Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees appointments and officer positions 2018

[Lucas Teles]

Congrats from Brazil.

Hope for a community of editors and contributors as diverse as the Board
already is.

Teles

Em qui, 19 de jul de 2018 às 12:34, Christophe Henner 
escreveu:

> And because I can't step down properly, a part of the email was missing,
> here is the complete version
>
>
>
> *Hello everyone,*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *I am happy to make some announcements about the Wikimedia Foundation Board
> of Trustees. As of today, Tanya Capuano has formally joined the Board.
> Tanya is an experienced financial professional who has worked as a Vice
> President of Finance for Intuit, and more recently as CFO for the software
> firm G5. She is passionate about education, having served on the boards of
> various educational nonprofits.Tanya will enrich the financial and
> accounting skills critical to the oversight of the Foundation and to her
> role as Chair of the Foundation’s Audit Committee, to which she was also
> elected today. Please join me in warming welcoming her in the Wikimedia
> movement. As Tanya joins us, we also see Kelly Battles and Alice Wiegand,
> two very valuable trustees, leave us as their terms of service come to a
> close. Both of them have been stellar trustees who helped the board and the
> Foundation grow and become a more robust organisation.Kelly and Alice, you
> have brought so much to the Foundation and to the movement, and it has been
> an immense pleasure serving with you. I can only hope, as has often been
> the case with other former trustees, our movement will be lucky enough we
> keep seeing both of you around and that you keep on bringing your
> experience, skills, and wisdom to all of us. As you might have noticed we
> still are one trustee short, with a total of nine. We are currently
> searching for a tenth Trustee, with a technology and platform background;
> you can read the profile here on Commons
> <
> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a8/Board_Recruiting_Candidate_Packet_May_2018.pdf
> >.
> Today the Board also voted to appoint María Sefidari as Chair and
> Christophe Henner as Vice Chair. After serving as Chair for two terms, I
> decided to step down and support María as Chair, hopefully as effectively
> as she served me and the organization when she was my Vice Chair. María and
> I both have a long history of involvement in the Wikimedia community, and
> prior to coming to the Foundation, held leadership roles in local Wikimedia
> organizations.In addition, the Board re-elected Nataliia Tymkiv as Chair of
> the Board Governance Committee, supported by BGC members James Heilman and
> Dariusz Jemielniak, and alternates Raju Narisetti and María. We also
> elected Raju as Chair of the Human Resources Committee, with members María
> and Dariusz.  Finally, as noted, we elected Tanya Capuano as Chair of the
> Audit Committee, with Christophe and Raju as members and María and Jimmy as
> alternates.  More about Christophe, María, and the Committee Chairs are
> below. I hope you will join me in congratulating them on their new
> positions and wish them success in their terms ahead.On a more personal
> note, I would like to thank everyone for the last two years. This is not
> farewell, but the last two years have been a roller coaster and I am proud
> I had the chance to serve as Chair and helped us building up the future of
> the movement. We have achieved a lot in the last 24 months, and the best is
> yet to come!ChristopheAbout Tanya CapuanoTanya Pine Capuano most recently
> was the chief financial officer (CFO) of the data-driven marketing company
> G5 in Bend, Oregon. Originally from San Jose, California, she has
> wide-ranging experience including strategy and financial planning and
> analysis in technology. In addition to her recent role at G5, she has also
> worked for Hewlett-Packard and Intuit.She has also supported numerous
> education initiatives throughout her career; including serving on the
> boards of Education Pioneers, Los Altos Educational Foundation, and “I Have
> a Dream” Foundation San Francisco, an organization whose San Francisco
> chapter she co-founded.She is very involved with Stanford University alumni
> life, having earned a bachelor's in economics, a master's in education, and
> a master of business administration from the university. After graduating,
> she worked as the university’s Director of Alumni Relations and Development
> Director for the Initiative on Improving K-12 Education. She has also
> served on the board of the Stanford University Graduate School of
> Business.Tanya lives in the San Francisco Bay Area with her husband and two
> children. They enjoy traveling as a family and outdoor sports.About María
> SefidariMaría Sefidari Huici is a professor in the Digital Communications,
> Culture and Citizenship Master's degree program of Rey Juan Carlos
> University at the MediaLab-Prado.Born in Madrid, Spain, where she still
> lives today, María graduated with a 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] [PRESS RELEASE] Wikimedia Foundation and Kiwix partner to grow offline access to Wikipedia

[Lucas Teles]

Those are excellent news!

I wonder if there are any plans on working on less rich countries. They
usually have less internet access and would benefit from that.

Wikipedia Zero has just expired in Angola and I can’t imagine a best way to
replace that source of knowledge withou having to deal with the negative
side of it.

Concerning the many users from Angola that reached out to me complaining
about the end of Wikipedia Zero in Angola, giving them access to Kiwix will
be of enormous help.

