Re: Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-09 Thread Lionel Ulmer
 Also it would be nice if opengl could similarly be loaded on the fly.

I am working on this right now... It's relatively easy for the OpenGL parts
of the X11DRV (I will do as XRender), but I have two other problems :

 1) what about opengl32.dll.so itself ? In that case, can I let direct
OpenGL calls in there ? Thus if an application ever tries to load
opengl32.dll on a non-libGL.so enabled system, the Wine library load
will just fail due to a link failure and Wine will try to load the
native (if any) OpenGL32.DLL.

This is much more easy than doing a complete 'dlsym'ing of all the
various OpenGL calls that are thunked (although it could be done as I
would have just to rework my thunk-generator Perl script)

But well, considering that the result will be anyway 'DLL cannot be
loaded', I think that the 'ugly' solution is enough.

Comments :-) ?

 2) the other bigger problem is the current DDraw code. There are a whole
lot of OpenGL code directly called into it. This means that this Wine
package won't have DDraw work on a non-libGL.so enabled box (even if the
game is only a 2D game).

I am somehow reluctant to fix this as the Direct3D code is bound to have
some rework soon (at least I hope :-) ) and I do not want to have thinks
conflict uselessly or do a hacky solution now to replace it by something
nicer later. One solution would be to completely remove the D3D code
behind compilation flags (as it's non-functionnal anyway) and people
wanting to play with it could always set them to 'ON' somewhere in a .h
file.

For stuff like D3D8, it's the same as for OpenGL32.DLL as without
libGL.so we will never support it anyway.

  Lionel

-- 
 Lionel Ulmer - http://www.bbrox.org/




Re: Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-08 Thread Mike Hearn
Random idea: might it be worth creating a Works With Wine button,
similar to the old web-browser buttons, these images could link back to
the page on winehq with a description and screenshot (or maybe the
appdb) and be sent off to the app maintainers. Obviously some (Microsoft
:) aren't going to put the button up anytime soon, but others such as
WinRAR etc may well do - it can't hurt to try and could be a good way of
getting some free advertising to Windows users who may have never even
heard of Linux before.

I'm quite happy to try and knock up a design for this button and go ask
the developers for software we consider Gold to put it somewhere on
their site. So far most non-huge windows developers I've spoken to have 
been pretty happy that their app works in Wine, so I don't think they'd
mind.

Comments?
thanks -mike

On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 17:55, Dustin Navea wrote:
 --- Rick Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 11:19, Dustin Navea wrote:
   --- Sylvain Petreolle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Excuse me if I feel scared, but is this Appdb or something else ??
 
 No. It should be a group of applications tested by wine 
 developers (or application mantainers) and what should work more 
 or less flawless (without native dlls). It should be the screenshot 
 section. 

In this case Appdb is already there, and only needs a maintainer.
No need to duplicate work.

If you disagree, listen to what you wrote and compare it with Appdb
contents... 
  b) A index page with a table:
  
   
   | Name| Version |  Status  |
   
   | Internet Explorer   | 5.5 |  XXX--   |
   
   
  and a page for every application.

   
   Problem with using the AppDB is that it is highly disorganized, and most
  of
   the apps are non-working in there, his suggestion his that we only list
   'officially' tested and working apps on this/these page(s) AFAICS..
  
  Maybe you could add a Wine tested/Approved Stamp or something similiar 
  to AppDB (Approved image displays if column 'Approved' = 'Y'), 
  then display all and sort by that column.
  
  No duplication.
  
 Not a bad idea, but the other thing is that users are going to want to be
 able to look at one page that lists all of the working apps and if they want
 more info they can click the link.  At the top (or bottom) we could have a
 link that references the AppDB, something like:
 
 Don't see your App listed here?  Check the AppDB to see the status of it and
 what you can do to help get it working.  http://appdb.winehq.com
 
 Should suffice.
 
 -Dustin
 
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos
 http://launch.yahoo.com/u2
 
 






Re: Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-08 Thread Andreas Mohr
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 08:50:49AM +, Mike Hearn wrote:
 Random idea: might it be worth creating a Works With Wine button,
 similar to the old web-browser buttons, these images could link back to
 the page on winehq with a description and screenshot (or maybe the
 appdb) and be sent off to the app maintainers. Obviously some (Microsoft
 :) aren't going to put the button up anytime soon, but others such as
 WinRAR etc may well do - it can't hurt to try and could be a good way of
 getting some free advertising to Windows users who may have never even
 heard of Linux before.
 
