RE: [WISPA] Tower Height Regulations
Rick, There is a link in the drop down list called WISP Resouces for that page. It is the very top page called FCC Tower Search. Respectfully, Rick Harnish President OnlyInternet Broadband Wireless, Inc. 260-827-2482 Office 260-307-4000 Cell 260-918-4340 VoIP www.oibw.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Smith Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 12:19 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Tower Height Regulations There's a site somewhere buried inside the FCC tower search where you can input GPS coords, and it'll tell you whether you need special FAA approval or not. The way to FIND that search eludes me at the moment, though. Sorry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 4:22 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Tower Height Regulations Sounds like I'll be fine cause there isn't an airport close to here. Kurt Fankhauser WAVELINC 114 S. Walnut St. Bucyrus, OH 44820 419-562-6405 www.wavelinc.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Scrivner Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 7:59 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tower Height Regulations There are FAA guidelines about structures under 200 feet near airports but I have not searched for those guidelines. If you Google it and find anything of interest please feel free to pass along to the rest of us here. I remember something about allowing so many feet above AGL (Average Ground Level) for every mile from a runway. Scriv - Original Message - *From:* JNA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* 'WISPA General List' mailto:wireless@wispa.org *Sent:* Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:57 AM *Subject:* RE: [WISPA] Tower Height Regulations Did anyone ever respond on this? I am interested as well. Thanks, John *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Kurt Fankhauser *Sent:* Tuesday, January 03, 2006 2:44 PM *To:* wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org *Subject:* [WISPA] Tower Height Regulations Beside's local regulations does the FAA/FCC have requirements on the distance your tower is from the roads if it falls. I had someone tell me today that a couple years ago they made a law that if you had a 100' tower it needed to be 150' away from the road. And they said that older towers would be grandfathered in. Kurt Fankhauser WAVELINC 114 S. Walnut St. Bucyrus, OH 44820 419-562-6405 www.wavelinc.com -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/227 - Release Date: 1/11/2006 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/226 - Release Date: 1/10/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/226 - Release Date: 1/10/2006 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] Tower Height Regulations
Doih!, The link is on the www.wispa.org webpage. Rick Harnish President OnlyInternet Broadband Wireless, Inc. 260-827-2482 Office 260-307-4000 Cell 260-918-4340 VoIP www.oibw.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Harnish Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 7:37 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Tower Height Regulations Rick, There is a link in the drop down list called WISP Resouces for that page. It is the very top page called FCC Tower Search. Respectfully, Rick Harnish President OnlyInternet Broadband Wireless, Inc. 260-827-2482 Office 260-307-4000 Cell 260-918-4340 VoIP www.oibw.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Smith Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 12:19 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Tower Height Regulations There's a site somewhere buried inside the FCC tower search where you can input GPS coords, and it'll tell you whether you need special FAA approval or not. The way to FIND that search eludes me at the moment, though. Sorry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 4:22 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Tower Height Regulations Sounds like I'll be fine cause there isn't an airport close to here. Kurt Fankhauser WAVELINC 114 S. Walnut St. Bucyrus, OH 44820 419-562-6405 www.wavelinc.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Scrivner Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 7:59 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tower Height Regulations There are FAA guidelines about structures under 200 feet near airports but I have not searched for those guidelines. If you Google it and find anything of interest please feel free to pass along to the rest of us here. I remember something about allowing so many feet above AGL (Average Ground Level) for every mile from a runway. Scriv - Original Message - *From:* JNA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* 'WISPA General List' mailto:wireless@wispa.org *Sent:* Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:57 AM *Subject:* RE: [WISPA] Tower Height Regulations Did anyone ever respond on this? I am interested as well. Thanks, John *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Kurt Fankhauser *Sent:* Tuesday, January 03, 2006 2:44 PM *To:* wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org *Subject:* [WISPA] Tower Height Regulations Beside's local regulations does the FAA/FCC have requirements on the distance your tower is from the roads if it falls. I had someone tell me today that a couple years ago they made a law that if you had a 100' tower it needed to be 150' away from the road. And they said that older towers would be grandfathered in. Kurt Fankhauser WAVELINC 114 S. Walnut St. Bucyrus, OH 44820 419-562-6405 www.wavelinc.com -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/227 - Release Date: 1/11/2006 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/226 - Release Date: 1/10/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/226 - Release Date: 1/10/2006 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Tower Height Regulations
