Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia OTRS Annual Report

2015-02-26 Thread pajz
Hi, thank you all for your feedback. Asaf and MZMcBride, I'll try to
answer your questions in one email, hope that's fine:

Asaf,
 I am curious in my volunteer capacity about the prominence of the
 commons-permissions-he queue among other permission queues and relative to
 the size of the Hebrew Wikipedia.  Does anyone have a good theory to
 explain it?

I don't really know about it, and volunteers from that queue probably
could share more insights, but I'd just note that, first, he doesn't
also have a permissions-he queue (as opposed to -de, -en, etc., which
all have two permissions queues, one for Commons and one for other
projects), and, second, there are two people who sent in more than a
fifth of all tickets responded to in 2014 ( 200 tickets), which is
somewhat high. Indeed, if you look at the 10 most frequent customers
you find that they account for almost 400 tickets, which might explain
how even a small language/Wiki community can have quite a busy queue.

MZMcBride,
 [...]
 I'm curious about this as well. I see that source code is mentioned at
 https://tools.wmflabs.org/otrsreports/index.html, but I didn't see a
 link off-hand. If a code repository exists somewhere that people could
 contribute to, it might be nice to add a link in the footer. Just poking
 around the HTML page source, the report seems to be built using at least
 jQuery, Bootstrap, and xtable. Very neat, I'd be interested to learn more.

I've added a link. Nothing fancy, really. I just wrote the HTML from
scratch based on Bootstrap with the TOC borrowed from someplace I
don't remember (but the Bootstrap team uses it in their own
documentation as well); the tables look the way they look because of
bootstrap-table (http://bootstrap-table.wenzhixin.net.cn/); the two
interactive (simple) charts were made using Chart.js
(http://www.chartjs.org/); xtable is an R package (I've used R for
the analytical parts that I did) which has a function to print R data
tables/frames as HTML tables, so that was all just copypaste. All
static. The bar charts were created using ggplot2 and the plot.ly R
API (https://plot.ly/ggplot2/). Not sure if that's what you wanted
to know, but I hope it helps ;).

Regarding long-term archival of the report, I've answered at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:OTRS/Reports/2014#Preserving_history
(in short: yes, there will be a PDF, and the web version has also been
saved via archive.org).

Best,
Patrik

On 26 February 2015 at 11:48, Kasia Odrozek kasia.odro...@wikimedia.de wrote:
 This is a great report on a truly amazing job!
 Thank you Patrik and all OTRS agents across the movement, I'm a fan of
 yours.
 Kasia

 2015-02-26 7:32 GMT+01:00 MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com:

 Hi.

 Re: https://tools.wmflabs.org/otrsreports/annual/2014

 phoebe ayers wrote:
 p.s. The report layout/webpage is lovely! could it be used for other
 reports?

 I'm curious about this as well. I see that source code is mentioned at
 https://tools.wmflabs.org/otrsreports/index.html, but I didn't see a
 link off-hand. If a code repository exists somewhere that people could
 contribute to, it might be nice to add a link in the footer. Just poking
 around the HTML page source, the report seems to be built using at least
 jQuery, Bootstrap, and xtable. Very neat, I'd be interested to learn more.

 I also left a note on the wiki talk page about preserving this report. I'm
 pretty concerned that these micro-sites won't last nearly as long as the
 wikis, which is probably fine and to be expected, but I want to make sure
 we don't lose important historical data.

 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:OTRS/Reports/2014#Preserving_history

 MZMcBride



 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe




 --
 Kasia Odrozek
 Vorstandsreferentin / Executive Advisor

 Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963 Berlin
 Tel. +49 (030) 219 158 260
 Mobil: +49 151 46752534

 http://wikimedia.de http://www.wikimedia.de/

 Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
 Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter
 der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für
 Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines

[Wikimedia-l] WMCON15 - Eligibility deadline closes in two days!

2015-02-26 Thread Daniela Gentner
Dear Wikimedians,

We would like to refer to our call for registration for the Wikimedia
Conference from February 13, 2015. As we thoroughly hope that a lot of
Wikimedians will come to Berlin to actively participate in the conference,
we would like to point out that the eligibility deadline ends in two days
(February 28).

Please carefully check the overview of eligibility statuses before
registering. It is important to note that the criteria have changed
compared to last year. Chapters, Thematic Organizations and User Groups
must have shown signs of recent activity AND be up-to-date on their
reporting by the eligibility deadline of February 28th. This means that
there are only two days left to follow-up on the aforementioned.

