If the cookie is set, the Cookie-header is sent on every 
 request going to the server and you should see it on Paros.
 
 Janne
 
 On 28.8.2006, at 11.46, Nino Wael wrote:
 
  Our problem is that every time you hit the refresh, wicket 
 apparently 
  looses track of session. And creates a new sessionid.
 
 
  The above is not so critical in it self, yet. But we have to create 
  authentication, so the user can login if user wants to. I've tested 
  the above with a simple html page on my laptop linking 
 directly to our 
  base page without being mounted or having parameters 
 encapsuled in the 
  url, this if working just fine.
 
  So im thinking that it could either be the way that the 
 other vendor 
  generates the iframe to wicket that causes this or it might be the 
  encapsulation of parameters that does it or a combination?
 
 
 
  regards Nino
 
 
  -Oprindelig meddelelse-
  Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] på vegne 
 af Janne  
  Hietamäki
  Sendt: ma 28-08-2006 10:34
  Til: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  Cc:
  Emne: Re: [Wicket-user] Session management
  
  
 
  What kind of problems do you really have? May be you 
 should check  
  this http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Using_frames
 
  Janne
 
  On 28.8.2006, at 11.23, Nino Wael wrote:
 
 
  Ahh, wasnt sure if you used something special.
 
  
 
  We use both mounted urls and url parameters, im 
 wondering if this  
  could give us the problem so for example we could have a link like  
  this:
 
  
 
  http://Server/viewer/overblik/Y03
 
  
 
  where this is the raw page http://server/viewer 
 and parameters  
  are overblik and Y03. the whole lot are set as the source of the  
  IFRAME, could any of this break the session id?
 
  
 
  Regards Nino
 
  
 
  
_
 
 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:wicket- 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janne Hietamäki
  Sent: 28. august 2006 10:06
  To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Session management
 
  
 
  Session cookie expires when browser is shut 
 down, but on the  
  server side the default is 30 minutes. This can be altered in the  
  web.xml by adding something like this:
 
  
 
  
 
  session-config
 
session-timeout60/session-timeout
 
  /session-config
 
  
 
  
 
  Janne
 
  
 
  On 28.8.2006, at 11.00, Nino Wael wrote:
 
  
  
  
 
  That was what I thought, I do know that wicket 
 is not the bad guy  
  here:-)
 
  
 
  Whats the default timeout on the cookie? Or am 
 I barking up the  
  wrong leg?
 
  
 
  .regards Nino
 
 
 --
 ---
 Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web 
 services, security?
 Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make 
 your job easier
 Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on 
 Apache Geronimo
 http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057;
dat=121642
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 
 --
 ---
 Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web 
 services, security?
 Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make 
 your job easier
 Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on 
 Apache Geronimo
 http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057;
dat=121642

Re: [Wicket-user] Session management

2006-08-28 Thread Nino Wael
I see the problem, as a default firefox actually allows 3rd party cookies. But 
we are targeting IE 6(SP2) which does not by default allow 3rd party cookies.

Thanks for your mail. 

Regards Nino

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janne Hietamäki
Sent: 28. august 2006 13:17
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Session management

If the page and the iframe content does not originate from the same  
server the browser security settings can cause the cookies are not  
accepted. For example on firefox setting Preferences/Privacy/Cookies/ 
for the originating site only should not be set.

If the cookie is set, the Cookie-header is sent on every request  
going to the server and you should see it on Paros.

Janne

On 28.8.2006, at 11.46, Nino Wael wrote:

 Our problem is that every time you hit the refresh, wicket  
 apparently looses track of session. And creates a new sessionid.


 The above is not so critical in it self, yet. But we have to create  
 authentication, so the user can login if user wants to. I've tested  
 the above with a simple html page on my laptop linking directly to  
 our base page without being mounted or having parameters encapsuled  
 in the url, this if working just fine.

 So im thinking that it could either be the way that the other  
 vendor generates the iframe to wicket that causes this or it might  
 be the encapsulation of parameters that does it or a combination?



 regards Nino


   -Oprindelig meddelelse-
   Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] på vegne af Janne  
 Hietamäki
   Sendt: ma 28-08-2006 10:34
   Til: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
   Cc:
   Emne: Re: [Wicket-user] Session management
   
   

   What kind of problems do you really have? May be you should check  
 this http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Using_frames

   Janne

   On 28.8.2006, at 11.23, Nino Wael wrote:


   Ahh, wasnt sure if you used something special.

   

   We use both mounted urls and url parameters, im wondering if 
 this  
 could give us the problem so for example we could have a link like  
 this:

   

   http://Server/viewer/overblik/Y03

   

   where this is the raw page http://server/viewer and parameters  
 are overblik and Y03. the whole lot are set as the source of the  
 IFRAME, could any of this break the session id?

   

   Regards Nino

   

   
   _


   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wicket- 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janne Hietamäki
   Sent: 28. august 2006 10:06
   To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
   Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Session management

   

   Session cookie expires when browser is shut down, but on the  
 server side the default is 30 minutes. This can be altered in the  
 web.xml by adding something like this:

   

   

   session-config

 session-timeout60/session-timeout

   /session-config

   

   

   Janne

   

   On 28.8.2006, at 11.00, Nino Wael wrote:

   
   
   

   That was what I thought, I do know that wicket is not the bad 
 guy  
 here:-)

   

   Whats the default timeout on the cookie? Or am I barking up the 
  
 wrong leg?

   

   .regards Nino


-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] session management

2005-11-26 Thread Manuel Corrales
Ok, this worked ok. Now i have a question, what kind of verification
should i do on checkAccess(), and if i inherits AuthenticatedWebPage,
what that do to my pages??




Re: [Wicket-user] session management

2005-11-26 Thread Igor Vaynberg
any kind of verification you want. thats your business logic. you have access to the session so you can pull the user from that.-IgorOn 11/26/05, 
Manuel Corrales [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, this worked ok. Now i have a question, what kind of verification
should i do on checkAccess(), and if i inherits AuthenticatedWebPage,
what that do to my pages??






Re: [Wicket-user] session management

2005-11-22 Thread Manuel Corrales
I have this session:

public final class UserSession extends WebSession
{
 private Usuario user;
 
 /**
 * Constructor.
 * @param app
 */
 public UserSession(Application app)
 {
  super(app);
 }
 
 /**
 * 
 * @return true si existe un usuario logeado.
 */
 public boolean isSignedIn()
 {
  if (user == null) 
   return false;
  return true;
 }

 /**
 * 
 * @return el nombre del usuario logeado.
 */
 public Usuario getUser()
 {
  return user;
 }

 /**
 * @param user
 * New user
 */
 public void setUser(Usuario user)
 {
  this.user = user;
 }

}


I have the sessionFactory on the application
and then on the submit method i do:

UserSession us = (UserSession)getSession();
us.setUser(usuario);
setResponsePage(new Bienvenido());

where usuario is an model object i get from database.
Is this right?
On 11/21/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/21/05, Manuel Corrales 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, i've asked this question once but dont get a solution. So here i go again:Sorry, must've missed it.


I have some clues about stateful beans and stateless beans but not too
much. What i need is that when a user logins, create an object and that
that object exists during the user session (to logout). Now i think
this is easy to do with a app server, but all i have is tomcat and
wicket. Is there a way of achieve this?This
is easy to do w/out an application server. all you have to do is put
the object into user's servlet-container session. It will remain there
until you close the session on user's behalf (users clicks log out
link) or the session times out. This is a general solution that will
work in any servlet-container environment. A problem with this approach
is that the session is just a map, so you always have to cast the
object when you pull it out. Wicket builds on top of the servlet
container's session by allowing you to use type-safe semantics.
look at WebSession object in wicket and ISessionFactory. By providing
your own ISessionFactory you can create your own subclass of WebSession
which can have a getter/setter method for your object. Whenever the
object is there, simply call the setter in the websession and the
object will remain there across requests. Use the getter to pull it
back out.
Here is an example implementation:public class PhonebookApplication extends HibernateApplication { private final ISessionFactory sessionFactory=new ISessionFactory() {  public wicket.Session

