I also think that OpenMeetings would be great, being a big fan of open
source and free software, but the main issue here is one of speed, and
volunteer availability.
The way I see it, and Manuel can correct me if I am wrong, is that we have
someone who is familiar with BBB and setting up such a system for wikimedia
will not require a lot of extra learning for him. BBB will take time to set
up, of course, but not all that extra time needed to learn the details of
an Open software solution and to iron out the bugs.
I would say that we go ahead with the proposed BBB solution, and in a few
years we can always switch programs.
Gabriel
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Manuel Schneider
manuel.schnei...@wikimedia.ch wrote:
I have evaluated OpenMeetings before we discussed further steps on
implementing BBB.
It is very similar to BBB, has mostly the same features and also under
the most components are the same (J2EE, Red5...).
BBB seems to have a much nicer user interface, though.
I'd didn't know about the sister project proposal. It looks a bit odd to
me, doesn't really fit in the strategy of Wikimedia. I see video
conferences as a tool, not a project itself. We have a similar component
in the WikiTV project I am leading on german Wikipedia but the results
are the discussions we want to document, not the video platform we use.
/Manuel
Am 25.02.2013 14:05, schrieb Charles Andrès:
It seems that Openmeetings has actually been proposed as sister project,
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/OpenMeetings.org
But I do not see any progress on this subject.
I personnaly don't know OpenMeetings.
--
Wikimedia CH - Verein zur Förderung Freien Wissens
Lausanne, +41 (21) 34066-22 - www.wikimedia.ch
___
http://wikimedia.ch Wikimedia CH website
Wikimediach-l mailing list
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l
___
http://wikimedia.ch Wikimedia CH website
Wikimediach-l mailing list
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l