Please be kindly reminded to register until Monday, March 16, 2015. You
have less than three weeks left! For visa applicants we strongly recommend
to register as soon as possible and to check the amount of time needed for
applications to Schengen states.

Please find the link to the eligibility overview below (eligibility
deadline February 28):
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2015/Overview_Eligibility_Statuses

Also, please have a look at the current topics of the conference to pick
your representatives accordingly.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Conference_2015/Programme_team
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Conference_2015/Programme_team

Please find the link to the registration below (registration deadline March
16):
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2015/Registration
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2015/Registration

Today we have 17 affiliates who are represented at the conference. To the
remaining, please register as soon as possible. We would also love to see
you at the conference.

All registered participants can be found here:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2015/Participants

Please do not hesitate to reach out to us any time via wm...@wikimedia.de
should you have any questions or comments.

Best regards and see you soon in Berlin,

Daniela on behalf of the event team

Wikimedia Deutschland
wm...@wikimedia.de

-- 
Daniela Gentner
Team Event

Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963 Berlin
Tel. (030) 219 158 26-0
http://wikimedia.de

Stellen Sie sich eine Welt vor, in der jeder Mensch an der Menge allen
Wissens frei teilhaben kann. Helfen Sie uns dabei!
http://spenden.wikimedia.de/

Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter
der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für
Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wikimedia-l] Awesome Gender Gap Panel Streaming Live from WVU March 4th

2015-02-26 Thread Jake Orlowitz
Hi all,

March is an amazing month for raising awareness, excitement, and initiative
around broadening the presence women in our community and our content.

In that spirit, West Virginia University is hosting a stellar panel through
its Talking Publicly symposium series at WVU Libraries and the Reed College
of Media.

*Where Are All the Women? Wikipedia’s Gender Gap*
*March 4th 7:30pm EST *
Watch it Live:
http://tlcommons.wvu.edu/Webcasts/
#WikiGenderGap
https://twitter.com/search?f=realtimeq=WikiGenderGapsrc=typd

The panel includes:
*Adeline Koh -- Co-founder of The Rewriting Wikipedia Project which
supports and advocates for efforts to add entries and posts to Wikipedia
that focus on postcolonial studies as well as ethnic/minority and
marginalized peoples. Koh is currently an associate professor of literature
and the director of the Stockton College Center for the Digital Humanities.
She also is a core contributor to the Profhacker Column at the Chronicle of
Higher Education. Koh uses Wikipedia research writing assignments in her
classes and teaches others how to start activist instructional initiatives
of their own.

*Jami Mathewson -- Educational Partnerships Manager at the Wiki Education
Foundation where she develops partnerships with educational institutions
and academic associations to systematically bring more student editors and
high quality content to Wikipedia. Over the last three years, Mathewson has
focused her volunteer editing on improving content about women’s issues.
Mathewson identifies ways to support partners who are looking to promote
the use of Wikipedia as a teaching tool on a large scale.

*Sydney Poore -- Wikipedian in Residence at Cochrane Collaboration an
international not-for-profit research organization that provides
accessible, credible information to support informed decision-making health
care. Poore is a member of the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) Fund
Dissemination Committee and was a member of the Wikipedia English
Arbitration Committee and the WMF Ombudsmen Commission.

*Frank Schulenburg -- Executive Director of the Wiki Education Foundation
and former member of the executive management team of the Wikimedia
Foundation. His work primarily has focused on broadening participation and
developing the public understanding of Wikipedia, especially among subject
matter experts. Schulenburg has been involved with Wikipedia since 2005,
both as an author and as a photographer.

The following day WVU will host a 3-hour workshop to address strategies on
campuses underway for correcting the gender gap and introduce the protocols
of writing for Wikipedia at WVU with ideas for proven course assignments
and strategies for adoption in their courses.

This is only the kick-off in a year-long focus at WVU on Women and
Wikipedia.  WVU Dean of Libraries Jon Cawthorne was touched and inspired
after he heard the story of Adrianne Wadewitz and is dedicating this year
of discussion, experimentation, and action to her.

For full information about both events:
http://reedcollegeofmedia.wvu.edu/about/featured-events/wiki-panel

*Again, March 4th at 7:30pm EST*
*Watch it Live: http://tlcommons.wvu.edu/Webcasts/
http://tlcommons.wvu.edu/Webcasts/*

Cheers,

   - Jake Orlowitz (Ocaasi)
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Who are the nicest people on our projects ?