 newSession() {   return new PhonebookSession(PhonebookApplication.this);  }   }; protected ISessionFactory getSessionFactory() {  return sessionFactory; }
}Here PhonebookSession is a custom session subclass public class PhonebookSession extends WebSessionYou can get to session by creating a utility class in your page subclass that looks like this:public class BasePage extends WebPage { public PhonebookSession getMySession() { return (PhonebookSession)getSession()); }
Another related question is: How can i forbid access to a non loged user?

If you are using 1.1 check out the Page.checkAccess()
method. This method is called before rendering of any page. Here you do
the check and if the user is not logged in redirect them to a login
page. 
See Sign-in example for both solutions. Let me know if you need more help.-Igor




Re: [Wicket-user] session management

2005-11-22 Thread Igor Vaynberg
Looks right-IgorOn 11/22/05, Manuel Corrales [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have this session:

public final class UserSession extends WebSession
{
 private Usuario user;
 
 /**
 * Constructor.
 * @param app
 */
 public UserSession(Application app)
 {
  super(app);
 }
 
 /**
 * 
 * @return true si existe un usuario logeado.
 */
 public boolean isSignedIn()
 {
  if (user == null) 
   return false;
  return true;
 }

 /**
 * 
 * @return el nombre del usuario logeado.
 */
 public Usuario getUser()
 {
  return user;
 }

 /**
 * @param user
 * New user
 */
 public void setUser(Usuario user)
 {
  this.user = user;
 }

}


I have the sessionFactory on the application
and then on the submit method i do:

UserSession us = (UserSession)getSession();
us.setUser(usuario);
setResponsePage(new Bienvenido());

where usuario is an model object i get from database.
Is this right?
On 11/21/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
On 11/21/05, Manuel Corrales 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, i've asked this question once but dont get a solution. So here i go again:Sorry, must've missed it.



I have some clues about stateful beans and stateless beans but not too
much. What i need is that when a user logins, create an object and that
that object exists during the user session (to logout). Now i think
this is easy to do with a app server, but all i have is tomcat and
wicket. Is there a way of achieve this?This
is easy to do w/out an application server. all you have to do is put
the object into user's servlet-container session. It will remain there
until you close the session on user's behalf (users clicks log out
link) or the session times out. This is a general solution that will
work in any servlet-container environment. A problem with this approach
is that the session is just a map, so you always have to cast the
object when you pull it out. Wicket builds on top of the servlet
container's session by allowing you to use type-safe semantics.
look at WebSession object in wicket and ISessionFactory. By providing
your own ISessionFactory you can create your own subclass of WebSession
which can have a getter/setter method for your object. Whenever the
object is there, simply call the setter in the websession and the
object will remain there across requests. Use the getter to pull it
back out.
Here is an example implementation:public class PhonebookApplication extends HibernateApplication { private final ISessionFactory sessionFactory=new ISessionFactory() {  public wicket.Session


 newSession() {   return new PhonebookSession(PhonebookApplication.this);  }   }; protected ISessionFactory getSessionFactory() {  return sessionFactory; }
}Here PhonebookSession is a custom session subclass public class PhonebookSession extends WebSessionYou can get to session by creating a utility class in your page subclass that looks like this:public class BasePage extends WebPage { public PhonebookSession getMySession() { return (PhonebookSession)getSession()); }
Another related question is: How can i forbid access to a non loged user?

If you are using 1.1 check out the Page.checkAccess()
method. This method is called before rendering of any page. Here you do
the check and if the user is not logged in redirect them to a login
page. 
See Sign-in example for both solutions. Let me know if you need more help.-Igor






[Wicket-user] session management

2005-11-21 Thread Manuel Corrales
Hi, i've asked this question once but dont get a solution. So here i go again:

I have some clues about stateful beans and stateless beans but not too
much. What i need is that when a user logins, create an object and that
that object exists during the user session (to logout). Now i think
this is easy to do with a app server, but all i have is tomcat and
wicket. Is there a way of achieve this?

Another related question is: How can i forbid access to a non loged user?

Thanks very much.


Re: [Wicket-user] session management

2005-11-21 Thread Eelco Hillenius
You could best take a look at the sign-in example of wicket-examples.
It has a custom session - which can be used to store information you
want to keep during the whole user session - and it has an example of
how to prevent access/ redirect to a login page for a non logged on
user.

Eelco


On 11/21/05, Manuel Corrales [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi, i've asked this question once but dont get a solution. So here i go
 again:

  I have some clues about stateful beans and stateless beans but not too
 much. What i need is that when a user logins, create an object and that that
 object exists during the user session (to logout). Now i think this is easy
 to do with a app server, but all i have is tomcat and wicket. Is there a way
 of achieve this?

  Another related question is: How can i forbid access to a non loged user?

  Thanks very much.



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.  Get Certified Today
Register for a JBoss Training Course.  Free Certification Exam
for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv28alloc_id845op=click
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] session management

2005-11-21 Thread Igor Vaynberg
On 11/21/05, Manuel Corrales [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, i've asked this question once but dont get a solution. So here i go again:Sorry, must've missed it.

I have some clues about stateful beans and stateless beans but not too
much. What i need is that when a user logins, create an object and that
that object exists during the user session (to logout). Now i think
this is easy to do with a app server, but all i have is tomcat and
wicket. Is there a way of achieve this?This is easy to do w/out an application server. all you have to do is put the object into user's servlet-container session. It will remain there until you close the session on user's behalf (users clicks log out link) or the session times out. This is a general solution that will work in any servlet-container environment. A problem with this approach is that the session is just a map, so you always have to cast the object when you pull it out. Wicket builds on top of the servlet container's session by allowing you to use type-safe semantics. look at WebSession object in wicket and ISessionFactory. By providing your own ISessionFactory you can create your own subclass of WebSession which can have a getter/setter method for your object. Whenever the object is there, simply call the setter in the websession and the object will remain there across requests. Use the getter to pull it back out.
Here is an example implementation:public class PhonebookApplication extends HibernateApplication { private final ISessionFactory sessionFactory=new ISessionFactory() {  public wicket.Session
 newSession() {   return new PhonebookSession(PhonebookApplication.this);  }   }; protected ISessionFactory getSessionFactory() {  return sessionFactory; }
}Here PhonebookSession is a custom session subclass public class PhonebookSession extends WebSessionYou can get to session by creating a utility class in your page subclass that looks like this:public class BasePage extends WebPage { public PhonebookSession getMySession() { return (PhonebookSession)getSession()); }
Another related question is: How can i forbid access to a non loged user?
If you are using 1.1 check out the Page.checkAccess() method. This method is called before rendering of any page. Here you do the check and if the user is not logged in redirect them to a login page. 
See Sign-in example for both solutions. Let me know if you need more help.-Igor


[Wicket-user] Session Management

2005-08-07 Thread David Liebeherr

Hi all!

How can i set wicket to only use URL-Rewriting for sessions rather than cookies no matter if the 
browser supports cookies or not?


Thanx,
Dave


---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference  EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile  Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects  Teams * Testing  QA
Security * Process Improvement  Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Session Management

2005-08-07 Thread Juergen Donnerstag
That is not a matter of Wicket (Struts, Webwork). You have to
configure the servlet container (jetty, tomcat, etc)

Juergen

On 8/7/05, David Liebeherr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi all!
 
 How can i set wicket to only use URL-Rewriting for sessions rather than 
 cookies no matter if the
 browser supports cookies or not?
 
 Thanx,
 Dave
 
 
 ---
 SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference  EXPO
 September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
 Agile  Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects  Teams * Testing  QA
 Security * Process Improvement  Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference  EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile  Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects  Teams * Testing  QA
Security * Process Improvement  Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user