[WISPA] Dragonwave...

2010-02-17 Thread Bob Moldashel
I have another Dragonwave 200 Mb AirPair 23 Ghz. link coming into my 
stock next week.  Customer has closed and we took it in for the cost of 
removal at both sites. Its about 2 years old. If anyone is interested 
the best offer over $4K gets it.  It has been up the whole time without 
issue.

Offlist:

-B-

Bob Moldashel
516-551-1131
lakel...@gbcx.net



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Dragonwave...

2010-02-17 Thread Matt
 I have another Dragonwave 200 Mb AirPair 23 Ghz. link coming into my
 stock next week.  Customer has closed and we took it in for the cost of
 removal at both sites. Its about 2 years old. If anyone is interested
 the best offer over $4K gets it.  It has been up the whole time without
 issue.

Is that licensed or unlincensed?  Whats max range on that band?

Matt



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Dragonwave...

2010-02-17 Thread Bob Moldashel
Licensed.  Range depends on your location, antenna size (I have 2' and 
4' antennas for this link) and level of reliability you are looking for.

-B-




Matt wrote:
 I have another Dragonwave 200 Mb AirPair 23 Ghz. link coming into my
 stock next week.  Customer has closed and we took it in for the cost of
 removal at both sites. Its about 2 years old. If anyone is interested
 the best offer over $4K gets it.  It has been up the whole time without
 issue.
 

 Is that licensed or unlincensed?  Whats max range on that band?

 Matt


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


   




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Billing and CRM solutions

2010-02-17 Thread ccrum
Wispmon will soon have a built in billing function, and it will also have
an option to integrate with Quickbooks. It already does high level network
monitoring/reporting, CRM, customer/sales qualification and reporting,
trouble ticketing, and workorder creation/tracking/scheduling. Look for
the billing to be integrated as of about April.

Cameron

 We're trying to get freeside working for us.  It's proving a bit of a
 wreck
 for us.  Would I go that route again?  Not at this time.  Once we finally
 have it totally up and running maybe I'll change my mind.  But right now I
 hate it.  We've spent nearly a year typing every customer in by hand.
 We're
 less than half done (one person, 7 hours per week!).

 We can't search on fields like what ap each customer is on.  We track the
 data but can't easily search on it.

 The call things their own code words rather than normal billing type stuff
 we were used to with quickbooks etc.

 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: chris cooper ccoo...@intelliwave.com
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 1:07 PM
 Subject: [WISPA] Billing and CRM solutions



 I am looking for a new, off the shelf billing and CRM solution.  I am
 not interested in writing something custom.  Im looking at Freeside,
 Platypus and Powercode.  Ive heard that Powercode hasn't performed great
 for people.  Any input on these three options?  Have you used them and
 what do you like/dislike about them?

 Thanks
 Chris



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Possible way to create a free tool for 477 reporting data at the tract level

2010-02-17 Thread Brian Webster
I just found this web page that talks about a free API that could be used on
a web page to do address lookup/geocode as well as map to the proper census
tract and/or census block. I'm not a programmer but maybe someone on the
list could look at this and put together something that could be used.
Ideally it would do both single and batch lookups. If there is a way to also
standardize the address fields to increase the accuracy that would be a big
plus.

https://webgis.usc.edu/Services/Geocode/WebService/GeocoderWebService.aspx


Thank You,
Brian Webster



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Possible way to create a free tool for 477 reporting data at the tract level

2010-02-17 Thread Rick Harnish
WISPA will gladly place this on our webpage if we can find someone to help
get it in place.  

 

Thanks,

Rick

 

From: members-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:members-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Brian Webster
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 7:20 PM
To: WISPA List; memb...@wispa. org; Motorla List Beehive; WISPA Board
Subject: [WISPA Members] Possible way to create a free tool for 477
reporting data at the tract level

 

I just found this web page that talks about a free API that could be used on
a web page to do address lookup/geocode as well as map to the proper census
tract and/or census block. I'm not a programmer but maybe someone on the
list could look at this and put together something that could be used.
Ideally it would do both single and batch lookups. If there is a way to also
standardize the address fields to increase the accuracy that would be a big
plus.

