Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Pd-Australia

2009-02-10 Thread Gnangarra
The duration of copyright in photographs was significantly extended as a
result of implementing Australia's
obligations under the AUSFTA. This made protection for photographs
consistent with protection for other types of
artistic works. For photographs in which copyrights still subsisted on 1
January 2005, or which are created on or
after that date, copyright lasts until 70 years from the end of the year in
which the photographer died.

Prior to this phototgraphs were PD after 50 years they were taken not after
the death of the photographer,

Painting etc have always been after the artists death, there was a window of
opportunity to copyrighted works in other countries that werent covered by
US copyright that the owner could register the work in the US and get
copyright reinstate in the US though it *did not  could not *be applied if
copyright had been extinguished in the originating country, the target group
of works for this was some cinamatic and all music where copyright in the US
was 20-25 years for foreign works, though it could have been applied to
photographs I havent seen any images that have been registered..

It is common practise for Australian institutions to claim copyright on PD
images where they dont actually have that right but they can reasonable
expect a fee for providing high quality large format copies for reuse so I
presume they use the copyright claim as the way of ensuring they get the
fee.

The image is already used in the FA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Bradman and was on the main page
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Today%27s_featured_article/August_27,_2008I'd
say theres very little doubt given the scrutiny and usage that the
image
has already had in the last 6 months that its PD


2009/2/10 Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com

 Oh I hate this stuff

 According to the reading by the Copyright Council of Australia (who are the
 most conservative in these matters) the rules are that the image is PD if
 the photographer *died* before 1955 - not whether the photograph was
 *published* before 1955. So, in the case of Anon photographers this gets
 even trickier.
 http://www.copyright.org.au/information/introduction/intro-5.htm

 I don't know if we want to take their advice, but on that reading it is
 *likely* that a 1946 photographer probably lived 'till 1955 and therefore
 the image is *likely* still copyrighted. However, this is NOT the practice
 on WP to-date and it is not an uncontested reading.

 -Liam

 On 2/10/09, YellowMonkey blnguyen2...@gmail.com wrote:

 Can anyone who understands PD-Australia look at


 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Donald_Bradman_with_the_Australian_cricket_team_in_England_in_1948

 please

 The 1955 rule seems to being challenged again

 ___
 Wikimediaau-l mailing list
 Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l




 --
 Email - liamwy...@gmail.com
 Phone - +61 (0)434 056 914
 Skype - Wittylama
 Wikipedia - [[User:Witty lama]]
 ___
 Wikimediaau-l mailing list
 Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l




-- 
GN.
http://gnangarra.redbubble.com/
___
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l


[Wikimediaau-l] Chapters meeting

2009-02-10 Thread private musings
G'day all,

I just thought I'd ask the committee (and anyone else) if they've heard
anything about possible attendance at an 'all chapters' meeting in Berlin in
April... in particular if fund-raising is being considered, or maybe just to
check that we're 'on the radar' down here :-)

cheers.

Peter.
___
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l


Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Chapters meeting

2009-02-10 Thread private musings
coolio! - I'd missed the detail in the minutes (sorry);

http://wikimedia.org.au/wiki/Meeting:Committee_(2009_January_15)

- is there any call for a bit of AU fundraising at this stage? - the minutes
indicate we've requested subsidy, and presumably the WMF and the German
Chapter are kicking in with some financial support - is this covering
enough? - Presumably those interested in bringing Wikimania to these shores
are aware of how useful some 'face time' might be with various chapter types
- and I wonder if we've considered sending our VP along too? (if he's
available, for example?)

cheers,

Peter,
PM.

2009/2/11 Sarah Ewart sarahew...@gmail.com



 2009/2/11 private musings thepmacco...@gmail.com

 G'day all,

 I just thought I'd ask the committee (and anyone else) if they've heard
 anything about possible attendance at an 'all chapters' meeting in Berlin
 in April... in particular if fund-raising is being considered, or maybe just
 to check that we're 'on the radar' down here :-)


 Yes, it was mentioned in the minutes I posted last week. Brianna, as
 President, will be going to represent us and we have requested funding.


 ___
 Wikimediaau-l mailing list
 Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l


___
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l


Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Chapters meeting

2009-02-10 Thread Liam Wyatt
we've said that we're requesting a spot for the Prez, and that in the event
that there is funding and all the stars align then we'd like to send the
Vice Prez too. There is discussion about whether 1 or 2 people from the
various chapters will be going but I think it unlikely given the costs -
especially for WM-Au.

We've not discussed fundraising or the allocation of funds to this as yet.

-Liam

On 2/11/09, private musings thepmacco...@gmail.com wrote:

 coolio! - I'd missed the detail in the minutes (sorry);

 http://wikimedia.org.au/wiki/Meeting:Committee_(2009_January_15)http://wikimedia.org.au/wiki/Meeting:Committee_%282009_January_15%29

 - is there any call for a bit of AU fundraising at this stage? - the
 minutes indicate we've requested subsidy, and presumably the WMF and the
 German Chapter are kicking in with some financial support - is this covering
 enough? - Presumably those interested in bringing Wikimania to these shores
 are aware of how useful some 'face time' might be with various chapter types
 - and I wonder if we've considered sending our VP along too? (if he's
 available, for example?)

 cheers,

 Peter,
 PM.