Teles

Em qui, 19 de jul de 2018 às 19:16, Samantha Lien 
escreveu:

> This press release is also available on the Wikimedia blog here:
> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2018/07/18/wikimedia-foundation-and-kiwix-partner-to-grow-offline-access-to-wikipedia/Wikimedia
> Foundation and Kiwix partner to grow offline access to Wikipedia
> *The Wikimedia Foundation and Switzerland-based Kiwix announce a global
> collaboration to increase offline access to Wikipedia and the Wikimedia
> projects.*
>
> Lausanne, Switzerland, and San Francisco, USA, 18 July 2018 – The
> Wikimedia Foundation has announced a partnership with Kiwix, the free and
> open-source software solution that enables offline access to educational
> content, to expand and improve access to Wikipedia and other Wikimedia
> projects globally. This partnership will include a $275,000 contribution to
> Kiwix to further enhance offline access to Wikipedia in parts of the world
> where consistent, affordable internet connectivity presents a significant
> barrier to accessing Wikipedia.
>
> “Our hope is that one day everyone will have access to the internet, and
> eliminate the need for other offline methods of access to information.”
> said Kiwix CEO Stephane Coillet-Matillon. “But we know that there are still
> serious gaps in internet access globally that require solutions today.
> Kiwix is a tool to start fixing things right now.”
> The Wikimedia Foundation and Kiwix have had a long-standing collaborative
> relationship to expand access to Wikipedia around the world. This includes
> recent support to Kiwix and WikiProject Medicine to improve the
> availability of offline Wikipedia medical content [1], as well as
> improvements to the Kiwix desktop experience.
>
> Through this partnership, the two organizations will collaborate to create
> a long-term strategy for third party reuse of Kiwix’s free access platform,
> fix longstanding code debt, improve Kiwix’s usability across mobile
> platforms including Android, and integrate Kiwix’s and the Wikimedia
> Foundation’s technical operations more closely for improved Wikipedia
> offline experiences.
>
> “As part of the 2030 direction for Wikimedia’s future [2], we’re thrilled
> to be partnering with Kiwix to invest in solutions to address one of the
> critical barriers to participating in Wikipedia globally: reliable internet
> access,” said Anne Gomez, Senior Program Manager at the Wikimedia
> Foundation. “We have made a commitment as an organization to actively
> address the challenges and barriers to reaching our global Wikimedia
> vision: a world in which everyone can freely share in knowledge. Today
> marks an important step toward realizing that commitment.”
>
> The Wikimedia vision is global: a world in which everyone can freely share
> in the sum of all knowledge. While there has been a significant reduction
> in high mobile data costs and other barriers to participating in Wikipedia,
> more than half the world’s population is not yet online. [3]
>
> Today, Kiwix sits at the heart of the offline ecosystem with more than 3
> million users from more than 200 countries. It can store millions of
> Wikipedia articles from any of Wikipedia’s nearly 300 languages along with
> thousands of books and videos on a single flash drive or microSD card for
> access on smartphones and computers. Kiwix has also worked with nonprofits
> such as the Orange Foundation, Human Rights Foundation, Internet in a Box,
> WikiFundi, and Digisoft to scale distribution of offline education
> materials around the world to students, teachers, and the general public.
>
> More information about the Wikimedia Foundation’s work to expand access
> and participation to Wikipedia globally, including information about this
> partnership with Kiwix, can be found in the Wikimedia Foundation’s
> 2018-2019 annual plan. [4]
>
>
>
> About the Wikimedia Foundation
>
> The Wikimedia Foundation is the nonprofit organization that supports and
> operates Wikipedia and its sister free knowledge projects. Wikipedia is the
> world’s free knowledge resource, spanning more than 45 million articles
> across nearly 300 languages. Every month, more than 200,000 people edit
> Wikipedia and the Wikimedia projects, collectively creating and improving
> knowledge that is accessed by more than 1 billion unique devices every
> month. This all makes Wikipedia one of the most popular web properties in
> the world. Based in San Francisco, California, the Wikimedia Foundation is
> a 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Board of Trustees participation in the Movement Strategy Process

[Samuel Klein]

Many thanks, Kaarel and Chris. :)



On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:10 PM Kaarel Vaidla 
wrote:

>  Dear Craig and SJ,
>
> > > Which group focuses on information quality and accuracy?
> >And which group focuses on information breadth and coverage?
> If these are cross-cutting issues touching on many groups, where should
> relevant input go?
>
> Thank you for forwarding your questions and input in relation to the
> strategy process!
>
> We have not yet set up a place or page where collect the input on meta, but
> we plan to do so in the near future. Currently I can invite you to leave
> the questions and comments on the *Working Group talk page* [1], so it can
> be commented on and later be fed into relevant Working Group. You can also
> add tags / comments to state where you think they might fit in.
>
> The topics you have mentioned in this thread are indeed cross-cutting and
> related to various Working Groups. What I can suggest is publish the
> question with rationale behind it in the context of the proposed thematic
> areas for Working Groups. Regarding the wide scope of the proposed
> questions, it would make sense to provide some more context and specify
> diverse aspects of these questions, so their focus would be more clear for
> the Working Groups and they can be better fed into discussions / be
> commented on.
>
> Personally, at a first superficial glance, I can see strongest connections
> for these questions to the Diversity, Partnerships and Product & Technology
> groups, but like I said, it would be easier to say, if the questions would
> be more elaborated. Feel free to share your point of view or understanding!
>
> Thank you for bringing this topic up and looking forward to receiving more
> input from you throughout the process!
>
> Wishing you a nice end of the week!
> Kaarel
>
>
> [1]
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Working_Groups
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 9:34 PM Chris Keating 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi SJ,
> >
> > I think everyone who is taking part in this stage of the strategy process
> > already knows about it.
> >
> > There was of course an open call for members of the working groups a few
> > weeks ago, and the working groups will have some unspecified method of
> > involving the broader community in these conversations, though I expect
> the
> > only substantive conversations will happen among working group members -
> > just as to date the only substantive conversations about movement
> strategy
> > have happened at the Wikimedia Conference.
> >
> > I genuinely don't know whether anyone including WMF thinks the WMF
> advisory
> > board still exists.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, 17:07 Samuel Klein,  wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 4:48 PM Craig Newmark <
> craig.newm...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Maria, thanks, much appreciated!
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hear, hear!  It has been good to see the updates all year.
> > >
> > >
> > > > > Which group focuses on information quality and accuracy?
> > > >
> > >
> > > And which group focuses on information breadth and coverage?
> > > If these are cross-cutting issues touching on many groups, where should
> > > relevant input go?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:54 PM Chris Keating <
> > chriskeatingw...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > No-one seems to be particularly sure if the Advisory Board is still a
> > > > thing or not.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Let's fix that :)   This seems like something advisors are particularly
> > > suited to.
> > >
> > > SJ
> > > ___
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > 
> > ___
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > 
>
>
>
> --
> *Kaarel Vaidla*
> Process Architect for
> Wikimedia Movement Strategy
> 2030.wikimedia.org
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> 