The best way is to contact the FAA directly. A couple of quick phone calls should do the trick. marlon - Original Message - From: Rick Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 9:18 PM Subject: RE: [WISPA] Tower Height Regulations There's a site somewhere buried inside the FCC tower search where you can input GPS coords, and it'll tell you whether you need special FAA approval or not. The way to FIND that search eludes me at the moment, though. Sorry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 4:22 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Tower Height Regulations Sounds like I'll be fine cause there isn't an airport close to here. Kurt Fankhauser WAVELINC 114 S. Walnut St. Bucyrus, OH 44820 419-562-6405 www.wavelinc.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Scrivner Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 7:59 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tower Height Regulations There are FAA guidelines about structures under 200 feet near airports but I have not searched for those guidelines. If you Google it and find anything of interest please feel free to pass along to the rest of us here. I remember something about allowing so many feet above AGL (Average Ground Level) for every mile from a runway. Scriv - Original Message - *From:* JNA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* 'WISPA General List' mailto:wireless@wispa.org *Sent:* Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:57 AM *Subject:* RE: [WISPA] Tower Height Regulations Did anyone ever respond on this? I am interested as well. Thanks, John *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Kurt Fankhauser *Sent:* Tuesday, January 03, 2006 2:44 PM *To:* wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org *Subject:* [WISPA] Tower Height Regulations Beside's local regulations does the FAA/FCC have requirements on the distance your tower is from the roads if it falls. I had someone tell me today that a couple years ago they made a law that if you had a 100' tower it needed to be 150' away from the road. And they said that older towers would be grandfathered in. Kurt Fankhauser WAVELINC 114 S. Walnut St. Bucyrus, OH 44820 419-562-6405 www.wavelinc.com -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/227 - Release Date: 1/11/2006 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/226 - Release Date: 1/10/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/226 - Release Date: 1/10/2006 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Redundant Connections
A little feedback from the collective is appreciated here. I have a high school who has bought a connection from me but is also stuck with an old T1 circuit under contract for the next 3 years. They want both connections to be used all the time and for all traffic to automatically go through the working connection if one fails. Basically they want load balancing and failover. All addresses are nat'd private space IPs. I would think I should be able to do this with Mikrotik and/or Star OS but I do not know how. Your thoughts and or other suggestions are highly appreciated. If only failover or only load balance is possible then suggestions on that are welcome also. By the way, the T1 provider is not me and will likely not work with me unfortunately. We have to leave their network settings intact. Scriv -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] Redundant Connections
Running a EoIP tunnel across both the T1 and your link you should be able to load-balance across both links for incoming and outgoing traffic by bonding both EoIP interfaces at the customer site and your Mikrotik box. I have done this in the past but it has been across a couple of wireless links with similar round trip delays. If you use per-packet load balancing there may be issues with packets arriving out of order but if you do it per session it should work fine. With per session load balancing you won't get an aggregate throughput of both links with a single stream but should use both links if multiple streams are flowing. Cheers, P. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Scrivner Sent: 12 January 2006 19:11 To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] Redundant Connections A little feedback from the collective is appreciated here. I have a high school who has bought a connection from me but is also stuck with an old T1 circuit under contract for the next 3 years. They want both connections to be used all the time and for all traffic to automatically go through the working connection if one fails. Basically they want load balancing and failover. All addresses are nat'd private space IPs. I would think I should be able to do this with Mikrotik and/or Star OS but I do not know how. Your thoughts and or other suggestions are highly appreciated. If only failover or only load balance is possible then suggestions on that are welcome also. By the way, the T1 provider is not me and will likely not work with me unfortunately. We have to leave their network settings intact. Scriv -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/227 - Release Date: 11/01/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/227 - Release Date: 11/01/2006 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] Redundant Connections
Can mikrotik switch between per packet or per session load balancing? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 3:23 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Redundant Connections Running a EoIP tunnel across both the T1 and your link you should be able to load-balance across both links for incoming and outgoing traffic by bonding both EoIP interfaces at the customer site and your Mikrotik box. I have done this in the past but it has been across a couple of wireless links with similar round trip delays. If you use per-packet load balancing there may be issues with packets arriving out of order but if you do it per session it should work fine. With per session load balancing you won't get an aggregate throughput of both links with a single stream but should use both links if multiple streams are flowing. Cheers, P. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Scrivner Sent: 12 January 2006 19:11 To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] Redundant Connections A little feedback from the collective is appreciated here. I have a high school who has bought a connection from me but is also stuck with an old T1 circuit under contract for the next 3 years. They want both connections to be used all the time and for all traffic to automatically go through the working connection if one fails. Basically they want load balancing and failover. All addresses are nat'd private space IPs. I would think I should be able to do this with Mikrotik and/or Star OS but I do not know how. Your thoughts and or other suggestions are highly appreciated. If only failover or only load balance is possible then suggestions on that are welcome also. By the way, the T1 provider is not me and will likely not work with me unfortunately. We have to leave their network settings intact. Scriv -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/227 - Release Date: 11/01/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/227 - Release Date: 11/01/2006 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/227 - Release Date: 01/11/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/227 - Release Date: 01/11/2006 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] BlueSocket APs?