 2009/2/11 Sarah Ewart sarahew...@gmail.com



 2009/2/11 private musings thepmacco...@gmail.com

 G'day all,

 I just thought I'd ask the committee (and anyone else) if they've heard
 anything about possible attendance at an 'all chapters' meeting in
 Berlin in April... in particular if fund-raising is being considered, or
 maybe just to check that we're 'on the radar' down here :-)


 Yes, it was mentioned in the minutes I posted last week. Brianna, as
 President, will be going to represent us and we have requested funding.


 ___
 Wikimediaau-l mailing list
 Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l



 ___
 Wikimediaau-l mailing list
 Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l




-- 
Email - liamwy...@gmail.com
Phone - +61 (0)434 056 914
Skype - Wittylama
Wikipedia - [[User:Witty lama]]
___
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l


Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Pd-Australia

2009-02-10 Thread Gnangarra
Under the FTA copyright in the US is extinguished if the copyright in the
originating country was already extinguished at the time of FTA being
implimented

2009/2/11 Stephen Bain stephen.b...@gmail.com

 2009/2/10 Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com:
 
  According to the reading by the Copyright Council of Australia (who are
 the
  most conservative in these matters) the rules are that the image is PD if
  the photographer *died* before 1955 - not whether the photograph was
  *published* before 1955. So, in the case of Anon photographers this gets
  even trickier.
  http://www.copyright.org.au/information/introduction/intro-5.htm

 Photos are a special case. Prior to the FTA changes, the rule was 50
 years after the photo was *taken*. Any photo taken in Australia before
 1 Jan 1955 is in the public domain in Australia.

 After the FTA changes, the rule became life of the author plus 70,
 just like for other types of works. This applies to any photo taken
 after 1 Jan 2005, or any photo still in copyright as at 1 Jan 2005.

 That's only Australian copyright though, things can be under copyright
 still in the US even if they are out of copyright elsewhere, thanks to
 stupid American copyright law.

 --
 Stephen Bain
 stephen.b...@gmail.com

 ___
 Wikimediaau-l mailing list
 Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l




-- 
GN.
http://gnangarra.redbubble.com/
___
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l


[Wikimediaau-l] Australian Higher Education Supplement today - Wikipedia story

2009-02-10 Thread Kimberlee Weatherall
Rather negative Wikipedia story in The Australian higher education
supplement (page 1, also here:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25037270-12332,00.htm
l).

 

Kim

 

 

Kimberlee Weatherall

Senior Lecturer

TC Beirne School of Law

The University of Queensland

St Lucia, Queensland, 4072

Work Telephone: +61 7 3346 7503

Mobile: +61 403 762 544

 

 

___
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l


Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Australian Higher Education Supplement today - Wikipedia story

2009-02-10 Thread YellowMonkey
I think that if people read the article (and haven't already made up their
mind) then they will notice the pundit has already made up his mind before
he did the interview...

2009/2/11 Kimberlee Weatherall k.weather...@law.uq.edu.au

  Rather negative Wikipedia story in *The Australian *higher education
 supplement (page 1, also here:
 http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25037270-12332,00.html
 ).



 Kim





 Kimberlee Weatherall

 Senior Lecturer

 TC Beirne School of Law

 The University of Queensland

 St Lucia, Queensland, 4072

 Work Telephone: +61 7 3346 7503

 Mobile: +61 403 762 544





 ___
 Wikimediaau-l mailing list
 Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l


___
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l


Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Australian Higher Education Supplement today - Wikipedia story

2009-02-10 Thread YellowMonkey
Is the Sunday Times, of the Times of UK?

One of their journos bludged his Keith Miller blog post off my article about
Miller.

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:10 PM, YellowMonkey blnguyen2...@gmail.comwrote:

 I think that if people read the article (and haven't already made up their
 mind) then they will notice the pundit has already made up his mind before
 he did the interview...

 2009/2/11 Kimberlee Weatherall k.weather...@law.uq.edu.au

  Rather negative Wikipedia story in *The Australian *higher education
 supplement (page 1, also here:
 http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25037270-12332,00.html
 ).



 Kim





 Kimberlee Weatherall

 Senior Lecturer

 TC Beirne School of Law

 The University of Queensland

 St Lucia, Queensland, 4072

 Work Telephone: +61 7 3346 7503

 Mobile: +61 403 762 544





 ___
 Wikimediaau-l mailing list
 Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l



___
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l


Re: [Wikimediaau-l] Australian Higher Education Supplement today - Wikipedia story

2009-02-10 Thread Stephen Bain
2009/2/11 Kimberlee Weatherall k.weather...@law.uq.edu.au:
 Rather negative Wikipedia story in The Australian higher education
 supplement (page 1, also here:
 http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25037270-12332,00.html).

At least they edited out the glaring error in the original Sunday
Times copy (that there was vandalism about the author in the Wikipedia
article on him; in fact at the time no such article existed).

-- 
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com

___
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l