-- 
Samuel Klein  @metasj   w:user:sj  +1 617 529 4266

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Board of Trustees participation in the Movement Strategy Process

[Kaarel Vaidla]

 Dear Craig and SJ,

> > Which group focuses on information quality and accuracy?
>And which group focuses on information breadth and coverage?
If these are cross-cutting issues touching on many groups, where should
relevant input go?

Thank you for forwarding your questions and input in relation to the
strategy process!

We have not yet set up a place or page where collect the input on meta, but
we plan to do so in the near future. Currently I can invite you to leave
the questions and comments on the *Working Group talk page* [1], so it can
be commented on and later be fed into relevant Working Group. You can also
add tags / comments to state where you think they might fit in.

The topics you have mentioned in this thread are indeed cross-cutting and
related to various Working Groups. What I can suggest is publish the
question with rationale behind it in the context of the proposed thematic
areas for Working Groups. Regarding the wide scope of the proposed
questions, it would make sense to provide some more context and specify
diverse aspects of these questions, so their focus would be more clear for
the Working Groups and they can be better fed into discussions / be
commented on.

Personally, at a first superficial glance, I can see strongest connections
for these questions to the Diversity, Partnerships and Product & Technology
groups, but like I said, it would be easier to say, if the questions would
be more elaborated. Feel free to share your point of view or understanding!

Thank you for bringing this topic up and looking forward to receiving more
input from you throughout the process!

Wishing you a nice end of the week!
Kaarel


[1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Working_Groups


On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 9:34 PM Chris Keating 
wrote:

> Hi SJ,
>
> I think everyone who is taking part in this stage of the strategy process
> already knows about it.
>
> There was of course an open call for members of the working groups a few
> weeks ago, and the working groups will have some unspecified method of
> involving the broader community in these conversations, though I expect the
> only substantive conversations will happen among working group members -
> just as to date the only substantive conversations about movement strategy
> have happened at the Wikimedia Conference.
>
> I genuinely don't know whether anyone including WMF thinks the WMF advisory
> board still exists.
>
> Chris
>
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, 17:07 Samuel Klein,  wrote:
>
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 4:48 PM Craig Newmark  >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Maria, thanks, much appreciated!
> > >
> >
> > Hear, hear!  It has been good to see the updates all year.
> >
> >
> > > > Which group focuses on information quality and accuracy?
> > >
> >
> > And which group focuses on information breadth and coverage?
> > If these are cross-cutting issues touching on many groups, where should
> > relevant input go?
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:54 PM Chris Keating <
> chriskeatingw...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > No-one seems to be particularly sure if the Advisory Board is still a
> > > thing or not.
> > >
> >
> > Let's fix that :)   This seems like something advisors are particularly
> > suited to.
> >
> > SJ
> > ___
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > 
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> 



-- 
*Kaarel Vaidla*
Process Architect for
Wikimedia Movement Strategy
2030.wikimedia.org
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

[Wikimedia-l] Fwd: Movement Strategy Working Group goal proposals some of which overlap Thematic Areas

[James Salsman]

I'm forwarding my Movement Strategy proposals for wider comment.

Best regards,
Jim

-- Forwarded message --
From: James Salsman 
Date: Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 8:06 PM
Subject: Movement Strategy Working Group goal proposals some of which
overlap Thematic Areas
To: kvai...@wikimedia.org
Cc: Nicole Ebber , Ad Huikeshoven
, Pine W 


Hi Kaarel,

Thank you for facilitating the Movement Strategy teleconference.

As promised, here are the Working Group proposals I would like to
make, each of which is listed with the applicable Thematic Area(s)
from the abbreviations below. I hope this helps resolve the issue of
how to assign questions which overlap in different Areas.

[R] [COM] [DIV] [ADV] Movement leaders need to advocate for policies
which directly support the informed, healthy, and abundant
availability of community volunteers. I.e.
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2018-June/090494.html
;

[R] [REV] [ADV] CFO should be trying to achieve capital appreciation
instead of cash retention, the former being a refinement of the
latter, and our investments should be consistent with our principles
-- https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2018-January/089458.html
-- and -- 
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales/Archive_227=828849352#Warren_Buffett_investment_lessons_and_our_endowment_fund
;

[R] [PAR] [T] [CAP] intelligibility remediation on Wiktionary as a
Foundation
technology development project http://j.mp/scraise ;

[R] [COM] [T] [CAP] [DIV] [ADV] we should not be logging
personally identifiable information which might increase our subpoena
burden or result in privacy violation incidents. Fuzzing geolocation
is okay, but we should not be transmitting IP addresses into logs
across even a LAN, for example, and we certainly shouldn't be
purchasing hardware with backdoor coprocessors wasting electricity and
exposing us to government or similar intrusions
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/analytics/2017-January/005696.html
;

[R] [RES] [COM] [CAP] [DIV] [ADV] we need to make sure our economics
articles aren't pro-austerity or pro-trickle down --
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2018-May/090181.html
-- and, e.g. --
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wiki-research-l/2018-April/006256.html
;

[R] [RES] [COM] [T] [CAP] [DIV] we need to provide more
telepresence opportunities for participation -- I do not have a
current URL for the best telepresence robots, but e.g. Amazon likely
does -- I do note that the Smithsonian recently started featuring a
robot docent  ;

[R] [RES] [PAR] [COM] [DIV] [ADV] we should add an essay contest
into the Education program
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/education/2018-May/002002.html ;

[R] [RES] [COM] [DIV] [ADV] we should be demanding compulsory
royalties for Wikipedians --
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/publicpolicy/2016-December/001559.html
;

[R] [REV] [PAR] [CAP] We should grow the Endowment with exclusive
fundraiser galas competing with the World Economic Forum for the most
exclusive fundraising events; and

(via Pine) [R] [RES] [COM] [CAP] Working Groups should be allowed to
make exceptions to the hour requirements in pursuit of expertise and
diversity -- Kaarel, you mentioned you have already added language to
address this issue.

Please let me know your thoughts.

Best regards,
Jim

P.S. Thematic areas and abbreviations:

[R] Roles & Responsibilities

[REV] Revenue Streams

[RES] Resource Allocation

[PAR] Partnerships

[COM] Community Health

[T] Technology & Product

[CAP] Capacity Building

[DIV] Diversity

[ADV] Advocacy

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Board of Trustees participation in the Movement Strategy Process

[Chris Keating]

Hi SJ,

I think everyone who is taking part in this stage of the strategy process
already knows about it.

There was of course an open call for members of the working groups a few
weeks ago, and the working groups will have some unspecified method of
involving the broader community in these conversations, though I expect the
only substantive conversations will happen among working group members -
just as to date the only substantive conversations about movement strategy
have happened at the Wikimedia Conference.

I genuinely don't know whether anyone including WMF thinks the WMF advisory
board still exists.

Chris

On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, 17:07 Samuel Klein,  wrote:

> >
> > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 4:48 PM Craig Newmark 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Maria, thanks, much appreciated!
> >
>
> Hear, hear!  It has been good to see the updates all year.
>
>
> > > Which group focuses on information quality and accuracy?
> >
>
> And which group focuses on information breadth and coverage?
> If these are cross-cutting issues touching on many groups, where should
> relevant input go?
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:54 PM Chris Keating 
> wrote:
>
> > No-one seems to be particularly sure if the Advisory Board is still a
> > thing or not.
> >
>
> Let's fix that :)   This seems like something advisors are particularly
> suited to.
>
> SJ
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> 
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Board of Trustees participation in the Movement Strategy Process

[Samuel Klein]

>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 4:48 PM Craig Newmark 
> wrote:
> >
> > Maria, thanks, much appreciated!
>

Hear, hear!  It has been good to see the updates all year.


> > Which group focuses on information quality and accuracy?
>

And which group focuses on information breadth and coverage?
If these are cross-cutting issues touching on many groups, where should
relevant input go?

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:54 PM Chris Keating 
wrote:

> No-one seems to be particularly sure if the Advisory Board is still a
> thing or not.
>

Let's fix that :)   This seems like something advisors are particularly
suited to.

SJ
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Board of Trustees participation in the Movement Strategy Process

[The Cunctator]

That's a good find. Hopefully every working group will be tasked with
making their work explicitly consistent with the actual mission of
Wikimedia.

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018, 11:48 AM Craig Newmark 
wrote:

> Maria, thanks, much appreciated!
>
> Which group focuses on information quality and accuracy?
>
> What's the role of the Advisory Board?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Craig Newmark
> founder craigslist
> craignewmarkphilanthropies.org
> On July 19, 2018 9:43:21 AM María Sefidari 
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Wikimedians,
> >
> > In 2017, the Wikimedia movement began a collaborative process to define
> > what we want to build or achieve together by 2030. After eight months of
> > discussion, across languages, geographies, and contexts, the outcome
> > was a Strategic
> > Direction
> > <
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20
> >
> > focused on knowledge as a service and knowledge equity:
> >
> > “By 2030, Wikimedia will become the essential infrastructure of the
> > ecosystem of free knowledge, and anyone who shares our vision will be
> able
> > to join us.[1]”
> >
> > Now our task as a movement is to apply the Strategic Direction to our own
> > work. We need to answer questions that define our path forward: What kind
> > of structures are ideal for achieving our strategic direction? What
> > resources and capacities do we need to develop? How do we relate to each
> > other and make decisions as a movement? How do we manage change in a
> > healthy, sustainable way?
> >
> > Over the next year, the Wikimedia movement will engage in a structured,
> > distributed process to answer these questions. The process will be
> > structured around Working Groups who will develop guidance in key
> Thematic
> > Areas.[2]
> >
> > The Board of Trustees is committed to the Movement Strategy process and
> > each of us will join one of the Working Groups:
> >
> >
> >   -
> >
> >   Roles & Responsibilities: Nataliia
> >   -
> >
> >   Revenue Streams: Tanya
> >   -
> >
> >   Resource Allocation: María
> >   -
> >
> >   Partnerships: Raju
> >   -
> >
> >   Community Health: James
> >   -
> >
> >   Product & Technology: Christophe
> >   -
> >
> >   Capacity Building: Dariusz
> >   -
> >
> >   Diversity: Esra’a
> >   -
> >
> >   Advocacy: Jimmy
> >
> >
> > We will play two specific roles in this process:
> >
> >   1.
> >
> >   Individually, as members of the Working Groups
> >   2.
> >  1.
> >
> >  participate mindfully in ourtheir individual capacity,
> >  2.
> >
> >  bring our their content expertise and experience to the discussion,
> >  3.
> >
> >  ensure the information flow from the Working Group to the Board,
> >  4.
> >
> >  support an effective, and inclusive process.
> >  3.
> >
> >   Collectively, as the Board of Trustees
> >   4.
> >  1.
> >
> >  review recommendations from each Working Group and provide feedback,
> >  2.
> >
> >  resolve difficult questions as required and adhere to decisions
> made,
> >  3.
> >
> >  delegate approval of recommendations to an appropriate community
> >  mechanism whenever possible (such as endorsement or consensus),
> >  4.
> >
> >  make decisions when there is no other mechanism to make the
> decision,
> >  5.
> >
> >  accept the recommendations that are consistent with the movement’s
> >  values, the Strategic Direction as well as law and other compliance
> >  requirements,
> >  6.
> >
> >  direct resources, budgets and capacities for the implementation of
> >  approved recommendations.
> >
> >
> > This statement captures the perspective of the Board of Trustees, and we
> > believe that the process is a unique opportunity for the movement to
> build
> > and shape our future together. We will participate in strategy
> > conversations and sessions at Wikimania[3], and look forward to
> > contributing throughout the process together with many of you. We
> encourage
> > those who are attending Wikimania to also join these conversations and
> all
> > Wikimedians to participate in all the upcoming strategic conversations
> and
> > consultations.
> >
> > On behalf of the Board,
> >
> > María Sefidari
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20
> >
> > [2]
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Working_Groups
> >
> > [3] https://wikimania2018.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_2030#Schedule
> > ___
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > 
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Board of Trustees participation in the Movement Strategy Process

[Chris Keating]

No-one seems to be particularly sure if the Advisory Board is still a
thing or not.

https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Advisory_Board is marked as
historical and possibly inaccurate, and it hasn't been edited for
about 7 years!

Chris
User:The Land
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 4:48 PM Craig Newmark  wrote:
>
> Maria, thanks, much appreciated!
>
> Which group focuses on information quality and accuracy?
>
> What's the role of the Advisory Board?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Craig Newmark
> founder craigslist
> craignewmarkphilanthropies.org
> On July 19, 2018 9:43:21 AM María Sefidari  wrote:
>
> > Dear Wikimedians,
> >
> > In 2017, the Wikimedia movement began a collaborative process to define
> > what we want to build or achieve together by 2030. After eight months of
> > discussion, across languages, geographies, and contexts, the outcome
> > was a Strategic
> > Direction
> > 
> > focused on knowledge as a service and knowledge equity:
> >
> > “By 2030, Wikimedia will become the essential infrastructure of the
> > ecosystem of free knowledge, and anyone who shares our vision will be able
> > to join us.[1]”
> >
> > Now our task as a movement is to apply the Strategic Direction to our own
> > work. We need to answer questions that define our path forward: What kind
> > of structures are ideal for achieving our strategic direction? What
> > resources and capacities do we need to develop? How do we relate to each
> > other and make decisions as a movement? How do we manage change in a
> > healthy, sustainable way?
> >
> > Over the next year, the Wikimedia movement will engage in a structured,
> > distributed process to answer these questions. The process will be
> > structured around Working Groups who will develop guidance in key Thematic
> > Areas.[2]
> >
> > The Board of Trustees is committed to the Movement Strategy process and
> > each of us will join one of the Working Groups:
> >
> >
> >   -
> >
> >   Roles & Responsibilities: Nataliia
> >   -
> >
> >   Revenue Streams: Tanya
> >   -
> >
> >   Resource Allocation: María
> >   -
> >
> >   Partnerships: Raju
> >   -
> >
> >   Community Health: James
> >   -
> >
> >   Product & Technology: Christophe
> >   -
> >
> >   Capacity Building: Dariusz
> >   -
> >
> >   Diversity: Esra’a
> >   -
> >
> >   Advocacy: Jimmy
> >
> >
> > We will play two specific roles in this process:
> >
> >   1.
> >
> >   Individually, as members of the Working Groups
> >   2.
> >  1.
> >
> >  participate mindfully in ourtheir individual capacity,
> >  2.
> >
> >  bring our their content expertise and experience to the discussion,
> >  3.
> >
> >  ensure the information flow from the Working Group to the Board,
> >  4.
> >
> >  support an effective, and inclusive process.
> >  3.
> >
> >   Collectively, as the Board of Trustees
> >   4.
> >  1.
> >
> >  review recommendations from each Working Group and provide feedback,
> >  2.
> >
> >  resolve difficult questions as required and adhere to decisions made,
> >  3.
> >
> >  delegate approval of recommendations to an appropriate community
> >  mechanism whenever possible (such as endorsement or consensus),
> >  4.
> >
> >  make decisions when there is no other mechanism to make the decision,
> >  5.
> >
> >  accept the recommendations that are consistent with the movement’s
> >  values, the Strategic Direction as well as law and other compliance
> >  requirements,
> >  6.
> >
> >  direct resources, budgets and capacities for the implementation of
> >  approved recommendations.
> >
> >
> > This statement captures the perspective of the Board of Trustees, and we
> > believe that the process is a unique opportunity for the movement to build
> > and shape our future together. We will participate in strategy
> > conversations and sessions at Wikimania[3], and look forward to
> > contributing throughout the process together with many of you. We encourage
> > those who are attending Wikimania to also join these conversations and all
> > Wikimedians to participate in all the upcoming strategic conversations and
> > consultations.
> >
> > On behalf of the Board,
> >
> > María Sefidari
> >
> > [1]
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20
> >
> > [2]
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Working_Groups
> >
> > [3] https://wikimania2018.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_2030#Schedule
> > ___
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > 
>
>
>
>

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Board of Trustees participation in the Movement Strategy Process

[Craig Newmark]

Maria, thanks, much appreciated!

Which group focuses on information quality and accuracy?

What's the role of the Advisory Board?

Thanks!

Craig Newmark
founder craigslist
craignewmarkphilanthropies.org
On July 19, 2018 9:43:21 AM María Sefidari  wrote:


Dear Wikimedians,

In 2017, the Wikimedia movement began a collaborative process to define
what we want to build or achieve together by 2030. After eight months of
discussion, across languages, geographies, and contexts, the outcome
was a Strategic
Direction

focused on knowledge as a service and knowledge equity:

“By 2030, Wikimedia will become the essential infrastructure of the
ecosystem of free knowledge, and anyone who shares our vision will be able
to join us.[1]”

Now our task as a movement is to apply the Strategic Direction to our own
work. We need to answer questions that define our path forward: What kind
of structures are ideal for achieving our strategic direction? What
resources and capacities do we need to develop? How do we relate to each
other and make decisions as a movement? How do we manage change in a
healthy, sustainable way?

Over the next year, the Wikimedia movement will engage in a structured,
distributed process to answer these questions. The process will be
structured around Working Groups who will develop guidance in key Thematic
Areas.[2]

The Board of Trustees is committed to the Movement Strategy process and
each of us will join one of the Working Groups:


  -

  Roles & Responsibilities: Nataliia
  -

  Revenue Streams: Tanya
  -

  Resource Allocation: María
  -

  Partnerships: Raju
  -

  Community Health: James
  -

  Product & Technology: Christophe
  -

  Capacity Building: Dariusz
  -

  Diversity: Esra’a
  -

  Advocacy: Jimmy


We will play two specific roles in this process:

  1.

  Individually, as members of the Working Groups
  2.
 1.

 participate mindfully in ourtheir individual capacity,
 2.

 bring our their content expertise and experience to the discussion,
 3.

 ensure the information flow from the Working Group to the Board,
 4.

 support an effective, and inclusive process.
 3.

  Collectively, as the Board of Trustees
  4.
 1.

 review recommendations from each Working Group and provide feedback,
 2.

 resolve difficult questions as required and adhere to decisions made,
 3.

 delegate approval of recommendations to an appropriate community
 mechanism whenever possible (such as endorsement or consensus),
 4.

 make decisions when there is no other mechanism to make the decision,
 5.

 accept the recommendations that are consistent with the movement’s
 values, the Strategic Direction as well as law and other compliance
 requirements,
 6.

 direct resources, budgets and capacities for the implementation of
 approved recommendations.


This statement captures the perspective of the Board of Trustees, and we
believe that the process is a unique opportunity for the movement to build
and shape our future together. We will participate in strategy
conversations and sessions at Wikimania[3], and look forward to
contributing throughout the process together with many of you. We encourage
those who are attending Wikimania to also join these conversations and all
Wikimedians to participate in all the upcoming strategic conversations and
consultations.