2015-02-26 Thread
Now the run has been running a bit longer, it can be seen[1] that the
real sink is the logging table from wikidata. Other projects are
pretty quick from a few minutes to Commons taking half an hour.
Wikidata takes 7 hours for each query. It's a big log!

I am testing out separating wikidata from the other queries, so this
might get the majority done much more quickly. Either way, all the
reports should be finished within about 3 days. After that the monthly
updates should be done within an afternoon. :-)

Links
1. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Faebot

Fae

On 26 February 2015 at 06:02, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
 Fæ wrote:
Re: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Faebot/thanks

I am glad the tables are useful, hopefully stimulating more positive
use of the thanks notifier by contributors.

The reports are updating *slowly*, currently at April 2014... This is
in part because of the WMFlabs outage yesterday, though in general any
report of the logging table is going to be slow (it is the largest
table on the wiki database). The first run-through will take several
days as it is going back through all of 2014. Once it is only
reporting on the previous month, I suspect it will finish monthly
updates within the first first day.

 Hi.

 Hmm, I'm not sure how you're measuring largest, but I imagine on most
 wikis there are more rows in the revision table than there are in the
 logging table. For example, on the English Wikipedia, there are
 approximately 598,859,006 rows in the revision table and 62,731,285 rows
 in the logging table. I suspect on most wikis, revision, text, and maybe
 archive would typically be larger than logging, except in weird cases
 such as loginwiki[_p]. And then of course there are the *links tables. But
 it depends on whether you're comparing size on disk or number of rows.

Yes I got it wrong! :-)

 You probably want to use logging_userindex instead of logging. The former
 is typically significantly faster due to the way we use table views.

That's how it works. The key line is
SELECT log_user_text, count(log_action)
FROM {}wiki_p.logging_userindex

Where {} iterates over wiki short names.

 I have a bit of experience with database reports. Off-hand I'd say it
 should be possible to query all of this information in under an hour. With
 the index on logging[_userindex].log_action, even a large table such as
 logging shouldn't be too awful to query for this information. If you have
 queries that are taking a very long time, we should probably investigate.

Maybe, I have experimented a little with ways of writing the query
(such as using log_user rather than log_user_text) but have not found
a magic trick yet. Remember I'm reporting all of 2014 first. After
this first run, the time taken is unlikely to be noticed by anyone, so
volunteer time vs. processing time will mean I'll probably get on with
other projects, rather than spending my wiki-time making this SQL
based report more efficient. Naturally, if someone wants to offer me
some funding, or bribes me by nominating my Commons RFA, I'll look
again. ;-)

Cheers,
Fae

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Who are the nicest people on our projects ?

2015-02-26 Thread Rodrigo Padula
Hello Fae,

Are you generating json somewhere or thiking to create an API for that
information?

I have some ideas that I started to develop last year, I will ping you in
private.

Best regards and thanks by helping us with the important information.

Rodrigo Padula

2015-02-26 14:01 GMT-03:00 Fæ fae...@gmail.com:

 Now the run has been running a bit longer, it can be seen[1] that the
 real sink is the logging table from wikidata. Other projects are
 pretty quick from a few minutes to Commons taking half an hour.
 Wikidata takes 7 hours for each query. It's a big log!

 I am testing out separating wikidata from the other queries, so this
 might get the majority done much more quickly. Either way, all the
 reports should be finished within about 3 days. After that the monthly
 updates should be done within an afternoon. :-)

 Links
 1. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Faebot

 Fae

 On 26 February 2015 at 06:02, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
  Fæ wrote:
 Re: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Faebot/thanks
 
 I am glad the tables are useful, hopefully stimulating more positive
 use of the thanks notifier by contributors.
 
 The reports are updating *slowly*, currently at April 2014... This is
 in part because of the WMFlabs outage yesterday, though in general any
 report of the logging table is going to be slow (it is the largest
 table on the wiki database). The first run-through will take several
 days as it is going back through all of 2014. Once it is only
 reporting on the previous month, I suspect it will finish monthly
 updates within the first first day.
 
  Hi.
 
  Hmm, I'm not sure how you're measuring largest, but I imagine on most
  wikis there are more rows in the revision table than there are in the
  logging table. For example, on the English Wikipedia, there are
  approximately 598,859,006 rows in the revision table and 62,731,285 rows
  in the logging table. I suspect on most wikis, revision, text, and maybe
  archive would typically be larger than logging, except in weird cases
  such as loginwiki[_p]. And then of course there are the *links tables.
 But
  it depends on whether you're comparing size on disk or number of rows.

