Re: [Wikitech-l] Affiliation in username

2014-05-14 Thread Gabriel Wicke
On 05/07/2014 10:47 PM, Tyler Romeo wrote:
 One interesting idea might be what Reddit does:
 
 For a moderator of a subreddit, whenever they make a post it just appears
 normally. However, after posting they can choose to officiate it. All
 that does is highlight their username a different color and indicates they
 are acting in their position as moderator rather than a regular user.
 
 This idea could be applied to edits in core, and maybe posts in Flow. WMF
 employees in a special user group could make an edit, and then press a
 button on the history page to highlight that as an official edit.

A similar proposal for per-edit affiliation selection came up recently in
Zürich. It does sound more usable than having to log in using different
accounts.

In our context it might make more sense to let the user select the
affiliation at save time though, rather than making it an extra step after save.

Gabriel

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Affiliation in username

2014-05-09 Thread Gryllida
On Thu, 8 May 2014, at 6:22, Jared Zimmerman wrote:
 Affiliations change, and user names are quite difficult to change, this
 sounds like something that would be good for a structured profile, not for
 a user name.

One of the times I wish I could rename a thread.
Someone with spare time may want to take notes of everything said here onto 
Meta for further discussion.

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Affiliation in username

2014-05-09 Thread Ryan Lane
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Jared Zimmerman 
jared.zimmer...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 Affiliations change, and user names are quite difficult to change, this
 sounds like something that would be good for a structured profile, not for
 a user name.


Indeed, or in the user preferences so that it could be accessed natively.

- Ryan
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Affiliation in username

2014-05-07 Thread Jared Zimmerman
Affiliations change, and user names are quite difficult to change, this
sounds like something that would be good for a structured profile, not for
a user name.



*Jared Zimmerman * \\  Director of User Experience \\ Wikimedia Foundation

M : +1 415 609 4043 |   :  @JaredZimmermanhttps://twitter.com/JaredZimmerman



On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Gryllida gryll...@fastmail.fm wrote:

 On a second thought, do we want to add an optional affiliation field to
 the signup form, so the affiliation goes at the end of username in braces?

 - DGarry (WMF)
 - Fred (DesignSolutionsInc)
 - David (MIT)
 - ...

 So the signup form would look like this:

  -
 | |
 | [ Username preview in large green font ]|
 | |
 | Username:   |
 |  ___|
 | Password:   |
 |  ___|
 | Password 2: |
 |  ___|
 | Email (optional):   |
 |  ___|
 | Affiliation (optional; if your editing is related to work): |
 |  ___|
 | |
  -

 I.e.

  -
 | |
 | [ Gryllida (FOO) in large green font ]|
 | |
 | Username:   |
 |  _Gryllida__|
 | Password:   |
 |  ___|
 | Password 2: |
 |  ___|
 | Email (optional):   |
 |  ___|
 | Affiliation (optional; if your editing is related to work): |
 |  _FOO___|
 | |
  -

 Gryllida.


 On Sun, 23 Feb 2014, at 1:25, rupert THURNER wrote:
  hi,
 
  could wmf please extend the mediawiki software in the following way:
  1. it should knows groups
  2. allow users to store an arbitrary number of groups with their profile
  3. allow to select one of the groups joined to an edit when saving
  4. add a checkbox COI to an edit, meaning potential conflict of
 interest
  5. display and filter edits marked with COI in a different color in
 history
  views
  6. display and filter edits done for a group in a different color in
  history views
  7. allow members of a group to receive notifications done on the group
 page,
 or when a group is mentioned in an edit/comment/talk page.
 
  reason:
  currently it is quite cumbersome to participate as an organisation. it is
  quite cumbersome for people as well to detect COI edits. the most
 prominent
  examples are employees of the wikimedia foundation, and GLAMs. users tend
  to create multiple accounts, and try to create company accounts. the
 main
  reason for this behaviour are (examples, but of course valid general):
  * have a feedback page / notification page for the swiss federal archive
  for other users
  * make clear that an edit is done private or as wmf employee
 
  this then would allow the community to create new policies, e.g. the
 german
  community might cease using company accounts, and switch over to this
  system. this proposal is purely technical. current policies can still be
  applied if people do not need something else, e.g. wmf employees may
  continue to use sue gardner (wmf) accounts.
 
  what you think?
 
  best regards,
  rupert
  ---
  swissGLAMour, http://wikimedia.ch
  ___
  Wikimedia-l mailing list
  wikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org
  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org

Re: [Wikitech-l] Affiliation in username

2014-05-07 Thread Tyler Romeo
One interesting idea might be what Reddit does:

For a moderator of a subreddit, whenever they make a post it just appears
normally. However, after posting they can choose to officiate it. All
that does is highlight their username a different color and indicates they
are acting in their position as moderator rather than a regular user.

This idea could be applied to edits in core, and maybe posts in Flow. WMF
employees in a special user group could make an edit, and then press a
button on the history page to highlight that as an official edit.


*-- *
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2016
Major in Computer Science


On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Jared Zimmerman 
jared.zimmer...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 Affiliations change, and user names are quite difficult to change, this
 sounds like something that would be good for a structured profile, not for
 a user name.



 *Jared Zimmerman * \\  Director of User Experience \\ Wikimedia Foundation

 M : +1 415 609 4043 |   :  @JaredZimmerman
 https://twitter.com/JaredZimmerman



 On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Gryllida gryll...@fastmail.fm wrote:

  On a second thought, do we want to add an optional affiliation field to
  the signup form, so the affiliation goes at the end of username in
 braces?
 
  - DGarry (WMF)
  - Fred (DesignSolutionsInc)
  - David (MIT)
  - ...
 
  So the signup form would look like this:
 
   -
  | |
  | [ Username preview in large green font ]|
  | |
  | Username:   |
  |  ___|
  | Password:   |
  |  ___|
  | Password 2: |
  |  ___|
  | Email (optional):   |
  |  ___|
  | Affiliation (optional; if your editing is related to work): |
  |  ___|
  | |
   -
 
  I.e.
 
   -
  | |
  | [ Gryllida (FOO) in large green font ]|
  | |
  | Username:   |
  |  _Gryllida__|
  | Password:   |
  |  ___|
  | Password 2: |
  |  ___|
  | Email (optional):   |
  |  ___|
  | Affiliation (optional; if your editing is related to work): |
  |  _FOO___|
  | |
   -
 
  Gryllida.
 
 
  On Sun, 23 Feb 2014, at 1:25, rupert THURNER wrote:
   hi,
  
   could wmf please extend the mediawiki software in the following way:
   1. it should knows groups
   2. allow users to store an arbitrary number of groups with their
 profile
   3. allow to select one of the groups joined to an edit when saving
   4. add a checkbox COI to an edit, meaning potential conflict of
  interest
   5. display and filter edits marked with COI in a different color in
  history
   views
   6. display and filter edits done for a group in a different color in
   history views
   7. allow members of a group to receive notifications done on the group
  page,
  or when a group is mentioned in an edit/comment/talk page.
  
   reason:
   currently it is quite cumbersome to participate as an organisation. it
 is
   quite cumbersome for people as well to detect COI edits. the most
  prominent
   examples are employees of the wikimedia foundation, and GLAMs. users
 tend
   to create multiple accounts, and try to create company accounts. the
  main
   reason for this behaviour are (examples, but of course valid general):
   * have a feedback page / notification page for the swiss federal
 archive
   for other users
   * make clear that an edit is done private or as wmf employee
  
   this then would allow the community to create new policies, e.g. the
  german
   community might cease using company accounts, and switch over to this
   system. this