 

https://webgis.usc.edu/Services/Geocode/WebService/GeocoderWebService.aspx



Thank You,

Brian Webster

 

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.435 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2691 - Release Date: 02/17/10
07:35:00




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] The FCC wants service providers to offer home Internet data transmission speeds of 100 megabits per second

2010-02-17 Thread Marco Coelho
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/20100216/fcc-to-propose-faster-broadband-speeds.htm


But in reality.  I just spent 140K (list) today on a new border
router to handle the multi gig pipes we are bringing in.  This was
needed to allow us to service our PRESENT bandwidth requirements.
Makes me wonder what they are smoking in DC?



-- 
Marco C. Coelho
Argon Technologies Inc.
POB 875
Greenville, TX 75403-0875
903-455-5036



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] The FCC wants service providers to offer home Internet data transmission speeds of 100 megabits per second

2010-02-17 Thread Marco Coelho
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/20100216/fcc-to-propose-faster-broadband-speeds.htm


But in reality.  I just spent 140K today on a new border router to
handle the multi gig pipes we are bringing in.  This was needed to
allow us to service our PRESENT bandwidth requirements.  Makes me
wonder what they are smoking in DC?



-- 
Marco C. Coelho
Argon Technologies Inc.
POB 875
Greenville, TX 75403-0875
903-455-5036



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] The FCC wants service providers to offer home Internet data transmission speeds of 100 megabits per second

2010-02-17 Thread Marco Coelho
sorry about the double tap!




-- 
Marco C. Coelho
Argon Technologies Inc.
POB 875
Greenville, TX 75403-0875
903-455-5036



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Phonetic alphabet...

2010-02-17 Thread Marco Coelho
I would post one I saw here But the fallout would be hard core.
I've finally got my son to quit using Mango for M..

Marco

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Jeremy Parr jeremyp...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 16 February 2010 13:30, Randy Cosby dco...@infowest.com wrote:

 Last week my partner walked up to the front desk to hear our
 receptionist trying to be one of the boys by reading out the spelling
 of a word using the phonetic alphabet (ie: alpha, tango, foxtrot).

 Butterfly, Butterfly, Lettuce is all he heard before he had to turn
 around and walk away before cracking up.


 I once worked for a company where it was frequently required for the
 operators to communicate spellings to callers. Of course, I printed out a
 copy of the (NATO) phonetic alphabet for the operators to reference, and was
 promptly scolded, as it was not appropriate to use the word whiskey.
 Management decided to create their own in-house alphabet list.


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




-- 
Marco C. Coelho
Argon Technologies Inc.
POB 875
Greenville, TX 75403-0875
903-455-5036



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Regulators may drop broadband line-sharing bombshell

2010-02-17 Thread John Thomas
Wouldn't it be great if there was something resembling consistent 
policies regarding facilities? Years ago, there was the suggestion that 
phone companies should be broken into 2 pieces, facilities and services. 
The facilities unit could sell access to the copper/fiber/cable to *any* 
buyer. You would have some limitations, but you would be able to freely 
get access to the middle/last mile.

Here in the East San Francisco Bay Area, I know of the following

San Ramon CA, Bishop Ranch- Time Warner has fiber at our CURB, and 
offers 5 Meg business grade access for $700 per month, ut Bishop Ranch 
won't allow Time Warner in the MPOE to pull the Glass. The fact that ATT 
is a few blocks away has nothing to do with it, I am sure... :-(

Danville CA, customer wants Comcast Business grade Internet access. 
Comcast's services stop across the street from his building. Comcast 
wants $10,000 to go across the street. That is the same $10,000 they 
have wanted for better than 10 years.