 Yes I got it wrong! :-)

  You probably want to use logging_userindex instead of logging. The former
  is typically significantly faster due to the way we use table views.

 That's how it works. The key line is
 SELECT log_user_text, count(log_action)
 FROM {}wiki_p.logging_userindex

 Where {} iterates over wiki short names.

  I have a bit of experience with database reports. Off-hand I'd say it
  should be possible to query all of this information in under an hour.
 With
  the index on logging[_userindex].log_action, even a large table such as
  logging shouldn't be too awful to query for this information. If you have
  queries that are taking a very long time, we should probably investigate.

 Maybe, I have experimented a little with ways of writing the query
 (such as using log_user rather than log_user_text) but have not found
 a magic trick yet. Remember I'm reporting all of 2014 first. After
 this first run, the time taken is unlikely to be noticed by anyone, so
 volunteer time vs. processing time will mean I'll probably get on with
 other projects, rather than spending my wiki-time making this SQL
 based report more efficient. Naturally, if someone wants to offer me
 some funding, or bribes me by nominating my Commons RFA, I'll look
 again. ;-)

 Cheers,
 Fae

 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wikimedia-l] Events and editathons with journalists

2015-02-26 Thread Andrea Zanni
Dear all,
I was wondering if anyone, in the Wikimedia movement,
has done editathons and wiki-events with *journalists*.
In April, Wikimedia Italia will host a workshop at the International
Journalism Festival, and we'd welcome tips and suggestions.

Cheers

Aubrey
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia OTRS Annual Report

2015-02-26 Thread Kasia Odrozek
This is a great report on a truly amazing job!
Thank you Patrik and all OTRS agents across the movement, I'm a fan of
yours.
Kasia

2015-02-26 7:32 GMT+01:00 MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com:

 Hi.

 Re: https://tools.wmflabs.org/otrsreports/annual/2014

 phoebe ayers wrote:
 p.s. The report layout/webpage is lovely! could it be used for other
 reports?

 I'm curious about this as well. I see that source code is mentioned at
 https://tools.wmflabs.org/otrsreports/index.html, but I didn't see a
 link off-hand. If a code repository exists somewhere that people could
 contribute to, it might be nice to add a link in the footer. Just poking
 around the HTML page source, the report seems to be built using at least
 jQuery, Bootstrap, and xtable. Very neat, I'd be interested to learn more.

 I also left a note on the wiki talk page about preserving this report. I'm
 pretty concerned that these micro-sites won't last nearly as long as the
 wikis, which is probably fine and to be expected, but I want to make sure
 we don't lose important historical data.

 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:OTRS/Reports/2014#Preserving_history

 MZMcBride



 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe




-- 
Kasia Odrozek
Vorstandsreferentin / Executive Advisor

Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963 Berlin
Tel. +49 (030) 219 158 260
Mobil: +49 151 46752534

http://wikimedia.de http://www.wikimedia.de/

Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter
der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für
Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Events and editathons with journalists

2015-02-26 Thread Winifred Olliff
Hello, Andrea:

This sounds like an interesting project!

Here are some examples that popped into my head right away:
*CIS (is planning a workshop for journalists as part of Kannada language
outreach)
*Wikimedia CH (did some work building a network of journalism schools)
*Wikimedia Argentina (did at least one workshop for journalists back in
2012 in Rosario City)
*Wikimedia Deutschland (did at least one workshop back in 2013 with
journalists from ZDF Berlin)
*The Malayalam community did a workshop for journalists as part of the
events leading up to their community's 2013 conference

Not sure if everyone I've listed is working on this currently, but these
groups may have some experience to share. And there must be others I
haven't listed here! Seems like a good opportunity to share some learning
patterns on this topic, since I haven't found much there about working with
journalists! :)  https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Learning_patterns

Cheers and best of luck with your project! We look forward to the results.

Winifred



On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Andrea Zanni zanni.andre...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Dear all,
 I was wondering if anyone, in the Wikimedia movement,
 has done editathons and wiki-events with *journalists*.
 In April, Wikimedia Italia will host a workshop at the International
 Journalism Festival, and we'd welcome tips and suggestions.