 I'm quite happy to try and knock up a design for this button and go ask
 the developers for software we consider Gold to put it somewhere on
 their site. So far most non-huge windows developers I've spoken to have 
 been pretty happy that their app works in Wine, so I don't think they'd
 mind.
 
 Comments?
Great idea, IMHO.

We might want to make sure there is no conflict whatsoever between a
certain point in time where it happens to work with Wine and a certain
point in time when *Wine* is considered Gold and thus the app is *supposed*
to work at that time, though.

But OTOH that certification would probably simply translate into a web page
where you can view which Wine version *exactly* with which Wine settings
*exactly* has been made to work, so there wouldn't be a conflict.




Re: Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-08 Thread Mike Hearn
 Great idea, IMHO.
 
 We might want to make sure there is no conflict whatsoever between a
 certain point in time where it happens to work with Wine and a certain
 point in time when *Wine* is considered Gold and thus the app is *supposed*
 to work at that time, though.

Presumably once an app starts working with Wine, if it suddenly stops
for whatever reason (ignoring changes in the app itself) then it's a
regression in Wine, which should be pretty rare. 

As such once an app is known good it could receive this certification
and if somebody tries the app and it's found to not work, then a bug
should be filed in bugzilla. I'd suggest (I don't know current policy)
that bugs on apps that did work but now don't should be treated
seriously as regressions unless it's a known architectural issue (like a
new control is being tested or something).

OK, I'll try and make a button for this in the GIMP, so people can
applaud/flame etc on it. If people seem to think it's a good idea I
don't mind emailing people/organizations about it. When will the list of
top 10 gold apps be ready?

thanks -mike





Re: Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-08 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On November 8, 2002 07:26 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
 Presumably once an app starts working with Wine, if it suddenly stops
 for whatever reason (ignoring changes in the app itself) then it's a
 regression in Wine, which should be pretty rare.

:))) We wish!

 When will the list of top 10 gold apps be ready?

Real Soon Now (TM). We're on it.

-- 
Dimi.





Re: Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-07 Thread Carlos Lozano
El jue, 07 de nov de 2002, a las 00:48, Sylvain Petreolle escribio:
 Excuse me if I feel scared, but is this Appdb or something else ??
  Now the question is:
  a) One page for all the applications.
  
  b) A index page with a table:
  
  
  | Name| Version |  Status  |
  
  | Internet Explorer   | 5.5 |  XXX--   |
  
  
  and a page for every application.
  
  c) Several pages by themes.
  ...
  
  
  Every application should include at least the next info:
[...] 
  o Mantainer's name and email.

Excuse me if I feel scared, but is this Appdb or something else ??

No. It should be a group of applications tested by wine 
developers (or application mantainers) and what should work more 
or less flawless (without native dlls). It should be the screenshot 
section. 

Regards,
Carlos.

-- 
 ___ _  \  |  /  Infraestructuras
| . |._ _  _| | ___  ___  ___http://www.andago.com
|   || ' |/ . |_ |/ . |/ . \__ GNU/Linux
|_|_||_|_|\___|___|\_. |\___/ _ \  __|\ \  /
 Carlos A. Lozano   ___'/ | \ -_) __/\__ \ -_)
 [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]\___|_|  / _/\_\___|
 [ [EMAIL PROTECTED]   ]  http://www.epsxe.com




Re: Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-07 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On November 6, 2002 05:41 pm, Carlos Lozano wrote:
 Now the question is:
 a) One page for all the applications.

Yes. This has to be _one_ page, that user can just look at,
and get their appetites wet :)

[...]
 Every application should include at least the next info:

 o Name.
 o Version.
 o Description.
 o Screenshot.

small thumbnail that links to a screenshot, yes.

 o Download URL (when it is possible)

Yes. We should favour freeware apps, so that users can
actually download, and try them out right away, without
silly registrations, etc.

The entire thing should fit in one line, like so:

WinRAR 3.0   A nice archiving utility  [screenshot thumbnail]

 o Wine's Version.

No need, this is supposed to be the Gold list of supported apps.

 o Status.

Ditto. Status is *, it's implied in the Gold status.

 o Problems.

None. See above :)

 o Mantainer's name and email.

This belongs in the AppDB.

