[WISPA] Franken goes ballistic on Verizon, Google, Comcast, and NBCU

2010-08-20 Thread Cliff LeBoeuf
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/08/sen-franken-and-fcc-blast-ve
rizongoogle-nn-proposal.ars




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Franken goes ballistic on Verizon, Google, Comcast, and NBCU

2010-08-20 Thread Jeff Broadwick - List
I miss the days when he was funny on SNL...

  _  

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Cliff LeBoeuf
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 3:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Franken goes ballistic on Verizon, Google, Comcast, and
NBCU


http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/08/sen-franken-and-fcc-blast-ve
rizongoogle-nn-proposal.ars


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3083 - Release Date: 08/20/10
02:35:00





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Franken goes ballistic on Verizon, Google, Comcast, and NBCU

2010-08-20 Thread St. Louis Broadband
He was great last night in the in the live web stream from theuptake!

Did a lot of tweeting.  

 

~V~

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick - List
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 4:13 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Franken goes ballistic on Verizon, Google, Comcast, and
NBCU

 

I miss the days when he was funny on SNL...

 

  _  

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Cliff LeBoeuf
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 3:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Franken goes ballistic on Verizon, Google, Comcast, and
NBCU

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/08/sen-franken-and-fcc-blast-ve
rizongoogle-nn-proposal.ars

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3083 - Release Date: 08/20/10
02:35:00

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3076 - Release Date: 08/20/10
01:35:00




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Franken goes ballistic on Verizon, Google, Comcast, and NBCU

2010-08-20 Thread Tom DeReggi
Franken goes ballistic on Verizon, Google, Comcast, and NBCUThe problem I have 
with this arcticle's speaker's comments is. the SPIN SPIN SPIN.

all coporations care about is the bottom line
a dodge to avoid providing common carrier protections to consumers.

The spin is Pretending NetNeutrality is for protection consumers, when in 
reality NetNeutrality rules are focues to protect content providers.
Content providers are generally corporations.  

Thus the two comments contradict themselves. 

I'm all about protectng consumers, but when is the public going to open their 
eyes and see who is really getting protected under the current NetNeutrality 
direction?
It aint consumers.

Another great line from Copps (I like Copps):
I suppose you can't blame companies for seeking to protect their own 
interests, the Commissioner concluded. But you can blame policy makers if we 
let them get away with it.

BUT... He leaves out the reality of, what authority does the government have to 
take over someone else's business and property that they paid for with their 
own money?

How would you like it, if you owned a Giant food, and you invested money and 
time to make the shopping market successful, and then after all teh hard work 
was done and money invested, The givernment came in and said, We are going to 
over rule your managers and owners, and we are going to set the prices for 
consumers, and lower it to jsut a tad over cost, its our store now.  American 
people are going to be afraid to start businesses, if the presidence keeps 
getting set that the government is going to take over them and regulate them, 
to the point where the financial reward (ROI) potentially could be at risk. Why 
should broadband be any different than any other business? The fact is... 
Regulation and treating Businesses like Utilities KILLS small business and 
entrepreneurs. 

BUT  FRANKEN DID GET SOMETHING VERY IMPORTANT FINALLY SOMEONE STEPPING UP 
AGAINST THE MERGER OF CONTENT AND ACCESS (Anti-trust).

Thumbs up for his comments against the Comcast NBC merger, and the necessity to 
prevent similar future type mergers..

Preventing such type mergers would do more for creating helpful NetNeutrality 
that benefited consumers, than any actual NetNeutrality law could benefit 
consumers. 



Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


  - Original Message - 
  From: St. Louis Broadband 
  To: 'WISPA General List' 
  Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 5:42 PM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] Franken goes ballistic on Verizon, Google, Comcast,and 
NBCU


  He was great last night in the in the live web stream from theuptake!

  Did a lot of tweeting.  

   

  ~V~

   

  From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick - List
  Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 4:13 PM
  To: 'WISPA General List'
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] Franken goes ballistic on Verizon, Google, Comcast, and 
NBCU

   

  I miss the days when he was funny on SNL...

   


--

  From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
Behalf Of Cliff LeBoeuf
  Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 3:14 PM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: [WISPA] Franken goes ballistic on Verizon, Google, Comcast, and NBCU

  
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/08/sen-franken-and-fcc-blast-verizongoogle-nn-proposal.ars

  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3083 - Release Date: 08/20/10 
02:35:00

  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3076 - Release Date: 08/20/10 
01:35:00



--




  

  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  

   
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Franken goes ballistic on Verizon, Google, Comcast, and NBCU

2010-08-20 Thread Fred Goldstein

At 8/20/2010 09:39 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote:

...
Another great line from Copps (I like Copps):

I suppose you can't blame companies for seeking to protect their 
own interests, the Commissioner concluded. But you can blame 
policy makers if we let them get away with it.


This is the standard regulatory construct.  Regulations are supposed 
to apply to the corporations, and create a fair field for 
competition.  Violating rules is one way to make excessive 
profit.  Another is to buy regulators so that the rules are tilted in 
your favor.  In the telecom biz, such regulatory capture is the norm.


BUT... He leaves out the reality of, what authority does the 
government have to take over someone else's business and property 
that they paid for with their own money?


How would you like it, if you owned a Giant food, and you invested 
money and time to make the shopping market successful, and then 
after all teh hard work was done and money invested, The givernment 
came in and said, We are going to over rule your managers and 
owners, and we are going to set the prices for consumers, and lower 
it to jsut a tad over cost, its our store now.  American people are 
going to be afraid to start businesses, if the presidence keeps 
getting set that the government is going to take over them and 
regulate them, to the point where the financial reward (ROI) 
potentially could be at risk. Why should broadband be any different 
than any other business? The fact is... Regulation and treating 
Businesses like Utilities KILLS small business and entrepreneurs.


Well, no.  Some businesses *are* utilities.  It's not a takeover when 
the utiliity is regulated.  Utility law is well 
established.  Utilities are entitled to a fair return on their 
investment.  It's a low-risk business.  Not huge profit, but nice 
work if you can get it.


Grocery stores aren't utilities.  The key to a utility is that a) it 
is not fully competitive (if competitive at all), and b) the 
difference between cost and value is left to the user, not the 
utility.  In other words the utility doesn't charge as much as it can 
get away with; it charges enough to make a fair profit, and the user 
makes profit.  Imagine if the electric company figured out how much 
your business would lose if it didn't have power... that's not their business!


Telephone companies were utilities.  They built their networks using 
utility profits (i.e., basically guaranteed).  Then the rules were 
changed.  They were moved to price cap regulation, so profits were 
uncapped, and they could lay off lots of people to raise their 
margins.  And they were freed of their utility obligations, to make 
their service offerings available on a wholesale, nondiscriminatory 
basis.  So a telco calls itself an ISP but it can clobber other ISPs 
because it got its network as a utility.  What's the word for this, 
bait and switch, or just plain theft?   Maybe a nice discrete 
lawyerly term would be conversion of utility property, noting that 
in criminal law, conversion means theft.


So they should be regulated.  Or better yet, split into two 
companies.  A LoopCo would basically only sell outside plant 
facilities (dark copper and fiber), wholesale, to all comers, and be 
treated as a rate-of-return utility. Then the ServiceCo could operate 
as a competitive player, on the same terms as others.  But what we 
have now is a ServiceCo who owns the utility plant and keeps it to themselves.


The problem with the Neutrality movement is that it only knows about 
the duopoly, the cable and telco ISPs, and proposes regulating all 
ISPs in a manner that would hurt the big guys a little and the little 
guys, like WISPs, a lot. So VZ, who is impacted the least, is happy 
with it.  The correct answer is to open the networks, and leave 
self-provisioned ISPs (WISPs) alone.


 --
 Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com
 ionary Consulting  http://www.ionary.com/
 +1 617 795 2701 


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/