Does anyone have any production experience with BlueSocket Ap-1500s under heavy user loads? Thanx Chris -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] Redundant Connections
I think it depends on the links involved and the remote termination, I currently run per packet round robin load balance across 3 T1's, no issue's with VoIP or VPN - of course the remote ends points are the same devices -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom DeReggi Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 5:17 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Redundant Connections It important to consider the possibilties of packets arriving out of order. Some VPN protocols (deployed by corporate subscribers), will discard the packets when they arrive out of order, and is almost as bad as packet loss. And VOIP quality can be degrated as well. Per session is preferred. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: Paul Hendry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 3:22 PM Subject: RE: [WISPA] Redundant Connections Running a EoIP tunnel across both the T1 and your link you should be able to load-balance across both links for incoming and outgoing traffic by bonding both EoIP interfaces at the customer site and your Mikrotik box. I have done this in the past but it has been across a couple of wireless links with similar round trip delays. If you use per-packet load balancing there may be issues with packets arriving out of order but if you do it per session it should work fine. With per session load balancing you won't get an aggregate throughput of both links with a single stream but should use both links if multiple streams are flowing. Cheers, P. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Scrivner Sent: 12 January 2006 19:11 To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] Redundant Connections A little feedback from the collective is appreciated here. I have a high school who has bought a connection from me but is also stuck with an old T1 circuit under contract for the next 3 years. They want both connections to be used all the time and for all traffic to automatically go through the working connection if one fails. Basically they want load balancing and failover. All addresses are nat'd private space IPs. I would think I should be able to do this with Mikrotik and/or Star OS but I do not know how. Your thoughts and or other suggestions are highly appreciated. If only failover or only load balance is possible then suggestions on that are welcome also. By the way, the T1 provider is not me and will likely not work with me unfortunately. We have to leave their network settings intact. Scriv -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/227 - Release Date: 11/01/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/227 - Release Date: 11/01/2006 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/227 - Release Date: 01/11/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/227 - Release Date: 01/11/2006 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Canopy Lite $200 per SM MSRP
Moto announced their Lite SM - $200 list. Slow - 500Kbit. Designed to compete with dialup. Speed upgrades available this year, according to their announcement - up to 7 mbit. -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Attempted hack, what would you do?
Theoretically, if someone attempted to hack into your network via your router, say at least ten times, what would you do? If you could identify this culprit via logs and IP addresses, where you had them dead to rights, what would you do? ~V~ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] Attempted hack, what would you do?
Happens every day on our network. I get about 500 to 1000 hits a day on our servers/router logs of ppl port scanning and or running log in scripts trying to crack a username/pass. I have only turned a few in to thier ISP's abuse address and never heard anything from it except for a canned message here and there. Doesn't seem like anyone cares. Most hack attempts come from SBC DSL or china it seems. As far as I know I have only been hacked once, and it was my own fault. I had a FreeBSD box that I was doing some testing on and I forgot about it and left it on the Public side of the network. I had set up a user account with the same username and Pass.Well someone ran a script on it and got in the server. I didn't realize it until my MRTG router graph went crazy for a day with a large amount of traffic. I tracked it down to the box I forgot about and figured out what happened. They were uploading a bunch of stuff to the box through FTP. I did turn them into thier ISP but never heard anything from it. Chadd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Victoria Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 9:48 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: [WISPA] Attempted hack, what would you do? Theoretically, if someone attempted to hack into your network via your router, say at least ten times, what would you do? If you could identify this culprit via logs and IP addresses, where you had them dead to rights, what would you do? ~V~ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/227 - Release Date: 1/11/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/227 - Release Date: 1/11/2006 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] VOIP / CommPartners
Not to kick a dead horse here, but I heard the other day (from a WISP friend of mine) that Commpartners has stop installing WISP residential connections (due to E911 compliance issues) for the time being This sucks for him since he's already paid the $5k setup fee and his 1500+ wireless customers are all residential =( Can anyone verify this (right or wrong)? -Charles --- WiNOG Austin, TX March 13-15, 2006 http://www.winog.com -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