Remember, this page should be simple, and hold only the interesting
bits, none of this 'boring' stuff. :)

-- 
Dimi.





Re: Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-07 Thread Rick Romero
On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 11:19, Dustin Navea wrote:
 --- Sylvain Petreolle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Excuse me if I feel scared, but is this Appdb or something else ??
   
   No. It should be a group of applications tested by wine 
   developers (or application mantainers) and what should work more 
   or less flawless (without native dlls). It should be the screenshot 
   section. 
  
  In this case Appdb is already there, and only needs a maintainer.
  No need to duplicate work.
  
  If you disagree, listen to what you wrote and compare it with Appdb
  contents... 
b) A index page with a table:

 
 | Name| Version |  Status  |
 
 | Internet Explorer   | 5.5 |  XXX--   |
 
 
and a page for every application.
  
 
 Problem with using the AppDB is that it is highly disorganized, and most of
 the apps are non-working in there, his suggestion his that we only list
 'officially' tested and working apps on this/these page(s) AFAICS..

Maybe you could add a Wine tested/Approved Stamp or something similiar 
to AppDB (Approved image displays if column 'Approved' = 'Y'), 
then display all and sort by that column.

No duplication.

Rick


 
-- 
--
Rick Romero
IT Manager  
Valeo, Inc. ph: 262.695.4841
Sussex, WI. fax: 262.695.4850
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-07 Thread Dustin Navea
--- Rick Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 11:19, Dustin Navea wrote:
  --- Sylvain Petreolle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
Excuse me if I feel scared, but is this Appdb or something else ??

No. It should be a group of applications tested by wine 
developers (or application mantainers) and what should work more 
or less flawless (without native dlls). It should be the screenshot 
section. 
   
   In this case Appdb is already there, and only needs a maintainer.
   No need to duplicate work.
   
   If you disagree, listen to what you wrote and compare it with Appdb
   contents... 
 b) A index page with a table:
 
  
  | Name| Version |  Status  |
  
  | Internet Explorer   | 5.5 |  XXX--   |
  
  
 and a page for every application.
   
  
  Problem with using the AppDB is that it is highly disorganized, and most
 of
  the apps are non-working in there, his suggestion his that we only list
  'officially' tested and working apps on this/these page(s) AFAICS..
 
 Maybe you could add a Wine tested/Approved Stamp or something similiar 
 to AppDB (Approved image displays if column 'Approved' = 'Y'), 
 then display all and sort by that column.
 
 No duplication.
 
Not a bad idea, but the other thing is that users are going to want to be
able to look at one page that lists all of the working apps and if they want
more info they can click the link.  At the top (or bottom) we could have a
link that references the AppDB, something like:

Don't see your App listed here?  Check the AppDB to see the status of it and
what you can do to help get it working.  http://appdb.winehq.com

Should suffice.

-Dustin

__
Do you Yahoo!?
U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos
http://launch.yahoo.com/u2




Re: Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-07 Thread Sylvain Petreolle

  Problem with using the AppDB is that it is highly disorganized, and
 most of
  the apps are non-working in there, his suggestion his that we only
 list
  'officially' tested and working apps on this/these page(s) AFAICS..
 
 Maybe you could add a Wine tested/Approved Stamp or something
 similiar 
 to AppDB (Approved image displays if column 'Approved' = 'Y'), 
 then display all and sort by that column.
 
 No duplication.
 
Agreed.
And after some time we could display this page by default.

___
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com




Re: Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-07 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On November 7, 2002 01:06 pm, Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
  No duplication.

 Agreed.
 And after some time we could display this page by default.

There is no duplication. The AppDB, and this list server
different purposes, as I explained before. Let's not mix
the two, if not necessary.

-- 
Dimi.





Re: Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-07 Thread Rick Romero
On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 12:16, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
 On November 7, 2002 01:06 pm, Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
   No duplication.
 
  Agreed.
  And after some time we could display this page by default.
 
 There is no duplication. The AppDB, and this list server
 different purposes, as I explained before. Let's not mix
 the two, if not necessary.

But if App X is listed in AppDB, and on 'the list', wouldn't it be
duplicated?  
Why wouldn't you want to use the same (MySQL/Postgres/Yourfav) table?

I'm assuming the visual layout would be different than AppDB, but I
don't understand why the data would change.  I would think you would
also want to differentiate 'officially' tested apps from user submitted
apps within the AppDB also..

Rick

 
-- 
--
Rick Romero
IT Manager  
Valeo, Inc. ph: 262.695.4841
Sussex, WI. fax: 262.695.4850
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-07 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On November 7, 2002 01:42 pm, Rick Romero wrote:
 But if App X is listed in AppDB, and on 'the list', wouldn't it be
 duplicated?  
 Why wouldn't you want to use the same (MySQL/Postgres/Yourfav) table?

I DO NOT want that page be automatically generated, because:
  -- want want to be able to _hand_pick_ apps
  -- I don't want it to grow too large
  -- I want to be able to maintain consistency of information accoss apps
  -- I want it to have a hand-tuned, nice look

And *were*, pray tell, is the duplication? The fact that we list
the name of an app in a page, that might be in the AppDB does not
qualify as duplication. Please read my other posts on the subject, 
describing what I think should be on the page.

-- 
Dimi.





Re: Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-07 Thread Lionel Ulmer
 Also it would be nice if opengl could similarly be loaded on the fly.

I will put this on my todo list Will try to do it the same moment I want
to try to properly separate the DLL (and at the same time fix the NWN tools
problems).

No date promised, though :-)

   Lionel

-- 
 Lionel Ulmer - http://www.bbrox.org/




Re: Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-07 Thread Carlos Lozano
El jue, 07 de nov de 2002, a las 18:09, Sylvain Petreolle escribio:
 
  Excuse me if I feel scared, but is this Appdb or something else ??
  
  No. It should be a group of applications tested by wine 
  developers (or application mantainers) and what should work more 
  or less flawless (without native dlls). It should be the screenshot 
  section. 
 
 In this case Appdb is already there, and only needs a maintainer.
 No need to duplicate work.
 
 If you disagree, listen to what you wrote and compare it with Appdb
 contents... 

I have a different vision of Appdb actually, it is more a forum what
a real compatibility list. If you see entries like IE5.5 it will be
even funny:

guy a I run ie5.5 in my machine.
guy b It doesn't work for me in Redhat 7.2
guy c You suck, mozilla is better than ie5.5
guy d ie5.5 is better because 

In Appdb is mixed different versions of wine (the difficult is find
2 entries for one same application with the same version ;), and
it includes info about native DLLs.

This page should be a, hmmm ..., marketing page, it should show
to the users that wine works (yeah for some apps only), without tricks
or native dlls.

It should include a list of 20/30 applications what the user only
need download/install wine, download the application setup,
install and cool it works :)

It should be prepared by release date, and it shouldn't be modify,
except that wine develop will get separated in 2 tree, stable/unstable,
then it should be checked for every stable version.

Really the binary version what was used to check this applications 
should be in download section.

I don't think that the list should increase in number anytime. 
If wine should run every day better applications, this applications
should replace to some simple from the original list.

Regards,
Carlos.

-- 
 ___ _  \  |  /  Infraestructuras
| . |._ _  _| | ___  ___  ___http://www.andago.com
|   || ' |/ . |_ |/ . |/ . \__ GNU/Linux
|_|_||_|_|\___|___|\_. |\___/ _ \  __|\ \  /
 Carlos A. Lozano   ___'/ | \ -_) __/\__ \ -_)
 [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]\___|_|  / _/\_\___|
 [ [EMAIL PROTECTED]   ]  http://www.epsxe.com




Re: Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-07 Thread Carlos Lozano

[...]
  o Download URL (when it is possible)
 
 Yes. We should favour freeware apps, so that users can
 actually download, and try them out right away, without
 silly registrations, etc.
 
 The entire thing should fit in one line, like so:
 
 WinRAR 3.0   A nice archiving utility  [screenshot thumbnail]

Looks like fine for me :)

  o Wine's Version.
 
 No need, this is supposed to be the Gold list of supported apps.

I have thought that it shouldn't be necessary. It should be better
if the list is updated with the last stable release.

 
  o Status.
 
 Ditto. Status is *, it's implied in the Gold status.
 
  o Problems.
 
 None. See above :)
 

hmm, good, some applications could be very usable even 
if some feature is buggy, it is complex test applications
with more of 15-20 different options, and if the bugs are
known it could be listed in a different page (for example
together to the full screenshot)

Regards,
Carlos.

-- 
 ___ _  \  |  /  Infraestructuras
| . |._ _  _| | ___  ___  ___http://www.andago.com
|   || ' |/ . |_ |/ . |/ . \__ GNU/Linux
|_|_||_|_|\___|___|\_. |\___/ _ \  __|\ \  /
 Carlos A. Lozano   ___'/ | \ -_) __/\__ \ -_)
 [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]\___|_|  / _/\_\___|
 [ [EMAIL PROTECTED]   ]  http://www.epsxe.com




Re: Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-07 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On November 7, 2002 05:11 pm, Carlos Lozano wrote:
 hmm, good, some applications could be very usable even
 if some feature is buggy, it is complex test applications
 with more of 15-20 different options, and if the bugs are
 known it could be listed in a different page (for example
 together to the full screenshot)

Indeed, we can have a small, unintrusive [Notes] link,
over to the right, where we can add a small blurb about
potential problems, etc.

-- 
Dimi.





Re: Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-07 Thread Sylvain Petreolle
Agreed, should be cool !

 Indeed, we can have a small, unintrusive [Notes] link,
 over to the right, where we can add a small blurb about
 potential problems, etc.
 
 -- 
 Dimi.
 
  

___
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com




Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-06 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
This is based upon the Wine 0.8 TODO v0.2 send earlier to the list.

It is important to get a comprehensive list of what needs to be done,
in order to have a successful 0.9 release. This includes all things
Wine-related, not only the code. 

I can not do it alone -- I need your input.

Before I start, a quick reminder for the 0.9 criteria:
  -- Users can start using Wine
-- works well for a fair number of apps
-- no MS DLLs required (from real Windows)
  -- User facing stuff (website, docs, etc.) are in
a decent state, to avoid scaring them away
What is NOT in 0.9:
  -- stable server protocol (no binary compatibility)
  -- DLL separation (phase 2)

Please review it, and let me know if:
  - I've left something out
  - Something is in, and it doesn't belong in here (for 0.9 that is)
  - I have put your name on a task you are not working on
  - I have NOT put your name on a task you are working on
  - You have a status update (if you're working on something)
  - You want to start working on some of these.

Comments, flames, suggestions, are appreciated, as always.

A. WineHQ work (Beta at: http://lostwages.winehq.org)
  0. Website redesign [IN PROGRESS]
- worker: Jeremy Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  1. Reorganize the navigational menu [BETA]
- wine-devel consensus merged into new site
  2. Create some really sexy screenshots [IN PROGRESS]
-- one app per screenshot, avoid cluttered desktop
-- minimize size, if possible by using 'Positioned Color Dithering'
  3. Rework the FAQ interface [IN PROGRESS]
- workers: Dimitrie Paun, Keith Matthews, Thomas Wickline)
  4. Enlist some 'official' distribution maintainers [TODO]
 (at the minimum RedHat, SUSE, Mandrake, Debian)
  5. Create nice page with apps that run virtually flawless [IN PROGRESS]
 They should not require MS dlls, tricks, etc. to run
- worker: Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED]

B. Documentation work
  0. We need to first figure _what_ is out of date. [TODO]
  1. Convert man pages to SGML [TODO]
  2. Move CVS docu from User Guide to Devel Guide [TODO]

C. Wine configuration
  0. Merge configuration into the registry [TODO]
  1. Write control panel applets for editing it [TODO]
  2. Have decent defaults so we can start control panel 
 without prior configuration [TODO]
  3. Have wizard like app to autoconfigure wine [TODO]
WineSetupTk proposed by Jeremy White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  4. Make Wine's DLLs register themselves to avoid
 manual merging of the winedefault.reg [TODO]
  5. Write .inf script to setup a new Wine installation [TODO]
  6. Have a wineboot script for RunOnce stuff [IN PROGRESS]
- worker: Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED]

D. Stabilize utilities
  0. Get rid of the init directive from .spec files [DONE]
- worker: Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  1. Make sure the .spec file format is fairly stable [TODO]
Any other things that may need changing here?
  2. Ensure the various utilities' options are stable [IN PROGRESS]
- Alexandre fixed winebuild options
Anything here?

E. Important fixes
  0. Window management rewrite, so we can install apps in managed mode.
- worker: Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  1. Finish DLL separation Phase 1 [IN PROGRESS]
 That is, DLLs should use only functions exported through .spec file.
 Phase 2 is getting rid of unwanted functions from .spec file, and
 this is not a target for 0.9.

-- 
Dimi.





Re: Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-06 Thread Dustin Navea
--- Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[-snip-]
   5. Create nice page with apps that run virtually flawless [IN PROGRESS]
  They should not require MS dlls, tricks, etc. to run
   - worker: Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Add me on here, I will do some app testing from various sites...

 B. Documentation work
   0. We need to first figure _what_ is out of date. [TODO]

I can help here too, maybe not as much as app testing but still some..
[-snip-]

-Dustin

__
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/




Re: Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-06 Thread Duane Clark
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:

This is based upon the Wine 0.8 TODO v0.2 send earlier to the list.

It is important to get a comprehensive list of what needs to be done,
in order to have a successful 0.9 release. This includes all things
Wine-related, not only the code. 


A suggestion... As far as I know (I could be wrong about this) Wine 
currently has to be compiled for the CUPS/non-CUPS printing system that 
the user has. It would be nice if Wine could figure this out at runtime 
and configure itself then. At least for the non-gamers out there, 
printing support is fairly important.








Re: Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-06 Thread Carlos Lozano
El mié, 06 de nov de 2002, a las 13:16, Dustin Navea escribio:
 --- Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 [-snip-]
5. Create nice page with apps that run virtually flawless [IN PROGRESS]
   They should not require MS dlls, tricks, etc. to run
  - worker: Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Add me on here, I will do some app testing from various sites...

:)))

I don't think that we should start with a list of applications
too big. Maybe 20 or 30, getting a average of flawless/popular
applications.

Now the question is:
a) One page for all the applications.

b) A index page with a table:


| Name| Version |  Status  |

| Internet Explorer   | 5.5 |  XXX--   |


and a page for every application.

c) Several pages by themes.
...


Every application should include at least the next info:

o Name.
o Version.
o Description.
o Screenshot.
o Download URL (when it is possible)
o Wine's Version.
o Status.
o Problems.
o Mantainer's name and email.

Regards,
Carlos.

-- 
 ___ _  \  |  /  Infraestructuras
| . |._ _  _| | ___  ___  ___http://www.andago.com
|   || ' |/ . |_ |/ . |/ . \__ GNU/Linux
|_|_||_|_|\___|___|\_. |\___/ _ \  __|\ \  /
 Carlos A. Lozano   ___'/ | \ -_) __/\__ \ -_)
 [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]\___|_|  / _/\_\___|
 [ [EMAIL PROTECTED]   ]  http://www.epsxe.com




Re: Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-06 Thread Huw Davies
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 01:25:25PM -0800, Duane Clark wrote:
 Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
 This is based upon the Wine 0.8 TODO v0.2 send earlier to the list.
 
 It is important to get a comprehensive list of what needs to be done,
 in order to have a successful 0.9 release. This includes all things
 Wine-related, not only the code. 
 
 
 A suggestion... As far as I know (I could be wrong about this) Wine 
 currently has to be compiled for the CUPS/non-CUPS printing system that 
 the user has. It would be nice if Wine could figure this out at runtime 
 and configure itself then. At least for the non-gamers out there, 
 printing support is fairly important.

Yup, I'm going to do this in the near future.

Also it would be nice if opengl could similarly be loaded on the fly.

Huw.




Re: Wine 0.9 TODO v0.1

2002-11-06 Thread Sylvain Petreolle
Excuse me if I feel scared, but is this Appdb or something else ??
 Now the question is:
 a) One page for all the applications.
 
 b) A index page with a table:
 
 
 | Name| Version |  Status  |
 
 | Internet Explorer   | 5.5 |  XXX--   |
 
 
 and a page for every application.
 
 c) Several pages by themes.
 ...
 
 
 Every application should include at least the next info:
 
 o Name.
 o Version.
 o Description.
 o Screenshot.
 o Download URL (when it is possible)
 o Wine's Version.
 o Status.
 o Problems.
 o Mantainer's name and email.
 
 Regards,
 Carlos.
 
 -- 
  ___ _  \  |  /  Infraestructuras
 | . |._ _  _| | ___  ___  ___http://www.andago.com
 |   || ' |/ . |_ |/ . |/ . \__ GNU/Linux
 |_|_||_|_|\___|___|\_. |\___/ _ \  __|\ \  /
  Carlos A. Lozano   ___'/ | \ -_) __/\__ \ -_)
  [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]\___|_|  / _/\_\___|
  [ [EMAIL PROTECTED]   ]  http://www.epsxe.com
  

___
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com