[Wikimediauk-l] London pub meetups, November and December 2012

2012-10-23 Thread Gordon Joly




4th Birthday bash, with cake? See 
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meetup/London/63


December meeting - note change of pub! 
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meetup/London/64


*

There has been a lot of talk about the pros and cons of Penderel's Oak, 
so in December 2012, we will try Shakespeare's Head (that is a scheduled 
and pre-announced change of venue).


Both pubs are Wetherspoons and are a few minutes walk from Holborn Tube 
Station.


Neither of the meetings appear for me on geonotices!

Gordo


___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Having an advisory board

2012-10-23 Thread David Gerard
On 23 October 2012 16:19, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com wrote:

 Advisory board? Why? Why not just put petrol on the flames?
 A charity that is as small as Wikimedia U.K. has no need of more dimensions
 of governance...


An advisory board is conventionally advisory, per the name: they're
there to ask things and to occasionally speak up. They're not part of
the governance as such.


- d.

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] WikiConference 2013: Where will you be travelling from?

2012-10-23 Thread Thomas Morton
Hello All,

Thanks to everyone who has responded so far! We currently have 20
responses, which is not an insignificant portion of the attendees!

I have begun compiling stats based on the replies so far. If you still have
not answered the survey please do so ASAP so I can collate the results.

Tom

On 18 October 2012 11:55, Thomas Morton morton.tho...@googlemail.comwrote:

 To help inform the decision over the location of the 2013 WikiConference
 please could you take a moment to fill out the following survey!



 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?fromEmail=trueformkey=dHVpU2E1VjJfVmtaTkZldFNxSTY5N1E6MQ


 Cheers,
 Tom

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Having an advisory board

2012-10-23 Thread Gordon Joly

On 23/10/12 16:26, David Gerard wrote:

On 23 October 2012 16:19, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com wrote:


Advisory board? Why? Why not just put petrol on the flames?
A charity that is as small as Wikimedia U.K. has no need of more dimensions
of governance...


An advisory board is conventionally advisory, per the name: they're
there to ask things and to occasionally speak up. They're not part of
the governance as such.


- d.


So, what is the point? The Advisory Board can be ignored, as and when. 
The issue reminds of why I favour the CIC model, with a group of 
stakeholders to hold the main board to account. Likewise, NHS Foundation 
Trusts with a membership and a Council of Governors.


No gift aid with CICS.

http://www.bis.gov.uk/cicregulator/

***

Community Interest Companies (CICS) are limited companies, with special 
additional features, created for the use of people who want to conduct a 
business or other activity for community benefit, and not purely for 
private advantage.


This is achieved by a community interest test and asset lock, which 
ensure that the CIC is established for community purposes and the assets 
and profits are dedicated to these purposes. Registration of a company 
as a CIC has to be approved by the Regulator who also has a continuing 
monitoring and enforcement role.



***


Gordo


___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Having an advisory board

2012-10-23 Thread Thomas Dalton
What do you want to ask the charity commission? I think the guidance is
pretty clear. You just need to have it written down somewhere what their
role is and what authority they have (ie. none).

What is the difference between the CIC approach and our approach of having
members that hold the board to account?
On Oct 23, 2012 5:22 PM, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com wrote:

 On 23/10/12 16:26, David Gerard wrote:

 On 23 October 2012 16:19, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com wrote:

  Advisory board? Why? Why not just put petrol on the flames?
 A charity that is as small as Wikimedia U.K. has no need of more
 dimensions
 of governance...


 An advisory board is conventionally advisory, per the name: they're
 there to ask things and to occasionally speak up. They're not part of
 the governance as such.


 - d.


 So, what is the point? The Advisory Board can be ignored, as and when. The
 issue reminds of why I favour the CIC model, with a group of stakeholders
 to hold the main board to account. Likewise, NHS Foundation Trusts with a
 membership and a Council of Governors.

 No gift aid with CICS.

 http://www.bis.gov.uk/**cicregulator/http://www.bis.gov.uk/cicregulator/

 ***

 Community Interest Companies (CICS) are limited companies, with special
 additional features, created for the use of people who want to conduct a
 business or other activity for community benefit, and not purely for
 private advantage.

 This is achieved by a community interest test and asset lock, which
 ensure that the CIC is established for community purposes and the assets
 and profits are dedicated to these purposes. Registration of a company as a
 CIC has to be approved by the Regulator who also has a continuing
 monitoring and enforcement role.


 ***


 Gordo


 __**_
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-lhttp://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Mobile uk.wikimedia.org still failing

2012-10-23 Thread Andy Mabbett
It appears that this is still an issue.

On 5 October 2012 12:57, Richard Symonds
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:

 Have just chased this up with the WMF. Thanks for reminding me Andy!

 On 5 October 2012 12:49, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:

 It's difficult to promote events like:

http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/RBSA_Backstage_Pass

 when mobile visits to that URL are redirected to:

http://uk.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/RBSA_Backstage_Pass

 and errors are returned for all http://uk.m.wikimedia.org pages.

 I know this has been raised on this mailing list previously, but
 there's still no sign of a fix.

 The impact of this problem can be understood by considering that
 yesterday it was reported that 40% of Wikipedia's growth is mobile,
 versus 4% desktop.

 Can this serious bug be (re-)escalated as a matter of urgency, please?

 --
 Andy Mabbett
 @pigsonthewing
 http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org



 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org




-- 
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Mobile uk.wikimedia.org still failing

2012-10-23 Thread Stevie Benton
I'm still having problems too.

Stevie
On Oct 23, 2012 7:09 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:

 It appears that this is still an issue.

 On 5 October 2012 12:57, Richard Symonds
 richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:

  Have just chased this up with the WMF. Thanks for reminding me Andy!

  On 5 October 2012 12:49, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
 
  It's difficult to promote events like:
 
 http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/RBSA_Backstage_Pass
 
  when mobile visits to that URL are redirected to:
 
 http://uk.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/RBSA_Backstage_Pass
 
  and errors are returned for all http://uk.m.wikimedia.org pages.
 
  I know this has been raised on this mailing list previously, but
  there's still no sign of a fix.
 
  The impact of this problem can be understood by considering that
  yesterday it was reported that 40% of Wikipedia's growth is mobile,
  versus 4% desktop.
 
  Can this serious bug be (re-)escalated as a matter of urgency, please?
 
  --
  Andy Mabbett
  @pigsonthewing
  http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
 
  ___
  Wikimedia UK mailing list
  wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
  http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
  WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
 
 
 
  ___
  Wikimedia UK mailing list
  wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
  http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
  WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
 



 --
 Andy Mabbett
 @pigsonthewing
 http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Mobile uk.wikimedia.org still failing

2012-10-23 Thread Damokos Bence
I think this issue affects all *.wikimedia.org addresses (at least the ones
of chapters hosted by the WMF); a workaround is to change the user-agent
setting in your mobile browser, if possible.

Best regards,
Bence

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Stevie Benton 
stevie.ben...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:

 I'm still having problems too.

 Stevie
 On Oct 23, 2012 7:09 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:

 It appears that this is still an issue.

 On 5 October 2012 12:57, Richard Symonds
 richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:

  Have just chased this up with the WMF. Thanks for reminding me Andy!

  On 5 October 2012 12:49, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk
 wrote:
 
  It's difficult to promote events like:
 
 http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/RBSA_Backstage_Pass
 
  when mobile visits to that URL are redirected to:
 
 http://uk.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/RBSA_Backstage_Pass
 
  and errors are returned for all http://uk.m.wikimedia.org pages.
 
  I know this has been raised on this mailing list previously, but
  there's still no sign of a fix.
 
  The impact of this problem can be understood by considering that
  yesterday it was reported that 40% of Wikipedia's growth is mobile,
  versus 4% desktop.
 
  Can this serious bug be (re-)escalated as a matter of urgency, please?
 
  --
  Andy Mabbett
  @pigsonthewing
  http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
 
  ___
  Wikimedia UK mailing list
  wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
  http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
  WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
 
 
 
  ___
  Wikimedia UK mailing list
  wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
  http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
  WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
 



 --
 Andy Mabbett
 @pigsonthewing
 http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org




-- 
Damokos Bence
ügyvezető alelnök,
Wikimédia Magyarország
http://wikimedia.hu http://wiki.media.hu/
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Having an advisory board

2012-10-23 Thread Gordon Joly

On 23/10/12 17:45, Thomas Dalton wrote:


What do you want to ask the charity commission? I think the guidance 
is pretty clear. You just need to have it written down somewhere what 
their role is and what authority they have (ie. none).




I would ask them, given the current age of the charity, the budget, the 
relationships with stakeholders, the number of staff, the relationship 
with the Foundation, recent resignations, the work balance between 
Trustees and staff would an advisory board be of positive benefit.


What is the difference between the CIC approach and our approach of 
having members that hold the board to account?




Members of charities exercise their choices at AGMs and EGMs. 
Stakeholder groups for CICS might meet on a regular basis (e.g. 
quarterly?). Scrutiny roles can be defined in various ways, like the CIC 
model. Housing associations (all registered providers of housing) used 
to be subject to (tenant) scrutiny, before the TSA was abolished!


http://www.homesandcommunities.co.uk/tsa-archive

My housing association dumped all scrutiny functions as fast as they 
could when the legislation changed.


Gordo


___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Having an advisory board

2012-10-23 Thread Thomas Dalton
On Oct 23, 2012 10:23 PM, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com wrote:

 On 23/10/12 17:45, Thomas Dalton wrote:


 What do you want to ask the charity commission? I think the guidance is
pretty clear. You just need to have it written down somewhere what their
role is and what authority they have (ie. none).


 I would ask them, given the current age of the charity, the budget, the
relationships with stakeholders, the number of staff, the relationship with
the Foundation, recent resignations, the work balance between Trustees and
staff would an advisory board be of positive benefit.

That's not something they will be able to answer from just a phone call.
That's pretty complicated advice, which isn't something the charity
commission's helpline can give. They would need to know a lot about the
charity to know what would and wouldn't be appropriate for us.


 What is the difference between the CIC approach and our approach of
having members that hold the board to account?


 Members of charities exercise their choices at AGMs and EGMs. Stakeholder
groups for CICS might meet on a regular basis (e.g. quarterly?). Scrutiny
roles can be defined in various ways, like the CIC model. Housing
associations (all registered providers of housing) used to be subject to
(tenant) scrutiny, before the TSA was abolished!

We could have quarterly general meetings if we wanted to. We don't need to
change legal structure for that.
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Having an advisory board

2012-10-23 Thread Gordon Joly

On 23/10/12 22:31, Thomas Dalton wrote:


We could have quarterly general meetings if we wanted to. We don't 
need to change legal structure for that.


But stakeholder groups in CICS can be a subset of the membership, I 
believe. The CIC decides at the start how to run the stakeholder function.


Gordo


___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Mobile uk.wikimedia.org still failing

2012-10-23 Thread Michael Peel
I've raised this on bugzilla at:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41334
Please add any clarifying comments there that you think would be useful.

Thanks,
Mike

On 23 Oct 2012, at 19:46, Damokos Bence damokos.be...@wikimedia.hu wrote:

 I think this issue affects all *.wikimedia.org addresses (at least the ones 
 of chapters hosted by the WMF); a workaround is to change the user-agent 
 setting in your mobile browser, if possible.
 
 Best regards,
 Bence
 
 On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Stevie Benton 
 stevie.ben...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
 I'm still having problems too.
 
 Stevie
 
 On Oct 23, 2012 7:09 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
 It appears that this is still an issue.
 
 On 5 October 2012 12:57, Richard Symonds
 richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
 
  Have just chased this up with the WMF. Thanks for reminding me Andy!
 
  On 5 October 2012 12:49, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
 
  It's difficult to promote events like:
 
 http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/RBSA_Backstage_Pass
 
  when mobile visits to that URL are redirected to:
 
 http://uk.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/RBSA_Backstage_Pass
 
  and errors are returned for all http://uk.m.wikimedia.org pages.
 
  I know this has been raised on this mailing list previously, but
  there's still no sign of a fix.
 
  The impact of this problem can be understood by considering that
  yesterday it was reported that 40% of Wikipedia's growth is mobile,
  versus 4% desktop.
 
  Can this serious bug be (re-)escalated as a matter of urgency, please?
 
  --
  Andy Mabbett
  @pigsonthewing
  http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
 
  ___
  Wikimedia UK mailing list
  wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
  http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
  WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
 
 
 
  ___
  Wikimedia UK mailing list
  wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
  http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
  WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
 
 
 
 
 --
 Andy Mabbett
 @pigsonthewing
 http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
 
 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
 
 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Damokos Bence
 ügyvezető alelnök,
 Wikimédia Magyarország
 http://wikimedia.hu
 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org