Walnut Creek CA, Astound pulled fiber to a clients site and gave them 5 
Meg access for $700 per month.

Fiber Internet Center will do 5 meg burstable to 10 meg for $1595-1695 
per month through most of Northern California, and they bring the trucks 
and pull the fiber. They once quoted me at $7000/ month for 100 Meg over 
glass.

I realize that it costs some pretty big $ to get glass in the ground, 
but why is the pricing all over the board? If there were someone that 
didn't need a 1 year ROI, they could be out building out fiber, and 
making a lot of money, but it would take 5 - 10 years to see the big $.

John



Matt Liotta wrote:
 I don't think this is good. The last time it was tried we got a bunch of 
 unsustainable business models along with increasing gamesmanship from the 
 ILECs. Besides, the RBOCs are looking for reasons to shutdown their wireline 
 operations anyway. This will only speed that up.

 I think we need smarter policy to increase competition. How about fair and 
 reasonable real estate access? WISPA should be all over that one. I know 
 every business WISP has run into an unreasonable landlord. I also sure plenty 
 of residential WISPs have had their share of landlord problems.

 -Matt

 On Feb 16, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Scottie Arnett wrote:

   
  
 http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/02/regulators-may-drop-broadband-line-sharing-bombshell.ars?utm_source=rssutm_medium=rssutm_campaign=rss
  

 Could be good?

 Scottie

 Wireless High Speed Broadband service from Info-Ed, Inc. as low as 
 $30.00/mth.
 Check out www.info-ed.com/wireless.html for information.


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



   




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Possible way to create a free tool for 477 reporting data at the tract level

2010-02-17 Thread Scott Reed
I will be working on that in the morning as I have all my customers 
geocoded for Lat/Lon, but need the census stuff.  When I get something 
that works, I will get it to Rick.

Rick Harnish wrote:
 WISPA will gladly place this on our webpage if we can find someone to help
 get it in place.  

  

 Thanks,

 Rick

  

 From: members-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:members-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
 Of Brian Webster
 Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 7:20 PM
 To: WISPA List; memb...@wispa. org; Motorla List Beehive; WISPA Board
 Subject: [WISPA Members] Possible way to create a free tool for 477
 reporting data at the tract level

  

 I just found this web page that talks about a free API that could be used on
 a web page to do address lookup/geocode as well as map to the proper census
 tract and/or census block. I'm not a programmer but maybe someone on the
 list could look at this and put together something that could be used.
 Ideally it would do both single and batch lookups. If there is a way to also
 standardize the address fields to increase the accuracy that would be a big
 plus.

  

 https://webgis.usc.edu/Services/Geocode/WebService/GeocoderWebService.aspx



 Thank You,

 Brian Webster

  

 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 8.5.435 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2691 - Release Date: 02/17/10
 07:35:00



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


   

-- 
Scott Reed
Sr. Systems Engineer
GAB Midwest
1-800-363-1544 x4000
Cell: 260-273-7239




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] [Motorola II] WISP's are killing themselves!!!!- New FCC form 477 report is out, not looking good for Fixed Wireless

2010-02-17 Thread Edward Spoon
Which is probably why my state just started their own required bi-annual
broadband filing report. The preferred method was census BLOCK, luckily that
was optional and tract was acceptable. Hopefully it stays that way! I spent
over 30 man hours (much of it after hours, and with Brian's help) getting
the tract data / correct format the first time, but since we are now
maintaining it I have already completed the March 1 FCC filing - took less
than 1 hour!

I refuse to let my brain contemplate starting from scratch again to get
block level data. Nope. Not happening. Forget it. No way, (You know we're
gonna have to eventually!!)

Ed


On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Brian Webster 
bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com wrote:

 Yes there is a check box, that has been the problem with sharing the data.
 The FCC was even sued for a FOIA release of the From 477 data by The Center
 for Public Integrity in 2007. They were not required to release the
 information.



 Thank You,
 Brian Webster
   -Original Message-
  From: Ken Hohhof [mailto:khoh...@kwom.com]
  Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 12:33 PM
  To: bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com
  Subject: Re: [WISPA Members] [Motorola II] WISP's are killing
 themselves- New FCC form 477 report is out, not looking good for Fixed
 Wireless


   Well, I can see how that's a problem.
  Is there actually a checkbox where you choose to protect or not protect
 your data?  I don't remember that.  But I haven't done the March 1
 submission yet.
  If that's the case, and they are prohibited from sharing the data with
 other government entities doing broadband mapping, I don't have a solution
 for that.


  From: Brian Webster
  Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 11:22 AM
  To: Ken Hohhof ; memb...@wispa.org
  Subject: RE: [WISPA Members] [Motorola II] WISP's are killing
 themselves- New FCC form 477 report is out, not looking good for Fixed
 Wireless


  The biggest problem with not providing the 477 data to the state or making
 it available to those seeking grants, is the fact that people who file the
 data have checked the box that requires the FCC to protect it under NDA
 (Marlon do you remember this issue? As I recall you were one of the
 cheerleaders on that topic). The WISP's were the ones insisting that that
 option be available before they would file. Now the same industry it
 bitching about the fact that the data is not being distributed...can't have
 it both ways. The FCC has shared the data with NTIA and RUS and those
 agencies are protecting that same NDA.  Those agencies are using the data
 to
 cross reference grant applications and challenges.





  Thank You,
  Brian Webster
 -Original Message-
From: Ken Hohhof [mailto:khoh...@kwom.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 12:03 PM
To: bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com; memb...@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA Members] [Motorola II] WISP's are killing
 themselves- New FCC form 477 report is out,not looking good for Fixed
 Wireless


 Brian, this thread leaves me puzzled about a few things.

1) Why are we so worried about the US falling behind the rest of the
 world in broadband, while the fact that China is leaving us in the dust in
 high speed rail generates a mere yawn?  (same with solar and wind power ...
 technology, manufacturing, and deployment)

2) Does anyone really believe this is about high speed pipes for
 telemedicine, or kids doing their homework?  What is the national security
 issue with making sure every house is wired for 4 simultaneous streams of
 on-demand high definition 3D entertainment?  Are we afraid of falling
 behind
 the Chinese in the couch potato race?

3) This is a census year.  Why is the census not being used to get this
 data directly from end users?  Think of the questions you could ask, not
 just about what speeds people have, but why they don't have higher speeds.
 (unavailable?  too expensive?  not needed?  don't even have a computer?
 only use the Internet for texting and tweeting from their cellphone?)

4) Any other statistical survey would correct for known measurement
 errors.  For example, by checking a sample of the data against
 independently
 obtained data known to be accurate.  Or correcting for known measurement
 inaccuracies.  Like if you know that only 10% of Amish households have
 phones while 90% of the general population does, you might want to multiply
 the Amish responses in a phone survey by 9.  So if they know only 50% of
 WISPs are submitting Form 477, wouldn't it make sense to multiply the
 numbers by 2?  It wouldn't be perfect, but it would be more accurate than
 making decisions based on clearly wrong data.

5) Why is a fortune in stimulus money being handed out in state mapping
 grants, for a one-time measurement, and for results that won't be available
 in time for the broadband plan next month?

6) Why is no one cross referencing Form 477 data to state mapping
 projects?  I look at the Connect Illinois 

[WISPA] 3G Funny at ATT expense

2010-02-17 Thread Glenn Kelley
3G Funny ATT punked « Hostmedic http://ow.ly/1oQx3s

I think that guy should simply be given free Verizon service for life !



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Groups Push FCC to be Bold in National Broadband Plan

2010-02-17 Thread Jack Unger

http://www.media-democracy.net/node/597







WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/