On behalf of the Board,

María Sefidari

[1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20

[2]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Working_Groups

[3] https://wikimania2018.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_2030#Schedule
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l

New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 






___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

[Wikimedia-l] Board of Trustees participation in the Movement Strategy Process

[María Sefidari]

Dear Wikimedians,

In 2017, the Wikimedia movement began a collaborative process to define
what we want to build or achieve together by 2030. After eight months of
discussion, across languages, geographies, and contexts, the outcome
was a Strategic
Direction

focused on knowledge as a service and knowledge equity:

“By 2030, Wikimedia will become the essential infrastructure of the
ecosystem of free knowledge, and anyone who shares our vision will be able
to join us.[1]”

Now our task as a movement is to apply the Strategic Direction to our own
work. We need to answer questions that define our path forward: What kind
of structures are ideal for achieving our strategic direction? What
resources and capacities do we need to develop? How do we relate to each
other and make decisions as a movement? How do we manage change in a
healthy, sustainable way?

Over the next year, the Wikimedia movement will engage in a structured,
distributed process to answer these questions. The process will be
structured around Working Groups who will develop guidance in key Thematic
Areas.[2]

The Board of Trustees is committed to the Movement Strategy process and
each of us will join one of the Working Groups:


   -

   Roles & Responsibilities: Nataliia
   -

   Revenue Streams: Tanya
   -

   Resource Allocation: María
   -

   Partnerships: Raju
   -

   Community Health: James
   -

   Product & Technology: Christophe
   -

   Capacity Building: Dariusz
   -

   Diversity: Esra’a
   -

   Advocacy: Jimmy


We will play two specific roles in this process:

   1.

   Individually, as members of the Working Groups
   2.
  1.

  participate mindfully in ourtheir individual capacity,
  2.

  bring our their content expertise and experience to the discussion,
  3.

  ensure the information flow from the Working Group to the Board,
  4.

  support an effective, and inclusive process.
  3.

   Collectively, as the Board of Trustees
   4.
  1.

  review recommendations from each Working Group and provide feedback,
  2.

  resolve difficult questions as required and adhere to decisions made,
  3.

  delegate approval of recommendations to an appropriate community
  mechanism whenever possible (such as endorsement or consensus),
  4.

  make decisions when there is no other mechanism to make the decision,
  5.

  accept the recommendations that are consistent with the movement’s
  values, the Strategic Direction as well as law and other compliance
  requirements,
  6.

  direct resources, budgets and capacities for the implementation of
  approved recommendations.


This statement captures the perspective of the Board of Trustees, and we
believe that the process is a unique opportunity for the movement to build
and shape our future together. We will participate in strategy
conversations and sessions at Wikimania[3], and look forward to
contributing throughout the process together with many of you. We encourage
those who are attending Wikimania to also join these conversations and all
Wikimedians to participate in all the upcoming strategic conversations and
consultations.

On behalf of the Board,

María Sefidari

[1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20

[2]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Working_Groups

[3] https://wikimania2018.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_2030#Schedule
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees appointments and officer positions 2018

[Christophe Henner]

And because I can't step down properly, a part of the email was missing,
here is the complete version



*Hello everyone,*





































*I am happy to make some announcements about the Wikimedia Foundation Board
of Trustees. As of today, Tanya Capuano has formally joined the Board.
Tanya is an experienced financial professional who has worked as a Vice
President of Finance for Intuit, and more recently as CFO for the software
firm G5. She is passionate about education, having served on the boards of
various educational nonprofits.Tanya will enrich the financial and
accounting skills critical to the oversight of the Foundation and to her
role as Chair of the Foundation’s Audit Committee, to which she was also
elected today. Please join me in warming welcoming her in the Wikimedia
movement. As Tanya joins us, we also see Kelly Battles and Alice Wiegand,
two very valuable trustees, leave us as their terms of service come to a
close. Both of them have been stellar trustees who helped the board and the
Foundation grow and become a more robust organisation.Kelly and Alice, you
have brought so much to the Foundation and to the movement, and it has been
an immense pleasure serving with you. I can only hope, as has often been
the case with other former trustees, our movement will be lucky enough we
keep seeing both of you around and that you keep on bringing your
experience, skills, and wisdom to all of us. As you might have noticed we
still are one trustee short, with a total of nine. We are currently
searching for a tenth Trustee, with a technology and platform background;
you can read the profile here on Commons
.
Today the Board also voted to appoint María Sefidari as Chair and
Christophe Henner as Vice Chair. After serving as Chair for two terms, I
decided to step down and support María as Chair, hopefully as effectively
as she served me and the organization when she was my Vice Chair. María and
I both have a long history of involvement in the Wikimedia community, and
prior to coming to the Foundation, held leadership roles in local Wikimedia
organizations.In addition, the Board re-elected Nataliia Tymkiv as Chair of
the Board Governance Committee, supported by BGC members James Heilman and
Dariusz Jemielniak, and alternates Raju Narisetti and María. We also
elected Raju as Chair of the Human Resources Committee, with members María
and Dariusz.  Finally, as noted, we elected Tanya Capuano as Chair of the
Audit Committee, with Christophe and Raju as members and María and Jimmy as
alternates.  More about Christophe, María, and the Committee Chairs are
below. I hope you will join me in congratulating them on their new
positions and wish them success in their terms ahead.On a more personal
note, I would like to thank everyone for the last two years. This is not
farewell, but the last two years have been a roller coaster and I am proud
I had the chance to serve as Chair and helped us building up the future of
the movement. We have achieved a lot in the last 24 months, and the best is
yet to come!ChristopheAbout Tanya CapuanoTanya Pine Capuano most recently
was the chief financial officer (CFO) of the data-driven marketing company
G5 in Bend, Oregon. Originally from San Jose, California, she has
wide-ranging experience including strategy and financial planning and
analysis in technology. In addition to her recent role at G5, she has also
worked for Hewlett-Packard and Intuit.She has also supported numerous
education initiatives throughout her career; including serving on the
boards of Education Pioneers, Los Altos Educational Foundation, and “I Have
a Dream” Foundation San Francisco, an organization whose San Francisco
chapter she co-founded.She is very involved with Stanford University alumni
life, having earned a bachelor's in economics, a master's in education, and
a master of business administration from the university. After graduating,
she worked as the university’s Director of Alumni Relations and Development
Director for the Initiative on Improving K-12 Education. She has also
served on the board of the Stanford University Graduate School of
Business.Tanya lives in the San Francisco Bay Area with her husband and two
children. They enjoy traveling as a family and outdoor sports.About María
SefidariMaría Sefidari Huici is a professor in the Digital Communications,
Culture and Citizenship Master's degree program of Rey Juan Carlos
University at the MediaLab-Prado.Born in Madrid, Spain, where she still
lives today, María graduated with a Psychology degree from Universidad
Complutense de Madrid, and later a Master's degree in Management and
Tourism at the Business faculty of the same university. She was a 2014
Techweek Women’s Leadership Fellow, which showcases, celebrates, and
supports emerging female leaders in business and technology.María started
contributing to the Wikimedia projects 

[Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees appointments and officer positions 2018

[Christophe Henner]

*Hello everyone,I am happy to make some announcements about the Wikimedia
Foundation Board of Trustees. As of today, Tanya Capuano has formally
joined the Board. Tanya is an experienced financial professional who has
worked as a Vice President of Finance for Intuit, and more recently as CFO
for the software firm G5. She is passionate about education, having served
on the boards of various educational nonprofits.Tanya will enrich the
financial and accounting skills critical to the oversight of the Foundation
and to her role as Chair of the Foundation’s Audit Committee, to which she
was also elected today. Please join me in warming welcoming her in the
Wikimedia movement. As Tanya joins us, we also see Kelly Battles and Alice
Wiegand, two very valuable trustees, leave us as their terms of service
come to a close. Both of them have been stellar trustees who helped the
board and the Foundation grow and become a more robust organisation.Kelly
and Alice, you have brought so much to the Foundation and to the movement,
and it has been an immense pleasure serving with you. I can only hope, as
has often been the case with other former trustees, our movement will be
lucky enough we keep seeing both of you around and that you keep on
bringing your experience, skills, and wisdom to all of us. As you might
have noticed we still are one trustee short, with a total of nine. We are
currently searching for a tenth Trustee, with a technology and platform
background; you can read the profile here on Commons
.
Today the Board also voted to appoint María Sefidari as Chair and
Christophe Henner as Vice Chair. After serving as Chair for two terms, I
decided to step down and support María as Chair, hopefully as effectively
as she served me and the organization when she was my Vice Chair. María and
I both have a long history of involvement in the Wikimedia community, and
prior to coming to the Foundation, held leadership roles in local Wikimedia
organizations.In addition, the Board re-elected Nataliia Tymkiv as Chair of
the Board Governance Committee, supported by BGC members James Heilman and
Dariusz Jemielniak, and alternates Raju Narisetti and María. We also
elected Raju as Chair of the Human Resources Committee, with members María
and Dariusz.  Finally, as noted, we elected Tanya Capuano as Chair of the
Audit Committee, with Christophe and Raju as members and María and Jimmy as
alternates.  More about Christophe, María, and the Committee Chairs are
below. I hope you will join me in congratulating them on their new
positions and wish them success in their terms ahead.On a more personal
note, I would like to thank everyone for the last two years. This is not
farewell, but the last two years have been a roller coaster and I am proud
I had the chance to serve as Chair and helped us building up the future of
the movement. We have achieved a lot in the last 24 months, and the best is
yet to come!ChristopheAbout Tanya CapuanoTanya Pine Capuano most recently
was the chief financial officer (CFO) of the data-driven marketing company
G5 in Bend, Oregon. Originally from San Jose, California, she has
wide-ranging experience including strategy and financial planning and
analysis in technology. In addition to her recent role at G5, she has also
worked for Hewlett-Packard and Intuit.She has also supported numerous
education initiatives throughout her career; including serving on the
boards of Education Pioneers, Los Altos Educational Foundation, and “I Have
a Dream” Foundation San Francisco, an organization whose San Francisco
chapter she co-founded.She is very involved with Stanford University alumni
life, having earned a bachelor's in economics, a master's in education, and
a master of business administration from the university. After graduating,
she worked as the university’s Director of Alumni Relations and Development
Director for the Initiative on Improving K-12 Education. She has also
served on the board of the Stanford University Graduate School of
Business.Tanya lives in the San Francisco Bay Area with her husband and two
children. They enjoy traveling as a family and outdoor sports.About María
SefidariMaría Sefidari Huici is a professor in the Digital Communications,
Culture and Citizenship Master's degree program of Rey Juan Carlos *



Christophe HENNER
Stool of the board of trustees
chen...@wikimedia.org
+33650664739

twitter *@schiste*skype *christophe_henner*
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,