Re: [WISPA] More spectrum?
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
> At 4/2/2012 09:22 AM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:
>>Right. This is the next part of the puzzle. John Scrivner wrong to the
>>list a email titled [WISPA] Future of Wifi Offloading WAS: Ericsson is
>>buying BelAir, betting on Wi-Fi.
>>
>>This auction sums up my post in that thread. The cellco's are getting
>>smarter about what the users want and about how to
>>deliver it to them. Look at the partnerships that cellco's are making
>>with cable co's. The cable companies already have large
>>high speed footprints. Its trivial to throw a cable modem with a AP in
>>it onto a pole. Suddenly you have a very large roamable
>>footprint, if only that wifi chipset had a little more cellular sauce
>>in it.
>
> Just to clarify, "AP" generally means WiFi. Most smartphones already
> have WiFi, so it's just a matter of getting them to use it. But the
> cellcos could also choose to adopt picocells or DAS, where they mount
> a cell on every block or so, possibly hanging from the cable. That
> latter case uses the cellco's licensed frequencies. It puts more
> pressure on their spectrum, but lets them bill for the usage.
Right I should say PicoCell instead of AP. It really does not put more pressure
on the spectrum as it will be gps synced. Smaller, tighter cells
releases pressure
from the RF by offloading.
>
> Since Americans prefer flat-rate plans, the cellcos seem to be moving
> away from charging by the bit and more towards monthly plans. This
> changes their incentive from wanting more bits to wanting
> fewer. Think about how the LD business moved away from advertising
> usage ("the next best thing to being there") to discouraging usage
> (railing against "access stimulation"). So it looks like they'd
> really rather your smartphone move to WiFi when home and not tie up
> their network.
Right but this is where I think the cellco's got smart. They know that
is not going to fly
for long or very well. Also bits is not the main issue. RF congestion
is and this kind
of picocell setup would solve a lot of that. The main reason people do
not use their
wifi is the convenience of not having to switch radios. A cellco
powered wifi would go
a long way to making people happy in that regard. Also, look at all
the special use they
can bill for.
>
>>Atheros chips very well could do it with some good
>>firmware, look at Ubnt. They are pretty close with their GPS, for a
>>small in house project. Look at what Ubnt did with just a
>>highly experienced RF team? AirFiber. Now do the same with more money
>>and in a cellular project aimed at very small and
>>very fast cells. Sky is not falling, yet.
>
> Atheros is now part of Qualcomm, which of course makes cell phone
> chipsets too. There are already cheap femtocells (home-based) that
> do the RF side of the cellular system (NodeB) while parasitically
> feeding the customer's Internet connection, giving the cellco, in
> effect, free backhaul. (Why should Vonage have all the fun?) An
> outdoor picocell is a bit more complex but practical in an
> aerial-wire area. Of course it doesn't do much good in an
> underground-wire area. Femtocells haven't caught on that much here
> because WiFi is picking up the load. They are mostly useful when you
> are just out of range of a base station and need to use the cellphone
> at home; WiFi offload doesn't work for receiving phone calls.
Right. And they do work in a underground wire area. They just need to run
wire up a pole some place. Even in 100% underground areas there are light
poles and I have seen wifi on them, cellco's can do it too.
>
> But going back to the original thread, there's some irony here in how
> the cellcos almost screwed themselves when trying to screw us. They
> had inserted wording into a budget bill that would have banned the
> FCC from providing any more unlicensed spectrum. Their minions on
> the Hill thought that they wanted it. But while the lobbyists were
> pushing that message, the folks on the ground were trying to move
> traffic to WiFi, and thus their own cost-saving plans would have been
> hurt. They got word back to the Hill on time and thus concurred with
> WISPA and almost everyone else that banning unlicensed would be a bad move.
Gotta love politics.
>
> --
> Fred Goldstein k1io fgoldstein "at" ionary.com
> ionary Consulting http://www.ionary.com/
> +1 617 795 2701
>
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] More spectrum?
At 4/2/2012 09:22 AM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:
>Right. This is the next part of the puzzle. John Scrivner wrong to the
>list a email titled [WISPA] Future of Wifi Offloading WAS: Ericsson is
>buying BelAir, betting on Wi-Fi.
>
>This auction sums up my post in that thread. The cellco's are getting
>smarter about what the users want and about how to
>deliver it to them. Look at the partnerships that cellco's are making
>with cable co's. The cable companies already have large
>high speed footprints. Its trivial to throw a cable modem with a AP in
>it onto a pole. Suddenly you have a very large roamable
>footprint, if only that wifi chipset had a little more cellular sauce
>in it.
Just to clarify, "AP" generally means WiFi. Most smartphones already
have WiFi, so it's just a matter of getting them to use it. But the
cellcos could also choose to adopt picocells or DAS, where they mount
a cell on every block or so, possibly hanging from the cable. That
latter case uses the cellco's licensed frequencies. It puts more
pressure on their spectrum, but lets them bill for the usage.
Since Americans prefer flat-rate plans, the cellcos seem to be moving
away from charging by the bit and more towards monthly plans. This
changes their incentive from wanting more bits to wanting
fewer. Think about how the LD business moved away from advertising
usage ("the next best thing to being there") to discouraging usage
(railing against "access stimulation"). So it looks like they'd
really rather your smartphone move to WiFi when home and not tie up
their network.
>Atheros chips very well could do it with some good
>firmware, look at Ubnt. They are pretty close with their GPS, for a
>small in house project. Look at what Ubnt did with just a
>highly experienced RF team? AirFiber. Now do the same with more money
>and in a cellular project aimed at very small and
>very fast cells. Sky is not falling, yet.
Atheros is now part of Qualcomm, which of course makes cell phone
chipsets too. There are already cheap femtocells (home-based) that
do the RF side of the cellular system (NodeB) while parasitically
feeding the customer's Internet connection, giving the cellco, in
effect, free backhaul. (Why should Vonage have all the fun?) An
outdoor picocell is a bit more complex but practical in an
aerial-wire area. Of course it doesn't do much good in an
underground-wire area. Femtocells haven't caught on that much here
because WiFi is picking up the load. They are mostly useful when you
are just out of range of a base station and need to use the cellphone
at home; WiFi offload doesn't work for receiving phone calls.
But going back to the original thread, there's some irony here in how
the cellcos almost screwed themselves when trying to screw us. They
had inserted wording into a budget bill that would have banned the
FCC from providing any more unlicensed spectrum. Their minions on
the Hill thought that they wanted it. But while the lobbyists were
pushing that message, the folks on the ground were trying to move
traffic to WiFi, and thus their own cost-saving plans would have been
hurt. They got word back to the Hill on time and thus concurred with
WISPA and almost everyone else that banning unlicensed would be a bad move.
--
Fred Goldsteink1io fgoldstein "at" ionary.com
ionary Consulting http://www.ionary.com/
+1 617 795 2701
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] More spectrum?
ah! Yes I agree we could use the spectrum. I bet Ubnt could retool the M2 line for it in a hurry. What would it take to get this licensed in very small chunks, or even licensed lite? Ill go wake up in a few min. Jeromie Reeves On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Jason Bailey wrote: > No,I'm not. I was just saying we sure could use it!!! > > > --- On *Mon, 4/2/12, Jeromie Reeves * wrote: > > > From: Jeromie Reeves > Subject: Re: [WISPA] More spectrum? > To: "WISPA General List" > Date: Monday, April 2, 2012, 9:32 AM > > > Are you a cell co? I do not see anyone with out deep pockets getting > the RF. Not unless the FCC does this auction in very small > chunks. > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Jason Bailey > http://mc/compose?to=j284...@yahoo.com>> > wrote: > > > > That is exactly what I was thinking. We sure could use it! > > > > --- On Mon, 4/2/12, Jeromie Reeves > > http://mc/compose?to=jree...@18-30chat.net>> > wrote: > > > > > > From: Jeromie Reeves > > http://mc/compose?to=jree...@18-30chat.net> > > > > Subject: Re: [WISPA] More spectrum? > > To: "WISPA General List" > > http://mc/compose?to=wireless@wispa.org> > > > > Date: Monday, April 2, 2012, 9:22 AM > > > > > > Right. This is the next part of the puzzle. John Scrivner wrong to the > > list a email titled [WISPA] Future of Wifi Offloading WAS: Ericsson is > > buying BelAir, betting on Wi-Fi. > > > > This auction sums up my post in that thread. The cellco's are getting > > smarter about what the users want and about how to > > deliver it to them. Look at the partnerships that cellco's are making > > with cable co's. The cable companies already have large > > high speed footprints. Its trivial to throw a cable modem with a AP in > > it onto a pole. Suddenly you have a very large roamable > > footprint, if only that wifi chipset had a little more cellular sauce > > in it. Atheros chips very well could do it with some good > > firmware, look at Ubnt. They are pretty close with their GPS, for a > > small in house project. Look at what Ubnt did with just a > > highly experienced RF team? AirFiber. Now do the same with more money > > and in a cellular project aimed at very small and > > very fast cells. Sky is not falling, yet. > > > > Jeromie > > > > On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 6:54 AM, > > http://mc/compose?to=wispawirel...@ics-il.net>> > wrote: > > > I see that going to the cellular guys. > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > Mike Hammett > > > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > > http://www.ics-il.com > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Jason Bailey" > > > http://mc/compose?to=j284...@yahoo.com> > > > > > To: wireless@wispa.org <http://mc/compose?to=wireless@wispa.org> > > > Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:57:16 PM > > > Subject: [WISPA] More spectrum? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.tvtechnology.com/article/fcc-carves-out-another--mhz-forms-spectrum-auction-task-force/212502 > > > ___ > > > Wireless mailing list > > > Wireless@wispa.org <http://mc/compose?to=Wireless@wispa.org> > > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > ___ > > > Wireless mailing list > > > Wireless@wispa.org <http://mc/compose?to=Wireless@wispa.org> > > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > ___ > > Wireless mailing list > > Wireless@wispa.org <http://mc/compose?to=Wireless@wispa.org> > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > > > > ___ > > Wireless mailing list > > Wireless@wispa.org <http://mc/compose?to=Wireless@wispa.org> > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > ___ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org <http://mc/compose?to=Wireless@wispa.org> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > ___ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] More spectrum?
No,I'm not. I was just saying we sure could use it!!! --- On Mon, 4/2/12, Jeromie Reeves wrote: From: Jeromie Reeves Subject: Re: [WISPA] More spectrum? To: "WISPA General List" Date: Monday, April 2, 2012, 9:32 AM Are you a cell co? I do not see anyone with out deep pockets getting the RF. Not unless the FCC does this auction in very small chunks. On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Jason Bailey wrote: > > That is exactly what I was thinking. We sure could use it! > > --- On Mon, 4/2/12, Jeromie Reeves wrote: > > > From: Jeromie Reeves > Subject: Re: [WISPA] More spectrum? > To: "WISPA General List" > Date: Monday, April 2, 2012, 9:22 AM > > > Right. This is the next part of the puzzle. John Scrivner wrong to the > list a email titled [WISPA] Future of Wifi Offloading WAS: Ericsson is > buying BelAir, betting on Wi-Fi. > > This auction sums up my post in that thread. The cellco's are getting > smarter about what the users want and about how to > deliver it to them. Look at the partnerships that cellco's are making > with cable co's. The cable companies already have large > high speed footprints. Its trivial to throw a cable modem with a AP in > it onto a pole. Suddenly you have a very large roamable > footprint, if only that wifi chipset had a little more cellular sauce > in it. Atheros chips very well could do it with some good > firmware, look at Ubnt. They are pretty close with their GPS, for a > small in house project. Look at what Ubnt did with just a > highly experienced RF team? AirFiber. Now do the same with more money > and in a cellular project aimed at very small and > very fast cells. Sky is not falling, yet. > > Jeromie > > On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 6:54 AM, wrote: > > I see that going to the cellular guys. > > > > > > > > - > > Mike Hammett > > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > http://www.ics-il.com > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Jason Bailey" > > To: wireless@wispa.org > > Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:57:16 PM > > Subject: [WISPA] More spectrum? > > > > > > > > > > http://www.tvtechnology.com/article/fcc-carves-out-another--mhz-forms-spectrum-auction-task-force/212502 > > ___ > > Wireless mailing list > > Wireless@wispa.org > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > ___ > > Wireless mailing list > > Wireless@wispa.org > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > ___ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > ___ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] More spectrum?
Are you a cell co? I do not see anyone with out deep pockets getting the RF. Not unless the FCC does this auction in very small chunks. On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Jason Bailey wrote: > > That is exactly what I was thinking. We sure could use it! > > --- On Mon, 4/2/12, Jeromie Reeves wrote: > > > From: Jeromie Reeves > Subject: Re: [WISPA] More spectrum? > To: "WISPA General List" > Date: Monday, April 2, 2012, 9:22 AM > > > Right. This is the next part of the puzzle. John Scrivner wrong to the > list a email titled [WISPA] Future of Wifi Offloading WAS: Ericsson is > buying BelAir, betting on Wi-Fi. > > This auction sums up my post in that thread. The cellco's are getting > smarter about what the users want and about how to > deliver it to them. Look at the partnerships that cellco's are making > with cable co's. The cable companies already have large > high speed footprints. Its trivial to throw a cable modem with a AP in > it onto a pole. Suddenly you have a very large roamable > footprint, if only that wifi chipset had a little more cellular sauce > in it. Atheros chips very well could do it with some good > firmware, look at Ubnt. They are pretty close with their GPS, for a > small in house project. Look at what Ubnt did with just a > highly experienced RF team? AirFiber. Now do the same with more money > and in a cellular project aimed at very small and > very fast cells. Sky is not falling, yet. > > Jeromie > > On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 6:54 AM, wrote: > > I see that going to the cellular guys. > > > > > > > > - > > Mike Hammett > > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > http://www.ics-il.com > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Jason Bailey" > > To: wireless@wispa.org > > Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:57:16 PM > > Subject: [WISPA] More spectrum? > > > > > > > > > > http://www.tvtechnology.com/article/fcc-carves-out-another--mhz-forms-spectrum-auction-task-force/212502 > > ___ > > Wireless mailing list > > Wireless@wispa.org > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > ___ > > Wireless mailing list > > Wireless@wispa.org > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > ___ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > ___ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] More spectrum?
That is exactly what I was thinking. We sure could use it! --- On Mon, 4/2/12, Jeromie Reeves wrote: From: Jeromie Reeves Subject: Re: [WISPA] More spectrum? To: "WISPA General List" Date: Monday, April 2, 2012, 9:22 AM Right. This is the next part of the puzzle. John Scrivner wrong to the list a email titled [WISPA] Future of Wifi Offloading WAS: Ericsson is buying BelAir, betting on Wi-Fi. This auction sums up my post in that thread. The cellco's are getting smarter about what the users want and about how to deliver it to them. Look at the partnerships that cellco's are making with cable co's. The cable companies already have large high speed footprints. Its trivial to throw a cable modem with a AP in it onto a pole. Suddenly you have a very large roamable footprint, if only that wifi chipset had a little more cellular sauce in it. Atheros chips very well could do it with some good firmware, look at Ubnt. They are pretty close with their GPS, for a small in house project. Look at what Ubnt did with just a highly experienced RF team? AirFiber. Now do the same with more money and in a cellular project aimed at very small and very fast cells. Sky is not falling, yet. Jeromie On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 6:54 AM, wrote: > I see that going to the cellular guys. > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > - Original Message - > From: "Jason Bailey" > To: wireless@wispa.org > Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:57:16 PM > Subject: [WISPA] More spectrum? > > > > http://www.tvtechnology.com/article/fcc-carves-out-another--mhz-forms-spectrum-auction-task-force/212502 > ___ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > ___ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] More spectrum?
Right. This is the next part of the puzzle. John Scrivner wrong to the list a email titled [WISPA] Future of Wifi Offloading WAS: Ericsson is buying BelAir, betting on Wi-Fi. This auction sums up my post in that thread. The cellco's are getting smarter about what the users want and about how to deliver it to them. Look at the partnerships that cellco's are making with cable co's. The cable companies already have large high speed footprints. Its trivial to throw a cable modem with a AP in it onto a pole. Suddenly you have a very large roamable footprint, if only that wifi chipset had a little more cellular sauce in it. Atheros chips very well could do it with some good firmware, look at Ubnt. They are pretty close with their GPS, for a small in house project. Look at what Ubnt did with just a highly experienced RF team? AirFiber. Now do the same with more money and in a cellular project aimed at very small and very fast cells. Sky is not falling, yet. Jeromie On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 6:54 AM, wrote: > I see that going to the cellular guys. > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > - Original Message - > From: "Jason Bailey" > To: wireless@wispa.org > Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:57:16 PM > Subject: [WISPA] More spectrum? > > > > http://www.tvtechnology.com/article/fcc-carves-out-another--mhz-forms-spectrum-auction-task-force/212502 > ___ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > ___ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] More spectrum?
I see that going to the cellular guys. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Jason Bailey" To: wireless@wispa.org Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:57:16 PM Subject: [WISPA] More spectrum? http://www.tvtechnology.com/article/fcc-carves-out-another--mhz-forms-spectrum-auction-task-force/212502 ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
[WISPA] More spectrum?
http://www.tvtechnology.com/article/fcc-carves-out-another--mhz-forms-spectrum-auction-task-force/212502 ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] More Spectrum!!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The pricing better come WAY WAY WAY down if multiple people can access the same spectrum. The only way the current prices are justified is because the access is exclusive. On 12/30/2010 10:43 AM, Jerry Richardson wrote: > Where do we start? > > - Jerry > > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Matt Larsen - Lists > Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 9:26 AM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: [WISPA] More Spectrum!! > > Folks, here is the real opportunity that we need to be focusing on > > http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/12/white-spaces-could-expand-beyond-unused-tv-spectrum.ars > There may be no more important item for wisps to unite in their focus on > than this. If we can start to use other "white space" spectrum - or even > scraps of licensed spectrum that are going unused - we will have all the > spectrum we need. > Time to roll! > Matt Larsen > Vistabeam.com > Wirelesscowboys.com > > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com> > Version: 10.0.1191 / Virus Database: 1435/3348 - Release Date: 12/30/10 > > > > > > > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ - -- Charles N Wyble (char...@knownelement.com) Systems craftsman for the stars http://www.knownelement.com Mobile: 626 539 4344 Office: 310 929 8793 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNHNhMAAoJEMvvG/TyLEAtSTEQALlhiB/7VdBbZrUrCFNLaSaV J84/lWx4ciaXgAtItE9pH1d4VcKzFozAdbkSJ12avL783+ej0R+9u+b4xtjAP69U UFRI/mHwviybyJ2KjreP0EOLWIK7bTgLf9I4jockaeAyRS3WJ1IfhVdFtEZPBup2 rhyq3qwR8THX3ECHR8m1ZTKCclvoJRxGfh5hUr4gOVtJh4iwq1ve4jGDSMhr8Pu6 +jCgmm29N0Kxk8ohBxCJrlCBGK/y/x5TdF75SMCDX4h1ZVfsBGWYWwIv5rgMw40r r0yeSStmdaQHf3omz4q7lkQRLNw4IJpNQmKV5Ik9gepPUqnUr3WojxrmW/MgFmLC TUzjvmwuYDCFImshhCcDxhJhZhHo/bMihVzJMoGyoElDUSQ7Ab6YleIVRTfaemzq VHElWTVkbCL8fKDUdasHhMByH6dXdEBirfk2mUYkkcj2xWCVxT3lYhpkxjllF9FG H57Mi48HSdxCL/RqTcPnlypquf3YnY9wyk1fhdfbOJIXrbMbzTXCQ6N1rVBKiCKi gErHiV+2tKXegzciWOmRY1cC1q/tGj0gfdLCFdrKsWvXTIfQHLVr6Snc/dp0QxYg kjEhBCeYkd9NWabTNPlEB7AgwFcSI9oe1r5RnWbAlfhRwfCt1uKPN7MuaD4dHmh0 sS7r+A9RtBM6ujR0EJ0m =a/VI -END PGP SIGNATURE- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] More Spectrum!!
Where do we start? - Jerry From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Matt Larsen - Lists Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 9:26 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] More Spectrum!! Folks, here is the real opportunity that we need to be focusing on http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/12/white-spaces-could-expand-beyond-unused-tv-spectrum.ars There may be no more important item for wisps to unite in their focus on than this. If we can start to use other "white space" spectrum - or even scraps of licensed spectrum that are going unused - we will have all the spectrum we need. Time to roll! Matt Larsen Vistabeam.com Wirelesscowboys.com No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com> Version: 10.0.1191 / Virus Database: 1435/3348 - Release Date: 12/30/10 WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] More Spectrum!!
Folks, here is the real opportunity that we need to be focusing on http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/12/white-spaces-could-expand-beyond-unused-tv-spectrum.ars There may be no more important item for wisps to unite in their focus on than this.If we can start to use other "white space" spectrum -- or even scraps of licensed spectrum that are going unused -- we will have all the spectrum we need. Time to roll! Matt Larsen Vistabeam.com Wirelesscowboys.com WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
