Re: [WinPcap-users] Problems HP computers

2004-05-20 Thread Gianluca Varenni

- Original Message - 
From: Jens Munk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 11:19 PM
Subject: Re: [WinPcap-users] Problems HP computers


 My program is using the Packet API to communicate with some low level
 controllers, and when set I just store the selected adapter so the program
 automatically starts communicating next time I start it. It's not a big
deal
 now that I am aware of it, and I have actually been using the version 2.3
 for two years now without a single flaw. Nice job!

Why don't to migrate to the pcap API? I know this would be a big change for
your code, but the pcap API is more stable, while the packet API is subject
to change from time to time (in fact I suppose you had to modify some stuff
in your code to work with 3.1 beta, in particular regarding the
PacketGetAdapterNames() API).

Have a nice day
GV


 Thanks,

 Jens.

 
  Why do you need such information about the prefixes we use for the
 adapters?
  We cannot grant not to change that prefix in the future versions (as we
do
  not grant not to change the Packet API, as well).
 
  Have a nice day
  GV
 
 




 ==
  This is the WinPcap users list. It is archived at
  http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

  To unsubscribe use
  mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ==






==
 This is the WinPcap users list. It is archived at
 http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

 To unsubscribe use 
 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==


RE: [WinPcap-users] ANNOUNCE: WinPcap 3.1 beta3 has been released

2004-05-20 Thread List - WinPcap-Users
I've tested this some, and so far things look good.



I've just come across a need to use the rpcap capabilities.  However my
needs also include the use of pcap_sendpacket.  It seems that this is
not supported in the rpcap universe.  Is there hope for this?

By the way, a couple of months ago, I submitted changes to the generic
libpcap to support pcap_sendpacket on all/most platforms.  These are
visible in the current libpcap cvs.

Thanks.

- Mark Pizzolato


 -Original Message-
 From: Gianluca Varenni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Posted At: Saturday, May 15, 2004 4:02 AM
 Posted To: List - WinPcap-Users
 Conversation: [WinPcap-users] ANNOUNCE: WinPcap 3.1 beta3 has been
 released
 Subject: [WinPcap-users] ANNOUNCE: WinPcap 3.1 beta3 has been released
 
 The beta3 of WinPcap 3.1 is available from today in the download
section
 of
 the WinPcap site.
 
 WinPcap 3.1 beta3 is a minor update, that fixes a couple of bugs
present
 in
 beta2, that prevented it to work on Windows 9x.
 
 
 
 CHANGELOG
 =
 
 - Bug fixing:
   + Fixed a bug related to device listing if TCP/IP is not installed:
on
 2000/XP if TCP is not installed, it reported you must install
 TCP/IP,
 and this was plain wrong.
   + Added PacketSetSnapLen() under Win9x. Without this function,
wpcap.dll
 fails to load on Win9x.
   + PacketGetAdapterNames() has been rewritten under Win9x, in order
to
 comply to the correct behavior specified in the documentation.
 
 
 
 
 =
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ==
  This is the WinPcap users list. It is archived at
  http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 
  To unsubscribe use
  mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ==




= This is the WinPcap 
users list. It is archived at
 http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

 To unsubscribe use
 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=

Re: [WinPcap-users] Problems HP computers

2004-05-20 Thread {Pedro Lucas-Suporte Netcount}
Hi

I'm also using the packet API instead of pcap. The reason for Jens might be
(for me it is) performance. The more API layers it has to go through, the
slower the code. This is critical for low usage CPU (background)
applications that must capture live traffic, with repetitive calls to e.g.
PacketReceivePacket( ).
It is a fact that one must cope with the NPF_ and Packet_ , and the
ASCII/Unicode in PacketGetAdapterNames( ) stuff... and the
PacketGetVersion( ) format changes...but that's life.

Keep up the good work with Winpcap! Namely WAN support !
Pedro Lucas

 Why don't to migrate to the pcap API? I know this would be a big change
for
 your code, but the pcap API is more stable, while the packet API is
subject
 to change from time to time (in fact I suppose you had to modify some
stuff
 in your code to work with 3.1 beta, in particular regarding the
 PacketGetAdapterNames() API).

 Have a nice day
 GV




==
 This is the WinPcap users list. It is archived at
 http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

 To unsubscribe use 
 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==