 Cheers

 Aubrey
 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe




-- 
Winifred Olliff
Program Officer
Wikimedia Foundation
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] Leaving the Wikimedia Foundation

2015-02-26 Thread Anasuya Sengupta
Dear all,

To everyone who has reached out on the maillists, and privately, thank you.
I feel overwhelmed by the support, and deeply grateful and moved by the
appreciation.

I would like to - and will - respond to each of you individually, but given
my health, my apologies that I'm not able to respond to each of your
incredible messages as immediately as I'd like to.

...so yes, more to come, and many more journeys to share together!

Warmly,
Anasuya



On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Anasuya Sengupta asengu...@wikimedia.org
wrote:

 Dear friends and colleagues, fellow adventurers on the Wikimedia journey -

 Goodbyes are overrated.[1] But since I’m sure this will be au revoir, I’ll
 continue: I am leaving the Foundation as head of the Grantmaking
 department, at the end of March. This was not an easy decision to make;
 this is not an easy email to write.

 As some of you know, I have been battling health issues over the past few
 months. I’ve learnt sharp and intimate truths about myself as I’ve worked
 to get better, and what I’ve kept coming back to is the compassionate but
 fierce feminist slogan around self-care and sustainability: ‘what’s the
 point of the revolution if we can’t dance?’[2] To reassure you all, I will
 be well,[3] but I need a little time and space to focus on getting my
 dancing legs strong again.

 That said, I am pleased that we have a really solid plan in place as I
 leave. As Lila’s email just announced, Luis Villa (our current Deputy
 General Counsel) will be taking over the team effective immediately, and
 leading the organisation further in our support of Wikimedia communities
 worldwide. Luis brings with him a range of skills and qualities that I know
 will stand him, the team, and the movement in wonderful stead through it
 all. As a friend and colleague, I am so delighted to be supporting Luis
 through the next few weeks of transition.

 I joined the Foundation in July 2012 to oversee and implement the FDC
 process. Since then, I’ve had the privilege of creating and leading a
 department of more than twenty remarkable and passionate people who care
 about our mission, our communities, and the resources needed to match the
 two.

 We went from Asaf managing a small grants portfolio on his own, ably
 supported on occasion by Winifred, to a fully fledged grantmaking
 department with a spectrum of monetary and non-monetary resources. We have
 been able to offer these in different ways to different parts of our
 movement: to individual volunteers with great ideas in need of project
 management, to small groups experimenting with new initiatives, and to
 established organisations who form critical content and policy partnerships
 in their local contexts. We built an infrastructure for understanding our
 collective impact. We learned together about what our different communities
 are doing globally, about the successes and challenges we have, and above
 all: about how we can, together, create a more powerful set of outcomes for
 free knowledge.

 In doing so, I’ve had the joy of discovery,[4] of learning from and with
 some of the most dedicated volunteers in the world, who believe that
 knowledge matters. Most importantly, that it’s not only free knowledge
 _for_ all that we seek, but even more critically, that we believe in
 knowledge _from_ and _with_ all.

 And I’ve discovered that the nerdy, geeky, obsessed-with-data part of me
 found a home in this extraordinary universe, where everybody’s “unimaginable,
 magnificent, wonderful, stupid, amazing worlds” can find expression.[5] I
 look forward to the day when my worlds find more space on Wikipedia, when
 80% of the globe is represented by far more than 20% of the edits, when
 much more than 15% of our contributors can self-identify as women. Till
 then, I’ll keep fighting notability one article at a time...[6]

 So thank you for sharing your worlds with me, and no thanks for turning me
 into an obsessive Wikimedian. :-) As I have learnt with you, I know I have
 done so with trust, and as I have challenged you, I hope I have done so
 with respect. I look forward to continuing our friendships and obsessions
 on a wiki near you.

 With appreciation and gratitude,

 Anasuya

 p.s. You can find me in the future at my enWP user page (User:Anasuyas
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anasuyas) or (dare I say it) on
 Facebook. Longer diatribes on liff, the universe and everything can be sent
 to anasuyaATsanmathi.org

 [1] Neil Gaiman, American Gods (Chapter 8)

 [2] Urgent Action Fund, a funder of women’s human rights defenders, has
 this book on sustainability:
 http://urgentactionfund.org/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/06/WTPR-Final-Book.pdf

 [3] And look forward to dancing together on the beaches of a future
 Wikimania…

 [4] Sometimes frustrating, sometimes unbelievable, sometimes somewhat
 insane; but yes mostly, generous beyond belief, and always, joyous. :-)

 [5] More Neil Gaiman, from The Sandman: