Re: [Ninux-Wireless] Fwd: [Olsr-users] Anyone with verified 802.11n HT speeds on Ubiquiti M devices in adhoc/mesh mode?

2011-03-23 Per discussione Antonio Anselmi
funziona su M5... quello che manca e' la possibilita' di avere un simultaneo
VAP in managed :(


2011/3/23 Gioacchino Mazzurco gmazzurc...@gmail.com

 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Ben West westbyw...@gmail.com
 Date: 2011/3/22
 Subject: Re: [Olsr-users] Anyone with verified 802.11n HT speeds on
 Ubiquiti M devices in adhoc/mesh mode?
 To: Daniel A. Nagy nagyd...@epointsystem.org
 Cc: olsr-us...@lists.olsr.org


 For an update, I believe I was able to get HT modes working in IBSS
 (aka adhoc) on two Nanostation M5s.  The Links reported 150Mbit/s
 connection on both ends after settling, and throughput measured at
 45Mbit/s.
 This required patches to iw and compat-wireless on OpenWRT r25206.
 More info here:
 https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=131299#p131299
 I would be interested to hear if anyone has been able to specify HT
 modes in /etc/config/wireless on OpenWRT, since I was unable.
 Note that the link speeds did suggest I was getting multiple chains
 (i.e. MIMO) very briefly.  My test environment (indoor room, 20feet
 separation) could have been non-ideal.
 On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Ben West m...@benwest.name wrote:
 
  Sorry for not explaining this in the original post.  It is described in
 OpenWRT forum post; I had snipped my question to this list to focus on
 mesh-related question.
  Gateway: Rocket M5, flashed with pre-compiled
 openwrt-ar71xx-ubnt-rocket-m-squashfs-factory.bin for Backfire 10.03-rc4
  Repeaters (and a backup gwy): Nanostation M5, flashed with
 custom-compiled pre-compiled openwrt-ar71xx-ubnt-nano-m-squashfs-factory.bin
 from Backfire r24045, and with this patch to allow DHCP on 2nd LAN port:
  http://freifunk.net/pipermail/wlanware/2010-December/002439.html
  Basically, I'm curious to hear details (e.g. patches, what revision of
 OpenWRT/ath9k) where people have confirmed getting HT modes to work.
  Besides that, these nodes are actually working just fine, and their link
 speed generally outpaces the uplink I have for them anyway.  It's just that
 I would like to support ~40Mbit link speed in the intermediate future,
 should a fast enough uplink appear.
  On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Daniel A. Nagy 
 nagyd...@epointsystem.org wrote:
 
  On 03/14/2011 06:10 AM, Ben West wrote:
   I just set up 3 Ubiquiti M5 devices as mesh nodes running OpenWRT
 
  Since Ubiquiti M5 devices are not as identical as the pre-M series,
  could you be more specific?
 
  These three categories are quite distinct, require different firmware
  and have their own, distinct quirks:
  - PicoStation / Bullet M5
  - NanoStation M5
  - NanoStation M5 Loco
 
  Cheers,
 
  --
  Daniel
 
 
  --
  Olsr-users mailing list
  olsr-us...@lists.olsr.org
  http://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users
 



 --
 Ben West
 westbyw...@gmail.com

 --
 Olsr-users mailing list
 olsr-us...@lists.olsr.org
 http://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users
 ___
 Wireless mailing list
 Wireless@ml.ninux.org
 http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@ml.ninux.org
http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [Ninux-Wireless] Fwd: [Olsr-users] Anyone with verified 802.11n HT speeds on Ubiquiti M devices in adhoc/mesh mode?

2011-03-23 Per discussione Antonio Anselmi
piu' che ath9k sembra un problema ath9k + hostap stiamo a vedere come
evolvono le cose.



2011/3/23 Gioacchino Mazzurco gmazzurc...@gmail.com

 si ho gia' aperto un bug da tempo per il VAP

 ma sembra che al momento e' proprio al modalita' AP che ha bisogno di
 essere stabilizzata su ath9k dopo di che probabilmente aggiusteranno
 anche i VAP

 2011/3/23 Antonio Anselmi tony.anse...@gmail.com:
  funziona su M5... quello che manca e' la possibilita' di avere un
 simultaneo
  VAP in managed :(
 
 
  2011/3/23 Gioacchino Mazzurco gmazzurc...@gmail.com
 
  -- Forwarded message --
  From: Ben West westbyw...@gmail.com
  Date: 2011/3/22
  Subject: Re: [Olsr-users] Anyone with verified 802.11n HT speeds on
  Ubiquiti M devices in adhoc/mesh mode?
  To: Daniel A. Nagy nagyd...@epointsystem.org
  Cc: olsr-us...@lists.olsr.org
 
 
  For an update, I believe I was able to get HT modes working in IBSS
  (aka adhoc) on two Nanostation M5s.  The Links reported 150Mbit/s
  connection on both ends after settling, and throughput measured at
  45Mbit/s.
  This required patches to iw and compat-wireless on OpenWRT r25206.
  More info here:
  https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=131299#p131299
  I would be interested to hear if anyone has been able to specify HT
  modes in /etc/config/wireless on OpenWRT, since I was unable.
  Note that the link speeds did suggest I was getting multiple chains
  (i.e. MIMO) very briefly.  My test environment (indoor room, 20feet
  separation) could have been non-ideal.
  On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Ben West m...@benwest.name wrote:
  
   Sorry for not explaining this in the original post.  It is described
 in
   OpenWRT forum post; I had snipped my question to this list to focus on
   mesh-related question.
   Gateway: Rocket M5, flashed with pre-compiled
   openwrt-ar71xx-ubnt-rocket-m-squashfs-factory.bin for Backfire
 10.03-rc4
   Repeaters (and a backup gwy): Nanostation M5, flashed with
   custom-compiled pre-compiled
 openwrt-ar71xx-ubnt-nano-m-squashfs-factory.bin
   from Backfire r24045, and with this patch to allow DHCP on 2nd LAN
 port:
   http://freifunk.net/pipermail/wlanware/2010-December/002439.html
   Basically, I'm curious to hear details (e.g. patches, what revision of
   OpenWRT/ath9k) where people have confirmed getting HT modes to work.
   Besides that, these nodes are actually working just fine, and their
 link
   speed generally outpaces the uplink I have for them anyway.  It's just
 that
   I would like to support ~40Mbit link speed in the intermediate future,
   should a fast enough uplink appear.
   On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Daniel A. Nagy
   nagyd...@epointsystem.org wrote:
  
   On 03/14/2011 06:10 AM, Ben West wrote:
I just set up 3 Ubiquiti M5 devices as mesh nodes running OpenWRT
  
   Since Ubiquiti M5 devices are not as identical as the pre-M series,
   could you be more specific?
  
   These three categories are quite distinct, require different firmware
   and have their own, distinct quirks:
   - PicoStation / Bullet M5
   - NanoStation M5
   - NanoStation M5 Loco
  
   Cheers,
  
   --
   Daniel
  
  
   --
   Olsr-users mailing list
   olsr-us...@lists.olsr.org
   http://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users
  
 
 
 
  --
  Ben West
  westbyw...@gmail.com
 
  --
  Olsr-users mailing list
  olsr-us...@lists.olsr.org
  http://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users
  ___
  Wireless mailing list
  Wireless@ml.ninux.org
  http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@ml.ninux.org
http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless